Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Catholic High School Student Fights Teacher on Truth of the Resurrection
Life Site News ^ | 6/8/11 | Rebecca Millette

Posted on 06/08/2011 7:10:35 PM PDT by marshmallow

NORTH BAY, Ontario, June 8, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) - “If Catholic students are required to go to so much trouble with their Catholic teachers to defend a teaching as simple as the resurrection, what do they have to do in their Catholic schools to defend teachings on abortion, homosexuality, or same-sex ‘marriage’?” asked Suresh Dominic of Campaign Life Coalition Catholics commenting on the case of Francesca Sinicrope.

A Grade 12 student of North Bay, Ontario, Sinicrope has recently gone to battle with a teacher and principal at her Catholic High School over the truth of Christ’s Resurrection.

“He told us people have taken the Bible too literally,” Sinicrope told LifeSiteNews in a recent interview. “He began saying that it was like a metaphor that you follow…He said that Jesus never resurrected.”

While the principal says an investigation has cleared the teacher of wrongdoing, another classmate has corroborated Sinicrope’s account.

During the week leading up to Easter this year the Catholic High School decided to place crosses in every classroom, recounted the teen. Following Holy Thursday Mass, Francesca’s sociology teacher provided an explanation of the crosses to the whole class, saying that the same message would be given to all the classes.

Francesca’s video footage, posted on YouTube, recounts the events. “He told my whole class that Jesus had never resurrected,” the 17 year-old said. “That is so unbelievable to me in a Catholic school.”

(Excerpt) Read more at lifesitenews.com ...


TOPICS: Activism; Catholic; Theology
KEYWORDS: bidenvoters; catholichighschool; catholicschools; highschool
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 06/08/2011 7:10:39 PM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

It’s Canada. Secularism has metastacized onto every organ of their society.


2 posted on 06/08/2011 7:12:42 PM PDT by PGR88 (I'm so open-minded my brains fell out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

He said that Jesus never resurrected. The very cornerstone of Christian Faith. No resurrection, no salvation, no point.


3 posted on 06/08/2011 7:15:51 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (SP12: Josh Ferrin for President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

“Secularism has metastasized onto every organ of their society.”

Now THAT is the perfect analogy!


4 posted on 06/08/2011 7:16:06 PM PDT by BwanaNdege (For those who have fought for it, Life bears a savor the protected will never know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Whether or not one believes in the resurrection, it is the basis of Christianity. If the school does not ditch this “teacher”’ it is worthless.

If it does not watch out, it will sink to the level of Notre Dame and Georgetown.


5 posted on 06/08/2011 7:16:44 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

It’s the state of the church in the end times. God bless the young student for having the heart and faith and knowledge to stand up and fight for truth and for Jesus.


6 posted on 06/08/2011 7:18:03 PM PDT by Dogbert41 (I hate posting with ipad:( too many typos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

If Yashua not risen then our faith is in vain.


7 posted on 06/08/2011 7:21:00 PM PDT by SkyDancer (It's not the police that protect our rights, it's our military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Heck, even Mormons believe in the resurrection, just saying.


8 posted on 06/08/2011 7:25:26 PM PDT by RC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
Most western Catholic schools are a clear and present danger to the Faith and Morals of our Catholic children.

"Home schooling in the United States is the necessary concomitant of a culture in which the Church is being opposed on every level of her existence and, as a consequence, given the widespread secularization in our country, home schooling is not only valuable or useful but it is absolutely necessary for the survival of the Catholic church in our country."
~ Fr. John Hardon, S.J.
I witnessed Fr. Hardon say this in his sermon during a Mass at a Catholic homeschooling conference in Manassas VA back in the early 1990's. Never has a truer word been spoken regarding the importance of homeschooling to the Catholic Church in this country.
9 posted on 06/08/2011 7:27:22 PM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

Indeed. Follow it to it’s natural conclusion: No resurrection, no salvation, , no Jesus, no God.


10 posted on 06/08/2011 7:27:47 PM PDT by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

good grief i’d go looking for a different school.


11 posted on 06/08/2011 7:40:49 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Hawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

“...this year the Catholic High School decided to place crosses in every classroom....”

That struck me as odd. I would think a Catholic school would have a permanent Crucifix in every single classroom and office.


12 posted on 06/08/2011 7:44:28 PM PDT by baa39
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

That is why Catholic schools are loosing students, they are just a little better than public school. Many of them hire non-Catholic teachers.

If I ran a Catholic school, my teachers would pass a theology test before they could teach. Attendance at Mass would be mandatory.


13 posted on 06/08/2011 7:49:19 PM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tiki

Oops, losing.


14 posted on 06/08/2011 7:51:29 PM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

The warped version of “social justice” that has been pushed by many in the Church has resulted in less income for folks to voluntary give to support Catholic edjumcations. It usurps charity and Catholic community.

Although the crosses being put into classrooms by students is a very good sign, I reckon. It is a shame that it fell to them to get around to doing, but maybe they will take that with them as adults, so maybe that was the Plan.

Freegards


15 posted on 06/08/2011 8:07:45 PM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
I had to go looking for this, but I found it both on the Archdiocese of Washington website and here on FR. Here's the FR link: A Chronological Sequence of the Resurrection Events

I wonder how the teacher explained away all these appearances of Christ.

April 27

This blog post is a follow-up from yesterday’s blog. You can read yesterday’s post by clicking HERE.

When we encounter the resurrection accounts in the New Testament we face a challenge in putting all the pieces together in a way that the sequence of the events flow in logical order. This is due to the fact that no one Gospel presents all, or even most of the data. Some of the data also seems to conflict. I tried to show in yesterday’s blog that these apparent conflicts are not, usually, true conflicts. Another problem with putting all the facts together in a coherent and reasonably complete manner is that the time line of the events is often unclear in some of the accounts. Luke and John are the clearest as to the time frame of the events they describe but Matthew and Luke given us very few parameters. Both Acts and Paul also supply data wherein the time frame is not always clear.

Nevertheless I want to propose to you a possible, even likely, sequence of the Resurrection events. The work is my own and I make no claim that this scenario is certain or backed up by recognized ancient authority. St Augustine has done quite a lot of work in this matter and you can read that by clicking HERE. My attempts here are  simply the fruit of 20+ years of praying over and pondering the events of those forty days between the Lord’s resurrection and ascension. My reflections are based as solidly as possible on the actual biblical data with a small sprinkling of speculation. I realize that the  attempt to do this will irritate some modern biblical scholars who, for reasons unclear to me, seem to insist it is wrong to attempt any synthesis of the texts.

Nevertheless I boldly press on figuring that the average believer will benefit from it and find such a synthesis interesting. Take it for what it is, the work of an obscure pastor who has prayed and carefully sought to follow the sequence of the forty days. You may wish to offer correction or alternative interpretation and are encouraged to do so in the comments. I have posted a PDF of this Document that is easier to read here: Resurrection Chronological Sequence

  • I. The Morning of Day One
    • A. Very early in the morning a group of several women, including Mary Magdalene, approach the tomb to complete burial customs on behalf of Jesus (Matt 28:1; Mk 16:1; Jn 20:1).
    • B. They behold the tomb opened and are alarmed.
    • C. Mary Magdalene runs to Peter and John with distressing news of likely grave robbers (John 20:2)
    • D. The women who remain encounter an angel who declared to them that Jesus had risen and that they should tell this to the brethren (Mk 16:5; Lk 24:4; Matt 28:5).
    • E. They are filled with fear at first and depart from the tomb afraid to speak (Mk 16:8)
    • F. Recovering their courage they decide to go to the Apostles. (Luke 24:9; Matt 28:8)
    • G. Meanwhile Peter and John have gone out to the tomb to investigate Mary’s claim. Mary Magdalene followed them back out to the tomb arriving before they left. Peter and John discover the tomb empty though they encounter no angel. John believes in the resurrection. Peter’s conclusion is not recorded.
    • H. The other women have reported what the angels say to the Apostles. Peter and John have not yet returned and these remaining apostles are dismissive of the women’s story at first (Lk 24:9-11).
    • I. Mary, lingering at the tomb weeps and is fearful. Peering into the tomb she sees this time two angels who wonder why she weeps. Jesus then approaches her from behind. Not looking directly at Jesus, she supposes him to be the gardener. Then he calls her by name, and Mary, recognizing his voice, turns and sees him. Filled with joy she clings to him. (APPEARANCE 1) (Jn 20:16)
    • J. Jesus sends her back to the apostles with the news to prepare them for his appearance later that day. (Jn 20:17)
    • K. The other women have departed the apostles and are on their way possibly back home. Jesus then appears to them (Mat 28:9) after he had dispatched Mary. He also sends them back to the apostles with the news that he had risen and that he would see them. (APPEARANCE 2)
  • II. The Afternoon and evening of day one.
    • A. Later that Day, two disciples on their way to Emmaus are pondering what they have heard about rumors of his resurrection. Jesus comes up behind them but they are prevented from recognizing him. First Jesus breaks open the word for them, then sits at table with them and celebrates the Eucharist whereupon their eyes are opened and they recognize him in the breaking of the bread. (APPEARANCE 3) (Luke 24:13-30)
    • B. The two disciples returned that evening to Jerusalem and went to the Eleven. At first the eleven disbelieved them just as they had the women (Mk 16:13). Nevertheless they continue to relate what they had experienced. At some point Peter drew apart from the others (perhaps for a walk?) And the Lord appeared to Peter (APPEARANCE 4)(Lk 24:34; 1 Cor 15:5) who informed the other ten who then believed. Thus the disciples from Emmaus (still lingering with the apostles) were now told (perhaps by way of apology) that it was in indeed true that Jesus had risen (Lk 24:34).
    • C. Almost at the same moment Jesus appears to the small gathering of apostles and the two disciples from Emmaus. (APPEARANCE 5) Thomas was absent (although the Lucan text describes the appearance as to “the eleven” this is probably just a euphemism for “the apostles” as a group) They are startled but Jesus reassures them and opens the scriptures to them (Lk 24:36ff).
    • D. There is some debate as to whether he appeared to them a second time that night. The Johannine account has significantly different data about the appearance on the first Sunday evening from the Lucan account. Is it merely different data about the same account or is it a wholly separate appearance? It is not possible to say. Nevertheless since the data is so different we can call it (APPEARANCE 6) (John 20:19ff) though it is likely synonymous with appearance 5.
  • III. Interlude -
    • A. There is no biblical data that Jesus appeared to them during the week that followed. The next account of the resurrection says, “Eight days later” namely the following Sunday.
    • B. We do know that the apostles surely exclaimed to Thomas that they had seen the Lord but he refused to believe it. (Jn 20:24-26)
    • C. Were the apostles nervous that Jesus had not appeared again each day? Again we do not know, the data is simply silent as to what happened during this interlude.
  • IV. One week later, Sunday two.
    • A. Jesus appears once again (APPEARANCE 7) to the apostles gathered. This time Thomas is with them. He calls Thomas to faith who now confesses Jesus to be Lord and God. (John 20:24-29)
  • V. Interlude 2
    • A. The apostles received some instructions to return to Galilee (Mat 28:10; Mk 16:7) where they would see Jesus. Thus they spent some of the week journeying 60 miles to the north. This would have taken some time. We can imagine them making the trek north during the intervening days.
  • VI. Some time later -
    • A. The time frame of the next appearance is somewhat vague. John merely says “After this.” Likely it is a matter of days or a week at best. The scene is at the Sea of Galilee. Not all the Twelve are present. They have gone fishing and Jesus summons them from the lakeside. They come to shore and see him (APPEARANCE 8 ) . Peter has a poignant discussion with Jesus in this appearance and is commissioned to tend the flock of Christ (John 21).
    • B. The Appearance to the 500. Of all the appearances you might think that this one would have been recorded in some detail since it was the most widely experienced appearance. Many accounts it seems would have existed and at least one would have made its way into the scriptures. Yet there is no account of it other than it did in fact happen. Paul records the fact of this appearance: 1Corinithians 15:6 Then he appeared to more than five hundred brethren at one time, most of whom are still alive, though some have fallen asleep. (APPEARANCE 9) Where did this take place. What was it like. What was the reaction? We simply do not know. Proof once again that the Bible is not a history book in the conventional sense. Rather it is a highly selective telling of what took place, not a complete account. The Bible makes no pretenses to be something it is not. It is quite clear that it is a selective book: (John 20:30).
    • C. The Appearance to James. Here again we do not have a description of this appearance only a remark by Paul that it did in fact happen: 1Cor 15:7 Then he appeared to James. (APPEARANCE 10) The time frame is not clear. Only that it happened after the appearance to the five hundred and before the final appearance to the apostles.
  • VII. The rest of the forty days.
    • A. Jesus certainly had other on-going appearances with the disciples. Luke attests to this in Acts when he writes: Acts 1: 3 To them he presented himself alive after his passion by many proofs, appearing to them during forty days, and speaking of the kingdom of God.
    • B. During this time there is perhaps the one appearance we can attribute to this time period as recorded by Matthew (28:16ff) and Mark (16:14ff). It takes place an “a mountaintop in Galilee.” Mark adds that they were reclining at table. For these notes this appearance (time frame uncertain) is referred to as (APPEARANCE 11) It is here that he give the great commission. Although Mark’s text may seem to imply that Jesus was taken up from this mountain, such a conclusion is rash since Mark only indicates that Jesus ascended only “after he had spoken to them” (Mk 16:19).
    • Evidently Jesus had also summoned them back to Jerusalem at least toward the end of the period of the forty days. There they would be present for the feast of Pentecost. We can imagine frequent appearances with on-going instruction for Luke records that Jesus “stayed with them.” Most of these appearances and discourses are not recorded. Luke writes in Acts: And while staying with them he charged them not to depart from Jerusalem, but to wait for the promise of the Father, which, he said, “you heard from me, for John baptized with water, but before many days you shall be baptized with the Holy Spirit.” (Acts 1:4)
  • VIII. The final appearance and ascension:
    • A. After forty days of appearances and instructions we have a final account of the last appearance (APPEARANCE 12) wherein he led them out to a place near Bethany, gave them final instructions to wait in Jerusalem until the Holy Spirit was sent. And then he was taken up to heaven in their very sight. (Luke 24:50-53; Acts 1).

So here is a possible and, if I do say so myself, likely chronological sequence of the resurrection appearances. It is a kind of synthesis that attempts to collect all the data and present it in a logical order. There are limits to what we can expect of the Scriptural account, and fitting perfectly into a time frame and logical sequence is not what the texts primarily propose to do. Yet such a chronological sequence can prove helpful and it is in that spirit that I present this.


16 posted on 06/08/2011 8:30:36 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Thank you for the precise account. GG


17 posted on 06/08/2011 8:54:10 PM PDT by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
My Sister Veronica must be stomping around heaven seeing such things going on in Catholic Schools. She sure wouldn't have tolerated such heresy
18 posted on 06/08/2011 9:39:29 PM PDT by mckenzie7 (Democrats = Trough Sloppers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tiki
That is why Catholic schools are loosing students, they are just a little better than public school. Many of them hire non-Catholic teachers. If I ran a Catholic school, my teachers would pass a theology test before they could teach. Attendance at Mass would be mandatory.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I loved the nuns, they were fair with me, the lay teachers SUCKED, they gave me the most grief.

19 posted on 06/08/2011 10:43:13 PM PDT by Studebaker Hawk (It's said these geeks are a dime-a-dozen. I'm looking for the man with the dimes. Freddy Blassie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
He said that Jesus never resurrected. The very cornerstone of Christian Faith. No resurrection, no salvation, no point.

Yes, there's an anecdote about Voltaire who was stoutly anti-Christian

A student came up to say he had proof to denounce Christianity as a fraud. Voltaire told him good, now go home, kill yourself and return from the dead in 3 days and we can then dispute with Christians

Even a christianity-hater like Voltaire saw that this is the central point on which Christianity hinges. No resurrection, no Christianity.

20 posted on 06/09/2011 3:45:55 AM PDT by Cronos (Palin, Cain, Jindal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson