Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arabs Once Dominated Science
KSHB ^ | April 13, 2004 | Michael Woods

Posted on 04/19/2004 8:59:15 AM PDT by me_newswire

The Decline of Islamic Science, the Rise of Extremism

The United Nations Development Program, in a report published last year, described in often painful detail some of the factors that have contributed to the decline of science and the rise of extremism in Arab societies. Among them are:

Increases in average income have been lower in the Arab world than anywhere else for 20 years, except for the poorest African countries. "If such trends continue...it will take the average Arab citizen 140 years to double his or her income, whole other regions are set to achieve that level in a matter of less than 10 years," the report noted. One in 5 Arabs lives on less than $2 a day.

--- Arab unemployment is the highest in the developing world.

--- Surveys show more than half of young Arabs want to leave their countries
     and live in the United States or other industrialized countries where opportunities are better.

--- The Arab brain drain is the world's worst, with about 25 percent of new graduates
     in science, medicine and engineering emigrating each year.

--- About 1 in 4 Arab adults can neither read nor write. This is a particular problem
    among Arab women, 50 per cent of whom are illiterate. Many children do not attend school.

--- The quality of education has declined, with many schools teaching mainly
     interpretations of the Koran, rather than other knowledge or skills.

--- Less than 0.6 per cent of Arabs use the Internet and barely 1.2 percent have access
    to a personal computer. There are 18 computers per 1,000 Arabs, compared to the
    global average of 78.3.

--- During the entire 20th century, fewer than 10,000 books were translated into Arabic --
    equivalent to the number translated into Spanish in a single year. Religious books
    account for 17 per cent of new publications in Arab countries, compared to a world
    average of 5 per cent.

--- Censorship stifles ideas, information and innovation. Numerous censors review book
     manuscripts, each with the power to edit text or demand revisions.

___________________________________

Islamic medicine and science led the world for centuries
while Europe stagnated in the Dark Ages.

From 800 AD to 1500, Arabic was the language of science, as English is today. Muslims occupied Spain, and Europeans flocked to Toledo and other Spanish cities, or traveled great distances to Baghdad or Damascus, to translate Islamic science and medical books into Latin.

Islamic medicine in the year 1000 was a marvel of sophistication, featuring competency tests for doctors, drug purity regulations, hospitals staffed by nurses and interns, advanced surgeries, and other practices beyond the dreams of medieval Europeans.

So why is much of today's Islamic world a "scientific desert," to use the stark language of a 2002 article in the journal Nature? Why do many predominantly Muslim countries, home to 1.3 billion people and 75 percent of the world's oil wealth, neglect science and technology? And how might they recapture their amazing scientific heritage?

These questions have resounded at international, Arab and Islamic scientific conferences and have made headlines in science journals. Here's how the Nature article summed up the situation in the Middle East, for instance:

"The region is, for the most part, a scientific desert. In some states, oil wealth has allowed the construction of fabulous cities, magnificent mosques and sumptuous shopping malls. But little scientific infrastructure has emerged. Collectively, the Arab nations spend only 0.15 per cent of their gross domestic product on research and development, well below the world average of 1.4 per cent."

Muslims account for 20 percent of the world's population, but less than one percent of its scientists. Scientists in Islamic countries now make barely 0.1 percent of the world's original research discoveries each year.

Authorities on Islamic science cite various reasons for this state of affairs, but the Koran is not among them.

"The Koran actually forms one of the cornerstones of science in Islam in a way unlike any other scripture of any other religion," said Glen M. Cooper, a professor of the history of science and Islam at Brigham Young University.

"The Koran enjoins the believer and the unbeliever alike to examine nature for signs of the creator's handiwork, evidence of his existence, and his goodness," Cooper said. "Reason is revered as one of the most important of God's gifts to men. The examination of nature led historically into a scientific perspective and program."

Farkhonda Hassan, a professor at the University of Cairo who has written about barriers to science careers for Islamic women, agreed.

"The teachings of the Holy Prophet of Islam emphasize the acquiring of knowledge as bounden duties of each Muslim from the cradle to the grave, and that the quest for knowledge and science is obligatory upon every Muslim man and woman," she said. "One eighth -- that is, 750 verses -- of the Koran exhort believers to study, to reflect, and to make the best use of reason in their search for the ultimate truth."

Search they once did.

The rise of Islamic science

After Muhammad's death in 632, Muslim armies swept out of the Arabian Peninsula and expanded the borders of Islam east and west.

They absorbed not just land, but also scientific knowledge from India and Greek learning planted centuries earlier by the armies of Alexander the Great. Muslims translated into Arabic the treasures of Hippocrates, Aristotle, Archimedes and other great physicians, philosophers and scientists.

By 711, the Muslims had reached Spain, and they ended up dominating the region until Catholic monarchs Ferdinand and Isabella drove out the last of them in 1492.

The impact of Islam's discoveries during this period went far beyond individual innovations like algebra or the establishment of models for modern hospitals and universities. The spread of Islamic knowledge to Europe sparked, or at least helped to spark, the Renaissance and scientific revolution of the 17th century.

"It is highly probable that, but for the Arabs, modern European civilization would never have arisen at all," Sir Thomas Arnold and Alfred Guillaume wrote in their 1997 classic, "The Legacy of Islam."

Robert Briffault wrote in the "Making of Humanity" in 1938 that "Spain, not Italy, was the cradle of the rebirth of Europe. After steadily sinking lower and lower into barbarism, it had reached the darkest depths of ignorance and degradation when cities of the Saracenic world, Baghdad, Cairo, Cordoba, and Toledo, were growing centers of civilization and intellectual activity. It was there that the new life arose which was to grow into a new phase of human evolution."

Yet most Americans are completely unaware of Islam's rich scientific heritage, said George Saliba, a professor of Arabic and Islamic science at Columbia University, and more than a dozen other experts interviewed for this article.

"That is unfortunate," Cooper said. "Much of our modern science and philosophy owes a large debt to Islamic civilization during the Middle Ages for preserving the classical heritage in all intellectual fields, and for improving upon it in many of these fields. If the average American understood this, there would be fewer smug citizens looking down on 'backward Muslims' with hate and fear."

Two reasons Americans are relatively clueless on the subject are the Arabic-English language barrier and a long tradition of U.S. historians focusing on European scientific traditions, said Jeffrey Oaks of the University of Indianapolis.

"Anything not taught in high school is going to escape public consciousness," added Thomas F. Glick, an expert on Islamic history at Boston University.

Some historians from mainly Islamic countries see it differently.

"We believe that, for dishonorable purposes, there is in the West an intention to ignore the important scientific role played by Muslim scholars during the medieval age," said Abdul Nasser Kaadan, a professor with the Institute for the History of Arabic Science at the University of Aleppo in Syria. "This is to support the allegation that Muslim and Arabic mentality never in the past and not in the future can lead any scientific research."

Explaining the decline

So what happened to the once glorious scientific legacy of Islam and Arabia? Experts cite many things.

Universities were an Islamic invention later adopted in Europe, but Muslim universities did not shelter and preserve scientific knowledge during wars and other upheavals. Christian warriors carved up the Islamic empire and cut off contact between great scientific centers. Here in Spain, the Catholic reconquest of Ferdinand and Isabella deprived Islamic science of the great libraries and schools in Cordoba, Seville and Toledo.

Conflicts also cut off science's lifeblood -- cash for research and education. And the Ottomans, who took over much of the Islamic world in the early 1500s, used their resources to make war, not science.

In the 1700s, a puritanical form of Islam took root in Saudi Arabia, with a doctrine that rejected knowledge acquired after the first 300 years of Islam's existence.

Several scholars said one problem is the lack of awareness among Arabs and Muslims about their own scientific heritage.

"Muslims generally are unaware that their civilization had a high point of superiority in nearly every aspect," Cooper said. "Their current challenge is to face the fact that the Islamic edge has been completely lost.

"It would be a hard thing, I think, to be part of a religion and culture with such a glorious history as that of Islam, when that glory is all in the distant past, and an essentially godless civilization -- from their perspective -- enjoys the lead in power and science."

Eventually, in the United States and Europe, science began paying some of its own bills. Inventions like the telephone, radio, plastics and antibiotics led industry to pour billions into scientific research. In much of the Arab world, science remained dependent on handouts from sultans, kings or caliphs.

"Science and scientific research can flourish only when a country is affluent and has a sound and balanced economy," said Ahmad Y. al-Hassan, also a faculty member of the Arabic science institute at the University of Aleppo. "But when agriculture is the dominant sector, then a country will remain poor, and when petroleum is the only source of income, then this economy in the long run also is doomed."

Others also cited Arab oil wealth, and how rulers spend and invest their billions.

"They probably would have been better off without their mineral resources," said J. J. Witkam of Leiden University in The Netherlands. "It is a corrupting element in any society. But when societies are so unbalanced as most Islamic countries are, then it gets cancerous proportions."

The United Nations Development Program called oil wealth "a mixed blessing" in a 2003 report that called on Arab countries to reclaim their scientific heritage. It focused on the 22 members of the League of Arab States and their 280 million people.

UNDP pointed out that Arab rulers invest much of their oil money in the United States and other foreign countries, rather than using it to develop their own nations, and import technical know-how instead of educating ample numbers of their own citizens to be scientists and engineers. The report also cited "the pursuit of personal gain, the preference for the private over the public good, social and moral corruption, the absence of honesty and accountability and many other illnesses."

Experts also link the stagnation of Islamic science to a movement that took root more than a century ago that contends all knowledge can be found in the Koran. Meanwhile, the industrialized world has been moving toward a "knowledge society" fueled by information and liberal education.

Signs of rebirth?

The UNDP report also described what's needed to re-energize scientific inquiry in Arab and Islamic societies.

It included relatively straightforward suggestions like spending more on scientific research and ordinary education rather than religious schools. Other recommendations would involve reinventing new systems of government in some countries. One called for "guaranteeing the key freedoms of opinion, speech, and assembly through good governance bounded by law." Some involved correcting tenacious problems like poverty and unemployment.

"Our civilization once supported a knowledge society that was the envy of the world," said Rima Khalaf Hunaidi, a U.N. assistant secretary general who helped prepare the report. "They will do so again if we clear away the defective social, economic and political structures we have piled upon them. We can free our minds to reason without fear; free our people's souls to breathe."

Columbia University's Saliba echoed the need to focus on education.

"What's needed to increase research in Islamic countries?," he asked. "The same thing that is needed in any other country: priority on education, funding, training of teachers, building better relations between school and home, educating the parents, allocating higher budgets for education than for defense -- a situation that is not too different from what we face in this country, as well."

Arab scientists and governments are making some progress.

In 2000, a group of leading scientists formed the Arab Science and Technology Foundation in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates. The emirates are among a handful of Arab countries -- which include Egypt, Pakistan, and Jordan -- that are investing more in science education and research.

Sheikh Sultan Bin Mohammed Al-Qassimi, the ruler of Sharjah, donated $1 million from his own pocket to start the science foundation and provided its $5-million headquarters building. The foundation hopes to raise $100 million so it can provide research grants and encourage Arab scientists in other countries to return home.

The emir of Qatar is backing the Qatar Foundation for Education, Science and Community Development, which is building a vast "Education City" featuring branch campuses of Carnegie Mellon and Cornell universities.

"The pendulum can swing back," wrote Ibrahim B. Syed of the University of Louisville in an article about Islamic medicine:

"One thousand years ago the Muslims were the great torchbearers of international scientific research. Every student and professional from each country outside the Islamic Empire aspired, yearned, and dreamed to go to Islamic universities to learn, to work, to live and to lead a comfortable life in an affluent and most advanced and civilized society.

"Islamic countries have the opportunity and resources to make Islamic science and medicine number one in their world once again."

See current Middle East News links at Mideast Newswire:
www.mideastnewswire.com

____________________________________________________________________



TOPICS: Canada; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; Politics/Elections; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: arab; arabworld; godsgravesglyphs; islam; israel; israeli; jew; koran; middleeastnews; mideastnewswire; muslims; palestinian; religionofpeace; religionofpieces; rightofreturn; science; sharon; suicidebombers; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-125 next last
To: amanda99
That virtually is the only thing that separtes the two religions, and that makes it so different.

That and the lack of "kill the non-believers" in the Bible. Why do you keep avoiding that?

81 posted on 04/22/2004 8:00:56 AM PDT by Shryke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Parmy
Not only was Muhammad not able to read or write, but nobody anywhere wrote down anything about him or Islam for 3 generations after his death, and after Islam had conquered everything from Southern Spain to India. These pirates weren't keen on scholarship.

The Quran was first written down in Baghdad 200 years after Muhammad died.
82 posted on 04/22/2004 8:26:38 AM PDT by OK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Parmy
Not only was Muhammad not able to read or write, but nobody anywhere wrote down anything about him or Islam for 3 generations after his death, and after Islam had conquered everything from Southern Spain to India. These pirates weren't keen on scholarship.

The Quran was first written down in Baghdad 200 years after Muhammad died.
83 posted on 04/22/2004 8:26:48 AM PDT by OK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: me_newswire
I couldn't live over there. It's always so dusty and dirty, and they're always wearing the sandals or goin barefoot. Yuk- I would hate that. I need good footwear.
84 posted on 04/22/2004 8:31:41 AM PDT by petercooper (You'll get nothing and like it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amanda99
Its two different religions, the bible and the koran have many smilarities but distinct differences, like muslims believe jesus isnt the son of god, because god cant have a son. That virtually is the only thing that separtes the two religions, and that makes it so different.

Not really, the Koran says that it is the next line of Holy Books and says that the Bible and the Jewish texts are Holy and True. Well, the story of Ibrahim and ISAAC was held to be true way BEFORE Christianity, about 1000+ years before Christianity, by the Jews. There was NEVER any doubt for 1600+ years that Ibrahim was about to sacrifice his only legitimate son ISAAC. Then Mo comes and says that no, folks had it wrong for 1600 years, it was actually Ishmael. Huh? How can he say that?
85 posted on 04/22/2004 8:34:07 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: amanda99
All the muslims, according to you cronos, and your internet, are only on this earth to kill,

I'm flattered you consider it MY internet (but I'm not Al Gore!), however, all Muslimms who follow the Koran and see the words to go and kill infidels will go out and do that. The Koran is evil because of that reason (among others) and as I showed you with the Isaac story, it can so easily be proven WRONG.
86 posted on 04/22/2004 8:35:54 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: amanda99
Its two different religions, the bible and the koran have many smilarities but distinct differences, like muslims believe jesus isnt the son of god, because god cant have a son. That virtually is the only thing that separtes the two religions, and that makes it so different.

Actually, no, that's not what makes it different. Perhaps you've never read about the CHRISTIAN Monophysite heresy. It started in Egypt and Arabia and tried to state that Christ was not divine. It got proven wrong and died out. However, Mo heard of these stories and then incorporated them into his Arab nationalist theology that he made into a religion.
87 posted on 04/22/2004 8:38:13 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: amanda99
He had marriages, he had kids, he was on this earth to teach people the religion of islam.

Yes, he had marriages, the last of which was to a 7 YEAR OLD GIRL. Mohammmed CONSUMMATED HIS MARRIAGE TO A 9 YEAR OLD AISHA. A 60 year old man sleeping with a 9 year old. Do you call that marriage????? or even normal? And yet you call him your Holy prophet?
88 posted on 04/22/2004 8:42:47 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Made In The USA
LOL.
89 posted on 04/22/2004 8:44:00 AM PDT by Paved Paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OK; amanda99; Parmy
Not only was Muhammad not able to read or write, but nobody anywhere wrote down anything about him or Islam for 3 generations after his death, and after Islam had conquered everything from Southern Spain to India. These pirates weren't keen on scholarship. The Quran was first written down in Baghdad 200 years after Muhammad died.

ANd yet slamics are the first to complain that the Bible and the Talmud are distorted (when the Qumran texts that date from the time of Christ prove that the words have NOT been changed). Since the words of Christ were noted down during and soon after his death, I'd reckon their veracity is more certain than Mo's.
90 posted on 04/22/2004 8:48:26 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: me_newswire
Islame is to blame. But, not to worry Arabs, your religion plans to reduce the rest of the world to level of your society-a society consisting of only the stupid and the dead.
91 posted on 04/22/2004 8:52:30 AM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (John Kerry-decorated Vietnam Vet-decorated as unit Christmas tree for holiday party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amanda99; Parmy; OK; Shryke; ggekko; RightWhale; <1/1,000,000th%; quadrant; Monty22; ...
That virtually is the only thing that separtes the two religions, and that makes it so different.

Any Muslimwho wants to commit violence has perfect justification for doing so from the Quran. Many passages in the Quran exhort Muslims to kill infidels (non-Muslims) wherever they find them. See Suras 2:190-193, 2:216, 4:76, 5:32-36, 8:12-14, 8:39, 8:59, 8:65, 9:5, 9:14, 9:23-29, 9:38-41, 9:123, 47:4, 47:35, 61:4, and 66:9.

Usama bin Laden in the now famous videotape discovered in Afghanistan in late 2001 is quoted as saying, "I was ordered to fight the people until they say there is no god but Allah, and his prophet Muhammad." These words echo language in the Quran itself.

But the Quran is not the only basis for violence in Islam. The example of Muhammad himself laid the foundation for violence via his deeds and commands, which are found in the hadiths. Eleven percent of the pages of the Bukhari Hadiths mention Holy War (jihad). Military jihad is a traditional and authentic part of Islam.

There are two meanings for jihad. One meaning is a personal spiritual aspect to kill sinful desires. It also means to use violence to spread the faith. Muslims are taught that those who fight and die in a jihad have their sins forgiven, and they are rewarded with a sensual and luxurious life in paradise. See Suras 3:157-158, 3:169-171, 3:194-195, 4:74, 4:94-97, 22:58-59, 52:17-23, 56:10-38. Also see Bukhari 4:63, 72, 80, 85, 137, 175, 216, 266. So the killing of non-Muslims offers the religion's highest reward.

Muhammad personally led at least 27 bloody invasions (some say more than 60) and ordered his followers to wage many more. Muhammad assassinated many of his opponents during his lifetime. In his battle against the Quraiza Jews, women and children were sold into slavery, and hundreds of captured men were executed. Even some of his own people were horrified

Fundamentalism: Contrasting Christianity and Islam Fundamentalism Defined Similarities between Christianity and Islam Overall Tone of the Two Religions Treatment of Women The Nature of God The Nature of Man Salvation Heaven The Quran The Hadiths The Bible Jesus and Muhammad Summary and Invitation Recommended Resources and Bibliography Fundamentalism Defined The term fundamentalist has come to be a pejorative term. However, it need not be. Fundamentalism is a synonym for orthodoxy. A religious fundamentalist is one who is faithful to the tenets of his religion. It is common today to profess or practice a religion in ways that are not orthodox. There are, for example, nominal Christians, nominal Muslims, or nominal Jews, etc. They take on the label of the religion, but not the beliefs or practices. They may even attend worship services, but in their own mind reject many of the core beliefs. To get an understanding of Christianity and Islam, we consider irrelevant what Sally and Omar may improvise about their respective religions. Anybody can make up their own religion, for example, by taking from the Bible whatever they want and tearing out the pages they don't want. But this is disingenuous, hypocritical, eternally dangerous— and is probably heretical to whichever religion one claims allegiance. On what basis does one claim to know more about the religion than the founders of the religion themselves? We are interested in exploring here what the source documents say concerning these two major world religions, Christianity and Islam. That is, we will explore and compare the Bible and the Quran (plus the written traditions of Islam). As we compare orthodox (that is fundamental) Christianity and orthodox (fundamental) Islam, we hope to speak to a variety of audiences, including: Those people who sincerely want to learn more about these two religions. Most Christians know very little about Islam (the Muslim religion). Likewise, most Muslims have mistaken ideas about Christianity. Indeed, many people of both faiths do not even know enough about their own religion to validate its truth claims. We also are addressing those people who are under the false belief that all religions are equally valid, or that all religions lead to God. We will clearly show that Christianity and Islam are irreconcilable. Let us say this also at the outset. As noted on the home page of our website http://www.faithfacts.org, our organization is dedicated to exploring God through reason and evidence. Many people, including Christians, Muslims, atheists (or whoever) resist using reason and evidence. "Don't confuse me with the facts!" If you are in this camp, you may be wasting your time—even made uncomfortable—by reading this article. But if you are seriously interested in pursuing truth, the following discussion should be extremely interesting. Truth is discernible. At least, what is not true is discernible. Applying rules of logic, one can show that a truth-claim is not true by identifying arbitrariness or inconsistency in the claim. By using the same techniques as used in a court of law, one can determine truth beyond a reasonable doubt. Such techniques— in addition to using reason and evidence to verify facts— include an evaluation of witnesses (number of witness, motives of witnesses, corroboration of testimony, etc.) These same techniques are used to determine truth-claims in any discipline, including religious truth-claims. We offer detailed references from the Bible, the Quran, and the Bukhari Hadiths so that the interested reader can check the sources himself. We invite you to do so. Hadiths ("ahadiths") are written compilations ("traditions") of the sayings and actions of Muhammad. Muhammad's example and authority are prominent in Islam. The hadiths, along with the Quran, are meant to govern every aspect of life, including civil law. There are several collections of hadiths, but the one compiled by Bukhari (or "Al-Bukhari" or "Sahih Bukhari"), who lived 200 years after Muhammad, is considered very important, especially by Sunni Muslims. We will reference Bukhari primarily in our article, but will also reference the hadiths collected by "Sahih Muslim," who was a student of Bukhari. Some background for our non-Muslim readers might be helpful. There are several Muslim sects. Sunni Muslims represent about 85% of the world's Muslim population. The second largest sect is Shiite. There is disagreement among the various sects on some issues, not unlike theological disagreements among Christian denominations. Note: One thing that is confusing to English speaking people is that the English spelling of Arabic words is not standardized! For example, Moslem is a variant spelling for Muslim. The Bible, the Quran, and the hadiths are available online. One source for the Bible is http://bible.gospelcom.net/. There are several sources for the Quran and Hadiths online that can be found through a search engine. One source is http://www.answering-islam.org. The Quran is divided into 114 chapters called Suras. A designation of, for example, 10:1 means Sura 10, verse 1. The Bukhari Hadiths are divided into nine volumes, then various books, then hadiths by number. The numbering system is governed by the volumes, not the books. So, a designation of 5:416 means volume 5, hadith number 416. Bukhari is usually presented online in book order, so you might have to hunt for a few seconds to get the correct volume. It might help to use the following table. Here are the nine volumes, with the book number at which the volume begins being in parentheses: 1 (1), 2 (13), 3 (27), 4 (51), 5 (57), 6 (60), 7 (62), 8 (73), 9 (83). The Muslim Hadiths are numbered consecutively, uninterrupted for the entire collection. Similarities between Christianity and Islam Christians and Muslims have some beliefs in common. We both agree that there is one God who created the universe and is sovereign in the lives of men. We agree that God is the source of justice and morality. We agree that his ultimate justice is dispensed via life after death in heaven and hell. Fundamentalist Christians and fundamentalist Muslims both consider such things as pornography and licentious living as pollutants to society. In fact, one of the reasons for the strong negative reaction to western civilization in Muslim countries is the influence of such practices emanating from the west. But there are many things upon which we disagree. The points of disagreement touch on every important religious doctrine. Indeed, the disagreements are so severe as to be irreconcilable. We will look at these issues point by point. Overall Tone of the Two Religions Most Muslims are exceptionally gracious and peace-loving people. And Islam has many elements of peacefulness in it. However, anyone who wants to commit violence has perfect justification for doing so from the Quran. While violence in the Quran is sometimes for self-defense; at other times it is open-ended. Many passages in the Quran exhort Muslims to kill infidels (non-Muslims) wherever they find them. See Suras 2:190-193, 2:216, 4:76, 5:32-36, 8:12-14, 8:39, 8:59, 8:65, 9:5, 9:14, 9:23-29, 9:38-41, 9:123, 47:4, 47:35, 61:4, and 66:9. Usama bin Laden in the now famous videotape discovered in Afghanistan in late 2001 is quoted as saying, "I was ordered to fight the people until they say there is no god but Allah, and his prophet Muhammad." These words echo language in the Quran itself. But the Quran is not the only basis for violence in Islam. The example of Muhammad himself laid the foundation for violence via his deeds and commands, which are found in the hadiths. Eleven percent of the pages of the Bukhari Hadiths mention Holy War (jihad). Military jihad is a traditional and authentic part of Islam. There are two meanings for jihad. One meaning is a personal spiritual aspect to kill sinful desires. It also means to use violence to spread the faith. Muslims are taught that those who fight and die in a jihad have their sins forgiven, and they are rewarded with a sensual and luxurious life in paradise. See Suras 3:157-158, 3:169-171, 3:194-195, 4:74, 4:94-97, 22:58-59, 52:17-23, 56:10-38. Also see Bukhari 4:63, 72, 80, 85, 137, 175, 216, 266. So the killing of non-Muslims offers the religion's highest reward. Muhammad first claimed to have a vision from God in the year 610 AD. The first 13 years of his ministry were marked by peaceful preaching in the city of Mecca. During this period Muhammad seems to have been a well-meaning man who sought to oppose paganism and evil in his day. However, in the year 623 he became a political leader in the city of Medina. With his political power came a new aggressive behavior. He attacked pagan caravans and used the sword to spread his religion. Muhammad personally led at least 27 bloody invasions (some say more than 60) and ordered his followers to wage many more. Muhammad assassinated many of his opponents during his lifetime. In his battle against the Quraiza Jews, women and children were sold into slavery, and hundreds of captured men were executed. Even some of his own people were horrified. The tradition of violence in Islam, which started with Muhammad, continues to this day. There is worldwide evidence that some Muslims kill or otherwise persecute people solely for being non-Muslims. This is well documented in Nigeria, Algeria, Sudan (where modern slavery is documented), Egypt, Iran, Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Pakistan, Iraq, and Malaysia. One source for some of the evidence on this can be found in the video series listed below (hour 6 of the 8-hour program). You could also email the speakers on the video at cdebater@aol.com for further documentation.

According to the organization the Voice of the Martyrs (website http://www.vom.org or search for Voice of the Martyrs) 160,000 Christians are killed annually because of their faith— the vast majority being killed by Muslims. If Islam claims to be a religion of peace, why is there so much oppression in every Muslim country?

In the audio tape series listed at the end of this essay, Abdul Saleeb quotes from a PBS Frontline documentary called "Saudi Time Bomb?" According to the program, Saudi Arabian Ministry of Education textbooks contained, as of the year 2000, a most disturbing teaching. The teaching, which is from the hadiths (Bukhari 4:176-177) as taught by Muhammad himself, is required instruction for all middle school children in Saudi Arabia. The teaching which is entitled "The Victory of Muslims Over Jews," says:

"The last hour won't come before the Muslims would fight the Jews, and the Muslims will kill them. So Jews would hide behind rocks and trees. Then the rocks and trees would call, 'Oh, Muslim. Oh, Servant of God. There is a Jew behind me. Come and kill him.' "

Included with the text is a list of principles, including the following:

"Jews and Christians are the enemies of believers. They will never approve of the Muslims. Beware of them."

Contrast this with chritianity:
Jesus warned, "The time is coming when anyone who kills you will think he is offering a service to God" (John 16:2-4). While these words were spoken to his disciples, they have a powerful ring today

There is nothing like the Christian concept of "love your enemies" or "turn your other cheek" (Luke 6:27-37) found in Islam. While Christianity says to love your neighbor as yourself (Matthew 19:19), the Quran instructs its followers not to even take Christians or Jews as friends (Suras 3:118, 5:51, 64, 60:1-3)!

Another interesting point is that the Islamic concept of charity is different from the Christian concept. Muslims are required to give alms to the poor, but only to the Muslim poor. In this way, the Muslim's remaining wealth is purified. The biblical concept of charity is not limited to any group. In fact, Jesus used illustrations that encouraged helping those outside the faith (Luke 10:30-37).

One commonly hears in the press that Islam is a religion of peace. This is true only in one sense— peace will come when all competing religions have been brought into submission to Islam (Sura 9:29). Muslims who say Islam is a religion of peace, can only say so by ignoring or rationalizing away its violent commands.


92 posted on 04/22/2004 9:36:24 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%; quadrant; Monty22; isthisnickcool; MegaSilver; me_newswire; livius; Ubu Roi; ...
"Amanda": He had marriages, he had kids, he was on this earth to teach people the religion of islam.

Queer sort of "family man":

Muhammad married his daughter-in-law Zainab (Bukhari 9:516-518). He arranged for his adopted son Zaid to divorce Zainab so he could marry her. The divorce was prompted by the prophet's admiration for Zainab's beauty. Faced with the refusal of Zaid to dissolve his marriage, Muhammad had another convenient revelation from Allah, which not only commanded Zaid to give up his wife to Muhammad, but also decreed that there was no evil in a father-in-law taking his daughter-in-law away from his own adopted son (Sura 33:36-38).
93 posted on 04/22/2004 9:38:31 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: me_newswire
Outside of becoming the bloodiest murderers in the world, what has the Muslim world done lately?
94 posted on 04/22/2004 10:03:09 AM PDT by Beckwith (The greatest Muslim attribute - intolerance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: me_newswire
It would be more accurate to say that the Arabs were civilized by the more advanced cultures they conquered, just like the Romans before them and the Mongols after them.
95 posted on 04/22/2004 10:17:24 AM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uburoi2000
It could be argued that Islam succeeded in Persia and Damascus only because they were very united and their opponents were incapable of coming together to defeat the Arab armies.

The Arabs had the luck of being united by Mohammad just as the Byzantines and Persians were bleeding each other white in a twenty-year war. If he had come along a generation earlier or a generation later, the Arabs would have been pushed back (and quickly returned to their usual internicine sqabbling).

96 posted on 04/22/2004 10:19:16 AM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: me_newswire
Arabs Once Dominated Science

No, they didn't. Muslims conquered various countries, mostly via proxies who then sent the tributes back to their Muslim bosses (then largely Arab--until the rise of the Turks). In many of these countries, the science and math continued in spite of the Muslim-backed invasion and takeover. The scientific and mathematical discoveries continued in spite of, not because of, Islam.
97 posted on 04/22/2004 10:25:43 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: me_newswire
BS!

There is a profound difference between "controlling" science and controlling (and not sharing) the accumulated knowledge about the sciences done by others.

98 posted on 04/22/2004 10:31:02 AM PDT by Publius6961 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shryke; Cronos
"That and the lack of "kill the non-believers" in the Bible. Why do you keep avoiding that?"

I'm not avoiding that, yes the koran says that, but do any of you have the slightest idea of why its in there?....i thought so. It seems thats the only reason you guys hate the koran, hate prophet Muhammed, and hate the religion of islam. It says that because when prophet Muhammed was spreading the religion of islam around, and these "non believers" despised the religion and prophet muhammed and everything that had to do with it. Prophet Muhammed was told by god to kill these people "O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the Hypocrites, and be stern against hem. Their abode is Hell,- an evil refuge indeed" (9:73). Prophet Muhammed didnt just wake up one day and decide to kill people, he was told by god, and he listened, which is the right thing to do(Not kill non believers but to listen to god). If someone attacks you are you not going to attack back?
99 posted on 04/22/2004 1:36:38 PM PDT by amanda99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
Prophet muhammed's marriage to ayesha was because when Prophet Muhammed was aging, angel gabrielle showed him his wife in heaven, and she was similiar to Ayesha, god told prophet Muhammed to marry Ayesha and teach her everything you know. We all know the learning age for a person is age 6-18, when he first got together with ayesha she was 6-7, they lived together for about 15 years, and they never had sex. He taught her everything he knew so when he'd pass away she would be the person everyone would go to if they had questions. when he died she was known as the "mother of believers" she was the person that would carry on the religion of islam. He didnt marry her for his pleasure, get a grip.

100 posted on 04/22/2004 2:06:24 PM PDT by amanda99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson