Spin it all you want, you didn't post a date of your article either. If you have a problem with what I did or did not post, go complain to the moderator and have him/her straighten this point of contention out or show us where in the Free Republic rules it says we have to post a date. All one has to do is follow the link to the article.
As far as being refuted I disagree. One could say that 9-11 defined that election so it was quite the anomaly. If 9-11 did not happen, the trend in the article in all probability would have continued. Thanks for making my argument pertaining to the date of the article.
Well of course not because anyone who knows history as stated in reply #416 of this thread knows that Juan Peron has been dead for 30 years and his economic polices were well known and in modern times Pat Buchanan echoes Juan Peron's economic themes as stated in reply #416.
Where in your case you stated and implied something current in your reply #399, which have been proved wrong by the US mid term elections of 2002.