Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WSJ: The Bush Mandate
Wall Street Journal ^ | November 4, 2004 | Editorial

Posted on 11/04/2004 5:21:31 AM PST by OESY

...The huge voter turnout of some 120 million -- the largest as a share of the electorate since 1968 -- adds to the mandate because it means the country was fully engaged in this national debate. No one can say he didn't know what was at stake. The President's opposition went all-in, as they say in poker, with the most relentlessly partisan performance by elite cultural institutions that we've ever witnessed. Hollywood, CBS, and the New York Times threw everything they had at Mr. Bush, and the country rejected their values and agenda, not his.

We trust that the President will not now let those same opponents interpret his mandate for him. The effort is already under way to diminish the victory by insisting that Mr. Bush "move to the center," which is code for giving up the agenda that voters just endorsed. The country remains "deeply divided," we are told, so Mr. Bush is obliged to make concessions to Nancy Pelosi and George Soros.

Yet it wasn't Mr. Bush but Senate Democrats whose obstructionism was repudiated on Tuesday. South Dakota voters rejected Tom Daschle expressly on the grounds that he had made the Senate a "dead zone," as we once put it, for the Bush agenda. Mr. Daschle responded by saying he could bring more pork back home, but by blocking so much legislation he undercut his own credibility as a politician who could deliver. The men who really defeated Tom Daschle were Ted Kennedy, Chuck Schumer and the Filibuster Democrats, who also have other issues....

Mr. Bush could send an early message here if Chief Justice William Rehnquist decides to retire soon due to illness. He could do worse than elevate Antonin Scalia to Chief Justice and nominate Miguel Estrada as an Associate Justice....

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa; US: Michigan; US: Ohio; US: Oregon; US: Pennsylvania; US: South Dakota
KEYWORDS: bush; bushvictory; catholics; cbs; daschle; estrada; filibuster; hispanics; hollywood; iraq; jews; kennedy; mandate; newyorktimes; pelosi; rehnquist; saddam; scalia; schumer; soros; un
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 11/04/2004 5:21:31 AM PST by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OESY

I have not heard a figure yet of voter turnout (% of eligable)


2 posted on 11/04/2004 5:24:37 AM PST by Mr. K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

Miguel Estrada is an excellent choice.


3 posted on 11/04/2004 5:25:35 AM PST by sarasotarepublican (Politicians are like diapers. They both need changing regularly and for the same reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY; leadpencil1

Sweet.

All this time, I thought it was The Hartford Courant's backing of the President that put Bush over the top.


4 posted on 11/04/2004 5:27:26 AM PST by LurkedLongEnough (Mandates are wonderful when they're your ideals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

Bush has already moved too much to the center (RX program, federal school funding, etc.). He needs to stay where he is. If he moves much more to the center, somebody is going to come in and ambush the GOP from the right, like Perot did to his Dad.


5 posted on 11/04/2004 5:27:42 AM PST by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
Just so the Hollywood elite feel better, I want them to know that the President didn't campaign from the right; he campaigned from the center. I would have preferred far more mention of moral values than happened, but I'll settle for a piece of pie rather than no pie at all.

He has no "center" to move to. He's already there.

Let me suggest that they are Leninist Left, and that they need to move to the center....not to mention moving back to reality.

6 posted on 11/04/2004 5:28:16 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proudly Supporting BUSH/CHENEY 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
Senate Democrats whose obstructionism was repudiated on Tuesday

Exactly! No more "We can't be effective because Republicans ate my ballot" stories.

There are huge issues facing this country in addition to the war on terror. Education, social security reform, etc. The American people have clearly given the reins to Bush.

7 posted on 11/04/2004 5:28:47 AM PST by GVnana (If I had a Buckhead moment would I know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
Mr. Bush could send an early message here if Chief Justice William Rehnquist decides to retire soon due to illness. He could do worse than elevate Antonin Scalia to Chief Justice and nominate Miguel Estrada as an Associate Justice....

The WSJ often writes what I'm thinking, in a much more articulate manner. ;-)

8 posted on 11/04/2004 5:29:34 AM PST by handy (Forgive me this day, my daily typos...The Truth is not a Smear!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
"the most relentlessly partisan performance by elite cultural institutions that we've ever witnessed."

This had to be one of the sweetest treats in the smorgasbord of victory; showing a bunch of idiot rich actors and media elite just how little anyone with an IQ above room temperature really cares what they think.
9 posted on 11/04/2004 5:29:41 AM PST by CrazyIvan (What's the difference between Joseph Goebbels and Michael Moore? About 150 pounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

"Hollywood, CBS, and the New York Times threw everything they had at Mr. Bush, and the country rejected their values and agenda, not his."

So true.


10 posted on 11/04/2004 5:31:11 AM PST by Max Combined (I gave back, I can't remember, six, seven, eight, nine...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins; OESY

Bump


11 posted on 11/04/2004 5:34:12 AM PST by SpookBrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: OESY
WSJ editorial writers, right as usual. Do listen up, President Bush!

Dan
Biblical Christianity web site
Biblical Christianity message board

12 posted on 11/04/2004 5:34:31 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
The President's opposition went all-in, as they say in poker, with the most relentlessly partisan performance by elite cultural institutions that we've ever witnessed. Hollywood, CBS, and the New York Times threw everything they had at Mr. Bush, and the country rejected their values and agenda, not his.

Exactly. Remember when they lost last time, McAwfull's mantra was, "we didn't get our message out". Well, no mistaking what your message was this time. And it was TOTALLY REJECTED.

13 posted on 11/04/2004 5:34:40 AM PST by machman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libertina; glock rocks; backhoe; RadioAstronomer; PsyOp; BluesDuke; PoisedWoman

http://www.fair.org/media-contact-list.html

Link to contact emails for the WEEPING mainstream media to blow them a raspberry for failing to deceive 51% of the population...I'm sending the pic of the Casket of Kerry's campaign with Rather as head pallbearer. Beats Doin laundry!!!


14 posted on 11/04/2004 5:35:30 AM PST by sleavelessinseattle (I need help, why is being a democrat supporting Clintoon's reign NOT a fatal character flaw?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: OESY
. . . it means the country was fully engaged in this national debate. No one can say he didn't know what was at stake

So true.  The MSM and especially the leftist broadcast pundits, ranted and raved and lamented over a lack of debate and challenge over the war on terror--meaning our intervention in Iraq and Afghanistan.  Well, we certainly had it with Kerry.

15 posted on 11/04/2004 5:36:20 AM PST by Racehorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
"Hollywood, CBS, and the New York Times threw everything they had at Mr. Bush, and the country rejected their values and agenda, not his."

It was TOTAL MOBILIZATION of Conservative, Freeper, and Republican Ground Forces.

16 posted on 11/04/2004 5:36:58 AM PST by agincourt1415 (OK, Democrats ITS OVER, GET OVER IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

W is not the sort of guy, I don't think, who will let George Soros or Nancy Pelosi set his agenda for him. That's why they despise him to begin with. They're b*tches, he's a man.


17 posted on 11/04/2004 5:40:17 AM PST by the invisib1e hand (do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

Sweet...Loved the slam to cbs and nyt!!!


18 posted on 11/04/2004 5:41:49 AM PST by Woogit (IN GOD I TRUST...NO MATTER WHAT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

There were 129 million elegible voters I heard. So if 120 million turned out, That's a good turn out.

MSM as usual, is trying to downplay it. Bush has a landslide victory, but you just don't hear it in MSM. He's got a solid mandate.

It's time MSM starts redeeming itself and start telling people the truth. We will continue to do it.


19 posted on 11/04/2004 5:44:55 AM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OESY

and of course who was the first one to open up her big mouth..

We don't accept his health plan..
Pelosi.. witch


20 posted on 11/04/2004 5:48:08 AM PST by The Mayor (The fires of life will not destroy you if you're watered by the River of Life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson