Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/13/2013 5:43:01 PM PST by Faith Presses On
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Faith Presses On

Women in Leadership = non-Scriptural anyway so why the hub-bub over immodest dress?


2 posted on 11/13/2013 5:47:32 PM PST by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On
I have never been in a church where the women (in leadership, not pastors) do not dress in a modest fashion. So not sure what you are saying.
(by church, I mean Bible believing Spirit filled)

3 posted on 11/13/2013 5:47:56 PM PST by svcw (Not 'hope and change' but 'dopes in chains')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On

I saw a picture a few years ago of the First Baptist Church in some city in Romania. It was a large church. I noticed every woman over maybe 12 had some kind of hat or covering on her head.

I immediately remembered where Paul said that women should have their heads covered in church. I guess even the conservative Southern Baptists don’t keep that requirement.


4 posted on 11/13/2013 5:48:34 PM PST by yarddog (Romans 8: verses 38 and 39. "For I am persuaded".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On
A true observation -- so many women these days don't dress modestly. I would add that many men fail to dress modestly as well (sagging jeans, purposefully wearing shirts a size too small to accentuate muscles, etc), but I would hazard a guess that a man with plumber's crack doesn't entice women in the same way a man is enticed by a woman in low-slung jeans. Perhaps I am incorrect on this, but I'm sure the ladies here can either confirm or deny.

One thing though, I would also add -- In the past, a certain amount of cleavage or tightness of clothing was a sure signal of an "easy" female. These days, immodest fashions are so ubiquitous, that its not an accurate measure of whether a woman is a lady or the other kind. Plenty of good, chaste ladies dress immodestly without intending to at all -- they've simply been desensitized/were never educated about modesty of dress.

6 posted on 11/13/2013 5:55:17 PM PST by Wyrd bið ful aræd (Gone Galt, 11/07/12----No king but Christ! Don't tread on me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On

I agree completely.

We learn in Genesis that clothing was intended to conceal, not to reveal.

But I assure you. You are fighting a losing battle. This section of the Word of God does not even prevail in my own house. No matter how much I’ve tried to teach modest apparel, my daughters are always pushing the boundaries to see how much they can get away with. And they’re home schooled.

Ever notice on Sundays in the church? Men wearing full buttoned shirts, often with neckties, sport or suit coats, sweaters, loose fitting trousers, etc.

But the women are wearing short sleeves, or sleeveless blouses, tight pants or short skirts, plunging necklines, etc. I don’t think this is appropriate attire for church meetings or reverent worship.

But it is definitely a losing fight. Try to mention any of this, and you’ll be accused of having a dirty mind.


8 posted on 11/13/2013 5:56:00 PM PST by Westbrook ()Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On

Who defines what is modest?

Making girls wear burkas?

Making girls playing basketball wear knee length skortz?

My favorite was when I found myself unwittingly invited to a picnic with a group of Bill Gothard Institute types. The girls all wore long jean skirts. Then they got on the monkey bars and twirled upside down. Well at least they were in uniform but Oh. My.

So what is considered modest? Who decides? What century decides?

Is modesty defined by making sure everybody looks like a separatist freak? Amish women dress modestly. Is that wear it needs to be?

Does modesty mean all heads are to be covered? The problem is that this was written 2000 years ago with a diffrent set of societal norms and expectations. These expectations vary from one part of the country to another, and from one country to another yet many wish to impose provincial expectations on others that will seem silly with the passage of time. These sorts of discussions/distractions invariably promote self righteous attitudes and groups that are “in” and groups that are “out”. My advice is to relax, until women start wearing stripper gear.

Perhaps instead, Christians should quit worrying about how short a skirt is, or if (gasp) a bit of cleavage shows through and instead worship God together in peace.


10 posted on 11/13/2013 6:01:13 PM PST by DariusBane (Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On

Boy, does this message need to get out.

It’s unbelievable how I’ve seen women dress in church. They look like hookers or that they’re going out for a night on the town.

Dressing attractively is one thing. Dressing enticingly is another.


12 posted on 11/13/2013 6:01:42 PM PST by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of faith....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On

ridiculous describes so much of what i see in what many women wear to church on Sundays... flip-flops, tank shirts, capris, yoga pants, hoodies, yuck... any one of these things might work, but two and three of these pieces together? no bueno... mis dos centavos...


15 posted on 11/13/2013 6:04:44 PM PST by latina4dubya (when i have money i buy books... if i have anything left, i buy 6-inch heels and a bottle of wine...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On

Frankly, I think this topic is best suited for a small group Bible study or a one-on-one situation with an older (in Christ, if not age) believer instructing a younger believer.

I am an older woman believer.


16 posted on 11/13/2013 6:08:22 PM PST by Jemian (I do my best editing just after I hit the "post" button.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On

I actually once asked our preacher about women covering their heads. His reply was basically that men should dress like men and women in a feminine style.

That sounded good tho I am not entirely sure he was right but again, maybe that was the point of Paul’s instruction.


26 posted on 11/13/2013 6:19:01 PM PST by yarddog (Romans 8: verses 38 and 39. "For I am persuaded".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On

Proper dress for Church goes beyond how much or how little someone wears. Dress well, but don’t draw undue attention to yourself. Jesus taught about the hypocrites who loved to show how religious they were, and this included how they dressed. They were doing it for their own glory, and not God’s. The same thing applies today. Who is being glorified by an outfit that leaves little to the imagination? Likewise, who is being glorified by an outfit that is too modest? Don’t dress in a way that says “LOOK AT ME!!!”


46 posted on 11/13/2013 7:33:52 PM PST by yawningotter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On

No source?


47 posted on 11/13/2013 7:41:05 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On

Ladies who fail the dress code are welcome to come fish with the Lord and I Sunday...apostolically traditional and no building fund ;)


57 posted on 11/13/2013 8:13:58 PM PST by Anton.Rutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On

first, i think your heart is leading you truely.

women in general are in desparate trouble in this society and culture that has become unmoored from God and his Word.

various Christian sects are clearly not immune from that trouble. in my view, the Bible and the Apostle Paul come across crystal clear: clearly a critical sign and effect of that trouble is the pervasive presence of women who are immodest in church and in society. no question about it. and don’t let anyone convince you that immodesty isn’t real. it is.

i say follow your heart and lead whatever of your fellow women who will follow you. God bless.


93 posted on 11/13/2013 9:59:58 PM PST by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On

The Modesty Battle: What is Proper Dress for Christians?

Posted by Don Boys on September 27, 2013

http://donboys.cstnews.com/the-modesty-battle-what-is-proper-dress-for-christians

Is the Modesty Battle a private fight or can anyone jump in? It seems that everyone, even major secular magazines and newspapers are discussing (and cussing) modesty. Who would have thunk it? Jews, Roman Catholics, Mormons, Muslims, Fundamentalists and even Evangelicals are talking about modesty. So, I might as well jump in although I know I can’t win. Not too smart!

In a recent speech, former actress Jessica Rey discussed the evolution of the swimsuit and her opinions on modesty and the reaction produced a mini storm. Everyone seems to have an opinion and even their own line of clothes! Even the Mormons have their own line of modest clothing sold in high-end department stores, and the Muslims also have their own line. The Mormons’ dresses are much more stylish than the Muslims since you can’t do much with white sheets dyed black except cut two eye holes in them. With that, voilà, we have a dress!

For many years Roman Catholics, Mormons and Jews have tried to combat the rise in immodest dress. On one of my tours to the Middle East, we stopped for a couple days in Rome and when I took them to the Vatican there was a notice that informed us what was acceptable and unacceptable dress. At other Catholic churches, women were given wraparounds if they wore shorts or scandalous skirts. None of my group was dressed scandalously.

But feminists and many modern Christian leaders argue that the Bible’s demand for modesty refers to display of things such as wealth not seductive clothes. It is both! We should be more concerned with modesty and neatness in our garments than elegance, cost, and fashion.

Sharon Hodde Miller, a doctoral student at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School brazenly said, “A woman’s breasts and buttocks and thighs all proclaim the glory of the Lord.” She said, “Modesty is an orientation of the heart, first and foremost. It begins with putting God first.” She is correct; however, if God is first in one’s life, he or she will seek to glorify God and obey Scriptural commands. If a woman uses her bouncing breasts, swaying buttocks, or exposed flesh to influence men other than her husband, it is very unchristian. It is also a blasphemous use of the female body.

Evangelical and Fundamentalist youth wear shirts declaring “Hottest is Modest” or the reverse although I can’t imagine Christians wearing something like that. Whatever one’s definition of “hottest” it obviously can have a sexual and negative connotation. Why send the wrong message to others? I wonder what parents are doing in the parenting department. Are Christians to be “hot”? That kind of sexual suggestion is not conducive with the body being the Temple of the Holy Spirit. However, we are told to never correct our children since it might stunt their development and they might even throw a hissy. Can’t have that. They also may think they are unloved.

Christians are not to draw attention to self but the Savior. In Matt. 23:5 Christ rebuked the scribes and Pharisees by saying, “But all their works they do for to be seen of men…and enlarge their borders.” “Enlarge their borders” refer to Jews who wore fringes on their robes as commanded in Num. 15:38-39 to remind them of God’s commandments. However, they went beyond God’s command and enlarged them to draw attention to themselves. People dress outrageously and do strange things to their bodies to draw attention or to be “cool” or “trendy.”

Christ’s teaching in Matt. 23 will eliminate seductive clothing, inappropriate clothing, piercings, tattoos, expensive jewelry, green hair, Mohawk haircuts, and pants drooping below the 38th parallel. Christians are not to draw attention to self but to Christ. Believers were called Christians in Antioch because they reminded people of Christ. Many modern Christians remind me of a circus performer. Shocking, shameful, and salacious dress (or activity) will drive people away from Christ not to Him. Just today, a Texas public school district announced that any tattoos must be covered and only ear piercings would be accepted! Any churches doing that?

Modesty should be a byproduct of genuine Christianity although critics confuse modesty with prudery. Prudery is abnormal. Modesty is Christian, common, and commendable. Modest people have respect for their bodies (made in the image of God) and respect for social norms, and respect for other people. Both genders should consider proper dress as a sign of elegance, education, and erudition. A silent statement is made by immodestly dressed people, male and female: “I don’t think much of myself and I don’t expect you to value or respect me either.”

In many churches on Sunday morning, it is almost like a Sunday Morning Slutwalk with bouncing boobs, cavernous cleavage, gyrating hips, skintight pants (male and female), and slit skirts front, back and both sides. It seems tempting, tantalizing, and taunting are part of some modern women’s arsenals. Feminists and others seek to remove all responsibility from women for the reactions they get from men because of seductive clothes while most lusting men put the responsibility for their temptation totally upon the women!

It is normal for men to react to exposed breasts and other parts of the female body. That is the way God made them. It would be abnormal if they did not react to the exposed female body. However, men are responsible for their own impure, illegal and iniquitous actions. Moreover, attraction is not lust but it often ends in lust.

Men like to see skin but how much skin is permitted? Some Muslims cover their entire bodies, even their eyes! That might be considered going far past modesty to prudery.

The absence of modesty among females is an egregious problem, but I must emphatically state that however wickedly they dress, it does not relieve men of their own actions. While lust is natural, it is naturally sinful. It dehumanizes the female and a man takes her for himself (at least mentally) often to prove superiority over her as well as to satisfy personal cravings.

Christians should ask themselves not only what is acceptable but what is appropriate for each occasion. It is a joy to meet a person with a happy smile, pure heart, and noble intentions who is modest, kind, humble, and genuine. Not many out there!

Moreover, I’ll be considered naïve and self-righteous for even suggesting they should be out there!

Copyright 2013, Don Boys, Ph.D.


94 posted on 11/13/2013 10:17:51 PM PST by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On
"In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array; But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works." (1 Timothy 2:9-10)

As with all Scripture, we can discover God's instruction by looking at the context, the times, the people, the customs as well as the spirit behind passages like this one. Paul was not saying women shouldn't braid their hair or wear jewelry or nice clothing, just that we must let our character, good works and holiness shine through and not allow how we look to be the only way people view us. In Paul's day, it was the prostitutes who "dressed up" all flashy and calling attention to her looks. Christian women SHOULD be distinguishable from hookers, right? We must set examples for what is acceptable.

I agree that these days far too many women and girls look to Hollywood and the music scene to model their looks on and this should definitely NOT be who believers in Christ should look to to determine what is "proper". These fashions have objectified women and taken away her dignity and innate modesty. In the church, we are compelled by Christ to:

Teach the older men to be temperate, worthy of respect, self-controlled, and sound in faith, in love and in endurance. Likewise, teach the older women to be reverent in the way they live, not to be slanderers or addicted to much wine, but to teach what is good. Then they can urge the younger women to love their husbands and children, to be self-controlled and pure, to be busy at home, to be kind, and to be subject to their husbands, so that no one will malign the word of God. (Titus 2:2-5)

Women must likewise be dignified, not malicious gossips, but temperate, faithful in all things. (I Tim. 3:10,11)

These are traits that each woman must invest in to become the woman God has created her to be and that when the "world" looks at her, they see a confident, strong, self-assured, dignified and modest person who projects a character based on her intrinsic worth and value to God instead of an outward and fleeting rating from them.

95 posted on 11/13/2013 10:52:28 PM PST by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On

110 posted on 11/14/2013 4:36:17 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On

Because not everyone believes in the bible. If there was a god I’m sure he has more important things to do than worry about hemlines and blouses.


139 posted on 11/14/2013 9:29:50 AM PST by strider44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson