Posted on 01/04/2016 2:20:34 PM PST by overdog2
This video answers many of the questions posted here regarding the Shroud of Turin.
Note: it supports the connection to the Sudarium of Oviedo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCtDqCuhWNM&feature=youtu.be
"SHROUD A NEW ASTONISHING PHENOMENON DISCOVERED IN THIS FIND"
Published on Jun 28, 2015
Photogrammetric restitution on the Shroud of Turin has revealed a previously unknown phenomenon that opens up new horizons for science.
The strength of this discovery is stressed by the fact that the geometrical data used for restitution can be verified with tools that are accessible to everyone.
Executive summary?
PFL
Link please? I missed it.
Whoever did this video were amateurs. Didn’t anyone notice that the narrator’s mouth was too close to the microphone? With those exploding P’s, she sounds like a typical conservative talk show host.
Your ping list?
I’m not particularly interested in 53 minutes of it, but here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCtDqCuhWNM&feature=youtu.be
Oops, sorry, thought you were referring to the original link.
Executive summary?
...
Isn’t the CapsLock enough?
Second request for summary: video or audio takes too long.
In keeping with my practice of allowing everybody their opportunity to explain their ideas without prejudice, I have watched the entire presentation carefully. It relies on a degree of pareidolia to which Allan Whanger could only aspire in his wildest dreams, entirely based on some extremely blurred versions of the Enrie negatives which are claimed to be “very high resolution scans.†The word “restitution,†and a possible way in which two similar images can be combined to extract information not obtainable from either individually is described, but not, in fact demonstrated, so that the various lines delineating the objects discovered on the body are not actually apparent in what we are shown. If there is any truth in these discoveries, a much clearer demonstration of how they were achieved will be necessary.
Some researchers will be happy to accept all the pareidolia at face value, but we are next boldly informed that the body was lying face down on the Shroud, which will surely be a surprise to almost everybody. The justification for this is: “The position of the hair, the hollows of the face between the cheeks and mouth, the slope of the cloth from the right leg towards the left due to gravity, the position of the arms and wrists on a single plane and other details indicate that the force of gravity was towards the front of the body.†I don’t accept any of that at all, and could easily demonstrate the reverse.
The rest of the video attempts to show that Jesus was buried wearing various garments and adorned with religious ornaments, which, during the course of the image-forming process, moved, producing successions of images of the same objects on the Shroud, rather like stroboscopic photos of objects in motion. None of the objects discovered by Allan Whanger and other pareidolists (flowers, titulus, crowns of thorns, spear heads, scourges, death certificates etc.) are observed at all, although a leafy headdress of Sarcopoterium spinosum, and various belts, chains and buckles are described in detail.
As a bit of a side line it is revealed that the Sudarium of Oviedo, rather than being folded in two and wrapped around the face, was in fact folded into eighty layers and placed under the brow, thus holding the face slightly off the plane of the cloth. This is highly disputable.
There are some ingenious descriptions of how double images of the hands could have resulted in the image that we all observe, although the details, again, rely on pareidolia of a fairly extreme kind.
The video ends with a poorly argued attempt to explain how parallel radiation can emerge from a point source.
The “International Institute for Advanced Studies of Spacial Representation Sciences†appears to be a one-man-band consisting exclusively of Giuseppe Maria Catalano. It has, however, been operating for several years, and Catalano’s book “Sindone; il Ritorno alla Vita†was briefly mentioned here a couple of years ago, when Emanuela Marrinelli dismissed it as fantasy.
http://shroudstory.com/2015/07/29/a-new-astonishing-phenomenon/
Sorry. too old, I think.
Sorry. too old, I think.
But the headline was in ALLCAPS and used “astounding.” The lack of exclamation points should have been a tip off.
Achieving optimal mouth-microphone separation must take decades of practiced study. It’s the first and only thing I tend to notice.
Like Boortz? He sounded like he was spitting on the mic.
And Hannity. He has talked about his mic “technique.” His nose and mouth are in constant contact with the foam. That’s why you can hear the voice coming out of the nose when he says M and N. Horrible.
More and more people are using headsets, and the mic is right on the upper lip, right under the nose. Thus, nose sounds that are louder than the mouth sounds. All of Steve Deace’s sidekicks sound like this.
If you watch Rush, he stays about a FOOT from the mic.
Thanks for that, overdog.
Should’ve compared it to the Veil of Veronica. That would’ve been interesting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.