Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Freepers, a Question on "Suicide Bombings"
self | 8/28/05 | LS

Posted on 08/28/2005 11:53:39 AM PDT by LS

Freepers, I have a question (and I know I'm just asking for a lot of joke answers here, but I'm serious.) I've been doing a lot of reading on Islam/the Arab mind/terrorism. I'm especially interested in how concepts of shame and honor play into this.

Using such works as John Laffin, "The Arab Mind Considered" (1975) and Patton Howell's "The Terrorist Mind," (2003), it seems that prior to the mid-1970s at least, suicide was considered an act of dishonor or shame in Arab societies (and, again, I know that all Muslims, esp. Iranians, aren't "Arab"). The point is that it was an act of shame to kill oneself, even when destroying an enemy.

Yet by the 1980s (earlier?) we see so-called "suicide bombers." Does anyone have a take on how the concept of shame came to be ok when applied to suicide disappeared in the Arab world? And when did this occur? So far, the sources I've seen aren't helping. Thanks Freepers. I'll bet I have solid answers within 30 minutes!


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 911; bush; iraq; london; londonattacked; muslims; suicidebombing; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

1 posted on 08/28/2005 11:53:54 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LS
Suicide is apparently only considered "dishonorable" in Islamic cultures if you kill yourself and don't take a few infidels with you.
2 posted on 08/28/2005 11:56:31 AM PDT by Prime Choice (E=mc^3. Don't drink and derive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

I think that it has to do with the extremism that has moved to the forefront - and how that has changed definitions. where committing suicide in the quiet of your room may be a dishonorable thing, carrying out a homicide bombing isn't a suicide, so much as it may be considered dying while attacking the kfir.


3 posted on 08/28/2005 11:57:57 AM PDT by Tennessee_Bob ("Nac Mac Feegle! The Wee Free Men! Nae king! Nae quin! Nae laird! We willna be fooled again!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

Read your Koran.

Also look up the Hashishin, aka the Assassins. It's where we get the name. And, don't forget to read up on the celebrations of the martyr Hussein.


4 posted on 08/28/2005 11:58:02 AM PDT by combat_boots (Dug in and not budging an inch. NOT to be schiavoed, greered, or felosed as a patient)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

They are actually Homicide Bombers...


5 posted on 08/28/2005 11:59:18 AM PDT by FDNYRHEROES (Time for a new tag line...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS
I think that maybe the Muslim culture has some very powerful and influential people at the top telling the poor and insignificant that they are being held down. When that got ingrained they went to the next step. Tell the people that if they die for the "cause". They will be rewarded.

I would not think it would take long before the masses agreed.
6 posted on 08/28/2005 12:02:12 PM PDT by pennyfarmer (Shiite Muslim named Bob.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

The Islamacist clerics have justified suicide attacks by putting the emphasis on the attack, rather than on the act of the suicide.

They compare it to a man waging an impossible fight and dying in the process.

In their mind is is similar to a man facing overwhelming odds, rushing into battle and dying while striking out at the infidel.

Anybody with a modicum of common sense can see the difference between their justification of suicide bombing and a suicidal mission. In a suicide bombing a terrorist dies by their own hand. In a suicidal mission, one dies at the hands of the enemy.

The clerics have equated the two kinds of attacks. It doesn't make any sense, but enough Muslims have bought the justification.


7 posted on 08/28/2005 12:03:31 PM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: LS

The same reason that Jonestown happened. A nut speaks, koolaid is consumed.


9 posted on 08/28/2005 12:10:39 PM PDT by 359Henrie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS
You're overlooking the concept of martyrdom.

Fighting for one's beliefs and dying for a noble cause.

Of course the Islamofascist application is totally wrong and perverse.

10 posted on 08/28/2005 12:13:57 PM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Minuteman at heart, couch potato in reality))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FDNYRHEROES
"They are actually Homicide Bombers"

Actually, I disagree wirth that usage for the following reason. All successful bombers are homicide bombers but those that use themselves as the delivery system should be distinguished as suicide bombers. It matters little I suppose but the logic of "Homicide Bombers" escapes me.

11 posted on 08/28/2005 12:23:07 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LS

I can't remember the source, but I was told that it was Arafat who populized this terrorist 'technique'.
I don't know from where his justification, but he spread the idea through the schools from the youngest ages, and romanticised the concept.


12 posted on 08/28/2005 12:24:33 PM PDT by Sarah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coconutt2000
Japan adopted the practice of kamikaze....they were told that it was "honorable" to die in that way, but as a culture believed that committing suicide was to bring dishonor to your family.

It's simple....it's what one does when they know they have lost.

13 posted on 08/28/2005 12:25:01 PM PDT by RasterMaster (Saddam's family were WMD's - He's behind bars & his sons are DEAD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LS
There's a lot of material on this over at www.memri.org.

Example:

http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=subjects&Area=reform&ID=SP96805

"The Sharia rulings that forbid harming civilians remained valid [for centuries] until Sheikh Al-Qaradhawi and a group of ulama created a dangerous breach with regard to Jihad. This was when, out of support for Hamas, he ruled that suicide operations among civilians were legitimate. He said: This is one of the glorious types of Jihad, and it is a kind of terror that is legitimate according to Shari'a. He claimed that [in Israel] there is no difference between a civilian and a soldier – because the children of today are the fighters of tomorrow, and they are all occupiers.

"He [applied] this same fatwa to [suicide] operations in Iraq, saying that there was no difference between the [American] civilian and a member of the American military – because the civilian is serving the soldier. Then he applied this to all civilians, Muslims and non-Muslims, [in Iraq], who are connected to the occupation forces, by ruling that the sentence of anyone who collaborates with the occupier is the same as the sentence of the occupier himself. This is the same basis of jurisprudence one on which [Abu Mus'ab] Al-Zarqawi, [Abu Muhammad] Al-Maqdisi, [3] Abu Qatada, [4] and Sheikh Hamed Al-'Ali [5] rely…

"This fatal breach has created an ideological and moral crisis in Islam – as [former editor of the Saudi daily Al-Watan Jamal] Khashoggi said [in a July 19, 2005 article in the UAE daily Al-Itihad ]– and it has caused much damage to Islam and the Muslims. The moral deterioration has reached the point that they blow up children in Baghdad and peaceful civilians on buses in London. These fatwa s are a moral and ideological mark of shame, which we must purge from our Islam…"

14 posted on 08/28/2005 12:26:34 PM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RasterMaster
It's simple....it's what one does when they know they have lost.

That's pretty much the conclusion.

An interesting twist on the fight in Iraq is that they're having trouble finding suicide volunteers.

15 posted on 08/28/2005 12:28:18 PM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: LS

["it seems that prior to the mid-1970s at least....."]

Well, your timing is about right. But, I would consider your question more generally, More specifically, I think the consequences of the actions of the Arab terrorists at the 1972 Olympic games in Munich was a major paradigm shift in the thinking of these fanatics. In short, they realized that terrorism could work (T.V. network coverage, etc.)


16 posted on 08/28/2005 12:28:29 PM PDT by LjubivojeRadosavljevic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coconutt2000
"The clerics have equated the two kinds of attacks. It doesn't make any sense, but enough Muslims have bought the justification."

I believe your reasoning is correct. Muslim clerics identify feeble-minded students in their Madrassas and single them out for “special” treatment. A young feeble minded sexually repressed Muslim male can be made to believe that he is going to Hell simply because he masturbates, and that his only salvation is to die in the service of his God. And as an added bonus, he gets to spend eternity with seventy-two horny virgins. So just strap this bomb on Akmed, this is a win-win situation. Now, ain’t God great?

17 posted on 08/28/2005 12:36:26 PM PDT by DJ Taylor (Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: coconutt2000

I guess they're beginning to run out of lemmings for their lost cause!


18 posted on 08/28/2005 12:36:54 PM PDT by RasterMaster (Saddam's family were WMD's - He's behind bars & his sons are DEAD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee_Bob

Do you think this is a variant of a particular type of Islam, ie., Wahabbism? It would be worth knowing if all of the homicide bombers were of a particular "sect" or approach to Islam.


19 posted on 08/28/2005 12:37:22 PM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

The Assassins were not suicidal. They were killers. I did read up on them. The Koran is ambivalent (since it places no inherent value on human life anyway, I suppose it could be considered pro-suicide). I found nothing in the Hadith to support suicide.


20 posted on 08/28/2005 12:38:59 PM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson