Skip to comments.
BUSH PROPOSES LARGEST EXPANSION OF GOVERNMENT SINCE TRUMAN
CNN ^
| 6/6/2002
| President
Posted on 06/06/2002 5:17:43 PM PDT by UnBlinkingEye
I am watching President Bush giving a speech on CNN telling us he is expanding federal government more than any Democrat since Truman.
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: bush; defense; expansion; homeland
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 541-550 next last
To: APBaer
I stand corrected. I believe (I hope I don't get it wrong again) it was the Department of War that got renamed to the Army.
41
posted on
06/06/2002 5:40:11 PM PDT
by
Zon
To: Lower55
We call it cleaning house.In business "reorganization" is usually synonomous with "downsizing".
But for some reason, I don't get the impression that this is what Dubya has in mind.
To: magellan
I saw no expansion, per se. Instead Bush's reorg is likely to reduce government growth, since all of the homeland security stuff will be one agency, as opposed to every cabinet department having its own homeland security division.
I agree. If anything, this could save money. It definitely sounds more efficient. Of course, a rock sounds more efficient than the INS.
To: VRWC_minion
Expanding gov't for defense = good It is one of the tasks given to the fed in the constitution. I generally prepare to skoff any time somebody uses the phrase "expanding government". That's such a bizaare term. If they spend more money but don't hire anymore people is that expanding? What about vice versa? What about idjit laws?
44
posted on
06/06/2002 5:40:33 PM PDT
by
discostu
To: UnBlinkingEye;weikel
Who can deny him these are exceptional times? Exceptional times demand exceptional measures! Exceptional measures demand exceptional men!
"In response to the direct threat to the Republic from the Confederacy of Independent Jihadists Systems, I propose that the Senate gives immediate emergency powers to the Supreme Chancellor-George W. Bush!"
To: VRWC_minion
Expanding gov't for defense = goodExpanding gov't for sucking up to liberal causes = bad.
Unfortunately, many Bush bashers fail to see the difference and bash the President no matter what he does. So I'll have to just ignore them.
I know that our President is not perfect, but he's a honorable man, and I am very proud of him as our Commander in Chief.
Sometimes it seem like Bush bashers fail to recognize the difference between Clinton and Bush. It can be quite amusing at times, and annoying most of the time.
To: Willie Green
Do you mean to say he's even gonna surpass Johnson's "Great Society"??? Heaven help us!!!
Who would have thought this could happen?
To: UnBlinkingEye
It sounded more like taking pieces of already existing bureaucracy and rearranging them. Didn't sound like "expansion" to me, though creating another cabinet department is fairly serious business. We'll need to see more details of it before reaching a final conclusion.
To: Darth Sidious
Good thing God built you a roof. God will do a lot, but He also gave most of us a brain to help Him out.
49
posted on
06/06/2002 5:42:58 PM PDT
by
Lower55
To: sinkspur
it may come to that Another operation the size of WTC911 would probably do the trick.
To: sinkspur
Don't be a simpleton.Beats being a Bush bootlick.
To: UnBlinkingEye
"What is the purpose of the Department of Defense? "Obviously to be the policeman for the WOSP (World's Only Super Power). If you were thinking it was to defend the USA, you are mistaken. It takes a village to raise a child - government just has to get bigger and more obtrustive. Where do you think this country will be 25 years from now?
52
posted on
06/06/2002 5:44:01 PM PDT
by
ex-snook
To: WhiteGuy
Our friends in DC can't manage a budget, and waste more than they should. I'm not so sure they are our friends.
and duhbya's solution is to throw more money at the problem.
Classic
Republicrats think big government is the solution for all things.
To: Willie Green
This isn't business, it's security.
54
posted on
06/06/2002 5:44:14 PM PDT
by
Lower55
To: Willie Green
remember Bush is a businessman and I think things will be streamlined - - If it doesn't it won't be because he didn't try -- he has to deal with some heavy duty labor unions within the govt
55
posted on
06/06/2002 5:44:28 PM PDT
by
duckbutt
To: APBaer
Thanks for the info re 1947 ... I wasn't around during WWI, so I figured it had to be after WWII.
g
To: UnBlinkingEye
This is wonderful. There will be a hand-picked staff to be built by Bush's hand-picked man.
It is a good way for President Bush to leave behind both the old management and staff who have made career history as being paper pushers at the DOD,FBI,CIA - leave them sitting with their coffee and newspapers and waiting for pensions. The old turf wars between the alphabets is all torn up. I'll trust Tom Ridge to build the new model for government pay grade attainment. The added bonus is that Bush will get credit for at least a decade - or until the Dems succeed in getting some of 'their team' to be on the inside of PC decision making.
57
posted on
06/06/2002 5:44:40 PM PDT
by
seenenuf
To: Darth Sidious
Comrade, how dare you question the "perogative" of the executive branch!
58
posted on
06/06/2002 5:44:42 PM PDT
by
lawdog
To: Darth Sidious
Response of a true simpleton....lol
59
posted on
06/06/2002 5:45:05 PM PDT
by
Lower55
To: Reagan Man
According to Andy Card, WH Chief of Staff, there will no additional money required except the $37.1 billion he requested for Homeland Security. In fact, there will be streamlining!
Look at it this way -- some of the Senior Executive Service folks in INS, Customs, etc. are going the way of the dinosaur as you won't need so many and a lot of these were appointed by clinton! This is one way to get rid of clintonites in supervisory positions. These will be new jobs, their old ones will go away and now the clintonites will be able to "spend more time with their family!" Pretty neat way to get rid of them while making the Government work better if you ask me!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 541-550 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson