Skip to comments.
CNN: HARRIET MIERS HAS WITHDRAWN!
Posted on 10/27/2005 5:54:48 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
just breaking!!!!!!!!
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 0; 00000000000000000000; 00000nosantorum; 000sorryfirstkeyword; 0notsofast1stkeyword; 0real1stkeyword; 1firstkeyword; alangreenspan; alito; alltogethernow; angieharmon; borked; botsuicidewatch; bradpitt; brown; bushsquagmier; dealwithit; edithbrownclement; faves; fredthompson; harrietemiers; harrietmiers; harrietthemere; hightechlynching; humphreybogart; janicerbrown; janicerogersbrown; jellopudding; jrb; judgeclement; judicialnominees; luttig; marklevinforscotus; miers; noloyaltytopresident; noricksantorum; rightsviolated; rino; sadday; santorumdogcatcher08; scotus; snugasabuginarug; sorrybushbots; spinelessrinos; stupidsenatetricks; traitorrepubs; unjustandunfair; victory; withdrawal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500, 501-520, 521-540 ... 3,421-3,436 next last
To: RushCrush
Bwa ha! DU is claiming victory on this one...They've just been handed a mighty weapon and they know it.
501
posted on
10/27/2005 6:26:57 AM PDT
by
rhombus
To: Cuttnhorse; goldstategop
The entire discussion here on FR was amazing in that if anyone voiced dissagreement with the Miers nomination, that person hated Miers, hated the president and was a lefty lurking on Free Republic. Exactly right! Ridiculous.
To: KavMan
Ted Olsen, 42nd Solicitor General of the United States, was the husband of Barbara Olsen--FReeper, author, and conservative spokeswoman who died 9-11-2001 on Flight 77
To: mainepatsfan
I think the TV ads against her were damning especially the quote from Robert Bork. Now that was the proverbial "nail in the coffin!"
504
posted on
10/27/2005 6:27:00 AM PDT
by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
To: SoFloFreeper
Thank The Lord
505
posted on
10/27/2005 6:27:01 AM PDT
by
Vision
(When Hillary Says She's Going To Put The Military On Our Borders...She Becomes Our Next President)
To: SuperSonic
506
posted on
10/27/2005 6:27:03 AM PDT
by
rightinthemiddle
(We Self-Destruct. We Blame Bush. That'll Show 'Em!)
To: lonevoice
Now let's get a highly qualified nominee.
To: You Dirty Rats
...filibuster bait...
There is a reason that America voted to put the GOP in charge of the government. Its about time that the government starts doing what the voters wanted.
Fighting for the will of the American voter (lose or win) is better than ignoring the voters and avoiding a fight.
508
posted on
10/27/2005 6:27:06 AM PDT
by
kidd
To: Sloth
No one HATED her. This position is just too important and the conservatives worked too hard to just "take a stab at it".
I pray he selects a clear conservative nominee this time. Don't forget, we're still not sure how John Roberts is going to pan out.
To: SoFloFreeper
YES! Finnaly somebody in the WH is listening to the people who put them in there in the first place.
Finding out about her Afermative Action/racial quota stand was the last straw for me. I went from "just trust Bush", to what the heck was he thinking in the last 48 hours.
To: buckeyeblogger
I'm going to gloat, YES! And the audio was from Gloat Fest 2004.
Just havin' fun with the good news.
To: Pondman88
He won twice because conservatives worked our asses off to get him elected. We gave our time and money, so when you say he won the election you need to understand that he did it by espousing a conservative agenda. Is it too damn much for us to ask the President to live up to his promises. This crap that he won, and he picks with no consensus is ludicrous, and you really need to read some history. Follow a philosophy and not an individual.
To: RushCrush
I vote for the most conservagtive person in an election, no matter of party. Example, I would prefer a Zell Miller to a John McCain.
513
posted on
10/27/2005 6:27:33 AM PDT
by
TXBSAFH
(The GOP needs to be made to toe the conservative line, not the other way around.)
To: xzins; You Dirty Rats
I was talking about compromise among the Republicans & conservatives. Heck, I'd love to get JRB on the Court. But a compromise among the factions represented here at FR doesn't cut it. I don't think the factions here were divided as much over a like/dislike of Miers as a disagreement over what was possible given the current makeup of the Senate. Heal that rift, and you're still only talking about 45 Senate votes. The Snow/Specter RINO's are the ones we'd need to get, and I don't see where they have an incentive to pull together in support of a more conservative nominee than they'd have supported before Miers was nominated.
To: sinkspur
Guess again.OK. I predict one of the Michaels: Luttig or McConnel.
515
posted on
10/27/2005 6:27:40 AM PDT
by
Timeout
To: qam1; Cboldt
> Trent Lott is doing a good job too - on FoxNews. He was until he recommended not nominating Brown or Rogers but someone more acceptable
What a Pµ§§`/
Cave-A-Lott wanted someone provably a "like-for-like" replacement for O'Connor.
516
posted on
10/27/2005 6:27:40 AM PDT
by
steveegg
(Take two - this time, nominate a conservative, not someone who would be at least as bad as O'Connor.)
To: sinkspur
Not if you get your ass kicked. Being afraid of an ass-kicking doesn't win wars. It sounds so... French.
517
posted on
10/27/2005 6:27:41 AM PDT
by
Rutles4Ever
(Stuck on Genius)
To: qam1
I could find a senator with a stronger backbone if I carved one out of a bannana. :D
To: lugsoul
Oh. So it is about something other than who is on the Supreme Court?
IMO, that's the problem. |
Not at all. It is kind of like a football game where the guys on the same team bash on each others pads to get themselves fired up. That was Miers. JRB or Luttig are going to be the game, and we are damned fired up. Timing it to coincide with the Plame steaming pile of s..t does not hurt either. The base's nostrils are flaring, and there is fire in their eyes. We want a fight, and we are tired of fighting with each other over Miers. We want Dim blood.
To: flashbunny; Travis McGee; All
Isn't it funny?
Weeks of reading some on here say "she WILL be confirmed," "she WILL get a hearing. Don't like it? Tough" "You are a one-percenter."
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA!
It's just so funny looking back now.
520
posted on
10/27/2005 6:27:46 AM PDT
by
NapkinUser
("It is a damn poor mind indeed which can think of only one way to spell a word." -Andrew Jackson)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500, 501-520, 521-540 ... 3,421-3,436 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson