Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NEWSWEEK POLL: Kerry 48%, Bush 45%; Edwards 46%, Bush 46% (1000 adults, polled Thursday & Friday)
Newsweak ^ | 2.21.04

Posted on 02/21/2004 11:27:51 AM PST by ambrose

NEWSWEEK POLL: Campaign 2004

Saturday February 21, 12:43 pm ET

Sixty-Eight Percent Say Jobs, Foreign Competition Very Important In Determining Vote for President; Bush, Kerry Nearly Even on Who Would Be Better at Protecting U.S. Jobs and Creating New Ones

Kerry Keeps Lead Over Bush; Edwards Ties Bush in Test Match-Up; 52 Percent Say No to Re-Electing Bush

NEW YORK, Feb. 21 /PRNewswire/ -- Sixty-eight percent of registered voters polled say American jobs and foreign competition will be very important in determining their vote for president this year; 22 percent say it will be somewhat important, according to the latest Newsweek Poll. When asked which presidential candidate would do the best job of protecting American jobs and creating new ones, regardless of the candidate they may support, 35 percent of registered voters say President George W. Bush would do the better job, but Democratic contender John Kerry gets 31 percent of the vote; 18 percent say it would be Kerry's opponent John Edwards. And 55 percent of all those polled disapprove of the way Bush is handling American jobs and foreign competition; just 32 percent approve.

Eighty percent of those polled say a major reason for the loss of American jobs to foreign competitors, is that people in other countries are willing work for lower pay and 77 percent say a major reason is investors and CEOs want profits and don't care where they come from. Sixty-one percent say it's because other countries have lower environmental and worker health standards; 56 percent say it's because consumers in this country want everything at the lowest possible price and 42 percent say it's because of weak corporate leadership in this country.

As the Democratic presidential campaign winds down to a race between Kerry and Edwards, Kerry maintained a big lead as the preferred Democratic nominee with 54 percent of the vote among registered Democrats and Democratic leaners, the poll shows. Edwards received 19 percent of the vote. In test match-ups, Kerry maintained his lead over President Bush from one week ago in the Newsweek Poll and Edwards ties Bush, the closest showing yet for the Democratic contender. But with the margin of error of 3 percentage points, the candidates are in a statistical dead heat. Among registered voters, 48 percent say they would vote for or lean toward voting for Kerry, compared to 45 percent who say the would vote for or lean toward voting for Bush. (In the February 5-6 Newsweek Poll, Kerry lead Bush 50 to 45 percent). Edwards ties Bush at 46 percent among registered voters. (In the February 5-6 Newsweek Poll, Bush lead Edwards 49 to 44 percent). If the election were held today with a Bush/Cheney ticket v. a Kerry/Edwards ticket, Kerry/Edwards leads by 49 to 45 percent among registered voters. And when asked if they'd like to see Bush re-elected to another term as president, 52 percent of registered voters say no; 43 percent say yes. And 38 percent of registered voters say Bush is somewhat likely (31% say very likely) to be re-elected this year. Forty-eight percent of Americans polled approve of the way George W. Bush is handling his job as president, the same as one week ago in the Newsweek Poll.

In the wake of the controversy over Bush's obligations for military service in the National Guard at the time of the Vietnam War, 49 percent of those polled say they're inclined to believe that Bush fulfilled the obligations; 33 percent have serious doubts about it. And 58 percent of all those polled say they think of Bush as an honest person by nature; 34 percent do not see him this way.

In deciding which Democratic presidential candidate to support this year, 49 percent of registered Democrats and Democratic leaners say they are personally more inclined to vote for the candidate who comes closest to their way of thinking on major issues; 42 percent say they are inclined to support the candidate with the best chance of defeating Bush in November. Regardless of the Democratic presidential candidate they may support, 57 percent say Kerry would do a better job leading the war on terrorism (10% say Edwards) and 45 percent say Kerry better understands the concerns of people like them (30% say Edwards).

On the topic of free trade and jobs, 35 percent of all those polled say NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) and the WTO (World Trade Organization) have been a bad thing for the United States; 28 percent say they've been a good thing. Sixty-eight percent disagree with a statement from a government official who recently said that "outsourcing" of American service jobs to other countries is not only inevitable but is good for Americans; only 23 percent agree with that statement.

On the topic of legalizing gay marriage, 45 percent of all those polled says they oppose any legal recognition for gay and lesbian couples; 23 percent support full marriage rights for the couples and 24 percent support civil unions or partnerships, but not gay marriage, the poll shows.

Thirty-nine percent of those polled say they would support a Constitutional amendment that would ban gay marriage in all 50 states; 33 percent say it should be left up to individual states to pass their own laws about gay marriage and 23 percent support full marriage rights for gays. While 23 percent of registered voters say the issue of gay marriage will be very important and the same number say it's somewhat important in determining their vote for president this year, 20 percent say it's not too important and 32 percent say it's not at all important, the poll shows.

This poll is part of the March 1 issue of Newsweek (on newsstands Monday, February 23.) For this Newsweek Poll, Princeton Survey Research Associates International interviewed 1,019 adults aged 18 and older on February 19-20, 2004. The margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points.


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; bush; edwards; kerry; newsweak; newsweek; poll; polls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: Rome2000; deport; Torie; ambrose; JohnnyZ
Kerry 48% - W 45%
Kerry/Edwards 49% - Bush/Cheney 45%
W Approval @ 48%
Newsweek Poll
MOE+/-3% (Adults 18 and Older) 02/19-20/04
52% for not to Re-Elect - 43% for Re-Election of W
-----------------------------

W 45% - kerry 45%
W 43% - Kerry 42% - Nadar 4%
W Approval @ 48%
Fox News Poll
MOE+/-3% (Reg Voters) 02/18-19/04
----------------------

kerry 48% - Bush 46%
W Approval @ 47%
ARG Poll
MOE+/-3.5% (Reg Voters) 02/17-19/04
----------------------

Kerry 55% - W 43%
W Approval @ 51%
USA TODAY/CNN/Gallup
MOE+/-3% (Likely Voters) 02/16-17/04
---------------------

W 47% - Kerry 47%
W Approval @ 48%
Pew Research Poll
MOE+/-3% (Reg Voters) 02/11-16/04
---------------------

Kerry 46% - W 45%
W Approval @ ??%
University of Connecticut Poll
MOE+/-2.9% (Reg voters) 02/12-16/04
----------------------

Kerry 48% - W 43%
W Approval @ 50%
CBS Poll
MOE+/- 3% (Reg Voters) 02/12-15/04
---------------------------

Kerry 52% - W 43%
W Approval @ 50%
ABC/WP Poll
MOE+/-3% (Reg Voters) 02/10-11/04
------------------

W 50% - Kerry 48%
W Approval @ 54%
CNN/TIME Poll
MOE+/-4.1% (Reg Voters) 02/05-06/04


41 posted on 02/21/2004 2:06:48 PM PST by KQQL (@)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
polls are a quite valuable insight, once you adjust them for their inherent biases.

ANY poll that includes Friday or Saturday is automatically prejudiced toward the Left/Democrat [why, I don't know, but I have my ideas]

Second, any Newsweek poll is biased toward the left.

My conclusion? The Rasmussen poll that had Bush up by 6% is probably semi-accurate, and correcting this poll for its two biases would probably have Bush up about 10%
42 posted on 02/21/2004 2:08:30 PM PST by fqued (GW - Go West, young man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
They have the jobs issue.
43 posted on 02/21/2004 2:10:10 PM PST by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Reactionary
I just don't get it. pre-Howard Dean Kerry was a nobody, lucky to rank third or fourth in various caucuses. Now he's "electable" and "ahead of Bush." I don't see excitement or a groundswell of support for this man. If it exists, it exists in Liberal La La Land and nowhere else.

You're right, it doesn't exist, and here's why: These polls, at this stage in the game, are comparing apples to oranges. When they ask a person - registered voter, likely voter, merely an "adult", it doesn't matter - "Bush vs Kerry, you pick," what they're doing is asking the person to make a judgment on three years' worth of governance on Bush's side, while asking little more than "Do you think he's a nice guy or not?" on Kerry's side. So of course Kerry's going to get an extra bounce on that, because hardly anyone knows anything about him.

Come September or October, that will change.

Ambrose has been posting a number of threads on FR in the last few days from old Washington Post articles published in 1980 and 1984, showing how, at various points in those election cycles, the polls were predicting all sorts of things that ended up being 180 degrees from what the voters actually did on Election Day.

It's just too early. These polls mean bupkis.

44 posted on 02/21/2004 2:21:58 PM PST by Timesink (Smacky is power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

Election 2004

Kerry 51% Edwards 25% Edwards faces McCain's problem.

Bush 47% Kerry 45%

(updated Saturday)

Congress: Dem 42% GOP 40%
Bush Job Approval: 56%

National Political Tracking Data Updated Daily by Noon Eastern

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/
45 posted on 02/21/2004 2:43:22 PM PST by KQQL (@)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
"Graham could help with FL, but
he's awfully weird"

Bill Nelson?

What would that do?
46 posted on 02/21/2004 3:00:19 PM PST by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
If Bush's job approval really is 56%, it would be a historical occurance if he didnt win. Reagan had a 58% approval rating in Oct 1984 and won 59%. IF Bush really does have a 56% approval rating, he'll win somewhere near 54-55%. If you believe it is 56%.
47 posted on 02/21/2004 3:02:36 PM PST by raloxk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette; DrDeb
Ping to this thread...
48 posted on 02/21/2004 3:03:09 PM PST by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Take a picture, John F'ing Kerry!

It's downhill from here.

I think freepers have given the RNC plenty of material for some great ads. ...let's spend a bunch of money and get our message out now that we have a target.

49 posted on 02/21/2004 3:03:42 PM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
He's sure to get more than 2%, more likely 4-5%


What makes you think Nader will do so much better this time around then he did in 2000? He got about 2.7% nationwide and was on the ballot in 47 states with the Greens.... He'll be lucky as an independent to be on that many states with the effort it takes to get the signatures.... In CA he got 3.8% of the vote. His best state percentage wise was Alaska where he got 10.1%
50 posted on 02/21/2004 3:47:15 PM PST by deport ( BUSH - CHENEY 2004 .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: All
This is hillarious stuff. It's called p-r-o-p-a-g-a-n-d-a. One of the ways psychological warfare is waged is by convincing your enemy you are much stronger than you actually are in reality. The leftist press has always done this. What's more, they firmly believe that they can bring about their desired results by reporting things this way. If nothing else, it keeps us in the desired spirit of gloom.

C'mon folks, do the people down at the mall even know who John Kerry or John Edwards are? Let alone what kind of nonsense is this that the Democrat talking points of the last week, meaning "jobs," now suddenly resonates to the exclusion of all other issues with the public. This is plain crap, people. And it will go down the liberal garbage hole soon enough. I remember when they had polls in March of 1984 saying Mondale or Hart would mop the floor with Reagan. Democrats have no issues, so whatever they come up with will be branded the golden key to the White House by the adoring Bolshevik media. What's new?

Now, about cutesy words and phrases: also in 1984; the Jesse Jackson campaign used this year's slogan,"jobs" as a mantra, just like Willy successfully used "change" as his in 1992. Only this year the vote ain't divided. When Jackson changed the issue of the day to "drugs," the press ran around screaming that was the wonderful new flavor fare. This was during the Reagan years. If the GOP talked in these terms, the press would accuse us of insulting the voters. Liberals think we're all idiots. That's why they go for simple first grade words and phrases.

Even funnier, the press watched their beloved Mikey Dukakis blown apart in the last debate of 1988 and still ran around for the last two weeks of the election claiming that the sentence/message, "I'm on your side" was going to alter the election and rout Bush. That was the same year they had made fun of everything but Dan Quayle's deodorant.

These press people are liars. They are lying. That's what they do. Don't get upset about their lies. Know your enemy, and don't forget the past. We are winning. Just remember the press is like your insane, senile, old uncle that would say the sky was orange if you said it was blue. They are not on our side and not about truth.

Anybody remember all their stories reporting Dole was down by thirty points to Clinton in 1996, when he was really behind by less than ten? Laugh at them. They are truly pitiful and insane.
51 posted on 02/21/2004 4:22:36 PM PST by Luke21 (oldberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Polls further indicate that if the 2012 election were held two weeks from last monday VALIN would be the overwhelming winner of the 2012 election.
52 posted on 02/21/2004 4:24:14 PM PST by Valin (America is the land mine between barbarism and civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasJ7
I doubt if Maine is a shoe-in for Kerry: they know him as a phony and they don't like him.
53 posted on 02/21/2004 6:03:30 PM PST by Meldrim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Among registered voters, 48 percent say they would vote for or lean toward voting for Kerry, compared to 45 percent who say the would vote for or lean toward voting for Bush.

This poll can be discounted. That Newsweek is citing it is just one more unecessary bit of evidence that it can't be trusted.

54 posted on 02/21/2004 6:09:43 PM PST by Tribune7 (Vote Toomey April 27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Polled adults is virtually useless, especially the way NewsWeak is likely to do it.
55 posted on 02/22/2004 4:54:35 PM PST by chiller (JUDGES is JOB #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette
I don't believe Nelson is that popular. The VP spot is important, but it doesn't cancel everything.
56 posted on 02/22/2004 6:51:03 PM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: deport
Why Nader will do better: There are other reasons, but these are the biggies and I can't think of the rest just now.
57 posted on 02/22/2004 6:57:47 PM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Polls further indicate that if the 2012 election were held two weeks from last monday VALIN would be the overwhelming winner of the 2012 election.

Maybe, but if the election were held in 2015 on a Saturday where only dead chickens are eligible to vote, AmishDude would be the winner. FReepmail me to send your contributions.

58 posted on 02/22/2004 6:59:29 PM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Meldrim
I keep hearing that Massachusetts hates their own Kerry.
59 posted on 02/22/2004 7:03:18 PM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
:-)
If it's good enough for the media..why not.
All I ask is the NY Time prove I'm wrong.
60 posted on 02/22/2004 9:24:46 PM PST by Valin (America is the land mine between barbarism and civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson