Skip to comments.
Florida: Complaints over restaurants not complying with smoking ban
First Coast News ^
Posted on 10/20/2003 7:27:44 AM PDT by SheLion
DUVAL COUNTY, FL -- Florida's smoking ban was officially put into place on July 1st but not everyone is abiding. The state has had close to 800 complaints on restaurants that are not complying with the rules.
In Duval County, there have been 19 complaints with the majority coming from customers of RP McMurphy's located in Jacksonville Beach. The restaurant has received a warning and has 30 days to comply.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: antismokers; bans; butts; cigarettes; individualliberty; michaeldobbs; niconazis; prohibitionists; pufflist; smokingbans; taxes; tobacco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 561-571 next last
To: VRWC_minion
The state is sovereign. All property within its confines belongs and is controlled by the state. Your right to own property is granted to you by the state. Its right to remove your property is absolute.You have just outed yourself, again, as a true socialist.
281
posted on
10/20/2003 12:14:04 PM PDT
by
Just another Joe
(FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: Im4Starr
If you're gonna be one of them, you might as well say it proudly instead of pretending you're somewhere in the middle. Because I disagree with the bans.
282
posted on
10/20/2003 12:14:12 PM PDT
by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: VRWC_minion
Rockefeller Center 1932
Notice the two gentlemen on the left and the man in the center, minnie. Notice the man on the right with the empty pint. No safety hats, no safety lines, no harnesses.
Smoke 'em if ya got 'em!
283
posted on
10/20/2003 12:14:17 PM PDT
by
metesky
("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
To: VRWC_minion
The state is sovereign. All property within its confines belongs and is controlled by the state. Your right to own property is granted to you by the state. Its right to remove your property is absolute. Amendment V of the US Constitution "...nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation."
Not quite absolute, in the general sense. Certainly, no individual has a snowball's chance in hell of beating the government at its own game.
284
posted on
10/20/2003 12:14:27 PM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: Steely Glint
Apparently you have left the thread. Unfortunate, despite your "get a clue" insults posted to others. You confirm my belief that the anti-smoker's position is strictly based on "annoyance", and therefore dishonest and socialist.
285
posted on
10/20/2003 12:14:48 PM PDT
by
Shryke
To: Grit
Now you are just being silly.You have a basic misconception of property.
286
posted on
10/20/2003 12:14:58 PM PDT
by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: Mears
It must have been a fluke that we all lived through it ; )
287
posted on
10/20/2003 12:15:41 PM PDT
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Taglines are for the curious to read and the talented to write. Would someone write me one?)
To: Steely Glint
nope, just because a 1993 EPA flawed study says so it's not so.
when a good years (20-30) long study of children of smokers shows beyord any resaonable dought that SHM causes serious problems then we can talk about banning smoking in homes, but not before if at all.
To: shattered
And whose threads are 'our threads' and how long to you have to be at FR to be 'on' them? Excuse me bud, but we have a large group of Conservative smokers in Free Republic. Your either with us or against us. Your either for the rights of the business owners or against free interprise. Your choice.
You don't need to smoke to be with us. You don't need to even LIKE cigarettes, but to try to take away the rights of the business owners is w r o n g.
No matter what you think about smoking.. TOBACCO.., it's still a legal commodity. Right?
289
posted on
10/20/2003 12:16:13 PM PDT
by
SheLion
(Curiosity killed the cat BUT satisfaction brought her back!!!)
To: VRWC_minion
Because I disagree with the bans. On what grounds?
290
posted on
10/20/2003 12:16:14 PM PDT
by
Grit
(Tolerance for all but the intolerant...and those who tolerate intolerance etc etc)
To: VRWC_minion
"I don't have the time to handle each one of your statements"
Don't worry, I am used to that from you.
"Evenif you barter item A for item B. Without the gov't the person who gave you item B can take it back if his gun is bigger than yours."
And by your love of government, your solution would be for the government to ban guns!
291
posted on
10/20/2003 12:16:32 PM PDT
by
CSM
(Congrats to Flurry and LE!)
To: Steely Glint
The last time I looked at a CO detector the minimum detectable of amount of CO was 9 PPM. Thanks for proving my point. Not so fast, grasshopper.
He has done no such thing.
Your brainless point referred to "anything above the zero baseline level".
I know I know... the end justifies the means, and what's a little hyperbole?
292
posted on
10/20/2003 12:16:33 PM PDT
by
Publius6961
(40% of Californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
To: VRWC_minion
It really doesn't matterIt doesn't really matter, Saint VRWC, Patron Saint of the Trodlodyte Worker?
I guess you think every bar and restaurant owner is just another oppressor of the masses, huh?
So far you folks have not come up with a winning argument.
We "folks" have always had the winning argument.
It's just that weaker types such as yourself have wormed your way onto the tit of Nanny Government while the rest of us were making an honest living.
It's happened before, you always lose in the end.
To: VRWC_minion
The new front is smoking at home and in the car but by the time you folks notice, the anti's will be steamrolling you there too and just like the bars and restaurants, you won't know what hit you. So far you folks have not come up with a winning argument. Interesting. Apparently you would condone illegalization of smoking in a car and a home. Tell me, VRWC, do you have any regard for private property at all?
294
posted on
10/20/2003 12:16:56 PM PDT
by
Shryke
To: RightFighter
RightFighter? Bwahahahaha!
295
posted on
10/20/2003 12:16:56 PM PDT
by
metesky
("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
To: VRWC_minion
You have a basic misconception of property. Please enlighten me. I am all ears.
296
posted on
10/20/2003 12:17:06 PM PDT
by
Grit
(Tolerance for all but the intolerant...and those who tolerate intolerance etc etc)
To: CSM
However, our points are that even though this may be the case, we do not agree with it! You do agree with it and appreciate your government governing every aspect of your life!.
I hate to be the one to break the news to you but reality is reality.
297
posted on
10/20/2003 12:17:46 PM PDT
by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: Madame Dufarge; CSM
And I wrote the following for mini as well:
Smoke Gnatzies
They buzz around your head until,
You think it will explode.
Youd like to catch them all and flush,
Theyd swirl down the commode.
They agitate, they irritate,
They just wont go away.
They want to tell you how to live,
To all of them I say.
Be gone you pest, just fly away,
My freedom you wont take.
If not for all the buzzing,
Id swear you were a snake.
But snakes are bad, and youre just sad,
So go and bug some cat.
Cause if you dont get out of here,
Theres gonna be a splat.
Flurry 9/16/3
298
posted on
10/20/2003 12:18:17 PM PDT
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Taglines are for the curious to read and the talented to write. Would someone write me one?)
To: Just another Joe
You have just outed yourself, again, as a true socialist.Then the founders of our states are socialists.
299
posted on
10/20/2003 12:18:31 PM PDT
by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: CSM
And by your love of government, your solution would be for the government to ban guns!
If they want the government to forbid anything that might be "bad for us", that would probably be a pretty good idea. And I'm not talking about the potential dangers of guns to the users. >:)
-Eric
300
posted on
10/20/2003 12:19:03 PM PDT
by
E Rocc
(Collectivism is to freedom as raw sewage is to fresh water.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 561-571 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson