Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Blessed Virgin in the History of Christianity [Ecumenical]
Insight Scoop ^ | January 1, 2009 | John A. Hardon, S.J.

Posted on 01/01/2009 3:51:01 PM PST by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-184 next last
To: the invisib1e hand

Very well put. BTTT!


61 posted on 01/01/2009 5:23:50 PM PST by Salvation ( †With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper
Well, there is the crux of the problem with "reformed" thinkers.

Well God told us to seek Him, not blindly follow some church.

62 posted on 01/01/2009 5:25:10 PM PST by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

**1+1=3 is as logical as Mary being the Mother of God.**

Are you saying that Jesus Christ, second person of the Trinity is NOT God?

Mary was His Mother, hence she was also Mother of Christ, second person of the Trinity, truly God, and Mother of Christ, truly man.

If you do not believe that Jesus Christ was true God and true man, you are furthering the Nestorian heresy.


63 posted on 01/01/2009 5:27:46 PM PST by Salvation ( †With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
But we can agree that Jesus is our Savior, which is the most important belief of all.

On that and many other things, FRiend (though not much in this post), we agree.

64 posted on 01/01/2009 5:28:37 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (revolution is in the air.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

Look at #43 and then #46. The poster in #46 states that what the poster in #43 posted was as logical as 1+1=3. I was just saying that a lover of Truth (like the poster of #43) would never find 1+1=3 logical, whereas the poster of #46 does. LOL...got it?


65 posted on 01/01/2009 5:28:49 PM PST by big'ol_freeper (Gen. George S. Patton to Michael Moore... American Carol: "I really like slapping you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Not according the Holy Scripture where we are told to bring our disputes to the Church if they can’t be resolved between us.


66 posted on 01/01/2009 5:30:08 PM PST by big'ol_freeper (Gen. George S. Patton to Michael Moore... American Carol: "I really like slapping you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper
got it?

Uhh, I'll just take your word for it...

67 posted on 01/01/2009 5:30:29 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (revolution is in the air.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Matthew 18:15-18:

15"(A)If your brother sins[a], go and show him his fault in private; if he listens to you, you have won your brother.

16"But if he does not listen to you, take one or two more with you, so that (B)BY THE MOUTH OF TWO OR THREE WITNESSES EVERY FACT MAY BE CONFIRMED.

17"If he refuses to listen to them, (C)tell it to the church; and if he refuses to listen even to the church, (D)let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector.

18"Truly I say to you, (E)whatever you bind on earth shall have been bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall have been loosed in heaven.

Seems to me that not listening to the Church is a problem in someone's mind....

68 posted on 01/01/2009 5:37:47 PM PST by big'ol_freeper (Gen. George S. Patton to Michael Moore... American Carol: "I really like slapping you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper
Not according the Holy Scripture where we are told to bring our disputes to the Church if they can’t be resolved between us.

Completely out of context. It was referring to legal disputes.

69 posted on 01/01/2009 5:38:36 PM PST by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Completely out of context. It was referring to legal disputes.

Nice try. Wrong.

My dispute with my neighbor about the boundary lines to my property and his is a legal dispute, and is not the purview of the Church. Holy Scripture here is discussing a brother who has sinned...read that faith and morals...and we are directed to bring it to the Church if the brother does not listen.

70 posted on 01/01/2009 5:43:26 PM PST by big'ol_freeper (Gen. George S. Patton to Michael Moore... American Carol: "I really like slapping you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper
Seems to me that not listening to the Church is a problem in someone's mind....

That was directed toward Jews, not Gentiles.

71 posted on 01/01/2009 5:43:31 PM PST by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper
Nice try. Wrong. My dispute with my neighbor about the boundary lines to my property and his is a legal dispute, and is not the purview of the Church. Holy Scripture here is discussing a brother who has sinned...read that faith and morals...and we are directed to bring it to the Church if the brother does not listen.

Your first statement was concerning bring disputes to the church is from 1 Cor 6, which is absolutely about legal disputes.

72 posted on 01/01/2009 5:47:39 PM PST by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Wrong. Nice try. Jews did not have “the Church” in their religious construct. It is directed toward those (the Apostles) who He is giving the authority to “loose and bind”...ergo the newly founded Church.


73 posted on 01/01/2009 5:51:13 PM PST by big'ol_freeper (Gen. George S. Patton to Michael Moore... American Carol: "I really like slapping you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

While you are correct about Corinthians, these verses are specifically about sin and the Church’s authority to “loose and bind”.


74 posted on 01/01/2009 5:52:48 PM PST by big'ol_freeper (Gen. George S. Patton to Michael Moore... American Carol: "I really like slapping you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper
17"If he refuses to listen to them, (C)tell it to the church; and if he refuses to listen even to the church, (D)let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector.

Seems directed towards Jews to me. Definitely not the Catholic Church because of the reference of 'let him be to you as a Gentile' would make no sense.

75 posted on 01/01/2009 5:56:47 PM PST by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Your answer makes no sense. The Church is just being formed. Jesus has not even been crucified yet. He is instructing Peter and the Apostles on the Church He has just stated is to be built upon Peter, the Rock. His statement, treat the sinner, who has rejected the Church, like a Gentile is a reference to Jewish practice towards Gentiles at the time, which is to say that one who rejects the Church is to be treated as unclean, an unrepentant sinner. It is not a directive on how to treat Gentiles. It is a directive on how to treat those who reject the authority of the Church.

Makes you wonder why anyone would want to reject His Church and remain outside of it.


76 posted on 01/01/2009 6:08:09 PM PST by big'ol_freeper (Gen. George S. Patton to Michael Moore... American Carol: "I really like slapping you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Mary was prophesied in Genesis.
77 posted on 01/01/2009 6:15:25 PM PST by TASMANIANRED (TAZ:Untamed, Unpredictable, Uninhibited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

It is lovely.


78 posted on 01/01/2009 6:20:33 PM PST by TASMANIANRED (TAZ:Untamed, Unpredictable, Uninhibited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
By the way, looking at your profile I notice the quote:

Three people responsible for the freedom of hundreds of millions of people............Nobel Peace Prizes, ZERO."

I see you have a photo showing Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan. I'd be interested in who the third of the three was, and even more interested why his photo is missing from your homage.

79 posted on 01/01/2009 6:31:28 PM PST by big'ol_freeper (Gen. George S. Patton to Michael Moore... American Carol: "I really like slapping you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper
I see you have a photo showing Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan. I'd be interested in who the third of the three was, and even more interested why his photo is missing from your homage.

It was a picture of Reagan and JPII. And it is missing because whoever had it posted is no longer hosting the image. Thanks for pointing it out.

80 posted on 01/01/2009 6:45:18 PM PST by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-184 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson