Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EARLY PEEK AT POLL RESULTS
Kerry Spot/NRO ^ | 9/27/04 | jim geraghty

Posted on 09/27/2004 11:45:04 AM PDT by Cableguy

Just talked to a senior Republican in Washington. The USA Today/CNN/Gallup poll should be out shortly - Bush up 53-42 among registered, 52-44 among likely voters.

UPDATE: This source doesn't know about the ABC/Washington Post poll that is supposed to be out later today. Overall thoughts from this GOP source: Most of non-public polls are showing Bush up five or six points. He is telling every Bush supporter who will listen not to get complacent - this lead could shrink quickly, although he is reassured that once you throw out most of the odd outliers (Bush up a lot, or Kerry up a bit) the lead has been pretty steady since the convention. Still, he adds, Bush campaign knows "to campaign like they're five points down."


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cnn; gallup; kewl; poll; polls; usatoday
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-196 next last
To: Rutles4Ever
Oh you can bet Jeb knows what chicanery lies ahead. He knows how the Dems tried to steal the election in 2000.
61 posted on 09/27/2004 12:03:53 PM PDT by rintense (Results matter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
At any rate, DUmmies are ripping violin music in droves....

Kerry's new drinking song (you all saw the photo of Macho Man in the bar):

We had joy, we had fun,
We had seasons in the sun
But the stars we could reach
Were just starfish on the beach.

We had joy, we had fun,
We had seasons in the sun
My campaign, I did find
Was just windmills in my mind.

62 posted on 09/27/2004 12:04:04 PM PDT by Ciexyz ("FR, best viewed with a budgie on hand")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cableguy

Bush continues to poll in the low 50s while Kerry polls in the low to mid 40s. Good! This poll result is a slight tightening from the 54-40 result last time, but that last poll seemed to be a bit of an outlier anyway. 52-44 is more in line with most other national polls.


63 posted on 09/27/2004 12:04:13 PM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

McGovern 38.2% in 1972. Don't know how Mondale did, but I think he was above 40%.


64 posted on 09/27/2004 12:04:13 PM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny; All

I said somewhere in a different post that Bush will win all but 10 or 11 states. Right now he is well within the margin or in striking range of all but 10 states.


65 posted on 09/27/2004 12:05:10 PM PDT by Heff ("Liberty is not America's gift to the world, it's the Almighty's gift to humanity" GW Bush 4/12/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jdm
I'm going to have to do some research to find out when the last time a Presidential candidate secured less than 40% of the vote. Kerry will not score even 40% -- that's my prediction, anyway.

1972.

66 posted on 09/27/2004 12:05:28 PM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: WildTurkey
One would think that he would be smart enough to know that appealing to the MAC crowd will not be worth many votes.

Smart Mac Users vote Republican!

Well Smart People vote Republican too I guess. Its really non exclusive in this sense. heh
67 posted on 09/27/2004 12:06:20 PM PDT by NYURepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
That's why I'm questioning the numbers. If this is true, this is a shift, because I don't recall any "likely-voters" polling data that shrunk the spread for the President before this.

If true, it would suggest that Kerry's Iraq attacks have been successful in turning his depressed supporters who weren't going to vote into "likely voters", but has done little to win over independents. We shall see.

68 posted on 09/27/2004 12:06:29 PM PDT by ambrose (http://www.swiftvets.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Bush 41 in 1992 at 38% assuming you mean D and R candidates only.


69 posted on 09/27/2004 12:07:41 PM PDT by RockinRight (W stands for whoop-a**!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Keith

Oops, forgot about that one. Before Bush 41, there was McGovern in 1972. 1972 was certainly the last time that the winner had over 60 percent of the vote. Clinton got only 43% in 1992.


70 posted on 09/27/2004 12:07:49 PM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Kylie_04

Yeah, but there's also Maine, Oregon, New Jersey, Iowa, Minnesota and Wisconsin. The dike is getting more leaks than the Dims have fingers!


71 posted on 09/27/2004 12:08:05 PM PDT by Sooth2222
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

We need to know the precentage of deceased voters who intend to vote before I know Kerry's probable tally.


72 posted on 09/27/2004 12:09:16 PM PDT by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

Thread Bump!!! There have been multiple instances of this phenomenon this election, still wondering if anyone has any instances of this from the 2000 election?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1226896/posts


73 posted on 09/27/2004 12:10:12 PM PDT by bcatwilly (West Virginia is BUSH-Cheney Country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Well, I hate to be a spoil-sport, but this does in fact represent a 6 point drop among likely voters over the past 10 days. Bush similarly dropped 4 to 5 points in the Time poll.

I look at it like this: several weeks ago the Bush camp said it looked like they were 6 points up. McCurry said at a DNC fundraiser in CA a week and a half ago that their polls had Bush up 7 points. All the major polls now pretty much validate this.

74 posted on 09/27/2004 12:10:32 PM PDT by Tennessean4Bush (An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds, a pessimist fears this is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: spodefly

Rush mentioned today that Kerry had a lead of 5% of dead voters. Not sure of the source.


75 posted on 09/27/2004 12:10:37 PM PDT by JTHomes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: jdm

GWHB scored 37%


76 posted on 09/27/2004 12:11:49 PM PDT by Tennessean4Bush (An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds, a pessimist fears this is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
When was the last time a candidate came from behind on account of the debates? I'm hard pressed to think of a single instance except for the 1960 Kennedy/Nixon debates.

Actually, this is a myth. Kennedy and Nixon were tied going into the debate, Kennedy got a three point bump, but had lost it again by election day (the election essentially ended in a tie.

The only election that was materially affected by a debate was 1980. Carter had actually led Reagan going into that debate, but there was a massive shift immediately following the debate that continued to Election Day. If you actually crunch the pre-and post-debate poll numbers, there is simply no hard evidence -- again leaving aside the 1980 election -- that they were materially affected by debates.

77 posted on 09/27/2004 12:12:10 PM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Worrying is a useless and counterproductive emotion.

Counterproducers of the world, unite! Make the debates one big worryfest. (yeah, i'm worried too;hope he doesn't project poorly)

78 posted on 09/27/2004 12:12:14 PM PDT by philomath (from the state of franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak
I've been waiting for some polls this week since Kerry's new stance on Iraq last week......sorry Kerry, it didn't work.

Add to that: I've been waiting for hanoi john to do the honorable thing, ala Bob Dole, and resign his Senate seat.

79 posted on 09/27/2004 12:12:24 PM PDT by AxelPaulsenJr (Excellence In Posting Since 1999)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jdm
I'm going to have to do some research to find out when the last time a Presidential candidate secured less than 40% of the vote.

You should focus on elections where there was no major third-party candidate, since George H.W. Bush received only about 37% of the popular vote in 1992.

80 posted on 09/27/2004 12:13:19 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (I made enough money to buy Miami -- but I pissed it away on the Alternative Minimum Tax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-196 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson