Skip to comments.
CNN: HARRIET MIERS HAS WITHDRAWN!
Posted on 10/27/2005 5:54:48 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
just breaking!!!!!!!!
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 0; 00000000000000000000; 00000nosantorum; 000sorryfirstkeyword; 0notsofast1stkeyword; 0real1stkeyword; 1firstkeyword; alangreenspan; alito; alltogethernow; angieharmon; borked; botsuicidewatch; bradpitt; brown; bushsquagmier; dealwithit; edithbrownclement; faves; fredthompson; harrietemiers; harrietmiers; harrietthemere; hightechlynching; humphreybogart; janicerbrown; janicerogersbrown; jellopudding; jrb; judgeclement; judicialnominees; luttig; marklevinforscotus; miers; noloyaltytopresident; noricksantorum; rightsviolated; rino; sadday; santorumdogcatcher08; scotus; snugasabuginarug; sorrybushbots; spinelessrinos; stupidsenatetricks; traitorrepubs; unjustandunfair; victory; withdrawal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480, 481-500, 501-520 ... 3,421-3,436 next last
To: quantim
We want this. We want the nuclear option. We want tough leadership. We want all the senate RINO's exposed so we can get rid of them too. YES!!!
481
posted on
10/27/2005 6:24:47 AM PDT
by
icwhatudo
(The rino borg...is resistance futile?)
To: TexasNative2000
"Forced out by hard-line conservatives" Yup, heard it early on CNN along with "cronyism".
482
posted on
10/27/2005 6:25:01 AM PDT
by
StarFan
To: Acts 2:38
We never even got to hear the woman's opinions. How do you know she wouldn't have been good?
Personally, I think he's going to nominate Gonzales. No problem with confirmation because he's very liberal, and the conservative high priests who canned Miers won't be able to pull off such a stunt twice in a row.
483
posted on
10/27/2005 6:25:02 AM PDT
by
livius
To: DoughtyOne
We all deserve a do-over from time to time. Yes...and we must also pray that the right person's heart is willing to go through the fire for the "prize."
To: SoFloFreeper
Good news! Now let's put this train back on the tracks and move faster than a speeding locomotive.
To: xrp
You might believe that, but Libertarians have a demonstrable trackrecord of untrustworthiness.
486
posted on
10/27/2005 6:25:09 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
(/ hey coach do I gotta' put in that "/sarcasm " thing again? How'bout a double sarcasm for this one)
To: rightinthemiddle
487
posted on
10/27/2005 6:25:19 AM PDT
by
SuperSonic
(Don't just complain. Do something productive! >> www.clubforgrowth.org <<)
To: quantim
We want tough leadership. < cheeky > We always want what we don't have. < /cheeky>
If the nuclear option (I prefer the term "constitutional option") was truly on the table way-back-when, we wouldn't be in the situation we now find ourselves "Miered" in.
488
posted on
10/27/2005 6:25:21 AM PDT
by
MortMan
(Eschew Obfuscation)
To: mountainfolk
" I will never forget what has been done to this woman and to this President"
The Supereme Court is too important for just anyone to be allowed on. Harriet seems like a great woman, but there are hundreds of people in this country with records that are as good or better and hundreds of people who have been fighting in the trenches against judicial liberalism for decades and who have proven themselves to be great constitutional scholars.
To: XJarhead
The manner in which Miers was sunk gives the Dems in the Senate a huge lift. They can freely say they were willing to support the President's nominee, but she was sunk by the "radical right wing". Whomever the next nominee is -- unless he/she's definitely more liberal/moderate than Miers, will be portrayed as a pick forced on the President by the Terry Schiavo/Pat Robertson freaky right wing, and opposed on that basis. They've wanted an opportunity to derail the process, and it was just handed to them. It would have been much better for her to have failed on a vote where there would be a lot of Democrats on record as having opposed her. Now, the withdrawal will be blamed entirely on the right. And the Dem "support" for her will be there excuse to derail future nominees.You got that exactly right. So much for our claim about everyone deserving a fair up or down vote. We are all severely weakened... but some feel there is victory in defeat or are just content with "moral" victories. Those victories NEVER get anything done in Washington.
490
posted on
10/27/2005 6:25:34 AM PDT
by
rhombus
To: SoFloFreeper
AngryAmish (1000+ posts) Thu Oct-27-05 08:56 AM Response to Original message we destroyed her. This is a great day for DU.
Bwa ha! DU is claiming victory on this one...
491
posted on
10/27/2005 6:25:34 AM PDT
by
RushCrush
(The Original Harriet Miers Free Zone ™)
To: SoFloFreeper
492
posted on
10/27/2005 6:25:42 AM PDT
by
not2worry
(What Goes Around Comes Around!)
To: muawiyah
Nope, not at all. It was her lack of proven constructionist credentials.
493
posted on
10/27/2005 6:25:45 AM PDT
by
RockinRight
(I am beginning to think conservatism is buried somewhere under New Orleans' mud...)
To: COEXERJ145
Just remember most of the people who opposed Miers were the same who opposed Roberts and oppose everything the Preisdent does. They hate him just as much as the kook left does which is why they sound more and more like them every day. I opposed Mires, but I've backed President Bush for years. And I backed Roberts. You're painting with too broad a brush...
494
posted on
10/27/2005 6:25:48 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
(NYT: How many times do you have to ask for an error to be corrected before the "error" becomes a "li)
To: Les_Miserables
We wer supposed to not get uppity and just drink th koolaid.
495
posted on
10/27/2005 6:25:53 AM PDT
by
TXBSAFH
(The GOP needs to be made to toe the conservative line, not the other way around.)
To: goldstategop
Well said and I agree with you completely.
The entire discussion here on FR was amazing in that if anyone voiced dissagreement with the Miers nomination, that person hated Miers, hated the president and was a lefty lurking on Free Republic.
To: monkapotamus
Thank you ANN COULTER, Bork, and others for speaking out against this nomination. You were right. Pffft!
Yeah...she was right.
It was quite shocking to see all the new-found Coulter turncoats throughout this whole thing, she really rattled the cages of the personality cultists.
497
posted on
10/27/2005 6:26:31 AM PDT
by
BureaucratusMaximus
(Hard-core, politically angry, hyperconservative loaded with vitriol about everything liberal.)
To: xzins
If these people (Bush hating conservatives) don't ease up, the nation will get no supreme court justice worth having.There isn't a chance in the world of any "easing up" now; not after the debacle of the Miers nomination.
Looks like those on the Left and Right who wanted a fight to the death in the Senate will get their wish. I doubt we have the votes to succeed.
498
posted on
10/27/2005 6:26:31 AM PDT
by
You Dirty Rats
(Lashed to the USS George W. Bush: Glub Glub Glub)
To: SoFloFreeper
To: rodguy911
>>>"Right" is to get a nominee confirmed.<<<
So, it was right for Bush to nominate Souter; Reagan to nominate O'Connor and Kennedy? That is ridiculous.
500
posted on
10/27/2005 6:26:54 AM PDT
by
PhilipFreneau
("The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God." -- Psalms 14:1, 53:1)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480, 481-500, 501-520 ... 3,421-3,436 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson