Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: carlo3b
I think that you are getting upset over the wrong issue. Suggesting that activities between persons of the same sex are equatable with actions between members of the opposite sexes, is precisely to play into the hands of those who want to equate a deviant "life-style," with normal human sexuality. What Lesbians do, or what Homosexual males do with each other, are not by any precise definition, "sexual acts." Our sexuality has to do with the division of the species into two sexes, and these deviant acts are tantamount to a denial of the overriding Creational importance of the division.

Do not mistake my point, either. Leaving your spouse to engage in deviant acts with members of your own sex is hardly acceptable conduct; and should certainly have similar negative consequences, to those which the law imposes for adultery. (In addition to whatever stigma may obtain from the deviant acts, themsleves.) It is just that it should not be called "adultery," which has a meaning that has been well understood for 3000 or so years, at least.

William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site

178 posted on 11/08/2003 3:01:57 PM PST by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ohioan
What Lesbians do, or what Homosexual males do with each other, are not by any precise definition, "sexual acts." ...It is just that it should not be called "adultery," which has a meaning that has been well understood for 3000 or so years...

Here we go again.. But, this time, I think I really understand... NOT!.. :)

180 posted on 11/08/2003 3:15:19 PM PST by carlo3b (http://www.CookingWithCarlo.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

To: Ohioan
Leaving your spouse to engage in deviant acts with members of your own sex is hardly acceptable conduct; and should certainly have similar negative consequences, to those which the law imposes for adultery.
William Flax
178





Which leaves the real question.

Why should our law be involved in imposing penalties for adultery?

181 posted on 11/08/2003 3:17:32 PM PST by tpaine (I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but wait till next year gun law appeasement effort is sheer BS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson