Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nazi March Canceled When Police Disperse Rock-throwing Protesters (ongoing looting)
nbc24.com ^ | 10/15/2005 | N/A

Posted on 10/15/2005 10:30:55 AM PDT by sageb1

TOLEDO, Ohio (AP) - Police used tear gas to break up a rock-throwing crowd that had gathered to protest a planned march Saturday by the National Socialist Movement.

At least two dozen members of a Roanoke, Va.-based group that calls itself "America's Nazi Party" had gathered at Wilson Park just before noon and were to march under police protection.

(Excerpt) Read more at nbc24.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: canadians; gangs; mediabias; nationalsocialists; nazisvscommies; notapeacemovement; oh; ohio; racewar; racialdivision; riot; socialists; toledo; toledoriot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620621-640641-660 ... 1,081-1,098 next last
To: janetjanet998

I'm sorry that you don't understand. They were going to march in a black neighborhood over a black neighbor and white neighbor arguing over a fence.


621 posted on 10/15/2005 5:34:43 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 616 | View Replies]

To: freema
Yes, I agree with legislation that inhibits hate.

Frankly, I'm offended by your implication that speech can be "hateful". That is very offensive to lovers of free speech. Hateful in fact.

622 posted on 10/15/2005 5:35:15 PM PDT by TaxRelief ("Conservatives are cracking down!" -- Rush Limbaugh, October 13, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 609 | View Replies]

To: freema

"Speech that deliberately offends, degrades, intimidates, dehumanizes- incites violence, prejudice, contempt? Yes, I agree with legislation that inhibits hate."

All that is in the ear of the beholder, what bother one may mean nothing to another.. so since there is infinite possibilities for offending someone then the only preventive method would be to silence everyone..


623 posted on 10/15/2005 5:38:32 PM PDT by SeaBiscuit (God Bless all who defend America and Friends, the rest can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 609 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief

Tell me that you don't honestly believe that the First Amendment means you are free to say ANYTHING that comes into a persons head?


624 posted on 10/15/2005 5:40:46 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 622 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Either the civic association or deed restriction dictates the standards of "fence". Does anyone have further details?


625 posted on 10/15/2005 5:42:12 PM PDT by weegee (The lesson from New Orleans? Smart Growth kills. You can't evacuate dense populations easily.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 621 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

It seems that there quite a few blondes posting to this thread..... Their stellar use of logic would make my old UofT logic prof cringe... ;-)


626 posted on 10/15/2005 5:44:04 PM PDT by NoCmpromiz (What part of John 14:6 don't you get?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Either the civic association or deed restriction dictates the standards of "fence". Does anyone have further details?

I sure don't but, dang!, can we say "escalation"?

627 posted on 10/15/2005 5:44:07 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 625 | View Replies]

To: NoCmpromiz
Their stellar use of logic would make my old UofT logic prof cringe... ;-)

I don't know about cringe but my eyes look like pinwheels!!

628 posted on 10/15/2005 5:45:35 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

"The city had the right to deny the permit. Some idiot didn't."

The government has the right to reduce my taxes. I think they should. They haven't, but its OK for me not to pay them anyway, because "some idiot didn't" do what I thought they should.

RIIIGHT.

Rally still legal. Rioters illegal. No simpler summary possible. No woulda coulda shoulda.

Not describing mayhem as "stellar" behaviour is far from calling it what it is.

The rioters are responsible for their actions. Denying them their responsibility is denying them their humanity. Expect better behaviour and you will get it.


629 posted on 10/15/2005 5:46:12 PM PDT by Mr. Rational (God gave me a brain and expects me to use it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 525 | View Replies]

To: Roccus
As the folks in NYC found out after Crown Hgts., you have no 'right' to expect police protection in such circumstaces. IOW, you're on your own.

I was thinking about the Crown Heights riot too, when I heard this story.

If Yankel Rosenbaum HAD pulled out a weapon and bust a cap in the head of any of his attackers that night, I'd lay odds that he'd have been indicted for murder and sued by the creep's family.

Isn't that how these scenarios play out?

630 posted on 10/15/2005 5:46:22 PM PDT by ariamne (Proud shieldmaiden of the infidel--never forget, never forgive 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies]

To: montag813; oh8eleven; thoughtomator; RJS1950; JABBERBONK; BlackJack; Mr. Rational; WildTurkey
Like it or not, free speech has limits. Where we place those limits determines the quality of our politics.

No one is excusing looting and anarchy. Arrest them all.

As I posted #65 and #120...

Exceptions established by the courts to the First Amendment protections include the following: Defamation; Causing panic; Fighting words; Incitement to crime; Sedition; Obscenity.

Fighting words: In the famous case of Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the First Amendment does not protect "fighting words -- those which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace." (315 U.S. 568, 572 [1942])

Note that the harm involved is physical harm caused by someone else who was provoked by the speaker whose speech is being suppressed. The fact that someone else flies into a rage and causes physical harm results in justifying suppression of speech by another person.

It is simply not a cut-and-dried issue.

631 posted on 10/15/2005 5:47:10 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ('Deserves' got nothing to do with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 584 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Rational

See post 611.


632 posted on 10/15/2005 5:48:29 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 629 | View Replies]

To: sageb1
Toldeo = Toledo

If we change the name, will they vote Republican?

633 posted on 10/15/2005 5:48:44 PM PDT by NoCmpromiz (What part of John 14:6 don't you get?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 591 | View Replies]

To: freema
You really need a link to something that states that Hitler incarcerated defenders of Jews??? Here:

Shirer, William. The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, Gramercy. June 1, 1994.

634 posted on 10/15/2005 5:49:04 PM PDT by TaxRelief ("Conservatives are cracking down!" -- Rush Limbaugh, October 13, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 617 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Rational
Denying them their responsibility is denying them their humanity.

Btw, where did I do that? Check my posts and you'll find that I refered to their "criminal behaviour". I NEVER said it wasn't.

635 posted on 10/15/2005 5:50:46 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 629 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
I guess we should change that to : Anyone can protest as long as the militant Black groups and street thugs don't threaten to riot. This tactic seems to be workin for them. Sick. Disgusting.
636 posted on 10/15/2005 5:50:58 PM PDT by Diva Betsy Ross (Code pink stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 612 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief

Your point?


637 posted on 10/15/2005 5:52:46 PM PDT by freema (Proud Marine Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 612 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch
Giving every impression that it was the NAZIs, who were rampaging, because authorities had cancelled their event.

I've seen two reports and heard one on the radio. EVERY SINGLE ONE made it appear that the neo-nazis were rioting. Even on Fox. (I'm done with Fox).

The MSM makes me sick. This feels like Big Brother re-writing history.
638 posted on 10/15/2005 5:52:53 PM PDT by Zechariah_8_13 (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 620 | View Replies]

To: strategofr

I think you've snapped your cap.


639 posted on 10/15/2005 5:53:20 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 601 | View Replies]

To: Certain_Doom
I really hate Ohio Nazis.

But who are the "Nazis"?
640 posted on 10/15/2005 5:53:25 PM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620621-640641-660 ... 1,081-1,098 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson