Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who is the Harlot AND Her Daughters?
12/3/2012 | self

Posted on 12/03/2012 2:15:56 AM PST by DouglasKC

Question: In the passages below a harlot symbolizes something. The title on her head is "MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND OF THE ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH." One of the titles is "the mother of harlots". This suggests that there are other harlots that have sprung from this harlot.

This is more curiosity then anything else...but what are opinions on what this represents?

Rev 17:1 Then one of the seven angels who had the seven bowls came and talked with me, saying to me, "Come, I will show you the judgment of the great harlot who sits on many waters,
Rev 17:2 with whom the kings of the earth committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth were made drunk with the wine of her fornication."
Rev 17:3 So he carried me away in the Spirit into the wilderness. And I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet beast which was full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.
Rev 17:4 The woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet, and adorned with gold and precious stones and pearls, having in her hand a golden cup full of abominations and the filthiness of her fornication.
Rev 17:5 And on her forehead a name was written: MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND OF THE ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.
Rev 17:6 I saw the woman, drunk with the blood of the saints and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus. And when I saw her, I marveled with great amazement.
Rev 17:7 But the angel said to me, "Why did you marvel? I will tell you the mystery of the woman and of the beast that carries her, which has the seven heads and the ten horns.
Rev 17:8 The beast that you saw was, and is not, and will ascend out of the bottomless pit and go to perdition. And those who dwell on the earth will marvel, whose names are not written in the Book of Life from the foundation of the world, when they see the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.
Rev 17:9 "Here is the mind which has wisdom: The seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman sits.
Rev 17:10 There are also seven kings. Five have fallen, one is, and the other has not yet come. And when he comes, he must continue a short time.
Rev 17:11 The beast that was, and is not, is himself also the eighth, and is of the seven, and is going to perdition.
Rev 17:12 "The ten horns which you saw are ten kings who have received no kingdom as yet, but they receive authority for one hour as kings with the beast.
Rev 17:13 These are of one mind, and they will give their power and authority to the beast.
Rev 17:14 These will make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb will overcome them, for He is Lord of lords and King of kings; and those who are with Him are called, chosen, and faithful."


TOPICS: Ecumenism; General Discusssion; History
KEYWORDS: 666; christian; harlot; herbertwarmstrong; revelation; worldwidechurchofgod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 341-343 next last
To: Responsibility2nd

Hey, I’m going to continue boasting of the power of Jesus Christ. If it annoys you, tough luck. Go to DU


201 posted on 12/04/2012 7:57:15 AM PST by Cronos (**Marriage is about commitment, cohabitation is about convenience.**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
What does ‘sabbath’ mean? How many times has the calendar been changed. God gave prophecies about those of the solar - sun-Son - children of light, and then prophecies about children of darkness - moons, lunar, months.

There is no one who can argue with credibility that our 7th day of the week is still the same day of the week as was instituted by the hand of God, though Moses. Wonder why God allowed that to happen IF He intended to punish people for not keeping that particular day?

Christ became our Sabbath, the word means ‘rest’. And not one day should go by without a Christian ‘resting’ in Christ.

Have you noticed that since the beginning the majority were always on the side of wrong, not ‘right’.... still nothing new under the sun because church has become the new idol. People need to belong to something and post after post is about trashing this church or another church with total disregard of the log in the eye of their church. God is judge and when and IF He wants the eyes/ears opened of any one of us He is able.

202 posted on 12/04/2012 7:57:58 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
perhaps actually reading would help, right?

If Rome is the harlot city, as the majority opinion presumes, there is a problem in that it was never destroyed. It was sacked many centuries after Biblical times (in the late 4th and early 5th Centuries AD), but it was never burned or destroyed as depicted in Revelation. Jerusalem however was destroyed and burned in 70 AD and thereby correspondent to the prophecies of the Book of Revelation (e.g. Rev 18:18 inter al).

In the Old Testament, Jerusalem, and the people of Israel are called the “harlot” since they have committed adultery, forsaken the Lord, and are sleeping with false gods. Nowhere in the Old Testament is Rome or any pagan city called a harlot. But Jerusalem repeatedly is.

(Isa 1:20-21) But if you refuse and rebel [O, Israel], you shall be devoured by the sword; for the mouth of the LORD has spoken.” {21} How the faithful city has become a harlot, she that was full of justice! Righteousness lodged in her, but now murderers.

.(Jer 2:19-20) Your wickedness will chasten you, and your apostasy will reprove you. Know and see that it is evil and bitter for you to forsake the LORD your God; the fear of me is not in you, says the Lord GOD of hosts. {20} “For long ago you broke your yoke and burst your bonds; and you said, ‘I will not serve.’ Yea, upon every high hill and under every green tree you bowed down as a harlot.

203 posted on 12/04/2012 8:03:01 AM PST by Cronos (**Marriage is about commitment, cohabitation is about convenience.**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest; BlueDragon
Bluedragon -- you were asking about British Israelism, well here is it Today, America, Canada, Britain -- Israelitish nations. descended from the ancient so-called lost ten tribes of Israel -- are actually in the ways of this "BABYLON."

It's still alive and well :)

204 posted on 12/04/2012 8:05:57 AM PST by Cronos (**Marriage is about commitment, cohabitation is about convenience.**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: haffast

Double standard?

Evangelicals LIVE by the double standard around here. Look at post 201; the reply to 196.

Does he answer my questions? Is he confronting the truth?

Nahhhh... Just a stock response from someone who loses the arguement:

“Go to DU”

Typical.


205 posted on 12/04/2012 8:09:54 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie2001

“I’m not trying to be difficult here but be specific in what she said that did not come to pass.”

She falsely predicted the end of the world and the Second Coming of Christ, many times, and was wrong every time. Here’s a site that has some details about that:

http://www.inplainsite.org/html/ellen_white_false_prophecy.html

“But the Catholics want to disparage the SDA’s by posting the ex SDA website that says absolutely nothing and yet their own teachings veer FAR FAR FAR from the Bible. Praying to statues and dead people, priests forgiving sins, etc., are NOT grounded in Biblical truth.”

Well, if the Catholics are wrong in some of their doctrines, it doesn’t mean the SDAs’ doctrine is sound simply because they denounce the Catholics’ errors. One needs to look at all things critically, with the Bible as the standard of proof.


206 posted on 12/04/2012 8:10:16 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

It was the JOHN Smith part that threw me. The rest, well whatever. Quaint theories. Lots of folks have them. Some are more well stocked than others.


207 posted on 12/04/2012 8:37:05 AM PST by BlueDragon (in essentials, unity; in doubtful matters, liberty; in all things, charity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Thanks for the very informative post, xzins!

I once heard Chuck Missler say about those that believed differently that “we will explain it to them on the way up.”

208 posted on 12/04/2012 8:37:05 AM PST by Syncro (The Tea Party is Dead-->MSM/Dems/GOP-e -- LONG LIVE THE TEA PARTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

Lots of good verses. Thanks.

If you summed up your position, what would it be?


209 posted on 12/04/2012 8:39:07 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

I don’t think he’s an “evangelical”, Ask him. He thrives in categorization or religious divisions, from a particular perspective.


210 posted on 12/04/2012 8:42:04 AM PST by BlueDragon (in essentials, unity; in doubtful matters, liberty; in all things, charity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.


211 posted on 12/04/2012 8:45:00 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

That’s why it’s just one of the pieces of evidence.


212 posted on 12/04/2012 8:54:03 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

Missler in among those preacher/teachers who can pack so much info into such a short period of time and with clarity.

I’m in awe of such a gift. I wouldn’t turn such a thing down.


213 posted on 12/04/2012 9:00:47 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

“Ok, so when Christ said “on this day”, He didn’t really mean it?”

I’m sure he meant it. He didn’t, however, say the thief would be in “Heaven, on this day”, or “resurrected, on this day”, but that the thief would be in “paradise, on this day”. Most of the possible meanings of “paradise” are quite different than the traditional meaning of heaven. It may instead refer to the place known as Abraham’s bosom, or as Strong’s Concordance puts it:

“3) the part of Hades which was thought by the later Jews to be the abode of the souls of pious until the resurrection: but some understand this to be a heavenly paradise”

This would make perfect sense, because even if the thief did go to heaven on that day, Christ wouldn’t have been with him, since Christ went down to the grave that day, and not to heaven. The only way the statement really makes sense is if the “paradise” is part of the grave/sheol, and that is why Christ would be with him, since that was where Christ was headed as well.


214 posted on 12/04/2012 9:02:40 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: xzins
If you summed up your position, what would it be?

I take the Words of Christ as His Standard, the one by which I will be judged. I accept Paul's description of Ephesians 1:4, the 'chosen', 'election', took place as Paul says before the foundation of this world, which is actually a verb that means before the casting down - overthrow of the first rebel. Those elected holy prophets as Peter calls them wrote the script that we on any given day can see being played out. Christ said for the elect's sake time was shortened. But every event He said in Matthew 24, Mark 13, and Luke 21 (which are the seals/trumps/vials, John elaborates upon in Revelation) will take place, but in quick time.

The tribulation is deception, notice how many times Christ repeated that warning in the above name books. So much so that Paul says II Thessalonians 2:9 Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,

10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.

11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie;

12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

Paul also says Ephesians 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.

All of these things tell what that tribulation is. We have war and rumors of war all over this globe but Christ said Matthew 24:6 ........ see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass but the end is not yet.

So all the white faced fear of a bloody 'anti-Christ' is misleading, because he will play the part of Jesus coming to save IF whatever tradition of man passed down through the generations will be part of his script. Problem is the majority do not have a clue the first supernatural being dumped out of heaven is none other than the devil himself. Why would Paul write Ephesians 6 if the church was not going to be here to take a stand against the devil?

Christ did not need be tempted by the devil, Christ did that for us to see what the devil's method of operation will be.

Check out the 6th trump, the 6th seal, and the 6th vial all point to the instead of Jesus. Christ does not return until the last trump, the 7th.

215 posted on 12/04/2012 9:03:44 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: BlueDragon

Oh, I think I was confusing. No, I know that poster is no Evangelical. By no means. I know exactly what he is and his motives for posting here.

I’M the Evangelical Christian. And I meant to say that I (and all other Evangelicals) live and FReep around here UNDER the double standard set by Catholics.


216 posted on 12/04/2012 9:06:43 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
The 7th seal opens up the trumpet judgments, but the 7th trumpet sounds before the vials/bowls are poured out.
217 posted on 12/04/2012 9:08:15 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Ok. Yet to double-standard is only human. Individual mileage will vary ;)


218 posted on 12/04/2012 9:20:15 AM PST by BlueDragon (in essentials, unity; in doubtful matters, liberty; in all things, charity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: xzins

“That’s why it’s just one of the pieces of evidence.”

Well, they can’t be very good pieces of evidence, if you must bolster them with weak sauce such as that.


219 posted on 12/04/2012 9:24:40 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
The order of the days of the week has NEVER changed.

Read from THE CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA. Now let's study the 4th Commandment.

220 posted on 12/04/2012 9:41:18 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 341-343 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson