Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Anatomy of Original Sin: The Sin of Adam was Far More than Eating a Piece of Fruit.
Archdiocese of Washington ^ | 2/5/2014 | Msgr. Charles Pope

Posted on 02/06/2014 2:39:13 AM PST by markomalley

Many understandings of Original Sin, the sin committed by Adam and Eve tend to describe the sin as the eating of a forbidden fruit. While this description is not inaccurate, it is incomplete and many rightly wonder as to how and why all this trouble came from the mere eating of a piece of fruit.

It may be helpful therefore to consider the Sin of Adam more richly. While the eating of the fruit is the external act, like any human act, it proceeds from the heart and admits of some complexity or stages.

Perhaps a quote from the Book of James will help frame our reflections since it describes the stages of sin:

Let no one say when he is tempted, “I am being tempted by God,” for God cannot be tempted with evil, and he himself tempts no one. But each person is tempted when he is lured and enticed by his own desire. Then desire when it has conceived gives birth to sin, and sin when it is fully grown brings forth death. (James 1:13-15)

And thus we can distinguish the following stages of sin:

1. The lure of Temptation
2. The engagement of desire
3. The conception of sin
4. The birth of sin
5. Spiritual Death

And thus when we consider the Sin of Adam and Eve we can see these stages at work. Perhaps we do well to examine these stages and also add in some of the subtleties and presumptions of the story.

Preamble- God had put Adam in the garden even before Eve was created. As the text says,

The LORD God took the man and placed him in the Garden of Eden in order to have him work it and guard it. And the Lord God commanded the man, “You are free to eat from any tree in the garden; but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat from it you will certainly die.”(Gen 2:15-17).

And therefore Adam’s task was to work the garden and also to guard, (to keep watch over) the Garden. There was also a boundary that God told him not to cross regarding the tree. Of the fuller meaning of that tree we will treat in a moment, but for now note that God does not explain why, but simply notes the danger and asks Adam to trust him that the tree is trouble.

Thus, in three words, Adam is to tend, till and trust. As we shall see, Adam fell short in two of these and they are aspects of what we have come to call Original Sin.

1. The Lure of Temptation – The story of Original Sin opens with the description of the serpent which is described as the most cunning of all the wild creatures God had made (3:1). While most of us imagine a snake of some sort, that description is given only after God curses Satan who is allegorically represented by this creature. Exactly what this creature looked like before the fall, is not stated, and hence we need not imagine a talking snake. Whatever the creature Satan made use of, (or what the author of Genesis allegorically made use of) it is the way in which Satan interacts with Eve.

Cunning and subtle, Satan uses intellectual arguments to appeal to aspects of what would later come to be called pride and sensuality. He also seeks to undermine her trust in God’s goodness.

He begins his temptation by attempting to make God seem unreasonable, suggesting that God had forbidden them to eat from any of the trees in the garden. Eve easily deals with this temptation and dismisses it, correctly stating that it is only one tree that has been proscribed. Of course this is a common tactic of Satan even to our own day; namely, that God is unreasonable, that He demands too many things, forbids too many things, etc. This accusation of course, wholly ignores that God has given incredible liberty to the human person,  who, unlike any other creature except the Angels is able to say “no” to God.

Satan’s second attack is more successful. He declares that God is not telling them the truth. In effect he says that God who has given them everything, is holding something very important back. In effect Satan argues that God is restraining them from being the gods they deserve to be. In pointing to the fruit of this tree, Satan says,  n effect, “Why do you let anyone have power over you? Why do you let anyone tell you what to do? Why do you not instead say, “I will do what I want to do, and I will decide whether it is right or wrong!” Satan temps to an incredible pride, “You will be gods!”

And thus Eve is in the first stage of the sin, the lure of temptation. But we do well to ask where is Adam at this time? Satan has been speaking with Eve. Yes, but where is Adam? The text says he is right there with her (Gen 3:6)!

Now here’s a problem integral to the sin of Adam. He was told among other things to guard the garden; that is, to keep watch over it. It is arguable whether he could have prevented Satan from being present at all, (he probably could not), but surely he could have sought to protect and guard his wife! Satan is manifest, and Adam says nothing, and does nothing. He does not seek to ward off the evil one, neither does he assist his wife in refuting the tempting thoughts. No, he stands quietly by. Here is a passive husband.

As the head of his family he had every obligation to come to his wife’s help, to protect her, to assist her in this grave temptation and threat. But the text reports him doing nothing by standing quietly by. Indeed, so quietly that when I point out to many people the six verse which says he was “with her” they are surprised. Even many modern passive husbands would intervene when they see some strange individual speaking to their wife.

“But Father, but Father, are you saying that Adam has already sinned even before Original Sin is committed?” No, not necessarily, but the point here is that Original Sin is a more complicated reality than merely biting into a piece of fruit. It, like many sins, has layers. Adam may not yet have sinned, but his silence is surely puzzling, indeed troubling. To be tempted, is not sin, for even Jesus was tempted. But to do nothing in the face of temptation for ourself or others is to at least open the door to the next stage of sin.

2. The Engagement of Desire – The text says, the woman saw the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise (3:6).

Temptation, is merely a thought that either occurs to us, or is presented to us by another. If I were to say to you, “Why don’t we go down to the corner store and rob it.” I have simply presented to you thought, or course of action, which may or may not appeal to you, based on your background and proclivity to daring and violent actions, greed etc. But temptation of itself is merely a thought.

But in the second stage of sin, the tempting thoughts of Satan now engage Eve’s desires. The fruit engages her sensual desires, for it looks tasty, and delights the eyes. It also engages her intellectual desires, for it has been described to her as a source of empowering wisdom.

Thus, temptation begins to move from being a mere thought, to becoming a kind of force or power. Her desires have been engaged and ignited. Things are a bit more difficult. Mere intellectual response will not be enough, the will must be engaged in such a way that the desires will be curbed and subject to truth and right reason. Either she will obey God who has given her everything, and thus decide reasonably, or she will yield to temptation and desire and unreasonably accept the proposal of Satan who is given her nothing except to appeal to her sensuality and pride.

Again, we can simply note the silence of Adam. How tragic this is. Eve seems quite alone and without support in this moment. One would hope in any marriage, that when one spouse is struggling, the other will be strong. Adam remains silent. He is no leader, he seems to wait and see what his wife will do. He is a passive husband.

3.  The Conception of Sin - The text simply says she took of its fruit (3:6). In reaching out to take hold and possess this fruit, she conceives sin in her heart. Her husband will do the same thing, taking hold of it before he eats it. What are they taking hold of? Several things.

First, as we have seen, there is a colossal pride. Satan had said, “You will be gods.” Now they are laying hold of and conceiving of this idea. They are laying hold of the prideful and rebellious notion that “I will do what I want to do, and I will decide whether it is right or wrong. I will be under no one’s authority; I will do as I please; I answer to no one; I am god.”

They also sin against gratitude. For God had given them everything. But even paradise was not enough, they wanted more. Ungratefully, they reject God was given everything, and turned to Satan who “promises” more but has delivered nothing.

Finally, and most problematically,  they sin against trust. Note that the tree is called “The Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.” To “know” in the Bible almost always means more than simple intellectual knowing. It means to know something by experience. Thus, in naming this tree The Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, and commanding them to stay away from it, God is saying

I am asking you to trust me to tell you what is good and what is evil, and not to demand to know this personally for yourselves. I want you to trust me,  and that I tell you this for your own good. But if you take from that tree, you are insisting on knowing for yourself what is good and what is evil; and more importantly, you are insisting on knowing and experiencing evil.

Thus, Adam and Eve refused to trust God, and insist on knowing, that is experiencing, for themselves the difference between good and evil. The Catechism describes Original Sin in this manner:

Man, tempted by the devil, let his trust in his Creator die in his heart and, abusing his freedom, disobeyed God’s command. This is what man’s first sin consisted of.All subsequent sin would be disobedience toward God and lack of trust in his goodness.(# 397)

So we see that at the heart of Original Sin and all other sin is a refusal to trust God, a refusal to trust his goodness and an abuse of our liberty.

All of this has been conceived in the heart of Adam and Eve as they lay hold of this fruit.

4. The Birth of Sin – Given all our work, little needs to be said of this stage, the sin is engaged. Note, that Eve eats first, and then entices her husband. More of this will be spoken of in a future post, probably tomorrow,  when I reflect on St. Paul’s commentary on the Sin of Adam. Here, suffice it to say that the sin of Adam and Eve are described somewhat differently here in the text. Eve is described as being deceived, and Adam is described as being, in effect, seduced. Neither of them are without blame, but the nature of their temptation, and the engagement of their desires is slightly different. Again, more this later.

5. Spiritual Death – Adam and Eve do not drop dead in physical death; but rather, they die spiritually. And this is symbolized in many ways in the verses ahead.

In their experienced nakedness they feel exposed, no longer innocent, they feel vulnerable, naked ashamed. Righteousness and integrity have died in their hearts, now they are dis-integrated and disoriented.

Even more seriously, they are cut off from God. who is the source of their life. When God walks through the garden at the usual time, they do not run to him, but from him; they are afraid. Having died spiritually and embraced the darkness, they now fear He who is Life and Light. They cannot endure his presence.

Recriminations follow, and the prophecy of suffering, strife, and ultimately death. The wages of sin is death. God would spare them of this, had they been willing to trust him. But Adam and Eve wanted to know for themselves. Mysteriously, they sought a “better deal” than Paradise, even knowing the price of it would be death. So tragic, foolish, and horrifying.

Therefore, dear reader, pardon this rather long essay. But too often Original Sin is reduced to the mere eating of a piece of fruit. Far more was at stake, and far more was going on beneath the surface, in the subtleties of the story. There were many moving parts, and layers to the sad reality that we call Original Sin, and the sin of Adam.


TOPICS: Catholic
KEYWORDS: genesis; msgrcharlespope; originalsin; salvation; sin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: markomalley

In the Garden of Eden,
As everyone knows,
Lives Adam and Eve,
Without any clothes.

In this garden,
Were two little leaves,
One covered Adam’s,
One covered Eve’s.

As the story goes on,
Never the less to say,
The wind came along,
And blew the leaves away.

At the sight,
Adam did stare,
There was Eve’s treasure,
All covered with hair.

And wonder came,
Under Eve’s eyes,
As Adam’s thing,
Started to rise.

They found a spot,
That suited them best,
A nice big tree,
Where they began to rest.

I only posted the clean part of the poem.....

“God,” said Adam, “Why did you make Eve so beautiful?”
“So you would love her.”
“But why did you make her so dumb?”
“So she would love you.”

A women’s lib speaker was addressing a large group and said, “Where would man be today if it were not for woman?”

She paused a moment and looked around the room. “I repeat, where would man be today if it were not for woman?”

From the back of the room came a voice, “He’d be in the Garden of Eden, eating strawberries.”

In the beginning, God created earth and rested.
Then God created man and rested.
Then God created woman.
Since then, neither God nor man has rested.
AMEN


21 posted on 02/06/2014 12:17:40 PM PST by tired&retired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tired&retired

This thread was a bit to serious.... Please forgive my breaking the ice with a bit of humor.


22 posted on 02/06/2014 12:18:29 PM PST by tired&retired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: tired&retired
Re: Your post # 20. Not necessarily my opinion, but a different way of looking at the Adam & Eve event.

Not my opinion, either. Genesis presents an ancient (Jewish) concept of God, very different from the loving Father revealed by Jesus.

23 posted on 02/06/2014 12:21:53 PM PST by zot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: tired&retired

I’d disagree with you on that point of view only for the fact the Bible does indicate Eve had a willful conversation with the snake...about what God said regarding the Tree of Knowledge.


24 posted on 02/06/2014 1:16:29 PM PST by EBH ( The Day of the Patriot has arrived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
I do not pretend to be a serious theologian; although I certainly respect those who make that discipline their major focus.

But I do want to point out, that the methodology by which the serpent led Eve astray, in various forms, has been the prototype of the methods employed by Leftist demagogues, ever since, in leading the susceptible astray.

For a basic application of this interpretation of Leftist techniques: Variations On Demonic Theme.

I do not offer this to challenge in any way your erudite article; merely to suggest some of its contemporary applicability.

William Flax

25 posted on 02/06/2014 1:29:36 PM PST by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ohioan

Actually, you are more on the mark than you think. See post #5. Your observation is more enlightened than you take credit for.

I read a lot of the comments on article news sites and it is amazing to me, to read the guilt-goading and literal blasphemy liberals post as though they pay their taxes to the church of God-erment. And that it is your moral responsibility to do so as well or you are not a good Christian.

One of the ‘keys’ to understanding is that Adam and Eve had a choice in the Garden. Love means you have a choice. The priest that lead our talk highlighted that idea, God gives you choices(free will) to love Him or not. When that choice (free will) is taken away, you move into slavery(tyranny) to things/satan.

So Leftist demagogues, if one listens closely, offer the things of this world...and keep telling us how it is our moral (god-like) duty to make material things more ‘fair’ (hoarding).

None of anything was lost on this Retreat attendant and how those very demonic themes are being applied against our people today. The only question left in my mind is:

Are we going to be like Adam and say or do nothing and willingly participate? Or as believers in Love, Christ, and Salvation protect or people?

A lot of us have been using politics to try and stop this onslaught of evil against the American people, perhaps we’ve been worshiping at the wrong, weak, “savior of our country.” The founders knew we could not be a free nation if we had no morals...the story of Adam and Eve is a great understanding starting point as to why Godly morals make us Free. And how to not fall for the ‘Santa Claus’ syndrome of the leftists.


26 posted on 02/07/2014 3:19:09 AM PST by EBH ( The Day of the Patriot has arrived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: EBH
Thank you. I guess the major distinction between my article and the the thrust of the thread is not any distinction as to what is morally right. My focus differs in that it is on those who embrace the serpent's methodology to lead others astray, rather on how far astray are those who embrace the rationalizations that are offered.

An interesting discussion in the age of MSNBC, "same-sex marriage," and "partial birth abortions."

We see a living demonstration, all around us, of man's capacity to rationalize almost any form of degradation as enlightened.

27 posted on 02/07/2014 12:23:03 PM PST by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Isn’t it true that tradition (small “t”) states that Adam and Eve will be the last to exit Purgatory? I thought I read or heard that somewhere.


28 posted on 02/08/2014 8:04:07 AM PST by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: EBH
A lot of us have been using politics to try and stop this onslaught of evil against the American people, perhaps we’ve been worshiping at the wrong, weak, “savior of our country.” The founders knew we could not be a free nation if we had no morals...the story of Adam and Eve is a great understanding starting point as to why Godly morals make us Free. And how to not fall for the ‘Santa Claus’ syndrome of the leftists.

Good post, all of it, especially the quoted portion, IMO. I am believing the same more and more.

29 posted on 02/08/2014 8:07:34 AM PST by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

An excellent article.


30 posted on 02/10/2014 4:23:09 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson