Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN: HARRIET MIERS HAS WITHDRAWN!

Posted on 10/27/2005 5:54:48 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper

just breaking!!!!!!!!


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 0; 00000000000000000000; 00000nosantorum; 000sorryfirstkeyword; 0notsofast1stkeyword; 0real1stkeyword; 1firstkeyword; alangreenspan; alito; alltogethernow; angieharmon; borked; botsuicidewatch; bradpitt; brown; bushsquagmier; dealwithit; edithbrownclement; faves; fredthompson; harrietemiers; harrietmiers; harrietthemere; hightechlynching; humphreybogart; janicerbrown; janicerogersbrown; jellopudding; jrb; judgeclement; judicialnominees; luttig; marklevinforscotus; miers; noloyaltytopresident; noricksantorum; rightsviolated; rino; sadday; santorumdogcatcher08; scotus; snugasabuginarug; sorrybushbots; spinelessrinos; stupidsenatetricks; traitorrepubs; unjustandunfair; victory; withdrawal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 801-820821-840841-860 ... 3,421-3,436 next last
To: COEXERJ145

Yeah, and they're going to kick themselves right out of a job, and out of the majority. What a great idea.


821 posted on 10/27/2005 6:51:56 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated my FR profile on Sunday, August 14, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

Well, sure as heck wouldn't let Harry Reid make the pick.


822 posted on 10/27/2005 6:52:01 AM PDT by Mayflower Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 744 | View Replies]

To: XJarhead
I definitely share that concern with you.

Supposedly, we "know" that we have 55 Republican votes and the VP to break ties. That means we can lose only 5 votes and no more. There's no chance of picking up a democrat vote on a partyline fight.

Who are the most conservative of the McCain 7? Supposedly, need only two of them to get a victory.

Republican Senators John McCain (Az.), Lindsey Graham (SC), Mike DeWine (Ohio), Olympia Snowe (Me.), Susan Collins (Me.), John Warner (Va.), and Lincoln Chafee (RI),

However, here's the real truth. This was the group rumored PRIOR to the actual nuclear option deal to be willing to vote AGAINST any nuclear option

(Link) Susan Collins (Maine), Chuck Hagel (Nebraska), Arlen Specter (Pennsylvania), John Warner (Virginia), Mike DeWine (Ohio), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), John Sununu (New Hampshire)

In short, there are actually 11 Republican senators more than willing to vote AGAINST the nuclear option.

That means that SIX of the most conservative of that group must become converts.

I don't think it's possible to get anyone to the right of John Roberts confirmed, AND they will have to have nearly the same credentials and ability as Roberts.

823 posted on 10/27/2005 6:52:01 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 514 | View Replies]

To: pbrown

Well it shows that we can be just as nasty as the Dems.


824 posted on 10/27/2005 6:52:10 AM PDT by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 715 | View Replies]

To: sharkhawk
the person who vetted Miers for the Court

I think that was the problem: she wasn't vetted. It was cronyism, pure and simple. GW 'knew' her for years, so she was not subjected to a vetting process before she was named.
825 posted on 10/27/2005 6:52:27 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 759 | View Replies]

To: Mayflower Sister
And we still don't know how conservative Roberts is, do we?

I read his opinions and writings extensively prior to his hearings, and his performance before the Judiciary Committee was a tour de force.

I am entirely comfortable that he is a genuine conservative.

826 posted on 10/27/2005 6:52:31 AM PDT by TonyInOhio ("Men must be governed by God or they will be ruled by tyrants.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 790 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
"It is clear that senators would not be satisfied until they gained access to internal documents concerning advice provided during her tenure at the White House -- disclosures that would undermine a president's ability to receive candid counsel," Bush said.

Not a bad official reason...better than "ya, sorry guys, we goofed".

827 posted on 10/27/2005 6:52:32 AM PDT by M203M4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

This Halloween nightmare is over!


828 posted on 10/27/2005 6:52:36 AM PDT by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pravious

I am in complete agreement with everything you said.

The voters put the GOP in charge of the government. The GOP needs to fight for the will of the voters, win or lose.

Picking nominees simply to avoid a fillibuster is the same thing as refusing to fight for the American voter.


829 posted on 10/27/2005 6:52:37 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 753 | View Replies]

To: Les_Miserables
And all those who don't hate anyone but who honestly felt she was not either qualified nor a true conservative are praying that Bush will now nominate a truly qualified conservative constructionist with a substantial track record supporting that assessment.

Needs to be said again..!!

Nice post..!!

830 posted on 10/27/2005 6:52:38 AM PDT by Osage Orange (Hillary's heart is blacker than the devil's riding boots......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
Pukin Dog wrote:
The Krauthammer option wins in the end. Let the healing begin.

To be honest, I'd like to see a mind like Charles Krauthammer's on the Court. Why not draft him?

- John

831 posted on 10/27/2005 6:52:48 AM PDT by Fishrrman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Let's see how many of these howlers stick around to actually support Bush's next choice.

Aw, poor sinky, your precious nominee went bye-bye, so sorry!!!

832 posted on 10/27/2005 6:52:48 AM PDT by JohnnyZ ("She was appointed by a conservative. That ought to have been enough for us." -- NotBrilliant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Mister Da
An old, unmarried woman is suspect to me. What if she had come out of the closet shortly after confirmation?

More from the Fred Phelps wing of the conservative movement.

833 posted on 10/27/2005 6:52:53 AM PDT by sinkspur (Trust, but vilify.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 782 | View Replies]

To: kjam22

See #823. It will be VERY hard.


834 posted on 10/27/2005 6:53:01 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 582 | View Replies]

To: Capitalism2003

Mr. President, you were nominated and elected for such and opportunity as this. Put away the Rove's political chess board strategy for a moment and make us proud. Here is your nominee:

She was born Janice Olivia Allen in Greenville, Ala., in 1949, five years before the Supreme Court struck down public school segregation in Brown v. Board of Education. After returning from service in World War II, her father grew cotton, corn and peanuts on a 158-acre (0.6 km²) plot he leased about 25 miles (40 km) away from Greenville, before reenlisting in the military, said Havard Richburg, a friend of the family. Her parents separated, and she was raised primarily by her grandmother, Beulah Allen, until her teenage years, when her mother, a nurse, took her to Sacramento, California. (Her mother remarried, adding the name Rogers.) Her family was involved in the voting rights movement in Alabama and became liberal Democrats. She was inspired to become a lawyer by the career of Fred D. Gray, the Alabama civil rights lawyer who represented Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King Jr. Brown has said she initially shared her family's views, but over the years became more conservative in her thinking. In California, she made her way through Sacramento State University in part by working at the Department of Corrections, where she met her first husband, Alan Brown, an administrator there. Soon after the birth of their son, Mr. Brown died of cancer, leaving her to finish college and then law school at the University of California, Los Angeles as a single working mother. She earned her B.A. from CSU Sacramento in 1974 and her Juris Doctor (J.D.) degree from the UCLA School of Law in 1977. In addition, she received a LL.M. degree from the University of Virginia School of Law in 2004.



Time to rally and galvanize support around Brown.


835 posted on 10/27/2005 6:53:06 AM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet (If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

As Mao said, "Let every flower bloom". The President now knows just who supports him and who doesn't. Lets hope he applies that knowledge for the benefit of the country. Let the Billous Kristols, and George Willies take notice.


836 posted on 10/27/2005 6:53:18 AM PDT by hgro (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DevSix
[I.E. DEM's don't trust GWB on going to war]

The Dems refuse to trust any war; save their own. . .when you are 'anti-America/anti-Military; they have only themselves to engage. . .

837 posted on 10/27/2005 6:53:33 AM PDT by cricket (No Freedom - No Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 746 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
Precisely! Make the big, bad, scary "Gang of 14" vote against the President. Over and over if necessary. Let's see how much they value their political careers. All of this jumping on chairs and shouting "Eeek!" at the mention of their names is ridiculous, to say they least. Nominate a true strict constructionist, Mr. President, Gang of 14 be damned.
838 posted on 10/27/2005 6:53:33 AM PDT by Jokelahoma (Animal testing is a bad idea. They get all nervous and give wrong answers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 768 | View Replies]

To: MojoWire
IT's TIME TO GO ON THE OFFENSIVE, MR. PRESIDENT!!! Not some tepid on your heels selection, either.

ABSOLUTELY! I'm reminded of Joshua Chamberlain at the Battle of Gettysburg. Out of ammunition, battered and tired. When his troops were at their lowest point, he ordered them to fix bayonets and charge. They swept the Confederate troops from the field and held their critical part of the Union flank.

Even to a man raised in the south, this is still an inspiring and instructive story. This is the time to take back the initiative and not just get someone on the court, but defeat and demoralize the enemy!

839 posted on 10/27/2005 6:53:36 AM PDT by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 701 | View Replies]

To: livius
But the truth here is that nobody (other than Bush) really knew what her current opinions on anything were, and seeing a President's choice brought down by mob outcry without even going through the procedures is devastating. The Dems are jumping up and down with glee at this.

I am surprised at how few people seem to understand this. We have just handed leftists very powerful ammunition, to use against us in all future debates.

840 posted on 10/27/2005 6:53:47 AM PDT by maica (We are fighting the War for the Free World --Frank Gaffney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 632 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 801-820821-840841-860 ... 3,421-3,436 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson