Nothing in Scripture makes reference to THREE wise men.
He said the author of the text is unknown, but it is written in first-person plural from the perspective of the Magi themselves. Landau said scholars don’t have a lot to go on in terms of who wrote it, but there is no chance that it could have been written by the Magi because it references later biblical texts.
I saw this earlier. Pretty interesting find written on ancient leather, like the dead sea scrolls.
3 additional things that are of interest to me, off the top of my head, without having read the book.
1. Apparently, the number of wise men were twelve, as opposed to the traditional three, which is just based on the number of gifts.
2. The magi were part of the religious sect tracing themselves back to Seth, the third son of Adam, and they practiced sacred rites and looked for the promised star and sign.
3. The magi stated they had seen the Christ, and was told by Him “This is one of many occasions on which I have appeared to the peoples of the world...”
Just put in request for copy at library.
bttt
Given the limited nature of written words in ancient times, an idea written down had much more power with the masses. The value of this work may only be as a vehicle that documents the historic use of ancient mass manipulation techniques. Statistically speaking the odds of that are strong and a healthy skepticism relative to anything else apropos.
bookmark
as the story goes, the men known as the Magi find the infant Jesus in a lowly manger
So, this text seems to be claiming that Christ has actually been the foundation of a number of humanity's religious revelations.
His dissertation is drivel. Landau seems incapable of reading and
shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach
understanding the plain text of the
Holy Word in Matthew 2.
Very interesting, thanks for posting.
WHAT 'story'?
The SCRIPTURES say something different!
WHO had the bright idea of showing the 3 Magi (with camels no less) at the MANGER?
The BOOK does not say that!
IMAGES make a bigger mental impression than mere words.
True, there is no reference to three wise men. I, however, still believe that these were Magi — Zoroastrian priests, not Chinese. Chinese would have stood out way too much in th Middle East and the chances of them speaking a semitic language or even Greek would have been far less than the Irani world. They may have come from what is now Afghanistan or Tajikistan (i.e. Eastern Iran) as those were Indo-Greek and Greco-Parthian/ Greco-Bactrian kingdoms but no further
Great faith related article. This univerisity is the one that my University of CT football is going up against in the Festa Bowl on New Year’s Day.
Go UConn!!!!!!!!!!