1 posted on
06/17/2003 1:23:34 PM PDT by
qam1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: *puff_list
All conservatives who favor smoking bans are stooges of the Tobacco company *BUMP*
I guess Philip Morris pays Rush to say "In my formally nicotine stained hands"
2 posted on
06/17/2003 1:25:44 PM PDT by
qam1
To: qam1
If somebody waved 50k under Paul's nose to pitch Tofu or a subscription to High Times his tune would change in a hurry.
3 posted on
06/17/2003 1:27:14 PM PDT by
buccaneer81
(Plus de fromage, s'il vous plait...)
To: qam1
Um, so what?
4 posted on
06/17/2003 1:27:53 PM PDT by
Ramius
To: qam1
Whiney Liberal Redundancy Alert!
5 posted on
06/17/2003 1:28:30 PM PDT by
ASA Vet
("Those who know, don't talk. Those who talk, don't know." (I'm in the 2nd group.))
To: qam1
Well, it bothers me. It particularly bothers me because so many of these pitchmen claim to be conservatives. Conservatism in America is a philosophy of great ideas that has roots reaching back through Barry Goldwater all the way to Locke and Hobbes. But to hear these bozos tell it, you'd think that conservatism was invented yesterday to sell things. To get back to the New York Times for a second, I am among those conservatives with a long list of gripes about that newspaper's coverage. But how can Rush Limbaugh, for example, attack the New York Times for selling out when in the next breath he will be selling soda? I was prepared to submit a reasoned rebuttal to this article, but after reading this, forget it. This guy's an ignoramus.
6 posted on
06/17/2003 1:35:45 PM PDT by
L.N. Smithee
(Just because I don't think like you doesn't mean I don't think for myself)
To: qam1
"He doesn't claim to be a news person," said Pollak. "He's a talk- show host." Pollak, who is a very nice guy, did his best to explain the distinction to me. When it comes to TV and radio, he said, news reporters can't do ads. But opinion people like Limbaugh and Sean Hannity can.
I don't get it. I'm an opinion person.
Althought this guy claims to be a conservative (I doubt that's true, based on this article), he expresses the very problem of liberal bias in the news. Every time the conservatives complain of liberal bias in the news, the liberals counter by pointing out conservative dominance of radio. They simply cannot understand the difference between someone claiming to be a "neutral journalist", simply reporting the news, and someone who openly expresses that they are biased and giving an opinion.
In other words, liberals do not understand that there is a difference between news "reporting" and opinion. Thus, they see no problem in putting opinion into a "news" story, and don't understand that doing such is bias.
8 posted on
06/17/2003 1:36:24 PM PDT by
brownie
(Reductio Ad Absurdum, or something like that . . .)
To: qam1
Does it bother Mr. Mulshine that Tom Daschle, an honest-to-goodness public official and not just a radio host, takes legal bribes from Boeing via his wife's lobbying paycheck?
To: qam1
Paul Mulshine is NO liberal. He's the best conservative columnist in Jersey.
10 posted on
06/17/2003 1:38:24 PM PDT by
Zorrito
To: qam1
To: qam1
Well, I don't like yakking announcers at baseball games either. So I watch the kids play.
14 posted on
06/17/2003 1:57:41 PM PDT by
Anthem
To: qam1
What goes on behind the scenes could be worse. For example, I've noticed that virtually every radio and TV "conservative" is pro-cigarette. The impression created is that Republicans and conservatives have deep sympathies for the plight of the tobacco companies. Not the ones I know. When I wrote recently in favor of banning smoking in bars, the president of a Republican club in one of the most solidly Republican towns on the planet told me he agreed with me. I don't even know many Republicans who smoke cigarettes anymore.
Ummm, its not about smoking, ok? Its about THE GOVERNMENT GETTING THE HELL OUT OF MY LIFE AND THE HELL OUT OF PRIVATE BUSINESSES' BUSINESS AND TO QUIT TELLING ME WHAT IS RIGHT TO DO AND WRONG TO DO!!!!!!!
ahem, sorry about that.
16 posted on
06/17/2003 1:58:54 PM PDT by
eyespysomething
(Breaking down the stereotypes of soccer moms everyday!)
To: qam1
The funny thing ?
This article at the NJ.COM site has this advertisment smack in the middle of the text.
17 posted on
06/17/2003 2:00:58 PM PDT by
ChadGore
(Piss off a liberal: Hire Someone.)
To: qam1
Calvin and Hobbes I know, but who is Locke and Hobbes?
18 posted on
06/17/2003 2:01:48 PM PDT by
rogers21774
(The guilty taketh the truth to be hard, for it cutteth them to the very center.)
To: qam1
This guy needs to get a life, where does it say you must be anti tobacco to be a conservative....... or anti anything for that matter.
To: qam1
The difference is that "journalists" claim to be impartial when they are not. Rush freely admits that he is not impartial. Therefore I have an accurate lens to view Rush's comments through. I do not have the same luxury of the "journalist".
To: qam1
Proof that male PMS exists?
To: qam1
Conservatism has its roots in Hobbes??? Uh . . . . . no.
To: qam1
But how can Rush Limbaugh, for example, attack the New York Times for selling outRush attacked the NY Times for "selling out"?
To: qam1
I asked him if Paul Mulshine was being paid to tailor his articles in favor of certain DNC ideals. "The answer is: Who knows?" Silverman replied. "There's huge potential for abuse. My suspicion is that there is probably no direct payment but there is probably indirect payment, all kinds of benefits of various kinds: travel, resorts, dining, whatever."
To: qam1
Moron alert!
49 posted on
06/18/2003 7:56:06 PM PDT by
ladyinred
(The left have blood on their hands.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson