Posted on 11/11/2023 2:36:04 PM PST by ebb tide
TYLER, Texas (LifeSiteNews) –– The morning’s news of Pope Francis removing the bishop of Tyler – Bishop Joseph Strickland – has made international waves and caused instant outrage amongst Catholics, in a fallout, the scale of which, has likely taken even the Vatican by surprise.
In the Holy See Press Office’s daily bulletin on November 11, the Vatican announced that Pope Francis had “relieved” Bishop Joseph Strickland of the governance of his Diocese of Tyler.
READ: Pope Francis personally removes America’s Bishop Joseph Strickland
The true import of the Vatican’s brief statement was not lost on the international media. By late afternoon Saturday, numerous major outlets across the globe had reported on the story, with varying degrees of favorability for either Strickland or Francis. The list includes:
The Catholic media was not remiss in covering the news either, with the more heterodox outlets’ various reports welcoming the Pope’s move against Strickland, who has emerged as a recipient of regular criticism in the pages of many “Catholic” media outlets, for his stance promoting Catholic teaching and Tradition.
All outlets, Catholic and secular, noted Bishop Strickland’s vocal stance in proclaiming truths which are often posited in juxtaposition to the statements made by Pope Francis. Indeed, Strickland is known for his unequivocal defense of Catholic teaching, teaching that is often cast in confusion by papal statements or messages.
Strickland’s more public positions on moral and doctrinal issues include urging Francis to deny Holy Communion to former U.S. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi over her support of legal abortion, accusing the pope of a “program of undermining the Deposit of Faith,” and condemning the prominent pro-LGBT “blasphemy” of Father James Martin, S.J.
He has also been notably forthright on moral controversies in U.S. politics and culture, including the Biden administration’s spying on Catholics and public displays by self-described “Satanic” groups. This summer, he spoke at a protest against the Los Angeles Dodgers’ hosting an anti-Catholic drag queen troupe called the “Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence,” who style themselves as grotesque nuns.
Such a clear, and unwavering stance has put the Texas bishop on an increasingly public path, with news outlets and clerics alike noting the discrepancy between his and Pope Francis’ increasingly confusing or heterodox teachings.
The New York Times dubbed Strickland “one of the loudest American voices against Pope Francis within his own church.” Francis removing Strickland was described by the NY Times thus:
In a rare move that is a measure both of Bishop Strickland’s outspoken criticism of the supreme pontiff of his faith and Francis’ frustration with ultraconservatives in the United States who have emerged as the financial center, and media megaphone, of the resistance to his papacy, the pope removed the prelate from his post.
Strickland, the outlet added, is “now a martyr to frustrated traditionalists,” while the BBC wrote that Strickland’s forced removal “all follows significant attempts made by the Pope to make the Church more progressive during his papacy.”
Forbes described Strickland’s promotion of Catholic teaching as “his beliefs,” while the AP referred to Strickland as “a fierce critic of the pontiff and [who] has come to symbolize the polarization within the U.S. Catholic hierarchy.
The major import of the Pope’s move is also due in part to the un-precedented nature of taking direct action to remove a bishop. It comes after Strickland was subject to an apostolic visitation in June – about which, as recently as September 20, Strickland stated he had been given no reason for the visitation, nor had he heard any results from it.
READ: Former USCCB head: Apostolic visitation judged it ‘not feasible’ for Bishop Strickland to remain
In a statement November 11, Cardinal Daniel DiNardo – head of the Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston in Texas, of which Strickland’s Diocese of Tyler is a suffragan – declared the visitation had judged that it was “not feasible” for Strickland to remain as bishop of the diocese.
However, even at this late stage, DiNardo did not give any details about the visitation, its purpose or findings.
The striking nature of the Pope’s move has been noted especially by thousands of Catholics, who have taken to social media to express outrage against the Pope’s decision and support for Strickland.
“Jorge Bergoglio has no valid grounds to remove Bishop Strickland from the Diocese of Tyler,” wrote the U.K.’s Deacon Donnelly. “The usurper Bergoglio is a dictator, not a pope.”
The former U.S. Nuncio, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, described Francis’ action as “as a cowardly form of authoritarianism, which in no way fits with Bergoglio’s rants about “welcoming” and “inclusiveness.”
Theologian and author, Dr. Peter Kwasniewski, told LifeSiteNews that the Pope’s action vindicated the book written by Henry Sire:
Years ago Henry Sire called Pope Francis ‘the dictator pope.’ Time and again this evaluation has been vindicated, and never more so than when the pope deposes a bishop without due process, against canon law, and for no imaginable grave wrongdoing.
He has combined the “I am the Tradition” mentality of Pius IX with the motto of Juan Perón, “To the friend, everything. To the enemy, not even justice!,” and added his peculiar anti-American and anti-traditionalist venom. We must beg the Lord to deliver us from this abuser of the papal office and of the people of God.
The Spectator’s associate editor Damian Thompson excoriated Pope Francis for removing the Texas bishop, while adding that the Pope’s time “is thankfully running out.”
A number of priests have expressed their support for the beleaguered Bishop Strickland, yet so far the only prelate to do likewise is Astana’s Bishop Athanasius Schneider.
READ: Bishop Strickland’s removal is ‘a blatant injustice’ says Bishop Schneider
Writing on LifeSiteNews, the equally prominent bishop described the removal of Strickland as “a black day for the Catholic Church of our day.”
“We are witnessing a blatant injustice towards a bishop who did his duty in preaching and defending with parrhesia the immutable Catholic faith and morals and in promoting the sacredness of the liturgy, especially in the immemorial traditional rite of the Mass,” Schneider wrote.
“May the sacrifice, which Our Lord asked from Bishop Strickland, bear plenty spiritual fruits for time and eternity,” continued Schneider.
There has been no further comment on the situation from the Vatican, the U.S. Nuncio Cardinal Christophe Pierre, or the Vatican’s Dicastery for Bishops. Meanwhile, the Diocese of Tyler ends the day without the leadership of the bishop who led the diocese since November 2012.
Ping
Real Catholics are going to have to go their own way to save their faith or they will be part of the 666 system.
How about putting a real Catholic pope in Avignon?
The Poope is THE false prophet along with a slew of Antichrists.
Been wondering who the False Prophet would be.
My understanding is that the false prophet is a position and isn’t necessarily a specific individual. A prophet is one who gives a message from God. The false prophet gives a false message.
This Pope is definitely not in line with the Bible on anything that I can see.
This evil pope needs to be evicted from the Vatican.
What a time we live in.
Difficult times like these in the Church new saints and martyrs emerge from among us.
It seems the Catholic church might start driving parishes away.
Pope Biden.
Do they have an impeachment process?
For whatever it’s worth, it looks like Tyler, TX is a very small diocese by Catholic standards in the U.S. The figures I found indicate that there are fewer than 60,000 Catholics in the diocese, comprising less than 5% of the total population.
Yes, it’s called assassination.
Atheist commie pope strikes again.
RE: What a time we live in.
True. A bumbling half-wit US President and a progressive Pope hoping for higher poll ratings by appealing to gays and abortion rights types.
He was supposedly installed as Pope to get an increase in Third World and American young Democrats in the Church as attendance and the number of parishes were declining so much. Former Popes had all those fussy and particular rules enforced.
This sounds a lot like regular politics, doesn’t it?
Also, as Catholics, Protestants and Jews know, the talk from the pulpit can bring in more money or less money. Keeping quiet about “judgmental” and traditional teachings cuts down on money from “progressives.”
My grim joke: Maybe the religious groups will set up funding for women to have free limo service to get an abortion to show tolerance and modernism. Married lesbian priests can perform wedding ceremonies. And drag queen shows at Sunday school will be paid by churches and synagogues.
Bad news is some analysts wrote not long ago that if Pope Francis were no longer there the same small group of Vatican insiders would install another gay friendly, Third World popular, anti-tradition, anti-Latin Mass Pope.
A NYT article said the Pope has only visited the US 6 days in 10 years and faces American....
....”(critics) who prefer traditional forms of worship. But they are especially prominent and influential in the United States, where Francis faces a church hierarchy that is uniquely hostile to his papacy, led by several outspoken bishops and fueled by a well-funded ecosystem of right-wing Catholic websites, radio shows, podcasts and conferences that have shaped the landscape of American Catholicism and politics more broadly.”
Seems like everything is unfolding in a pandemic of evil
Seems like everything is unfolding in a pandemic of evil
><><
Yes, it does.
What happened to “””WHO AM I TO JUDGE??????
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.