Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wages From Sin: Churches should not accept money won from gambling
World Magazine ^ | January 11, 2003 online edition | John Piper

Posted on 01/03/2003 12:36:46 PM PST by sola gracia

Wages from sin

Churches should not accept money won from gambling

By John Piper

THE WEST VIRGINIA PASTORS WHO ACCEPTED JACK Whittaker's tithe on his $170 million Powerball booty should be ashamed of themselves. One of them said, "That's a blessing to have that kind of backing." I don't think so.

Christ does not build His church on the backs of the poor. The engine that delivers His righteousness in the world is not driven by the desire to get rich. The gospel of Jesus Christ is not advanced by undermining civic virtue. Let the pastors take their silver and throw it back into the temple of greed.

In 2001 Americans wagered $57 billion on lotteries, $18 billion on horses and dogs, $592 billion in casinos, and $150 billion on other gambling. This is a blot on American life. Break it down to individuals. Massachusetts sells more than $500 worth of lottery tickets each year for every man, woman, and child. Think how many do not gamble, and you will begin to imagine what thousands are throwing away to have a 1-to-135,145,920 chance for the jackpot.

The American exploitation of the poor with lotteries muddies the conscience of many legislators. Statistics abound that "the government-sponsored lottery continues its shameless exploitation of the poor" (James Dobson, April 1999 Newsletter). This exploitation is explicit in some of the advertising bought by the $400 million spent annually by states to promote lotteries. For example, in Chicago one sign read: "This could be your ticket out." That is shameless. Other promotions mock the virtues of hard work and serious study as a way to make a living. Plan A: Study hard, save money, get old. Plan B: Play the lottery.

Only a few, it seems, are willing to say how far and how manifold are the corrupting effects of the lottery. How many have pondered this insight from Richard Neuhaus, "In a democracy, the need for popular consent to tax is a powerful check on government growth and irresponsibility. A government that raises money by encouraging and exploiting the weaknesses of its citizens escapes that democratic mechanism of accountability. As important, state-sponsored gambling undercuts the civic virtue upon which democratic governance depends" (First Things, September 1991).

Is it a "blessing" for the church of Jesus Christ to have the backing of a social sickness that "destroys marriages, undermines the work ethic, increases crime, motivates suicide, destroys the financial security of families ... and dupes people into believing [it] will benefit the children" (Dobson)?

Don't play Powerball for me. I go on record now that I will not knowingly take any money won from gambling. And I will do my best to lead the elders of our church from accepting any money offered from the proceeds of gambling.

We are followers of Jesus. He had no place to lay His head and did not accept the demonic temptation to jump off the temple for the jackpot of instant recognition. The Calvary road is not paved with Powerball tickets, but with blood. The church was bought once by One who refused the short-cut of instant triumph. It will never be bought by those who dream of riches.

The lottery is another opportunity to pierce your soul with many pangs, and lead your children into ruin. The Bible says, "Those who desire to be rich fall into temptation, into a snare, into many senseless and harmful desires that plunge people into ruin and destruction. For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evils. It is through this craving that some have wandered away from the faith and pierced themselves with many pangs" (1 Timothy 6:9-10). In other words, the desire to be rich is suicidal. And endorsing it is cruel.

It is wrong to wager with a trust fund. And all we have, as humans, is a trust fund. Everything we have is a trust from God, to be used for His glory. God "Himself gives to all mankind life and breath and everything" (Acts 17:25). Faithful trustees may not gamble with a trust fund. They work and trade: value for value, just and fair. This is the pattern again and again in Scripture. And when you are handling the funds of another, how much more irresponsible it is to wager!

If you play, don't look our way. We will not salve your conscience by taking one dime of your plunder, or supporting even the thought of your spiritual suicide. Let the widow give her penny and the laborer his wage. And keep your life free from the love of money.


TOPICS: Current Events; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: churches; gambling; lottery; pastors
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 01/03/2003 12:36:47 PM PST by sola gracia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: drstevej; OrthodoxPresbyterian; JenB; Thinkin' Gal; Jerry_M; BibChr; enemy of the people; ...
A PIPER lottery BUMP.
2 posted on 01/03/2003 12:37:51 PM PST by sola gracia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sola gracia
The problem isn't the lottery. Most people who spend money on the lottery would spend the money on something else anyway. They would just blow it. It's not like they are going to put it in their savings account for a rainey day. Or like they are going to give it to the poor and homeless. They're going to rent a DVD instead. Or buy cigarettes, or an extra bag of dorritos or whatever.

Economically it comes down to money being taken out of business and put in the government. It becomes a tax.

Spiritually it's not a lot different than wasting money on any of the countless things we waste it on. It is not good stewardship of our money as taught in the bible, but neither is renting 4 dvd's over the weekend. Or spending $45 bucks a ticket to go see the OU Sooners (when they are on TV for free.... one of my personal vices).

Granted the guy going to the football game is making a concious decision to pay for entertainment...and maybe the guy buying the lottery tickets is doing it out of greed. Greed..... that's one of those Catholic things isn't it?

I'm opposed to the lottery and would not buy a ticket. But I don't have the strong feelings expressed in this article. I know that the poor are going to be poor with or without the lottery.

3 posted on 01/03/2003 12:56:38 PM PST by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sola gracia; JHavard; Havoc; OLD REGGIE; Iowegian; PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain; TrueBeliever9; ..
Piper bump...

all things are not profitable for us even if we have the liberty to do them IMHO the lottery is one of them..great article Sola

4 posted on 01/03/2003 1:40:08 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Piper bump...

http://www.newpiper.com

Piper, Vero Beach FL
5 posted on 01/03/2003 1:53:08 PM PST by unspun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sola gracia; RnMomof7; kjam22; OrthodoxPresbyterian
Taxation is an issue that is dear to my heart. Seeing that the bottom 50% of wage-earners don't pay anything at all in real taxes to support the nation nor most of the states, then it is hard to get sympathy from me for taking lottery money to fund some government project that otherwise would be paid by the over-taxed.

It's so surprising that Piper wants to appeal to this issue in building a case against lotteries.

If someone is getting some money out of these Americans to help shoulder a part of their share of the burden, then I'd be inclined to argue IN FAVOR of it. The bottom half of wage-earners in our nation are robbed of an equal voice by virtue of their being carried on the backs of everyone else.

In short, if they don't help pay, then they shouldn't get to vote....ESPECIALLY on tax issues and candidates.

If someone is arguing that the lottery helps get some of their money into the system, then I'd view that as an ARGUMENT ON BEHALF OF the lottery.

Amazingly shallow article.
6 posted on 01/03/2003 1:57:42 PM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Piper Bump

Exercising that choice not to buy the lottery Mom?? A little free will??? (Just kidding.... don't hit me too hard :)

7 posted on 01/03/2003 1:58:42 PM PST by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kjam22
Happy New Year if I missed you K...BTW we will not lose our abillity to choose sin till we die..santification is an ongoing process..
8 posted on 01/03/2003 2:01:04 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kjam22
Economically it comes down to money being taken out of business and put in the government. It becomes a tax. "The Pennsylvania Lottery...(proceeds benefit older Pennsylvanians)" One of the greatest lies ever told in the Commonwealth. Fact is, money budgeted from the general fund for Sr. Citizens never gets there because lottery funds ...when it actually turns a profit for anyone except the firm that markets the games to the states...replace that money. Budgeted money for Sr. Citizens goes into political mischief. One is forced to look at all sources of income that is tithed to the church. After all, there is no degree of sin is there?? Example: The nurse at a hospital that provides abortions is paid in blood money, even though she does not work in that particular part of the hospital, right? What then is the scriptural balance or guidlines for the church to follow? Maybe, "Whatsoever is sold in the shambles, that eat, asking no question for conscience sake: For the earth is the Lord's, and the fullness thereof. If any of them that believe not bid you to a feast, and ye be disposed to go; whatsoever is set before you, eat, asking no question for conscience sake."ICorinthians 10:25-27 KJV Agreed, it sounds as if it is a form of "don't ask, don't tell", but these are not Clinton's words, are they?
9 posted on 01/03/2003 2:26:06 PM PST by Calvinist_Dark_Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sola gracia
Christ does not build His church on the backs of the poor.
After it left the 'poor's hands, it was NO LONGER THEIR's!

Would they turn down money from a dairy; after 'the poor' had bought milk?

Would they refuse money from a rich landlord, after 'the poor' had paid their rent?

Would they sniff at money from a giving cotton mill owner, after 'the poor' had bought clothes?


NIV Micah 4:13
"Rise and thresh, O Daughter of Zion, for I will give you horns of iron; I will give you hoofs of bronze and you will break to pieces many nations." You will devote their ill-gotten gains to the LORD, their wealth to the Lord of all the earth.

Here, it appears, 'ill gotten gain' is NOT rejected!!!
10 posted on 01/03/2003 2:47:14 PM PST by Elsie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun
Piper bump... http://www.newpiper.com Piper, Vero Beach FL

I guess you can fly 'em if you got 'em.

11 posted on 01/03/2003 2:51:53 PM PST by sola gracia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xzins; RnMomof7
Taxation is an issue that is dear to my heart. Seeing that the bottom 50% of wage-earners don't pay anything at all in real taxes to support the nation nor most of the states, then it is hard to get sympathy from me for taking lottery money to fund some government project that otherwise would be paid by the over-taxed.

What this is, in essence, is an income tax disguised as a game of chance. The politicians know they can't increase taxes on the poor without confirming what they try so hard to hide: They think ALL the people's money belongs to them. It's a true voluntary tax (as opposed to the IRS's sham "voluntary tax") in that the people are not forced to buy a lottery ticket, but the fuel that drives the whole thing is the appeal to people's basic greed.

xzins, I recommend you read James Brovard's book "Freedom In Chains". If what you read in there doesn' make you hair stand straight up, I'd be very concerned for your perceptive powers. Statism is alive and well, and fast becoming the rule of Law in this country. One of the prime tenets of Statism is control over and collection of all forms of income and gain produced by all means, for the State to dole out to it's subjects as the State sees fit, supposedly so that all benefit equally. Karl Marx said it a different way in the Communist Manifesto: From each according to their abilities, to each according to their need. The underlying belief is that the State is a benevolent, all-knowing, wise entity which naturally has the best interests of its subjects in mind, and that the State cannot harm its subjects. Sound like someone we know? Statists have replaced God with the State as the supreme Being.

In every case I can think of, when promises have been made as to the benefits the lottery will bring, the benevolence it will bestow, and the good it will do, all those promises and benefits were so much hot air. But, greed wins out in most cases, partly because the people have a sense of being robbed anyway, by taxation. Lotteries just play into that feeling. It is an income tax, pure and simple, and it is a regressive one, because it hits the poor harder than the rich, rather than a progressive tax like the IRS Income tax.

Oh, and as to your assertion that 50% of wage earners don't pay any real tax, go to Rush Limbaugh's website, go to the bottom of the page, and check out the Only the Rich Pay Taxes section. It's an eye-opener.

12 posted on 01/03/2003 3:19:23 PM PST by nobdysfool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Seeing that the bottom 50% of wage-earners don't pay anything at all in real taxes to support the nation nor most of the states

I just went back and read again, and noticed that you said the bottom 50%. Dude, I'm in that catagory, and I assure you, I'm paying taxes. Personally, I think taxes are an evil institution. The percentage of my income that I pay in taxes, in total, counting all the sales, excise, license, and other taxes, is a far larger percentage of my income than it would be of a man making 10 times my earnings, or 100 times my earnings. I pay a larger portion of my income in taxes, as a percentage, than any rich man. To say that I make no real contribution by doing that is a slap in the face.

What exactly do you mean by the statement that "taxation is an issue that is dear to my heart"?

13 posted on 01/03/2003 3:30:13 PM PST by nobdysfool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nobdysfool; OrthodoxPresbyterian
Nbdy,
I'm a national retail sales tax kind of guy.

One tax and one tax only to pay for everything. You pay as you go and the % is the same for everyone. The conservative side of me says that the prime role of government is defense.

After that, I don't really need some legislator to tell me I can't have my eggs over easy or my property subject to their environmental rules.
14 posted on 01/03/2003 3:33:42 PM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sola gracia
Why not? Remember, the Israelites were told to "spoil the Egyptians" as they were fleeing Egypt.
15 posted on 01/03/2003 3:49:39 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sola gracia
I don't have a moral problem with it. For one thing, I don't think gambling is inherently wrong, although I acknowledge some people are irresponsible with their money and spend more than they can afford on lottery tickets, potato chips, television sets, and other frivolities.

Second, life is full of ambiguities that may be wrong for one person but not for another. For example, I buy my groceries from a store that sells lottery tickets and malt liquor (as well as groceries) to people on the margins of society. The author of this article probably patronizes only stores free from such corruption. Each of us must decide on these things for ourselves using the Scripture's and the Holy Spirit's guidance.

16 posted on 01/03/2003 4:24:05 PM PST by Fifth Business
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
One tax and one tax only to pay for everything.

Biggest problem I see with that is that it is a regressive tax. It will hit the poor much harder than the wealthy. Try as you might to say it won't, there are some things that everyone must buy, rich or poor. The poor will wind up paying through the nose for basic necessities. And instituting a National Retail Sales Tax will cause the barter trade to explode, thereby reducing actual realized revenue, and creating (or expanding, actually) a huge underground economy.

I'm Conservative, too, and don't think the government has any right to tell me how to have my eggs or what to do with my own land. the prime function of government is to protect its citizens, not from themselves, but from foreign aggression. After that, government should exercise minimal oversight over such public functions as are necessary for the smooth and efficient operation of commerce, while not directly engaging in the operation of commerce, or interfering with its operation with excess regulation, onerous rules, or restrictive limits.

17 posted on 01/03/2003 5:51:42 PM PST by nobdysfool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sola gracia; RnMomof7

Churches should not accept money won from gambling

Why not?
What scriptural reference is there to back up such a position?
Sounds like smug, self-righteousness to me.


18 posted on 01/03/2003 7:43:58 PM PST by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
If Piper preaches against gambling he should not accept any profit from it
19 posted on 01/03/2003 8:10:10 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: nobdysfool; xzins
" instituting a National Retail Sales Tax will cause the barter trade to explode, thereby reducing actual realized revenue, and creating (or expanding, actually) a huge underground economy."

Sounds good to me! - - Every dollar not paid in taxes is a dollar that cannot be used to harm us. Zero dollars to Government = FREEDOM. (like it, or lose it)

20 posted on 01/03/2003 8:20:21 PM PST by editor-surveyor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson