Posted on 06/16/2005 6:59:26 AM PDT by optik_b
King Tut's skin color a topic of controversy
By Evan Henerson Staff Writer
Wednesday, June 15, 2005 - Nobody can be sure exactly what the boy king Tutankhamun looked like. But a group of African-American activists charting the "Tutankhamun and the Golden Age of the Pharaohs" exhibition are certain of one thing: He didn't look white.
Following an appearance before the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, activists from the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the Committee for the Elimination of Media Offensive to African People, and the Association for the Study of Classical African Civilizations plan to protest the Tut exhibition, which opens today at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art.
They claim a trio of busts configured from Tut's corpse and a CT scan depict the ruler as being white, and are, therefore, inaccurate and racist.
"Those images are so critical for our children," says Legrand Clegg, Compton city attorney and a spokesman for the protesters. "We want them to focus not just on rappers, athletes and entertainers but on figures who are high achievers. What could be more elevating than a little boy who ruled the world?"
Three separate teams of researchers reviewing the data from the mummified corpse have concluded that Tutankhamun, who was part of the 18th Egyptian dynasty, was a Caucasoid North African. Clegg contends these conclusions fly in the face of separate research by a New Zealand and British research team that label Tut Negroid.
"The big variable is skin tone," says Terry Garcia, executive vice president for mission programs for National Geographic, one of the exhibition's presenters. "North Africans, we know today, had a range of skin tones, from light to dark. In this case, we selected a medium skin tone, and we say, quite up front, 'This is midrange.' We'll never know for sure what his exact skin tone was or the color of his eyes with 100 percent certainty.
"Maybe in the future, people will come to a different conclusion," Garcia continues. "From what we know, there is no doubt this individual was of North African descent."
That's not good enough for the activists, who demonstrated peacefully before an opening reception Wednesday and planned to protest again at today's opening.
"All we're asking," says Clegg, "is removal of those impostor busts, which have nothing to do with relics.
here's the earlier topic, also on the GGG list:
King Tut Exhibit Outrages Activists
NBC 4 | 4:03 pm PDT June 7, 2005
Posted on 06/08/2005 4:49:47 AM PDT by echoBoomer
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1418687/posts
"The real question: With whom did he sleep with?"
His sister, which makes him a bona-fide Bubba.
yes--but that was at a time when Loni Anderson took on roles as the typical Indian Squaw... dark make up, black hair, and there you have it... okay--sarcasm over...
(Lot of trouble, I know, but I've done it for special pics.)
I don't know why there should be any controversy. Can't somebody just take a look?
His skin was completely covered with the unguents and tars used to preserve the body, and very badly stained. The embalmers overdid it a bit, and the corpse is in extremely poor condition. Unfortunately, you couldn't tell if he was originally purple.
Well, skin color isn't the characteristic anyway. The hair is it. Is there any hair left?
I'm not going to post the pic because he's in pretty bad shape (his head was separated from his body a long time ago, I think by one of the archaeologists because his body had sort of melted into the coffin), but you can find it here
Oh. Well, there is no shortage of mummies even though they used them to power their locomotives not so long ago. Seems like there should be a clear enough picture of general characteristics of that region and time.
Actually, I would suspect that the Egyptian Coptic Chrisitians would bear the closest resemblance to ancient Egyptians.
Actually, I would suspect that the Egyptian Coptic Chrisitians would bear the closest resemblance to ancient Egyptians.
Actually, I would suspect that the Egyptian Coptic Chrisitians would bear the closest resemblance to ancient Egyptians.
Bingo
Maybe I'm not smart enough, but could someone please tell me why it is important to know the skin color of an Egyptian pharaoh who died thousands of years ago? Does this possibly have anything to do with who we are today and where we are going from here?
I would not think that genetically or by appearence today's Coptic Christians differ much with the general Egyptian population.
I would think maybe you are projecting a similar kind of hopefulness on your part, as do African-Americans wishing to claim a heritage link with ancient Egypt.
Perhaps you are confused because there are also Coptic Christians in Ethiopia, who also happen to be black.
What a moron. I doubt king of the world is a viable career path for many people, black or white. And is the inbred heir to a despotic bronze-age kingdom really a role model for anyone?
gracias, senor.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.