Skip to comments.
All the Way Back
White Horse Inn ^
| February 8, 2014
| Timothy F. Kauffman
Posted on 06/10/2015 7:44:27 AM PDT by RnMomof7
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
1
posted on
06/10/2015 7:44:27 AM PDT
by
RnMomof7
To: Alex Murphy; bkaycee; blue-duncan; boatbums; CynicalBear; daniel1212; Gamecock; HossB86; Iscool; ...
2
posted on
06/10/2015 7:45:06 AM PDT
by
RnMomof7
To: RnMomof7
Yes, the savage wolves! When challenged:
“Nobody in here but us chickens.”
3
posted on
06/10/2015 7:56:54 AM PDT
by
avenir
(I'm pessimistic about man, but I'm optimistic about GOD!)
To: RnMomof7
February 8, 2014
Here we go again!!
4
posted on
06/10/2015 7:58:15 AM PDT
by
Delta 21
(Patiently waiting for the jack booted kick at my door.)
To: RnMomof7
Paul warned explicitly that the next generation after the apostles would be one in which dangerous doctrines emerged even from within the Church. Grievous wolves from outside the church and from within it, would immediately start to deceive the flock: They shall enter in among you,
Also of your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them (Acts 20:29-30). Oh, goody -- the same "general apostasy" argument made by the Mormons and JWs.
Paul warns explicitly that we must not trust those who succeeded the Apostles, who took over for them in governing the churches of the first century, and the second, and the third.
Dead wrong. Heb 13:15 and 2 Timothy 2:2. Kauffman cherry-picks scripture like the cultist he is.
5
posted on
06/10/2015 8:07:19 AM PDT
by
Campion
To: RnMomof7
Yes, by all means, let's go for it again. Keep up the good work. Down with false religions. 😇😱😂😎
6
posted on
06/10/2015 8:13:32 AM PDT
by
Mark17
(Through all my days, and then in Heaven above, my song will silence never, I'll worship Him forever)
To: RnMomof7
For now, I wanted to demonstrate that, in a crunch, even the die-hard Roman apologist knows that going back to the 1st, 2nd and 3rd generations after the apostles is not sufficient to guarantee truth. You have to go all the way back to the Scriptures.You mean the 1st, 2nd and 3rd generations when they were written, provided you don't mean the OT.
7
posted on
06/10/2015 8:15:43 AM PDT
by
onedoug
To: Delta 21
It's not news, it's opinion. Is there a expiration date on opinion?
Is your comment really the best rebuttal you have available? On second thought is must be, because by your standard your own catechisms cannot be used.
8
posted on
06/10/2015 8:16:26 AM PDT
by
Gamecock
(Why do bad things happen to good people? That only happened once, and He volunteered. R.C. Sproul)
To: Delta 21
9
posted on
06/10/2015 8:39:48 AM PDT
by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: Campion; RnMomof7
Nope, not general apostasy. Simply acknowledging that apostasy was possible, so closeness in time or association to the apostles would not be mistaken for apostolic authority. This allows for a continuity of truth while admitting the correctness of Paul’s admonition to be careful and stay true to the apostolic Gospel.
Peace,
SR
To: Gamecock
What exactly are ‘my own catechisms’ that you referring to?
11
posted on
06/10/2015 9:38:02 AM PDT
by
Delta 21
(Patiently waiting for the jack booted kick at my door.)
To: Gamecock
I think you have me confused with another group. Just because the Roman Catholics have a position on an issue and I happen to agree with it (said opinion not having thing one to do with either one of these threads as a subject), does not make me a Roman Catholic. Just ask any one of them.
Please reference the last line of this post before it too gets deleted.
12
posted on
06/10/2015 9:49:48 AM PDT
by
Delta 21
(Patiently waiting for the jack booted kick at my door.)
To: Delta 21
31 October 1517
13
posted on
06/10/2015 10:02:45 AM PDT
by
Elsie
( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Delta 21
I have many things I agree with Rome about!
14
posted on
06/10/2015 10:03:42 AM PDT
by
Elsie
( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Elsie
I do as well, but there are many key substantial things that Rome advocates that I find absurd and sacrilegious.
15
posted on
06/10/2015 10:19:11 AM PDT
by
Delta 21
(Patiently waiting for the jack booted kick at my door.)
To: Elsie
I have many things I agree with Rome about!Me too...
It gets dark at night (in a lot of places)...Sugar is sweet...Horses have four legs...........
16
posted on
06/10/2015 10:41:57 AM PDT
by
Iscool
To: Elsie
Just as enthusiastically as I handed the nails to the centurian, I handed them to Luther as well.
17
posted on
06/10/2015 10:44:54 AM PDT
by
Delta 21
(Patiently waiting for the jack booted kick at my door.)
To: Salvation
Is the bible out of date??? Opinion is opinion...not news
18
posted on
06/10/2015 11:31:17 AM PDT
by
RnMomof7
To: Delta 21
And RC doctrine is dated when??
19
posted on
06/10/2015 11:31:58 AM PDT
by
RnMomof7
To: RnMomof7
You will have to ask a Roman Catholic about that.
20
posted on
06/10/2015 11:36:38 AM PDT
by
Delta 21
(Patiently waiting for the jack booted kick at my door.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson