Skip to comments.
New Hampshire Supreme Court: Gay Sex Not Adultery (Dumbing down deviancy!)
Wnne31, The Associated Press. ^
| November 7, 2003
| AP
Posted on 11/07/2003 12:35:42 PM PST by carlo3b
Supreme Court: Gay Sex Not AdulteryDecision Comes In Divorce Appeal
POSTED: 11:55 a.m. EST November 7, 2003
CONCORD, N.H. -- If a married woman has sex with another woman, is that adultery? The New Hampshire Supreme Court says no.
The court was asked to review a divorce case in which a husband accused his wife of adultery after she had a sexual relationship with another woman. Any finding that one spouse is at fault in the break-up of a marriage can change how the court divides the couple's property.
Robin Mayer, of Brownsville, Vt., was named in the divorce proceedings of a Hanover couple. She appealed the case to the Supreme Court, arguing that gay sex doesn't qualify as adultery under the state's divorce law.
In a 3-2 ruling Friday, the court agreed.
The majority determined that the definition of adultery requires sexual intercourse. The judges who disagreed said adultery should be defined more broadly to include other extramarital sexual activity.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: Connecticut; US: Maine; US: Massachusetts; US: New Hampshire; US: New Jersey; US: New York; US: Pennsylvania; US: Vermont; US: Washington; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: adultery; clintonlegacy; definitionofis; doublestandard; gay; gaytrolldolls; homosexual; homosexualagenda; itsjustsex; lesbian; lesbians; lyingliars; perverts; peversion; prisoners; sex; sick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 241-258 next last
To: carlo3b
YOU'VE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME!
So in other words, deviancy is okay but adultry is ONLY between a man and a woman.
Dare I ask ... what if in the picture perfect deviant couple, er same sex "couple" one cheats. Is THAT adultry? Or simply more deviancy?
,p>Just rtying hard to understand debiant liberal logic. Please help me out.
161
posted on
11/08/2003 12:30:58 PM PST
by
nmh
To: tpaine
OK, I will expect to have anyone say most anything.. thanks for the warning... HUH?
162
posted on
11/08/2003 12:31:34 PM PST
by
carlo3b
(http://www.CookingWithCarlo.com)
To: nmh
Just rtying hard to understand debiant liberal logic. Please help me out. Most of us appear to be clueless.. sorry.. :|
163
posted on
11/08/2003 12:34:25 PM PST
by
carlo3b
(http://www.CookingWithCarlo.com)
To: seamole
I ADORE Salia and Clawrence Thomas. Both are a breath of fresh air. I LOVE hearing or watching them speak on issues. They try so hard to bring Godly reason to answer this evil that continues to gain momentum. They'd better not retire from the U.S.S upreme Court or we are in deep *hit. They are the ONLY two conservatives that do occassionally influence their confused colleagues.
164
posted on
11/08/2003 12:36:41 PM PST
by
nmh
To: apackof2
"Who doesn't believe we are living in the end times?"
THAT is the first thing that crossed my mind and then the ANGER at how evil continues to prevail at a legal level.
165
posted on
11/08/2003 12:38:00 PM PST
by
nmh
To: carlo3b
carlo3b wrote: OK, I will expect to have anyone say most anything..
Exactly. Part of my initial point on your hypocrisy at 134.
You'll 'say' most anything..
166
posted on
11/08/2003 12:41:55 PM PST
by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but wait till next year gun law appeasement effort is sheer BS)
To: tpaine
Hey, Pain-in-the a$$, shut the F$#% up, or go lay down, will ya, PLEASEeeeeee.. can't you see adults are talking?
167
posted on
11/08/2003 12:46:41 PM PST
by
carlo3b
(http://www.CookingWithCarlo.com)
To: carlo3b
Where?
168
posted on
11/08/2003 12:48:37 PM PST
by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but wait till next year gun law appeasement effort is sheer BS)
To: tpaine; carlo3b
Why are you being so coy about your accusations? If you've got something to say, why not just say it instead of beating around the bush?
I've looked at carlo3b's page and see no evidence that he's trolling for anything. I see a link to his website, one to Photo of the Week and something called One Talent Source with his profile.
Quit being a coward and speak plain english, not innuendo.
To: Misty Memory; tpaine
Yeah! You tell him Misty!.. :) . . I think he's a really old and crotchety loner, or a cross dresser thats pregnant! Your guess is as good as mine!!
Or someone that got snookered by an Italian/actor/chef/freeper, in another life, years ago.. I dunno.. LOLOL
Better yet, I think he made a mistake and can't get out without saying "I'm so sorry Carlo"! That might be it, if so it isn't necessary, I really do understand.. :)
170
posted on
11/08/2003 1:31:45 PM PST
by
carlo3b
(http://www.CookingWithCarlo.com)
To: carlo3b
I think he's a really old and crotchety loner, or a cross dresser thats pregnant! Your guess is as good as mine!! Or someone that got snookered by an Italian/actor/chef/freeper, in another life, years ago.. I dunno.. LOLOL
I wonder if he was Julius Caesar in another life? Or had a bad experience with caesar salad.
I've found those with a deseased mind tend to believe others think the same way. He ascribes his impure motives to others to make himself seem normal.
To: Misty Memory
Coy? I posted 'trolling' examples from his site. I think they show hypocrisy when compared to his rants about being 'normal' on this thread.
You don't? -- Thats tough.
172
posted on
11/08/2003 2:08:16 PM PST
by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but wait till next year gun law appeasement effort is sheer BS)
To: tpaine
If they're such glaring examples, why are you the only who sees them?
Why don't point out for those of us who aren't from your planet exactly what he's trolling for? We're all on pins and needles waiting for your insight.
To: Misty Memory
Who said they were glaring examples? Actually the site is pretty clever about attracting talent. Smart fella.
174
posted on
11/08/2003 2:25:20 PM PST
by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but wait till next year gun law appeasement effort is sheer BS)
To: tpaine
Stop it now Paine, you've had your chance to be a jerk on this thread.. so now lick your chops and sulk away and be prepared to find the missing puzzle piece in my real name next time.. until then.. it's been real.. :)
175
posted on
11/08/2003 2:38:29 PM PST
by
carlo3b
(http://www.CookingWithCarlo.com)
To: Misty Memory
Shussssh, we'll talk later.. once the drugs take over, he sleeps like a baby.. LOL
176
posted on
11/08/2003 2:40:33 PM PST
by
carlo3b
(http://www.CookingWithCarlo.com)
To: carlo3b
"puzzle piece"?
Whatever..
Hurry back to your site, maybe some new talent showed up.
177
posted on
11/08/2003 2:46:07 PM PST
by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but wait till next year gun law appeasement effort is sheer BS)
To: carlo3b
I think that you are getting upset over the wrong issue. Suggesting that activities between persons of the same sex are equatable with actions between members of the opposite sexes, is precisely to play into the hands of those who want to equate a deviant "life-style," with normal human sexuality. What Lesbians do, or what Homosexual males do with each other, are not by any precise definition, "sexual acts." Our sexuality has to do with the division of the species into two sexes, and these deviant acts are tantamount to a denial of the overriding Creational importance of the division.
Do not mistake my point, either. Leaving your spouse to engage in deviant acts with members of your own sex is hardly acceptable conduct; and should certainly have similar negative consequences, to those which the law imposes for adultery. (In addition to whatever stigma may obtain from the deviant acts, themsleves.) It is just that it should not be called "adultery," which has a meaning that has been well understood for 3000 or so years, at least.
William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site
178
posted on
11/08/2003 3:01:57 PM PST
by
Ohioan
To: tpaine
Whatever.. Hurry back to your site, maybe some new talent showed up. I give up! Whatever indeed! Geeeze
179
posted on
11/08/2003 3:11:52 PM PST
by
carlo3b
(http://www.CookingWithCarlo.com)
To: Ohioan
What Lesbians do, or what Homosexual males do with each other, are not by any precise definition, "sexual acts." ...It is just that it should not be called "adultery," which has a meaning that has been well understood for 3000 or so years... Here we go again.. But, this time, I think I really understand... NOT!.. :)
180
posted on
11/08/2003 3:15:19 PM PST
by
carlo3b
(http://www.CookingWithCarlo.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 241-258 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson