Landslide!!
Posted on 10/30/2004 6:18:41 PM PDT by ambrose
New Mason-Dixon polls just released: FL+4; OH:+2; WV:+8; MN:+1; NM:+5; IA:5; AR:+8; NV:+6
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6363705/
This confirms they're new polls.
I'm still sticking with my +4 prediction by Tuesday.
You know these Right Track/Wrong Track polls are misleading.
I give Bush an A+ as President..but I think the nation is on a HUGE WRONG track. I think our media is on the WRONG track. I think our nations Morals are on the WRONG track. I think the size of Government is on the WRONG track. I think lots of things are on the wrong track..but that is our nation as a whole and independent of the job Bush is doing.
Does that make any sense?
Bottom line is we can't rest! We have to get the vote out! It has to be a big enough win to drive a stake through the ratz heart.
Like they have one...
prisoner6
I'll take any number between 270 and 538 but I'd much prefer somthing closer to 538!
I count Dubya having 300 electoral votes based on electoral-vote.com overlaid with these results.
The Mason-Dixon Minnesota Poll was conducted by Mason-Dixon Polling & Research, Inc. of Washington, D.C. from October 27 through October 29, 2004. A total of 625 registered Minnesota voters were interviewed statewide by telephone. All stated they were likely to vote in the November general election.
So who knows at this stage what this data is suppose to represent.......
The Mason-Dixon Minnesota Poll was conducted by Mason-Dixon Polling & Research, Inc. of Washington, D.C. from October 27 through October 29, 2004. A total of 625 registered Minnesota voters were interviewed statewide by telephone. All stated they were likely to vote in the November general election.
We're going to look back on these days and be proud we were a part of it!
Well I've read the story three times and I maybe mi-reading it, but the way I read it is between the 10th and the 18th.
Perhaps I'm over looking something.
I think there is a typo in Mason Dixon's results on Kerry's "neutral" and "unfavorable" ratings in OH. No way the numbers should show such a statistically significant different result from other states.
agreed but wish they had included NJ and Hawaii
Kerry was never going to win Iowa.
What graphic are you talking about? And this disclosure is part of the text: "Mason-Dixon Polling & Research, Inc. of Washington, D.C. conducted these polls from October 15 through October 18, 2004."
I pray to god republicans turn out heavily, even in states W will win. If we lose the popular vote again, but win the election, I fear for the electoral college. People will be demanding to get rid of it or change it.
Yes, if you go to RCP and check the individual states like AR and FL, these numbers have NOT been previously posted as Mason-Dixon results. We haven't seen these numbers before. These are all NEW numbers, and RCP has posted them as such on their front page. The article older date range is wrong and the Oct 26-29 dates must be correct.
That said, this is a set of great state numbers, including winning in the majors FL and OH. The ones we're losing are just within a point or two, showing how close these Blue states are to tipping over.
I have to assume they were done Oct 27 to 29th. Mason Dixon did polls last week. Why would MSNBC post polls from two weeks ago?
The Oct 15th to 18th must be a misprint.
I sure hope these are the most recent polls.
I'm not sure I'd say America is on the right track because of the moral decline, but that has nothing to do with amazing job the President's doing in trying to turn it around.
I think the whole thing is misleading.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.