Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN: HARRIET MIERS HAS WITHDRAWN!

Posted on 10/27/2005 5:54:48 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper

just breaking!!!!!!!!


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 0; 00000000000000000000; 00000nosantorum; 000sorryfirstkeyword; 0notsofast1stkeyword; 0real1stkeyword; 1firstkeyword; alangreenspan; alito; alltogethernow; angieharmon; borked; botsuicidewatch; bradpitt; brown; bushsquagmier; dealwithit; edithbrownclement; faves; fredthompson; harrietemiers; harrietmiers; harrietthemere; hightechlynching; humphreybogart; janicerbrown; janicerogersbrown; jellopudding; jrb; judgeclement; judicialnominees; luttig; marklevinforscotus; miers; noloyaltytopresident; noricksantorum; rightsviolated; rino; sadday; santorumdogcatcher08; scotus; snugasabuginarug; sorrybushbots; spinelessrinos; stupidsenatetricks; traitorrepubs; unjustandunfair; victory; withdrawal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,681-2,7002,701-2,7202,721-2,740 ... 3,421-3,436 next last
To: Arizona Carolyn
Yes, about 40% of the hispanic vote is what elected him.

I think that number has been revised downward. Also, the number is not very impressive when you consider those hispanics were in Bush's home state.

2,701 posted on 10/27/2005 1:03:28 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2694 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591

I agree with you that this didn't come close to Bork or Thomas in venom. Not even close.


2,702 posted on 10/27/2005 1:03:43 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII MOM -- Istook for OK Governor in 2006! Allen in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2497 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Calling people names is stupid IMHO

Yes, and those who did it are doodoo-heads!

Dan
Biblical Christianity BLOG

(c;

2,703 posted on 10/27/2005 1:04:12 PM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2700 | View Replies]

To: medscribe

if OConnor were replaced tomorrow with Janice Rogers Brown - there would still be 5 votes for Roe on the court - Kennedy, Souter, Breyer, Ginsburg, Stevens. the same 5 are for gay marriage.

to turn the tide, one of two things are needed:

- the president elected in 2008 will likely replace Stevens and Ginsburg. Its that president that will remake the court. if we lose the presidency in 2008, its all over, you can forget about any of the SCOTUS issues that concern you. Hillary will remake the court.

- we need a judicial leader, perhaps its Roberts, perhaps its the next appoitnment - to be able to pull Kennedy back from the dark side. Miers certainly wasn't going to be that leader.


2,704 posted on 10/27/2005 1:04:37 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2686 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Bush will nominate this guy! =)



2,705 posted on 10/27/2005 1:04:53 PM PDT by cdbull23 ("If it's brown, drink it down. If it's black, send it back." - Homer on what's good to drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc
. We simply believed it was an additional attribute, which showed the lady had strong moral character

That is very naive. Being a church member has nothing to do with moral character.

2,706 posted on 10/27/2005 1:05:05 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2693 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

Maybe, if only she never lets the liberals get to her. I need her to hate the libs with the same fierceness as Thomas does.


2,707 posted on 10/27/2005 1:05:25 PM PDT by faithincowboys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2315 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta

I will remind you of that on every 5-4 O'Connor swing vote case that comes down from here on out.


2,708 posted on 10/27/2005 1:05:37 PM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2697 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591

Few if any of the Miers opponents, though they may disagree with your characterization, are suggesting you keep that opinion to yourself.
-----

Tell flashbunny that.


2,709 posted on 10/27/2005 1:05:41 PM PDT by GarySpFc (Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2696 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
there would still be 5 votes for Roe on the court

Well, Ginsburg doesn't think that Roe was a good decision either.

2,710 posted on 10/27/2005 1:06:12 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2704 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

You don't deserve one.


2,711 posted on 10/27/2005 1:07:22 PM PDT by TAdams8591 (It's the Supreme Court, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2699 | View Replies]

To: baystaterebel
"Miers should have had her day before the judicial committee. That is where her nomination should have ended if it was to be ended"

Exactly, I agree with all else you said as well. But we eat our own and we, like liberals, like to judge, jury and condemn in the court of public opinion.

President Bush knew this person. For us to criticize him over it gives the liberals confirmation in their opinion of Bush. If I were a Democrat, I would be having a field day with this. "Not only am I right, but now the Conservatives agree; bush is wrong for America".
2,712 posted on 10/27/2005 1:08:04 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2625 | View Replies]

To: Nameless
I merely noted my striking resemblance to Thor.

Well, that's a real odd belief for someone who believes nothing.

2,713 posted on 10/27/2005 1:08:25 PM PDT by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2678 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta

yes, but she will find some other "emanation or penumbra" to say that unlimited abortion is a constitutional right.


2,714 posted on 10/27/2005 1:08:34 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2710 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
First, you are assuming Kennedy could not already be swayed - read again the dissent in Casey - and second, you are assuming Stevens, Ginsburg, etc. stay on the Court until 2009 ; )
2,715 posted on 10/27/2005 1:09:03 PM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2704 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591
Did I ask for one

My post was a way of saying your comment was laughable

2,716 posted on 10/27/2005 1:09:11 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2711 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta
That is very naive. Being a church member has nothing to do with moral character.

Being a church member has everything to do with moral character. If one believes in the moral law, then they realize their is a moral governor. Anyone who does not accept a moral law and its lawgiver is simply a moral relativist.
2,717 posted on 10/27/2005 1:09:17 PM PDT by GarySpFc (Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2706 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
I will remind you of that on every 5-4 O'Connor swing vote case that comes down from here on out.

Don't remind me - remind Bush for wasting so much time.

2,718 posted on 10/27/2005 1:09:25 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2708 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta
but you're among fellow conservatives here and criticizing Bush when he does something questionable shouldn't invoke such a reaction.

Am I? Most of us are conservatives, but are all of us? And if so, why can DU'ers invade so easily and say the same words against the President and go undetected?

My screenname was chosen right after President Bush took office. I was sickened and disgusted by 8 years of Clinton, and I was rejoicing and thanking God for the election of such a strong, moral, Godly man as President (as I still am). I have never been prouder of any President in my more than half century of living.

I don't care if the name causes misunderstandings because I am who I am. I think for myself as I always have. I'm nobody's robot, nor will I ever be.

btw......I'm also a Browns' fan, and an Indians' fan. Being a fan doesn't mean you think you're dealing with perfection........TRUST me. ;)

2,719 posted on 10/27/2005 1:11:13 PM PDT by ohioWfan (Take comfort, Friend George, God is with thee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2691 | View Replies]

To: mondonico

Yes...after hearing that Frist visited with Bush about this last night...I agree with you.

BTW...judges just keep making decisions....

I just saw a blurb on C-span that says a "FEDERAL" appeals court has ruled that Georgia CANNOT require picture ID for voters...


2,720 posted on 10/27/2005 1:13:04 PM PDT by Txsleuth (I am the real TXSLEUTH...please freepmail me if you doubt it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2695 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,681-2,7002,701-2,7202,721-2,740 ... 3,421-3,436 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson