Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mary not just for Catholics anymore
Catholic News Service ^ | Dec-8-2006 | Patricia Zapor

Posted on 06/18/2009 4:02:05 PM PDT by bronxville

Mary not just for Catholics anymore

By Patricia Zapor Catholic News Service

WASHINGTON (CNS) -- As publications from Time magazine to Christianity Today have discovered recently, Mary, the mother of Jesus, is not just for Catholics anymore.

Features on Mary are perennial favorites for editors looking for a religion-themed story before Christmas, and in the last few years many of these articles have focused on the increasing popularity of Mary among Protestants.

Marianist Father Thomas Thompson, editor of the Marian Library Newsletter at the University of Dayton in Ohio, points out that the expanding Protestant acceptance of Mary is based upon a strictly scriptural view of her, rather than on any change in Protestant theology.

Some Catholic doctrines about Mary, such as the Immaculate Conception -- the belief that she was conceived without sin -- remain controversial among Protestants, Father Thompson said. But as anti-Catholicism has waned among Protestants, the barriers to Episcopalians, Baptists and evangelicals turning to Mary have faded as well.

"We're very happy to see others taking an interest in Mary," he said in a telephone interview with Catholic News Service.

Timothy George, dean of Beeson Divinity School at Samford University, a Baptist college in Birmingham, Ala., wrote recently that "it is time for evangelicals to recover a fully biblical appreciation of the Blessed Virgin Mary and her role in the history of salvation, and to do so precisely as evangelicals." George's comments appeared in the December 2003 issue of Christianity Today and in a 2004 collection of essays by various theologians, "Mary: Mother of God."

"We may not be able to recite the rosary or kneel down before statues of Mary, but we need not throw her overboard," George wrote.

In the magazine, he quoted an early 20th-century Southern Baptist New Testament scholar, A.T. Robertson, who said Mary "has not had fair treatment either from Protestants or Catholics." Robertson argued that while Catholics have "deified" Mary evangelicals have coldly neglected her.

"We have been afraid to praise and esteem Mary for her full worth," said George, citing Robertson, "lest we be accused of leanings and sympathy with Catholics."

George's article went on to explain historical, scriptural and theological reasons why Protestants should embrace Mary.

"We need not go through Mary in order to get to Jesus," George concluded, "but we can join with Mary in pointing others to him."

Another recent book, "Blessed One," is a collection of 11 essays about Mary by Protestant scholars.

In their introduction, editors Beverly Roberts Gaventa and Cynthia L. Rigby, professors at Princeton Theological Seminary in New Jersey and Austin Presbyterian Theological Seminary in Texas, respectively, said their goal for the book was to help Protestants think in new ways about Mary, "blessing her and being blessed by her."

"She is a person of faith who does not always understand but who seeks to put her trust in God," they wrote.

For Muslims, on the other hand, Mary has always been a part of the picture.

John Alden Williams, professor emeritus in the humanities of religion at the College of William and Mary in Virginia, is a Catholic historian who has studied Islamic civilization and religion. He and fellow William and Mary professor James A. Bill published "Roman Catholics and Shi'i Muslims" in 2002.

It notes that two sections of the Quran, the sacred book of Islam, are devoted to Mary, known there as Maryam. She is recognized as the purified woman chosen to be the mother of the promised Messiah. Islam considers Jesus an important prophet, but not the incarnation of God.

Williams explained in a phone interview that, like Catholics, Shiite Muslims, who are a minority compared to the vastly more numerous Sunni Muslims, believe in intercessory prayer through saints and other holy people. That includes Mary, who is highly revered as a mediatrix between humans and God, or Allah. Sufis, another Islamic sect, also believe in intercession.

In Sunni Islam, "the whole idea of intercession is disputed," Williams said, "just as it is among Calvinist Protestants."

Among the differences the leaders of the Protestant Reformation had with the Catholic Church was the growth during the Middle Ages of devotion to Mary. Reformers argued that Jesus was the only mediator between God and mankind and that "exuberant Marian devotion seemed to them to threaten the clarity of the Gospel message of salvation by grace alone, through faith alone, through Christ alone," wrote Daniel L. Migliore, a theology professor at Princeton Theological Seminary, in his chapter in "Blessed One."

Muslims who seek Mary's intercession, on the other hand, see her in much the same way Catholics do, said Williams.

While living in the Middle East, he said he witnessed several striking examples of the reverence many Muslims have for Mary.

At the Convent of Our Lady, an Orthodox church in Sednaya, Syria, he watched devout Muslims roll out prayer rugs to join Christians in reverencing an icon of Mary that is reputed to have been painted by St. Luke the Evangelist and believed to have the power to cure illnesses.

And in the late 1960s, many Muslims were among the millions who gathered in a Coptic Orthodox church in Egypt, hoping to catch a glimpse of reported Marian apparitions, he said.

For more than a year starting in 1968, apparitions of Mary were reported over the domes of the Church of the Virgin Mary in the Zeitoun area of Cairo.

Williams went to the church once during that time and was surprised to see Muslims among the crowd, he said.

"I asked some people, 'Isn't it a little funny for you to be coming here to a Christian church?'" Williams said. They said they considered it only proper that Mary would appear at a church dedicated to her, but explained that they believed she was speaking to all Egyptians, not just Christians.

"They all saw it as a great sign of consolation after the war with Israel (in 1967) that God had not forgotten the people of Egypt," he said.


TOPICS: Catholic; Evangelical Christian; Mainline Protestant; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: blessedmaryprods; catholic; cult
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-194 next last
To: Mr Rogers

That’s from a Protestant Bible.
From the Douay-Rheims it says....

“26 And in the sixth month, the angel Gabriel was sent from God into a city of Galilee, called Nazareth, 27 To a virgin espoused to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David; and the virgin’s name was Mary. 28 And the angel being come in, said unto her: Hail, full of grace, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women. 29 Who having heard, was troubled at his saying, and thought with herself what manner of salutation this should be. 30 And the angel said to her: Fear not, Mary, for thou hast found grace with God.”

Sorry if you have a bad translation.


101 posted on 06/18/2009 6:42:08 PM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Juan Medén
If venerate means to honor, as you claim, would the Catholic church be willing to substitute honor for venerate in its descriptions of Mary and cease praying to Mary (and the saints)? I suspect not, which makes your claim of equivalence implausible.

Actually, if you look in the Catechism, "honor" is exactly the word the Catholic Church uses to talk about the veneration of Mary. "Veneration" is merely a synonym of "honor."

Here is what the Catechism states (bold text added for emphasis):

"All generations will call me blessed": "The Church's devotion to the Blessed Virgin is intrinsic to Christian worship." The Church rightly honors "the Blessed Virgin with special devotion. From the most ancient times the Blessed Virgin has been honored with the title of 'Mother of God.'...This very special devotion...differs essentially from the adoration which is given to the incarnate Word and equally to the Father and the Holy Spirit, and greatly fosters this adoration." (CCC 971).

So, as you can see, in fact, the Church, in the Catechism, does not even use the word "veneration," but rather "honor," as does the 4th Commandment. And it explicitly distinguishes this honoring from adoration, as I have stated. When the Church uses the term "veneration," this is merely a synonym of "honor" and is not to be confused with adoration or worship. If this type of honoring cannot be wrong, because it is expressed directly by the Lord in His Commandments passed down to us through Moses, as we all know from the book of Exodus.

You also raise the separate issue of asking Mary and the Saints for intercession. That will require another post, because I will be happy to show you how intercessory prayer to Mary and the Saints is Scriptural, in terms argued by the Catholic Church, and also consistent with orientation to Mary and the Saints found among early Christians. More on that later...
102 posted on 06/18/2009 6:42:15 PM PDT by bdeaner (The bread which we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ? (1 Cor. 10:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

I appreciate your postings, you know your Bible.

Can you explain to me why FreeRepublic posts so many Catholic and Mormon teachings on the religion forum?

I get the feeling Evangelicals aren’t given the same consideration. Is this my imagination?


103 posted on 06/18/2009 6:43:00 PM PDT by boatbums (Pro-woman, pro-child, pro-life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
"But where do you derive an eternal ministry out of that?"

Is she the Mother of God? Is she in Heaven? If so - as a Saint in Heaven, is not Her Ministry at least as valid as the Communion of Saints that the Apostles Creed confesses?

The Communion of Saints

A Statement of Evangelicals and Catholics Together

In a world where many believe that this life is all there is, Christians are called to bear bold witness to the solidarity of the communio sanctorum, a solidarity secured by our communion with Jesus Christ—crucified, risen, and coming again—and with all, both the living and the dead, who are alive in Christ.
Is not the Apostles Creed part of the Body of Christ?
104 posted on 06/18/2009 6:43:15 PM PDT by narses (http://www.theobamadisaster.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: boatbums; Jim Robinson

“Can you explain to me why FreeRepublic posts so many Catholic and Mormon teachings on the religion forum?”

Clearly the owner is a dreaded Mormon Catholic, a rare and difficult breed. Beware that you don’y offend, who knows the eternal {ZOT} torments that await?


105 posted on 06/18/2009 6:45:21 PM PDT by narses (http://www.theobamadisaster.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: narses

I honor my mother and I’m 56 years old. I do not, however, OBEY her anymore. Neither does she expect me to.


106 posted on 06/18/2009 6:45:34 PM PDT by boatbums (Pro-woman, pro-child, pro-life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

I believe yours is following the Vulgate to conform to your Church’s teaching. That is bias, not scholarship or honesty.


107 posted on 06/18/2009 6:47:02 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: boatbums

>>I get the feeling Evangelicals aren’t given the same consideration. Is this my imagination?<<

Yes, that is your imagination.
Anyone can and do publish on the Religion forum.

The Catholics and LDS threads are hot because there is a group of people who jump on them instantly to “debate” or “minister”.

However, many FReepers would certainly enjoy an Evangelical POV and would welcome threads from Evangelicals. Some of us cross over threads to other religions for solidarity.

If you post something, I’d welcome a ping. If you don’t mind that I’m Catholic. Many of my family members are Evangelical and will vouch for me. *smile*


108 posted on 06/18/2009 6:47:15 PM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
I don't like Wikipedia, but it is all I have at hand...

"The Douay-Rheims Bible, also known as the Rheims-Douai Bible or Douai Bible and abbreviated as D-R, is a translation of the Bible from the Latin Vulgate into English. The New Testament was published in one volume with extensive commentary and notes in 1582. The Old Testament followed nearly thirty years later in two volumes; the first volume (Genesis to Job) in 1609, the second (Psalms to 2 Machabees plus the apocrypha of the Clementine Vulgate) in 1610. Marginal notes took up the bulk of the volumes and had a strong polemical and patristic character. They also offered insights on issues of translation, and on the Hebrew and Greek source texts of the Vulgate. The purpose of the version, both the text and notes, was to uphold Catholic tradition in the face of the Protestant Reformation which was heavily influencing England. As such it was an impressive effort by English Catholics to support the Counter-Reformation."

109 posted on 06/18/2009 6:51:35 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

Actually, the Douay-Rheims is taken from Latin Vulgate, which is itself a translation from Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek texts.

Nevertheless, it was a translation of a translation of the Bible. Many highly-regarded translations of the Bible still use the Vulgate for consultation, especially in certain difficult Old Testament passages, but nearly all modern Bible versions go directly to the Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek Biblical texts for translation and not to a secondary version like the Vulgate (written by Saint Jerome (345-420) a little bit before your translation)

And like I said, sorry your translation is lacking.


110 posted on 06/18/2009 6:52:56 PM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

I gave Bible verses...where are yours? Truth is absolute and not relative. The Bible is the inspired Word of God and calls itself thus. Traditions do not trump inspiration, at least not for me. You are certainly free to believe whatever you want but if you want to argue theology you have to pick an authoritative source we can both agree on. Do you not accept the Bible as a sole authority?


111 posted on 06/18/2009 6:53:36 PM PDT by boatbums (Pro-woman, pro-child, pro-life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: boatbums

I think there are just a lot of Protestants, Catholics, and Mormons who wish to post about their faith. DU wouldn’t, since most posters there hate God.


112 posted on 06/18/2009 6:53:44 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

Yeah, and I’m sure those underlined parts were added by Catholics /s/

LOL!

Like I said, the Vulgate was a bit before the reformation.


113 posted on 06/18/2009 6:54:48 PM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

I’m not the one quoting a 500 year old translation that, by your own admission, is from the Latin. Your use of a translation made from Latin to promote Roman Catholic belief 500 years ago makes your posts suspect, not mine.


114 posted on 06/18/2009 6:56:52 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: boatbums

>>Truth is absolute and not relative.<<

Your own personal interpretation of scripture is yours.
Mine is mine.

I’m not the brightest bulb in the bunch and got Bible interpretation wrong during my “I’m going to do let God inspire me” phase.

Now I let the experts handle the job. They have been doing it as long as the Written Word of God has been around.


115 posted on 06/18/2009 6:57:31 PM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

ah-hem

“Actually, the Douay-Rheims is taken from Latin Vulgate, which is itself a translation from Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek texts.”

Little older than 500 years ago, my FRiend!


116 posted on 06/18/2009 6:58:34 PM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Adding to the discussion:

Luther, Calvin, and Other Early Protestants on the Perpetual Virginity of Mary

Luther, Calvin, and Other Early Protestants on the Perpetual Virginity of Mary

The Protestant Reformers on the Virgin Mary

Zwingli’s’ Mariology: On Mary “Full of Grace”

117 posted on 06/18/2009 6:59:15 PM PDT by Salvation (With God all things are possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

I always love when you throw in the right links!


118 posted on 06/18/2009 7:03:59 PM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: narses

You don’t sound like a loving person to me. If I try to persuade someone concerning my faith I do it respectfully. My post was for MrRogers and maybe should have been a personal post. That doesn’t give you the right to ridicule.


119 posted on 06/18/2009 7:04:56 PM PDT by boatbums (Pro-woman, pro-child, pro-life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: boatbums

If your mother asked you for a favor that you could easily grant, would you honor that request?


120 posted on 06/18/2009 7:05:31 PM PDT by narses (http://www.theobamadisaster.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-194 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson