Complete misunderstanding of what a Scientific Theory is, right out of the gate.
Save your brains cells and don't read any further.
I will say nothing further until this is moved out of religion forum.
What on earth are you talking about? Why, just last week, I saw a fence lizard, flopping around on useless protowings, planning an escape from fire ants in a few million years. < /sarc>
Don’t forget the example of the yucca moth and the yucca plant.The plant can’t survive without the moth and vice versa,yet supposedly they developed millions of years apart,
The Southern Baptist Council on Family Life found 88% of children raised in evangelical homes leave the church after high school, never to return.
If this is the nonsense that you are feeding them, it’s not too hard to see why.
Evolution cannot become a law because it is too complex to be simplified to a concise verbal or mathematical statement of a relation that is always under the same conditions.
I still don’t follow how those other statements refute evolution.
And what I see is devolution, not evolution. (Unless the concepts are interchangeable?)
Look at Congress.
Darwin is wrong but many of the skeptics are just as wrong.
Which means that at some point almost all cheetahs were killed, and the existing cheetahs are descendents of a very few related individuals.
Life did not start with a bolt of lightning striking a pond of water as claimed by evolutionists.
A bald-faced lie. The theory of evolution does not and is not intended to explain the overall origin of life.
The universe is slowing down to a lower state, not higher. The genes of plants, insects, animals and humans are continually becoming defective, not improving.
Most changes in a genome will be to the detriment of the individual. A very few will lead to an increased survivability. The fact that the former will greatly outnumber the latter is consistent with the theory of evolution.
Species are becoming extinct, not evolving.
First, if a species' environment changes more rapidly than the species can adapt, it will die out. Again, this is not inconsistent with the theory of evolution. Secondly, on what basis is the assertion "Species are becoming extinct, not evolving." asserted? Where is the evidence for this.
Order will always move naturally toward disorder or chaos, unless changed by an intelligent being.
The first phrase is a restatement of the laws of thermodynamics. But localized increase in order (e.g., the creation of a honeycomb) need not be directed by intelligence, unless you think for example that honeybees are sentient.
Agreed. It takes someone as belligerently ignorant as Ben Stein even to come up with something like that. Certainly not something a biologist would claim.
Scientic FACTS ARE wrong.
Just the grammar check. What happened to good journalism?
Nothing in the article displays evidence of an interest in even basic science, facts, or proof.
The biggest problem for the bible-based creationist effort is that it hinges on defending a very narrowly defined statement: God created all of the universe, fully formed as we know it now, in six earth days. It was also done exactly as the King James (or whatever) version of the bible states it... in English.
Science is not a competing religion (there are no shrines to the ‘time god’), it’s a way of discovering more about the world around us. Shouting down science is not a method of proving a point, it’s a way of declaring that you’re not interested in learning more. If creation in fact happened exactly as described by the bible, scientists will eventually uncover evidence to unambiguously support that position. If your faith isn’t strong enough to wait, it isn’t the fault of the evil time god.
Um, maybe that’s why they call it a theory instead of a law.
Thanks for making Christians everywhere look like mouth-breathing morons. Atheist love the Young Earth Creationists.
Undoubtedly, however, the Stray Man is an example of (un)Intelligent Design.
Right. Everyone knows that life was just poofed into existence.
Thanks, I guess, for posting the stupidest attack on evolution I’ve ever seen. That page is a real carnival of belligerent ignorance. You can dip in anywhere and find a statement that’s just flat-out wrong. It’s really an impressive achievement.
Evolution is entirely compatible with the practice of the Christian faith.
Which version of Creation do you believe in? The one in Genesis 1, or the one in Genesis 2?