Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BLAST AT CITY TUBE STATION - FOUR BOMB EXPLOSIONS AROUND LONDON
Sky News ^ | July 7, 2005

Posted on 07/07/2005 1:45:13 AM PDT by RWR8189

There has been an explosion at Aldgate East underground station in London, causing the closure of the entire Tube network.

There are also reports that a second incident took place at Edgware Road station in north west London.

The Aldgate East blast was caused by "some kind of power surge", according to Tube infrastructure company Metronet, which is responsible for maintaining the Metropolitan line.

A spokesman said: "We don't know the extent of the problem yet."

A London Ambulance Service spokeswoman said: "We have just sent some resources out to the scene."

British Transport Police confirmed that there are "walking wounded" and said paramedics have responded to one report of a person classed as "life at risk".

"It's chaos, with people trying to work out what has happened," said a spokesman.

"All we know at the moment is that staff reported a loud bang at 8.49am. No one is sure what caused an explosion, but it is thought it could have been a collision, a power cut, or a power cable problem."

One witness said the packed underground train he was on was 200 metres from Kings Cross when there was a huge flash.

The train stopped and people were using umberellas to smash windows of the trains. Passengers were led out of the train by underground staff.

He added people were milling around Kings Cross covered in soot.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 07july2005; 77; alqaeda; axisofevil; bomb; eu; explosion; g8summit; globaljihad; islam; islamofascism; jihad; jihadinengland; jihadineurope; jihadinlondon; killterroristsnow; koranimals; london; londonattacked; muslim; religionofpeace; religionofpieces; religionoftolerance; rop; sandnazis; terrorism; terrorists; trop; ukmuslims; waronterror; wot; wwiv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 3,861-3,8803,881-3,9003,901-3,920 ... 4,081-4,089 next last
To: Justanobody

She said the same as Biden, Schumer, Boxer, Kerry and Kohl, Corzine and Lautenberg! I am going to down load it and put it next to Seantor Allen's release, for 08! ;)


3,881 posted on 07/07/2005 6:04:39 PM PDT by defconw (ALLEN IN 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3874 | View Replies]

To: Eva

Rationality is based upon a set of given things or assumptions. Your basis says that suicide is irrational. An islamowacko's basis is that suicide and killing infidels is rational. He is no less rational than you if you understand his basic ethics. We don't like it. We value life. He doesn't. It is perfectly logical that you wouldn't blow up yourself to kill 20 people on a bus. It is also perfectly logical that he would. Rationality is a logical process starting with certain basic assumptions and values. If your values were the same as his, it would be rational for you to blow up the bus, too.


3,882 posted on 07/07/2005 6:04:49 PM PDT by furball4paws (One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3857 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
Crash eyewitnesses described aircraft behavior completely inconsistent with a shoe-bombing. A small bomb would more than likely (>80%) be ineffectual at such low altitude and speed. Weapons like that rely on aircraft speed and altitude (pressurization) to work. The initial skin rupture enlarges and the airframe disintegrates. That requires high speed and high altitude.

O.K.

Wouldn't that explain the 'falling apart' effect, and the minimal damage on the ground?

(questions from non-expert.)

3,883 posted on 07/07/2005 6:05:58 PM PDT by fanfan (" The liberal party is not corrupt " Prime Minister Paul Martin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3868 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
Crash eyewitnesses described aircraft behavior completely inconsistent with a shoe-bombing. A small bomb would more than likely (>80%) be ineffectual at such low altitude and speed. Weapons like that rely on aircraft speed and altitude (pressurization) to work. The initial skin rupture enlarges and the airframe disintegrates. That requires high speed and high altitude.

O.K.

Wouldn't that explain the 'falling apart' effect, and the minimal damage on the ground?

(questions from non-expert.)

3,884 posted on 07/07/2005 6:06:11 PM PDT by fanfan (" The liberal party is not corrupt " Prime Minister Paul Martin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3868 | View Replies]

To: Eva

Oh, thank God again! Were they supposed to leave tomorrow?


3,885 posted on 07/07/2005 6:06:30 PM PDT by TAdams8591 (Off-the-cuff-comments are NOT CLEAR and CONVINCING evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3880 | View Replies]

To: Gunrunner2

I don't know. It would have been real close.


3,886 posted on 07/07/2005 6:08:28 PM PDT by furball4paws (One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3839 | View Replies]

To: JWinNC
3,876

Exactly.

3,887 posted on 07/07/2005 6:08:50 PM PDT by fanfan (" The liberal party is not corrupt " Prime Minister Paul Martin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3876 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

Dick Durbin and his ilk are an unfortunate side effect from not having a declared war. If we had one we could hang him.


3,888 posted on 07/07/2005 6:10:17 PM PDT by furball4paws (One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3850 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
The 1993 Tower bombings, OKC, the Embassy bombings, the Cole and probably hundreds of other attacks occurred before we went into Iraq.

Terrorist attacks are caused by.....yes, terrorists!!

3,889 posted on 07/07/2005 6:12:34 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3879 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Two days ago, and politicizing 9-11 along the way, Hillary said that NY was the best place for the Olympics. Today, she said it's not safe!!!


3,890 posted on 07/07/2005 6:15:55 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3879 | View Replies]

To: furball4paws

No, your reasoning is faulty because Islam is based on the Koran which is in itself irrational. It has so many contradictions that it stands for nothing and everything, whatever you want it stand for. You can't justify an irrational ideology that is based on irrational, contradictory rules of morality. You are using circular logic.


3,891 posted on 07/07/2005 6:22:03 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3882 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

What is she, a flip-flopper? LOL

BTW, heads up everybody....Weasly Clark is going to be on Hannity & Colmes in a second....let's see how he, liberal idiot that he is, blames this on President Bush...

Speaking of weasely idiots, did ya'll see on Fox News that Saddam's lawyer quit today because his American lawyers (Ramsey Clark and pals) were getting in the way!!!! LOL


3,892 posted on 07/07/2005 6:22:44 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3890 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

If Saddam's lawyer quit today, it's because Saddam said so.


3,893 posted on 07/07/2005 6:26:52 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3892 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Here's a thread in real time at a UK site I've been visiting. http://www.housepricecrash.co.uk/forum/index.php?showtopic=12137&st=0


3,894 posted on 07/07/2005 6:28:20 PM PDT by Concentrate (www.housepricecrash.co.uk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3892 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau; defconw

Just as I thought, Weasley said that President Bush has spent about $100 million to LITTLE on Homeland Security...

He is the second one I've seen that has blamed Britain's attack today, on Bush not giving our government enough money!

Figure that one out!


3,895 posted on 07/07/2005 6:30:11 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3893 | View Replies]

To: furball4paws
You evaded my question.

Do Dick Durbin's words have an effect on the war or not?

And how could they be treason if words don't matter (your original point, IIRC)?

3,896 posted on 07/07/2005 6:30:25 PM PDT by ohioWfan ("If My people, which are called by My name, will humble themselves and pray.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3888 | View Replies]

To: Concentrate

Terrific thread....

It would be interesting to read a thread that was happening in real time of 9/11 from people really close to the scene.


3,897 posted on 07/07/2005 6:33:55 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3894 | View Replies]

To: trussell

You are so welcome!! They will be on a plane home soon!


3,898 posted on 07/07/2005 6:37:23 PM PDT by pitinkie (revenge will be sweet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3865 | View Replies]

To: furball4paws
Maybe. . .but I have real faith in this president. He acts in the interests of America and while it is nice to have allies along, it is not the defining criteria.

The presence or absence of allied support does not define the actions of Bush when it comes to national security. Allied support is not a criteria when determining if going to war is in the national security interests of the US. Whereas, sadly, for Clinton it was.

For Clinton, if he had no allied support then he would think, "Well, I guess it's not a national security interest."

That is lunacy.

Turning over to "allies" the solemn decision as to what constitutes a reason to go to war is an invitation to disaster. Bush knows better.
3,899 posted on 07/07/2005 6:40:50 PM PDT by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3886 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Finally! Someone called the libs on their damn politiziation talking point they've been circulating today that Iraq didn't keep all terrorists there to fight. I guess we know what Libs have been doing today. Finding a spine to fight the WOT? No. In Shame of politicizing the war? No. Mourning the loss of Life and showing solidarity in will with britain? No. Concocting vicious divisive political talking points meant to tear down the war, tear down the president? YES!

Bennett called Alan on it and I'm thrilled. I want Bennett on more often. He isn't afraid to nail Alan to the floor even if Alans puts on that mock outrage of swarmy grin.


3,900 posted on 07/07/2005 6:41:36 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3892 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 3,861-3,8803,881-3,9003,901-3,920 ... 4,081-4,089 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson