Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America no longer white, united, English-speaking
The Miami Herald ^ | 02 April 2004 | Patrick J. Buchanan

Posted on 04/03/2004 11:22:26 AM PST by MegaSilver

In 1960, when JFK defeated Nixon, America was a nation of 160 million, 90 percent white and 10 percent black, with a few million Hispanics and Asians sprinkled among us.

We were one nation, one people. We worshipped the same God, spoke the same English language, studied American history and English literature, honored the same heroes, read the same books, watched the same TV shows, went to the same movies and saw ourselves as defenders of Western civilization against the godless communism of the Soviet Empire.

We were confident and proud of who we were. That was yesterday. But due to the Immigration Act of 1965 and the cultural revolution of the '60s, that America is now gone forever. And as one studies the latest projections of the Census Bureau, the America of our grandchildren will be another country altogether, a nation unrecognizable to our parents, a giant Brazil of the North.

In 2050, there will be three times as many people living here as in 1960 -- 420 million. White Americans will be a minority, 49 percent, and falling. Hispanics in the United States, more than 100 million, will be equal to the population of today's Mexico. Our Asian population will be almost as large as our African-American population today.

By countries of origin, America will be a Third World nation. Our cities will look like Los Angeles today. Los Angeles and the cities of Texas, Arizona and California will look like Mexico City.

Writing in Foreign Policy, Harvard Professor Samuel Huntington, author of Who We Are, raises an alarm about the huge infusion of Hispanics into the Southwest, and for many reasons.

Much of this mass immigration is illegal. Vast numbers are coming here only to work. They are not assimilating. They do not want to become Americans. They are concentrating in states bordering Mexico, which is their country and a nation with a historic grievance against us. They are holding on to their language and culture, creating a Hispanic nation within our nation. By 2050, there will be scores of millions of people living here whose loyalty is to a foreign country.

Moreover, as multiculturalism has captured our schools and colleges, immigrant children will have prejudices and grievances against America and the West reinforced as they learn. The academic elite that controls these schools already paints America as a nation with a rancid history of genocide, slavery, racism, oppression and imperialism.

Is the Census Bureau future the future that Americans wish? No. Are they willing to risk it for their grandchildren? No.

Why, then, does that future appear inevitable?

Answer: Though a majority of Americans wish to preserve the land they grew up in for their children, our elites -- political, academic, cultural and corporate -- are either unwilling to conserve that America or indifferent to its disappearance.

Most Americans want immigration cut back and all illegal aliens sent back. Why is the will of the majority, expressed in polls and referenda, not reflected in law or policy? Because we no longer live in a democratic republic; we are ruled by a managerial elite.

America's corporate elites want an endless supply of cheap labor. Our judges throw out popularly enacted laws to which they object. Our academic elites work to see ''white, racist America'' disappear. Our neo-Marxist cultural elites wish to be the gravediggers of the West and of Christian culture. And America's conservative party, the Republican Party, believes that Hispanics hold the key to retention of presidential power and is anxious not to offend Mexican President Vicente Fox.

If, by 2050, the America we grew up in has become a Tower of Babel of squabbling minorities that is falling apart, it will be because of the treason of the elites, and our lack of will to overthrow them.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; aztlan; balkanization; breakingnews; buchanan; diversity; immigrantlist; immigration; multiculturalism; patbuchanan; patrickbuchanan; patrickjbuchanan; racistpat; sowhat; whoweare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640 ... 1,021-1,027 next last
To: Dane
Try not to choke on your sense of self virtue Dane.
601 posted on 04/04/2004 9:47:45 AM PDT by wardaddy (If we don't nut up quick as a nation, we'll be foraging for the eggs of the sooty tern soon enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 594 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
Who colonized the world and where are the civilizations you tout now?

That Tigres Euphrates thingie has seen better days hasn't it?
602 posted on 04/04/2004 9:48:52 AM PDT by wardaddy (If we don't nut up quick as a nation, we'll be foraging for the eggs of the sooty tern soon enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 592 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
Try not to choke on your sense of self virtue Dane.

As wardaddy states this choking on his pecan pie.

603 posted on 04/04/2004 9:49:44 AM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 601 | View Replies]

To: iconoclast
These folks are not worth your effort. They all have an axe to grind and are enjoying what you and I consider a problem.

They consider it just rewards or retribution. I'm not sure what sort of conservative they are.
604 posted on 04/04/2004 9:50:27 AM PDT by wardaddy (If we don't nut up quick as a nation, we'll be foraging for the eggs of the sooty tern soon enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 595 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
Oh BTW, the Scotch-Irish who immigrated to what is now the US were also considered "peasant" scum at one time.

Do you enjoy speaking like a modern Marie Antoinette.

605 posted on 04/04/2004 9:53:13 AM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 601 | View Replies]

To: Dane
My reply #416 chronicled the economic polices of Juan Peron, while your reply #399 was a comment on recent electoral trends that were refuted by the mid term election of 2002.

Spin it all you want, you didn't post a date of your article either. If you have a problem with what I did or did not post, go complain to the moderator and have him/her straighten this point of contention out or show us where in the Free Republic rules it says we have to post a date. All one has to do is follow the link to the article.

As far as being refuted I disagree. One could say that 9-11 defined that election so it was quite the anomaly. If 9-11 did not happen, the trend in the article in all probability would have continued. Thanks for making my argument pertaining to the date of the article.

606 posted on 04/04/2004 9:53:46 AM PDT by Missouri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 579 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
Actually you are quite funny.....educate yourself and go look up the ethnicities of free colonists here at the time of the revolution. Mostly English, Dutch, French Huguenots and a few others.....and the leaders were almost exclusively English descended

And the Germans, especially in Pennsylvania but elsewhere as well. Even today, more Americans with European ancestry have some German ancestry. Much of that did come later, and it wasn't true during the colonial period, but there was a significant minority of Germans even then.

Of all those you listed, plus the Germans, only the English had much of history of republican government behind them. The rest adopted it after they came here, just as subsequent waves of immigrants have.

607 posted on 04/04/2004 9:55:06 AM PDT by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
Who colonized the world and where are the civilizations you tout now?

Who colonized the world? Well, Persia did that first, conquering all of the world that mattered except for India and Greece (Rome was still a village).

Where are the civilisations I tout now? Most were destroyed by Islamc but the Persian survives in the form of Parsis in India and theIndian and Chinese civilisations are still alive and flourishing
608 posted on 04/04/2004 9:57:20 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 602 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
Who colonized the world and where are the civilizations you tout now?

And I dont' recall any Western country conquering Russia (Napoleon and Hitler TRIED). or China or Japan.
609 posted on 04/04/2004 9:58:34 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 602 | View Replies]

To: Missouri
Spin it all you want, you didn't post a date of your article either

Well of course not because anyone who knows history as stated in reply #416 of this thread knows that Juan Peron has been dead for 30 years and his economic polices were well known and in modern times Pat Buchanan echoes Juan Peron's economic themes as stated in reply #416.

Where in your case you stated and implied something current in your reply #399, which have been proved wrong by the US mid term elections of 2002.

610 posted on 04/04/2004 9:58:49 AM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 606 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
India and theIndian and Chinese civilisations are still alive and flourishing

Compared to whom....Bangladesh?

611 posted on 04/04/2004 9:59:19 AM PDT by wardaddy (If we don't nut up quick as a nation, we'll be foraging for the eggs of the sooty tern soon enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 608 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
Actually, there were quite significant Dutch, German, French and Italian Enlightenment philosophers.

No one to my knowledge had a Republican form of government prior to ours.

The western European immigrants were not tabula rasa when they arrived here. They brought traditions and culture which held a fair amount of commonality.....which was crucial in my view.
612 posted on 04/04/2004 10:03:17 AM PDT by wardaddy (If we don't nut up quick as a nation, we'll be foraging for the eggs of the sooty tern soon enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 607 | View Replies]

To: Dane
As wardaddy states this choking on his pecan pie.

Actually I am having pecan pie for lunch...my mom made it...thanks....I'll be thinking about you when it exits tomorrow morning.

613 posted on 04/04/2004 10:05:45 AM PDT by wardaddy (If we don't nut up quick as a nation, we'll be foraging for the eggs of the sooty tern soon enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 603 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
WD: where are the civilizations you tout now?

Cronos: theIndian and Chinese civilisations are still alive and flourishing

WD: Compared to whom....Bangladesh?

You wanted to know where are the civilisations that predated W Europe in origins. Well, I named them and they're still alive, aren't they?
614 posted on 04/04/2004 10:06:29 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 611 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Sheesh icon you are more cowardly than Missouri

Go back and read post #417. I'm the one who brought up the date so why would a coward do that? You didn't find out about it yourself because you were to lazy to go click the link and go read the whole article yourself.

615 posted on 04/04/2004 10:07:02 AM PDT by Missouri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 584 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
yeah..they are alive but not what I'd call flourishing.

Not like us...but don't fret....you do-gooders are going to change all that..lol
616 posted on 04/04/2004 10:15:06 AM PDT by wardaddy (If we don't nut up quick as a nation, we'll be foraging for the eggs of the sooty tern soon enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 614 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
And what's your definition of fluourishing? A civilisation that learns and builds up on itself? Yup, both do that. Economics alone do not a civilisation make.
617 posted on 04/04/2004 10:16:34 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 616 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
And even more so, it answers your question about civs that are older than Western European (note Greek ain't western European either) that are still around.
618 posted on 04/04/2004 10:17:23 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 616 | View Replies]

To: Missouri
Go back and read post #417. I'm the one who brought up the date so why would a coward do that? You didn't find out about it yourself because you were to lazy to go click the link and go read the whole article yourself

Whatever Miz.

The fact still stands that in your reply #399 that you posted a snippet of an article that is not currently topical and was proved wrong by the US midterm elections of 2002, while my reply about Buchanan echoing Peronist economic themes in reply #416 still stands.

619 posted on 04/04/2004 10:17:54 AM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 615 | View Replies]

To: iconoclast
Newspaper columnists DO NOT compose the headlines (titles) of their articles, never, none.

Well, then, count this as a smear effort by the papers.

620 posted on 04/04/2004 10:19:04 AM PDT by MegaSilver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 581 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640 ... 1,021-1,027 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson