Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It's Edwards
NBC | NBC

Posted on 07/06/2004 4:33:22 AM PDT by djf

NBC breaking says for sure it's Edwards for veep


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: 2004; alittledablldooya; ambulance; breck; chaser; edwards; handmemycomb; heezpurty; kerry; ketchup; northcarolina; oldnorthstate; prettyboy; southernfriedham; veep
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860861-880881-900 ... 1,001-1,018 next last
To: gathersnomoss
This breaking story is about as alluring as the campfire scene in Blazing Saddles.

Sounds like a new WB sitcom: "Lurch & The Kid."

861 posted on 07/06/2004 9:02:25 AM PDT by mhking (John Kerry & Al Gore: Cut from the same tree.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 668 | View Replies]

To: djf

IMHO Evan Bayh saw this as a losing year and bowed out. Hillary knows the same and will actively work behind the scenes, along with Bubba, to make sure Kerry/Edwards lose. Then with 4 more years of W, they will attempt to create not just hatred of Republicans but irrational hatred. Oh, I forgot, we're already there.

As far as Edwards goes, he's a one-trick pony (Two Americas yada-yada-yada) who only entered the race to be the VP pick. A one-term Senator and a lawyer is not going to win over alot of independents. The VP-candidate cannot obscure the obvious - the total lack of conviction and charisma that is at the head of the ticket - John Effin Kerry!




862 posted on 07/06/2004 9:04:05 AM PDT by torchthemummy (Florida 2000: There Would Have Been No 5-4 Without A 7-2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

How could he not be prepared?

Most boring choice EVER.

Seriously, I was gambling that all three 'finalists' were just misdirection plays. Ends up, Kerry's too boring to do something interesting.

Oh well, it's fine with me. For a second, I was worried he was going to pick Sam Nunn or Bob Graham. I'd be more worried about both of those.


863 posted on 07/06/2004 9:07:31 AM PDT by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: torchthemummy

Lots of people have been saying Edwards would never have gotten the nod without Hill's blessings.

If that's true, she must have a dump truck load full of dirt on the guy.


864 posted on 07/06/2004 9:08:29 AM PDT by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 862 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
I'm new to Iowa, but there are a few things I know: (1) Viltax isn't particularly popular, although I felt the flattery factor would have carried Iowa into the Kerry/Vilsack camp. (2) Iowa and Minnesota have that midwestern view of politics where they hate confrontation. (I think the only thing that killed Dean in Iowa was berating that questioner "Now you listen to me!" That was enough.) Bush/Cheney will not be on the attack. (3) On the other hand, Iowans tend to be isolationist and pacifist. The polls showed Kerry ahead by 3 but showed Kerry/Vilsack behind by 3.

I think Iowa is a little more liberal than the rest of the country in its presidential voting patterns. I give Kerry a +2% handicap in Iowa. That is, if Kerry and Bush get the same number of popular votes in the election, Iowa will go to Kerry. If the race is 49-49 in the country, Iowa will go 51-47 for Kerry. Ballot access is pretty easy in Iowa, so I expect Nader to get on the ballot. It's not much of an answer, it depends on so many things, but I think if Bush gets 52% of the popular vote, the dominoes of IA, MN, OR, WI and maybe PA will fall too. Maybe even NJ, which is going to be weird this year after 9/11.

The key this year is Ohio. I even heard that Edwards had a vote that went against Nevada. The only Bush states Kerry has a hope of picking up are FL, OH, NV and NH. Florida is out. He's focusing on Ohio, because he also has to keep the rust belt -- a problem for him. So he's running a strategy to help him win WI, MI, OH, PA. That's it. That's the list.

865 posted on 07/06/2004 9:08:41 AM PDT by AmishDude ("Another John-John going down in flames!" -- I was ashamed of this before I was proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 828 | View Replies]

To: chris1

We all know that GWB has fire in his belly. Right now, it is on a somewhat slow smolder, perhaps. But the president's enemies (foreign and domestic) have been throwing water on that fire unrelentingly in hopes of extinguishing it. I don't believe that fire will ever be put out, and by faith, I believe the fire in his belly will get really hot before this election cycle is over and he is reelected. Can't wait.


866 posted on 07/06/2004 9:09:14 AM PDT by ride the whirlwind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 847 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

"John and John"

aka. John-John. Another attempt to channel the spirit of JFK. I wouldn't be surprised if Cheney had met JFK and therefore could use that classic Lloyd Benson line. If Cheney had not met him, I'm sure he could say his good friend (blank) had and was a friend of JFK and you, sir, are no JFK.


867 posted on 07/06/2004 9:09:48 AM PDT by torchthemummy (Florida 2000: There Would Have Been No 5-4 Without A 7-2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: torchthemummy

Check the tasteless tagline.


868 posted on 07/06/2004 9:12:50 AM PDT by AmishDude ("Another John-John going down in flames!" -- I was ashamed of this before I was proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 867 | View Replies]

To: djf
in an attempt to recall the days of Camelot, the democrats are knicknaming this campaign "John-John."

i know i am late so i apologize to anyone who already said this.

869 posted on 07/06/2004 9:13:27 AM PDT by thefactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: torchthemummy

ugh. you JUST got me.


870 posted on 07/06/2004 9:14:11 AM PDT by thefactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 867 | View Replies]

To: djf

"Lots of people have been saying Edwards would never have gotten the nod without Hill's blessings.

If that's true, she must have a dump truck load full of dirt on the guy."

I have to admit that before Clark, Edwards was the candidate that Clinton had seemed to support but that could have been all smoke and mirrors.


871 posted on 07/06/2004 9:14:38 AM PDT by torchthemummy (Florida 2000: There Would Have Been No 5-4 Without A 7-2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 864 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

AH! you too!


872 posted on 07/06/2004 9:14:49 AM PDT by thefactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 868 | View Replies]

To: All
One thing to keep in mind, if Chillary is not on the ticket it's because she didn't want to be. Not to want be on the f'ing ticket means her sources tell her f'ing and the slick lawyer will loose.I think they are right.
873 posted on 07/06/2004 9:15:25 AM PDT by keysguy (Trust the media as far as you can throw them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 861 | View Replies]

To: djf

I'm surprised. I was sure that Kerry wouldn't pick anyone prettier or smarter than he was.


874 posted on 07/06/2004 9:16:44 AM PDT by Ciexyz ("FR, best viewed with a budgie on hand")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thefactor

"in an attempt to recall the days of Camelot, the democrats are knicknaming this campaign "John-John."

i know i am late so i apologize to anyone who already said this."

No sweat. I just woke up and I had to put in my two-cents right away before I read the 868 other posts. So I may be guilty of redundancy myself.


875 posted on 07/06/2004 9:17:17 AM PDT by torchthemummy (Florida 2000: There Would Have Been No 5-4 Without A 7-2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 870 | View Replies]

To: djf

876 posted on 07/06/2004 9:17:35 AM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

"("Another John-John going down in flames!" -- I was ashamed of this before I was proud of it.)"

Hey, that's fuuuuNY!


877 posted on 07/06/2004 9:18:50 AM PDT by torchthemummy (Florida 2000: There Would Have Been No 5-4 Without A 7-2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 868 | View Replies]

To: GRRRRR
"historic announcment", says Fox...because why???

First time we've had a "gigolo" and an "ambulance chaser" as candidates for P&VP?

878 posted on 07/06/2004 9:19:00 AM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Face it. You're just not nuanced enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw

I know Fox News has to be fair and balanced about this, but I had to turn them off. It's all Edwards this morning....one Demopuke even saying that "this country has a president who's a failed oilman and a cheat and those are his only accomplishments" (words to that effect). I can't stand the Dem lies and distortions. It's like they're all Michael Moore, there's no sanity in this fight with their spurious allegations.


879 posted on 07/06/2004 9:19:19 AM PDT by Ciexyz ("FR, best viewed with a budgie on hand")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

You hit the nail on the head.


880 posted on 07/06/2004 9:21:03 AM PDT by My Favorite Headache (Rush 30th Anniversary Tour Tickets On Sale Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860861-880881-900 ... 1,001-1,018 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson