Exactly. And that's why Pope Benedict XVI had the words of the canon, at the consecration, corrected from the erroneous "pro omnibus", that VCII forced on us, back to the correct "pro multis".
Posted on 05/04/2020 9:21:35 AM PDT by ebb tide
The heretical nonsense continues unabated from the mouth of Bergoglio, the latest is this morning.
Matthew 28:16-20 Douay-Rheims
And the eleven disciples went into Galilee, unto the mountain where Jesus had appointed them. And seeing him they adored: but some doubted. And Jesus coming, spoke to them, saying: All power is given to me in heaven and in earth. Going therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and behold I am with you all days, even to the consummation of the world.
He must have a warped idea of the Great Commission of Our Lord Jesus Christ because it is pretty clear. The words of Our Lord Jesus Christ as written by the St. Matthew the Apostle is also highly prophetic, "but some doubted."
We now know one of whom Christ referred.
The man is a criminal, he is a clear and present danger.
He must be denounced.
Ping
The ImPopester strikes again.
When will Catholics not just denounce this heretic, but abandon the institution that foisted him on them?
He’s literally saying one can obtain salvation without openly professing belief in the person of Christ. This is heresy - total one world religion stuff.
Sound as if The Pope just announced that he and Christianity are irrelevant.
Frankie is a collectivist. Jesus was not.
Being a Christian means an individual decision, whether you were baptized as a child or not (although I think the sacrament, which leaves an indelible mark on the would, does predispose to accepting Christ).
Our Lord has set us free to make individual moral decisions based on His teachings, and that’s what the Communist Chinese and Bergoglio hate.
Open universalism.
Saying "all are justified" sounds a lot like material heresy to my ears.
I think it is debatable whether Francis is truly the Pope, because I am not convinced that Benedict's resignation was not done under duress (which would invalidate it). All the more reason to stand our ground and defend the Church from someone who may be a usurper.
+100!!
How can somebody believe that Christ died cor their sins and yet persist in not accepting him as their lord and savior?
Unless they choose to be condemned ong with the demons who “know and tremble”
He did say in Amoris Laetitia that “No one can be condemned forever, because that is not the logic of the Gospel!”
Any thoughts about the Pope’s tweet on Saturday?:
“Let us turn this time of pandemic into a test case to prepare for our collective future. Without an all-embracing vision, there will be no future for anyone.”
https://mobile.twitter.com/Pontifex/status/1256546476789915651
Exactly. And that's why Pope Benedict XVI had the words of the canon, at the consecration, corrected from the erroneous "pro omnibus", that VCII forced on us, back to the correct "pro multis".
I left the Catholic church over 30 years ago and it was liberating.
I am closer to God now than I ever was when I believed I needed the church as an intermediary.
Then what need have we for Bergoglio?
And I got slammed here for quoting my brother (a retired Bishop — er, Bishop Emeritus or whatever) who opined that this Pope may be an Anti-Pope.
Evil stuff.
This group (Bergoglio and fellow travelers) would have us ignore and then forget Trent altogether.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.