Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The coolest spy plane ever built, SR-71.
Various ^ | 2-5-05

Posted on 02/05/2005 3:15:15 PM PST by Indy Pendance

Edited on 02/05/2005 3:17:49 PM PST by Lead Moderator. [history]

The coolest spy plane ever built, SR-71. I was watching Modern Marvels on the History channel last night. This aircraft broke all kinds of international speed and altitude records which still have not been beaten today. It was nothing for them to fly at 80,000 feet and it was a piece of cake to fly at about mach 3, or about 2100 mph. For those of you old enough, remember the sonic boom days? About 750 miles would create a sonic boom, or a doppler effect.

Here's the question, this plane was so fast, it was faster than the earth's rotation. What would happen with time over a long sustainable period of flying time? If it goes faster than the earth's rotation long enough, will it be ahead of time when it lands, or likewise in the opposite direction, will it go back in time. Do you think Einstein has an answer? Saturday night ponderings.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: flight; miltech; speedofsoundx5; spyplane; sr71
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-347 next last

1 posted on 02/05/2005 3:15:15 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

Although faster than the earth's rotation, it would have to be thousands of times faster to really exhibit time dialation for the pilot.

If he was in the air 23 hours and landed in the same spot he took off, it would still be 23 hours later :)


2 posted on 02/05/2005 3:19:29 PM PST by ruiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

Speaking of Saturday night ponderings (for those near the Tri-Cities, WA). Einstein@TheMovies:

http://www.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/world_year/iyp_events05.html


3 posted on 02/05/2005 3:21:54 PM PST by steve86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

It was originally the RS-71 until LBJ screwed up the name in a speech. So instead of owning up to a silly mistake, they renamed the plane. How pathetic can a guy get?


4 posted on 02/05/2005 3:22:04 PM PST by Flightdeck (Liberals see Saddam's mass graves as half full. I prefer to see them as half empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

Generally when planes become operational they are already obsolete technologically. This is one of the few airplanes that was ahead of its time. It even had features that were stealthy and probably helped those understand some of the principles of stealth technology being used today. It was a sad day when the Air Force retired that airplane. Of all the airplanes I've seen or worked on in the Air Force that one is my favorite.


5 posted on 02/05/2005 3:22:46 PM PST by MadAnthony1776 ("liberalism" = "do as I say, not as I do")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ruiner
Well they said, the plane flew faster than the earth's rotation. Like I asked, over a sustainable period of time, say weeks or months, what would happen?
6 posted on 02/05/2005 3:23:08 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ruiner

Well they took an atomic clock on plane far slower than the blackbird and flew it around the world and it was off by a fraction of a second.


7 posted on 02/05/2005 3:23:35 PM PST by Flightdeck (Liberals see Saddam's mass graves as half full. I prefer to see them as half empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

Despite what Hollywood portrays in Superman movies, the Earth's rotation has no influence on the passage of time. It merely forms a convenient measure of the passage of time.


8 posted on 02/05/2005 3:24:01 PM PST by SpyGuy (Liberalism is slow societal suicide. And screw political correctness: Islam is the Religion of Death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck

The plane was originally designed to be a interceptor-fighter but it was so fast that it couldn't perform that mission. I believe the original designation when they looked at it as an interceptor was YF-14.


9 posted on 02/05/2005 3:25:43 PM PST by MadAnthony1776 ("liberalism" = "do as I say, not as I do")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck

They never mentioned that. Thanks. I'm going back on my old college physic days, and the theory of relativity classes. I just thought it might make an interesting discussion.


10 posted on 02/05/2005 3:26:25 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

Nothing! Astronauts fly faster (or slower, or whatever) than the Earth's rotation. I don't get what you're driving at? Have you started a Super Bowl party early?


11 posted on 02/05/2005 3:26:55 PM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck
If you want to get really technical it was originally the A-12, and flown as a prototype for the AF as the YF-12. She was originally planned to be a fighter/interceptor.

I had the priviledge of working with the 9SRW at Beale afb for 4 years as a Mission Programmer for the Blackbird.

Spent many a night listening to the sound of freedom as an SR that had just returned from doing it's job of protecting this great nation sat in the burnoff area with her engines roaring.

There is no sight more beautiful than an SR-71 roaring down the runway with those twin Blue flames trailing behind her

12 posted on 02/05/2005 3:27:51 PM PST by commish (Freedom Tastes Sweetest to Those Who Have Fought to Preserve It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

If you are a real fan of this bird, I've got a couple of good book recommendations: (1) Sled Driver, by Brian Shul. Stunning, awe-inspiring photographs. (2) SR-71 Revealed, by Richard Graham. Graham is a retired Air Force Col. who flew the sled and commanded a squadron. Lots of insider info on getting picked to fly the sled, training, and operations.


13 posted on 02/05/2005 3:27:56 PM PST by spower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck

Let's say we develop an aircraft, say, star wars movie type stuff. What would be the outcome. Will we be able to go forward or backward in time? It's an intriguing topic.


14 posted on 02/05/2005 3:29:11 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Here's my 'pondering' - They retired this plane years ago. What did they replace it with?

Aurora, anyone?


BTW, saw one in the air museum last year on vacation in Utah. Earlier saw the minuteman missile display in South Dakota. Also Golden Spike and Thiakol(?) rocket display. Quite the trip.

15 posted on 02/05/2005 3:29:45 PM PST by T. P. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

Astronauts don't sustainably go forward or backward in time. They maintain the earth's rotation speed.


16 posted on 02/05/2005 3:30:43 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
"This aircraft broke all kinds of international speed and altitude records which still have not been beaten today. "

Cept for its replacement, satellites. And its predator, missiles.

17 posted on 02/05/2005 3:30:54 PM PST by bayourod (Unless we get over 40% of the Hispanic vote in 2008, President Hillary will take all your guns away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spower

Thanks, I was really fascinated by the presentation. I'll look up your recomendations.


18 posted on 02/05/2005 3:31:40 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Like I asked, over a sustainable period of time, say weeks or months, what would happen?

Google "International Dateline" .....

19 posted on 02/05/2005 3:32:09 PM PST by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Here's the question, this plane was so fast, it was faster than the earth's rotation. What would happen with time over a long sustainable period of flying time? If it goes faster than the earth's rotation long enough, will it be ahead of time when it lands, or likewise in the opposite direction, will it go back in time. Do you think Einstein has an answer? Saturday night ponderings.

:rolleyes:

20 posted on 02/05/2005 3:32:33 PM PST by delacoert (imperat animus corpori, et paretur statim: imperat animus sibi, et resistitur. -AUGUSTINI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-347 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson