Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blue states buzz over secession
Washington Times ^ | 11/09/04 | Joseph Curl

Posted on 11/08/2004 11:00:51 PM PST by kattracks

Secession, which didn't work very well when it was tried once before, is suddenly red hot in the blue states. In certain precincts, anyway.
     One popular map circulating on the Internet shows the 19 blue states won by Sen. John Kerry — Washington, Oregon, California, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois, Maryland and the Northeastern states — conjoined with Canada to form the "United States of Canada." The 31 red states carried by Mr. Bush are depicted as a separate nation dubbed "Jesusland." The idea isn't just a joke; one top Democrat says, "The segment of the country that pays for the federal government is now being governed by the people who don't pay for the federal government."
     "Some would say, 'Oh, poor Alabama. It's cut off from the wealth infusion that it gets from New York and California,' " said Lawrence O'Donnell, a veteran Democratic insider and now senior political analyst at MSNBC. "But the more this political condition goes on at the presidential level of the red and blue states, the more you're testing the inclination of the blue states to say, 'So what?' "
     Mr. O'Donnell raised the subject of secession on "The McLaughlin Group" during the weekend. "Ninety percent of the red states are welfare-client states of the federal government," said Mr. O'Donnell, who was an aide to Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan.


(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bluestates; bushwins; civilwar; civilwar2; civilwarii; cluelessness; commieseperatists; democratinsanity; dramaqueens; federalcrime; jesusland; kerrydefeat; redstates; representation; secession; sedition; separatists; traitors; traitorslose; welfare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-194 next last
To: risk

Sounds like liberals are, in fact, racists. Why wouldn't they want to align with Mexico? Why is it just Canada? I'll tell you why, cause they're racists and don't feel like Mexico is good enough with them.

Consider that...


21 posted on 11/08/2004 11:10:01 PM PST by WKUHilltopper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
It's time to part company-Walter Williams
22 posted on 11/08/2004 11:10:06 PM PST by AdamSelene235
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Don't be embarrassed--if we didn't have a few red state people in the blue states we would have no chance of the blue states changing to red states. Hang in there.


23 posted on 11/08/2004 11:10:34 PM PST by beaversmom (The greatness of a man is measured by the fatness of his wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

This is the predictably infantile, anti-intelliectual response from the Dems. Much like the precocious five year old who throws a hissy-fit after losing at a party game and stomps home, with this insanity they further cement their image to the rest of the country as spoiled, non-introspective brats who look to the Quebec secessionist movement for inspiration as the best way to run a nation. My hope is that they keep on with this for the next four years, as it will allow the Republicans to coast to an easy, nearly-uncontested victory.


24 posted on 11/08/2004 11:11:51 PM PST by Stoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa
Your tagline:
(At CBS - "We don't just report news - we make it - up.")

CBS: We report -- you deride

CBS: We get our news from reliable White Horse Souses.

CBS: Keeping you (mis)informed!

25 posted on 11/08/2004 11:11:55 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
As a Californian, I say no thanks. On the county map a great deal of this large state is not blue. We could just annex the coastline.

I'm with you! Instead of electoral votes, change it to acreage, land mass. Ha, then we can have a new coast.

26 posted on 11/08/2004 11:12:10 PM PST by CAluvdubya (From the RED part of California)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet

The Blue state people really have a false sense of exaltedness. None of them seem to realize that food and timber come from Red areas. They don't seem to comprehend that Blue area banks loan money to Red area farmers and that Blue area software companies sell their product to Red area businesses. I'm sure none of them realize that Louisiana and Mississippi produce a large amount of the drugs that they want at low-cost, whether they buy them here in a Blue area or in their possible new Canadian homes.


27 posted on 11/08/2004 11:12:53 PM PST by angry elephant (Endangered species in Seattle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Some would say, 'Oh, poor Alabama. It's cut off from the wealth infusion that it gets from New York and California,' " said Lawrence O'Donnell, a veteran Democratic insider and now senior political analyst at MSNBC. "But the more this political condition goes on at the presidential level of the red and blue states, the more you're testing the inclination of the blue states to say, 'So what?' "

Well, we've tried cutting their taxes, but their Senators voted it down.

The notion of a wealth transfer from blue to red is because when the Federal Government makes purchases, it must do so in places that actually produce something tangible (that certainly wouldn't be NY, NJ, CT, VT, HI, DC, MD, or MA), while defense activites are credited to those states that host military bases - mostly red states. On the other hand, lots of corporations are incorporated in DE and NY, so they get credit for corporate taxes not really earned there. And the choice of large numbers of wealthy people to live in NY, LA, SF, BOS, CHI, NJ, and CT is the other reason they pay an excess of taxes, not because they are more productive.

28 posted on 11/08/2004 11:13:22 PM PST by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

"In a telephone interview, Mr. O'Donnell said the red states that went to Mr. Bush "collect more from the federal government than they send in. New York and California, Connecticut — the states that are blue are all the states that are paying for the bulk of everything this government does, from ... Social Security to everything else, and the people in those states don't like what this government is doing."

If the blue states would keep their old people this wouldn't be the case.


29 posted on 11/08/2004 11:13:37 PM PST by Razz Barry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet

Oh, it was. 11,000 vote margin. Massive dem/527 voter registration drives with tons of stories of wrongdoing. 5,600 invalid addresses in the city of milwaukee. No ID requirement to vote. Same day registration. Lax absentee ballot standards.

If GWB didn't tap tommy thompson for HHS, he would have been governor to sign the voter ID bill, and GWB would have won wisconsin as well. Luckily that mistake didn't cost him the election.


30 posted on 11/08/2004 11:14:31 PM PST by flashbunny (Every thought that enters my head requires its own vanity thread.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Assuming they could actually pull of this utterly laughable idea, how would they defend themselves? The Great Pink Fleet? The Army of Homeless Dopers? The UN? King Kofi the Kleptocrat? The Coalition of the Fabulous (to borrow a Coulterism)?

Wow! These folks' cheese has done sild off their collective cracker!


31 posted on 11/08/2004 11:14:41 PM PST by Bogolyubski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Who's up for a Sherman-style march on NYC, San Fran, etc??


32 posted on 11/08/2004 11:15:29 PM PST by AdamSelene235
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Porterville

Bring it on!! I know one well armed Red county in Washington State that will defend itself. Top NW most piece of the State. Of course, Bangor Nuke Subs and Fort Lewis might give us a hand.

Gawd the clowns are fools!!


33 posted on 11/08/2004 11:15:31 PM PST by Gator113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

"The segment of the country that pays for the federal government is now being governed by the people who don't pay for the federal government."

I so confused. I thought that the Republicans were the party of the rich. Now I hear that we are the party of the poor?


34 posted on 11/08/2004 11:18:05 PM PST by RtWngr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

The only buzzing Ive heard in this blue state (WI) is the crunching of numbers as we try to figure out how much it will cost to rent enough U-Hauls to move Madison to Canada.


35 posted on 11/08/2004 11:18:42 PM PST by gnarledmaw (I traded freedom for security and all I got were these damned shackles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01
The city/state of Philadelphia, indeed!

Watch it!

We in the Great Northeast of Philadelphia have been trying for 25 years to leave the city. Our precincts up here bleed red, but we are overwhelmed by the inner city blue from the black block vote. We have 25% of the population, but pay 50% of the taxes, while receiving 10% of the common government services like police, roads, parks, etc.

If you are going to lop off Philadelphia, please let us lop ourselves off from the city first.

36 posted on 11/08/2004 11:19:09 PM PST by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Gator113
I think O'Donnel finally realized that a north eastern liberal will never win an election in this country again.
37 posted on 11/08/2004 11:21:46 PM PST by lulo_08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

LOL Go for it Blue States. IT will be a pleasure to live in a land devoid of your influence.


38 posted on 11/08/2004 11:26:16 PM PST by ETERNAL WARMING (He is faithful!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Funny, really funny.

Secession implies the ability to force one's views upon others. I suppose that the new Secession will entail nuclear suicide taxi cabs from New York backed by phalanxes of low-rider chevvys from LA.

Of course, there will be the subterfuge of poisoned latte from Seattle, the poison for which will be supplied by the newly-elected Marion Berry.
39 posted on 11/08/2004 11:26:56 PM PST by UMFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01
"And, if they want to secede on that basis, they'll be getting almost all of the problems...and almost none of the solutions.

The city/state of Philadelphia, indeed!"

Philadelphia & Pittsburgh are BLUE areas of Pennsylvania, as I'm sure you know. Hey, let em go -- as a Pennsylvanian, I for one certainly wouldn't mind since they're such a drag on the state. We could significantly reduce the state's taxes, and those urban areas could then be self sustaining. The more we talk about succession the MORE I like it.
40 posted on 11/08/2004 11:27:26 PM PST by Rabble (John sKerry: Betraying America and it's Military for 33 Years...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-194 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson