Plague in the house of Sir Jordan Fitz-Eisulf, Stained glass window, Canterbury Cathedral.
Posted on 03/09/2020 8:33:15 AM PDT by lightman
The World Health Organization has taken the rare step of declaring the coronavirus outbreak a global health emergency. The fast-spreading virus that originated in China has flu-like symptoms, but 20% of the cases develop into serious and potentially life-threatening conditions, such as pneumonia and respiratory failure. Though the mortality rate is not high–so far, 171 people in China have died, out of some 8,000 cases–the prospect of a pandemic has shaken the stock market, shut down a great deal of international travel, and imposed severe restrictions in China and other countries.
Medical professionals around the world are making plans for how they might deal with a coronavirus epidemic in their countries. Fear of the disease–or others, like it, perhaps more deadly–has Christians in many countries wondering how they should respond. Should they evacuate areas that are threatened by the disease? Should they find ways of helping the sick? If they do, won’t that expose them to the virus? These are especially urgent questions for Christians in China.
Medical student Emmy Yang has written an article for Christianity Today entitled Is It Faithful to Flee an Epidemic? What Martin Luther Teaches Us About Coronavirus, with this deck: “The German reformer’s pastoral reflection on the plague can guide both medical students like me and Christians in China—and everywhere the Wuhan virus has spread.”
In 1527, the black plague–which had wiped out half the population of Europe two centuries earlier–broke out in Wittenberg. The whole city, understandably, panicked. Luther wrote an open letter that would be entitled “Whether One May Flee from a Deadly Plague” (Luther’s Works 43:119-38). It is a profound and practical reflection on the Christian’s response to death and suffering, the obligations that come from loving one’s neighbor, the legitimacy of self-preservation, and–as one might expect–vocation.
Here is Emmy Yang’s summation of Luther’s points:
First, Luther argued that anyone who stands in a relationship of service to another has a vocational commitment not to flee. Those in ministry, he wrote, “must remain steadfast before the peril of death.” The sick and dying need a good shepherd who will strengthen and comfort them and administer the sacraments—lest they be denied the Eucharist before their passing. Public officials, including mayors and judges, are to stay and maintain civic order. Public servants, including city-sponsored physicians and police officers, must continue their professional duties. Even parents and guardians have vocational duties toward their children. . . .
Luther challenges Christians to see opportunities to tend to the sick as tending to Christ himself (Matt. 25:41–46). Out of love for God emerges the practice of love for neighbor.
But Luther does not encourage his readers to expose themselves recklessly to danger. His letter constantly straddles two competing goods: honoring the sanctity of one’s own life, and honoring the sanctity of those in need. Luther makes it clear that God gives humans a tendency toward self-protection and trusts that they will take care of their bodies (Eph. 5:29; 1 Cor. 12:21–26). He defends public health measures such as quarantines and seeking medical attention when available. In fact, Luther proposes that not to do so is to act recklessly. Just as God has gifted humans with their bodies, so too he has gifted the medicines of the earth.
What if a Christian still desires to flee? Luther affirms that this may, in fact, be the believer’s faithful response, provided that no emergency exists and that they arrange substitutes who will “take care of the sick in their stead and nurse them.” Notably, Luther also reminds readers that salvation is independent of these good works. He ultimately tasks them to decide whether to flee or to stay during plagues, trusting that they will arrive at a faithful decision through prayer and meditation on the Scriptures. Participation in aiding the sick arises out of grace, not obligation.
However, Luther himself was not afraid. Despite the exhortations of his university colleagues, he stayed behind to minister to the sick and dying.
Here is a brilliant quotation from Luther’s letter, drawing on Matthew 25:31-46:
This I well know, that if it were Christ or his mother who were laid low by illness everybody would be so solicitous and would gladly become a servant or helper. Everyone would want to be bold and fearless; nobody would flee but everyone would come running. . . .If you wish to serve Christ and to wait on him, very well, you have your sick neighbor close at hand. Go to him and serve him, and you will surely find Christ in him.
Plague in the house of Sir Jordan Fitz-Eisulf, Stained glass window, Canterbury Cathedral.
“...so far, 171 people in China have died, out of some 8,000 cases...”
I’d bet $5 that if the true numbers were known, over 500,000 are dead and 12-15,000,000+ are infected.
But we’ll never know.
Martin Luther also had a seven point plan for the extermination of my people, a plan ultimately followed by the Nazis.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Jews_and_Their_Lies
Can’t say I would willingly pay attention to anything such a foul man writes, let alone anything he attempts to pass off as moral teaching.
Don’t you know that Lutherans consider it a sin to question official government numbers?
That’s all and good but what did he say about the stock market?
Luther was just throwing the venom of the Rabbis back at them. And unlike the Rabbis, Luther had the excuse of being old and pissed off all the time.
Yeah, the Shoa was our fault.
Nice virtue signaling.
Oh no no! Better yet what did he say about the horse race this afternoon?
There’s noa business like shoa business!
Interesting. I was not aware Martin Luther was a time Traveller and thus able to discuss the Coronavirus 500 years before it happened.
I look forward to hearing John Calvin’s views on iPhones and St. Francis of Assisi’s discussion of Hot Pockets.
Don’t you know that Lutherans consider it a sin to question official government numbers?
Save yourself and your family.
Done.
Good point.! That’s another one.
The Holocaust is not a joking matter.
Let's just say that when ancient Jews (or the modern ultra-orthodox, who are infamous for spitting on random people or using group intimidation, corruption and shady business deals) started admitting to people that they pray daily that all the Gentile nations be made their slave, it did them no favors:
From the former Chief Sephardi Rabbi of Israel as reported by Israeli news: 
I’m a “recovering Methodist”, so no, I didn’t know that. Heh.
Doubtless you will have a great disgust for the most honored Jewish scholar and tireless defender of the Jewish ideal in the 1st Century; the learned Saul of Tarsus.
Galations 2-3 might give you some perspective.
Evidence of early Christians being God’s people is that they didn’t just kill all of the Jewish leaders in their sleep.
I will stand with you, for "Never again". At 70 years old, you just can't expect me do do any running.
You are misrepresenting Lutherans, my FRiend.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.