Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mormons: We're misunderstood
DAILY PRESS & ARGUS ^ | April 26, 2007 | Dan Meisler

Posted on 04/26/2007 6:03:35 AM PDT by Alex Murphy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-235 next last
To: needlenose_neely

Sure. You are scared of the words of Jesus. Understood.


61 posted on 04/26/2007 11:42:07 AM PDT by nowandlater (My 2008 Dream Ticket---Romney-Thompson or Thompson-Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
Have you seen this one?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1822809/posts?q=1&;page=301

62 posted on 04/26/2007 11:42:09 AM PDT by needlenose_neely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
"Sometimes people would say that we're not Christians," he said. "We definitely are. We believe in Jesus Christ."

Mormons believe that was reversed when Joseph Smith, regarded as a prophet, was visited by God and Jesus in a vision in 1820. That's when Smith was chosen to restore the true church to the world, according to LDS doctrine. Smith translated the Book of Mormon, the sacred text of the Latter Day Saints, which is based on the Bible.
Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.

But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.

As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.
--Galatians 1:7-9
The Book of Mormon is claimed to have been translated from documents antedating by thousands of years the King James version of the Bible. Strange that it should so closely resemble it. Well, I guess that proves how miraculous it really was, huh?
63 posted on 04/26/2007 11:48:08 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nowandlater

“what go must I do? “
The man was thinking in terms of righteousness by works, Jesus corrected this misunderstanding first before answering the question more fully. The term eternal life, kingdom of God, heaven were used interchangeable.
“Why do you ask me about what is good?”
Jesus wanted the man to think about what is good, since Jesus’ concept differed from the current religious leaders. Good is not something to be done in itself. God alone is good, all goodness derives from Him, even the keeping of the commandments, which Jesus explained.
“If you want to enter life, obey the commandments”
To enter life is the same as to get eternal life, The requirement to obey the commandments is not to establish one’s merit before God but is to be an expression of true faith. The Bible always teaches that Salvation is a GIFT of God’s grace received through FAITH.
The rich mans goal was eternal life but wealth and lack of commitment stood in his way. This was the rich man’s main problem.
As a side note when Jesus used the term “eye of a needle” He was not talking about a sewing needle, He was speaking (historically) about the city gates. The opening was often referred to as “eye of the needle”. A camel was to tall to get through when it was loaded up with goods and had to get on his knees to walk/crawl through the opening.
The rich man was not willing to humble himself.


64 posted on 04/26/2007 11:49:03 AM PDT by svcw (There is no plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: svcw

Where does Jesus says this?

“To enter life is the same as to get eternal life, The requirement to obey the commandments is not to establish one’s merit before God but is to be an expression of true faith. The Bible always teaches that Salvation is a GIFT of God’s grace received through FAITH.”

You are muddying up His words. He said to obey the commandments. That is it! Show me where Jesus does a commentary about this concept? Again, Jesus sounds very Mormon. Imagine that!


65 posted on 04/26/2007 11:55:15 AM PDT by nowandlater (My 2008 Dream Ticket---Romney-Thompson or Thompson-Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

And tradition Christians distort the direct words of Jesus from the GOSPELS. Who is selling a different Gospel? Those who cling to the direct words of Jesus or those who prefer Paul over Jesus in everything they seek to understand?


66 posted on 04/26/2007 11:58:14 AM PDT by nowandlater (My 2008 Dream Ticket---Romney-Thompson or Thompson-Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
The Book of Mormon is claimed to have been translated from documents antedating by thousands of years the King James version of the Bible. Strange that it should so closely resemble it. Well, I guess that proves how miraculous it really was, huh?

Well, don't you know, Reformed Egyptian was the forerunner of King James English.(wink)

67 posted on 04/26/2007 12:08:25 PM PDT by needlenose_neely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Logophile

From Wikipedia:
“According to the literal interpretation, Kolob is an actual star in this universe that is near to, or perhaps the sun of, the physical throne of God. This interpretation has significant formative impact on Mormon belief and criticism, leading to conceptions such as that the faithful will be made gods of planets in this universe, that God dwells within this universe rather than transcending it, and that the Biblical creation is a creation of the local earth, galaxy, or solar system rather than the entire known physical reality.”

While Wikipedia isn’t definitive, it certainly shows that the “god” controversy is not something I made up. By the way, do you believe God rules from a planet near Kolob in the center of the universe? More importantly, does Mitt Romney believe that?

By the way, I’ve heard the “god” of a planet story from a couple different Mormons trying to convert me. Once it was a lawyer for the hydroponics farm where they used magic water to make their plants grow (you can’t make this stuff up).


68 posted on 04/26/2007 12:10:12 PM PDT by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: needlenose_neely; All
Because they consider weak, ignorant, nominal Christians to be "Golden Contacts" to prey on as converts, which wins them lots of points toward godhood.

But aren't you doing the same type of thing? What do you get out bashing another's religion and arguing the same points over and over again? Do you get extra brownie points in your spiritual growth if you turn someone away from the "evil Mormon church"?

I wonder this mostly about the group up the street from me who call themselves Concerned Christians, too. Their only reason for being is to say, "Mormons are wrong". They bother people at the Easter pageant with signs that say Mormons are not Christian, yet their brand of Christianity feels ugly and hateful. What do they get out of it?

I can see a discussion that says, "Here is what I believe." (which is why I complimented the Catholic who has been on these threads (I suck at names). But, bashing someone over and over the head again saying, "Your beliefs are wrong and evil" reminds me too much of guys who yell vulgar things at girls from out their car window, then wonder why they can't get a girlfriend.

69 posted on 04/26/2007 12:12:18 PM PDT by HungarianGypsy (Pass the popcorn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: nowandlater

Ephesians 2:8
Titus 3:5
Romans 3:23-24
Romans 9:30-32
Ephesians 1:18-23 (my prayer for you).


70 posted on 04/26/2007 12:13:35 PM PDT by svcw (There is no plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: FastCoyote
While Wikipedia isn’t definitive, it certainly shows that the “god” controversy is not something I made up.

No, Wikipedia is not definitive or authoritative. As for the "god controversy," I am not sure which controversy you have in mind. Do you mean the doctrine that men may become the sons of God and therefore be called gods? I discussed that in my previous posts (27 and 32).

By the way, I’ve heard the “god” of a planet story from a couple different Mormons trying to convert me. Once it was a lawyer for the hydroponics farm where they used magic water to make their plants grow (you can’t make this stuff up).

He really said "magic water"? I suspect that someone has been pulling your leg.

71 posted on 04/26/2007 12:22:02 PM PDT by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: nowandlater
then please explain the words and counsel of the Lord Himself: Matthew 19:16

I see you stopped short of Matthew 19:25-26.

"When his disciples heard it, they were exceedingly amazed, saying, 'Who then can be saved?'"
But Jesus looked at them and said to them, "With men this (salvation) is impossible, but with God all things are possible."

The purpose of Jesus' comment to the rich ruler was to prove that point.

72 posted on 04/26/2007 12:27:59 PM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Logophile

“He really said “magic water”? I suspect that someone has been pulling your leg.”

It was the hydoponics farm owner who used the magic water statement. It was his lawyer who told me I could become a God on a planet with multiple Celestial wives. The hydoponics farm was just a stones throw from the Chicken Brothel in Pahrump (or maybe it was the Cherry Patch, I forget).

Which is not to be out done by the business partner who told me he vacuumed the sheeps wool on the wall at the Vegas Temple and the roller marks “magically” disappeared. He lives across the street from the temple. He and his son threatened to beat me up one Christmas, mainly because they were trying to hide the business books. They also got mad at me for trying to kill the Mormon crickets that infested the control room, apparently the crickets were magical or sacred or something.

But what disturbed me the most was the gal I dated who gotten a divorce from a Mormon and had been driven out of the church. That was the first time I suspected how cloistered most Mormons are.


73 posted on 04/26/2007 12:48:38 PM PDT by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: HungarianGypsy
Since you have no concern for the eternal destiny of anyone, there is no reason to discuss it with you.
74 posted on 04/26/2007 12:51:33 PM PDT by needlenose_neely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: HungarianGypsy

By the way, I have no interest in your postmodern liberal spirituality either. Heard it more than I care to at the moment already.


75 posted on 04/26/2007 12:53:23 PM PDT by needlenose_neely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: HungarianGypsy

[But, bashing someone over and over the head again saying, “Your beliefs are wrong and evil”]

It would certainly be out of place - if those weird doctrines weren’t the faith of a presidential candidate. Otherwise you might as well elect Tom Cruise, cause he’s just as good looking as Romney, some of his views are conservative, and the fact that he is driven to bizarre behavior by his religion should be of no concern.


76 posted on 04/26/2007 1:06:38 PM PDT by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry

I perceive that you are a student of this cult of Mormon. More power to you. I am a student of the cult of Marianism. I find an interesting intersection between the two at “Mother of God” and “Heavenly Mother”.


77 posted on 04/26/2007 1:08:40 PM PDT by DungeonMaster (Render therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: nowandlater

No. What I find ridiculous is that you would question the veracity of a quote in Isaiah. Have you read everything that both the Old and New Testament says about works? If not, why not? You don’t wish to know what God says on the subject?

You must honestly believe that God gives you the authority to pick and chose which quotes from the Holy Bible that you like and only apply those.

You have forgotten that the WORDS of Christ started with the WORD in Genesis? Jesus is the Word. Jesus is the Savior. You cannot separate Jesus from the Word.

If you didn’t have the Word, you wouldn’t have Jesus, would you?

If you didn’t have the Old Testament, you wouldn’t have the New Testament.

Picking and chosing is not going to benefit you on your walk with Christ.


78 posted on 04/26/2007 1:17:27 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife (Life isn't fair. It's just fairer than death, that's all.--William Goldman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster

I am not a student. I am an ex-mormon and simply pass on my experiences and what I was taught unitl I was in my mid-twenties. I have been out of the flow of Mormonism for about 25 years.


79 posted on 04/26/2007 1:35:42 PM PDT by colorcountry (An Honest Man will change his thoughts to match the truth and a Dishonest Man will change the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
The Book of Mormon is not based upon the Bible, but is a companion Testament bearing witness of Jesus Christ and detailing more of his ministry on the Earth. The book of Mormon was translated from golden plates supposedly given to Joseph Smith by an angel. Left that out

The author of this article has confused regular worship services in our Chapels with the ordinances performed in our Temples. No person who has not been deemed worthy by mormon authorities meaning obeying all the rules and paying 10% of their income to the church may enter a temple, even if a family member, including son or daughter, is being married within. They must wait outside on the steps or sidewalk. Left that out.

We perform proxy baptisms in our Temples for every person who has died, no matter their race, religion, nation of origin, etc. The names are submitted by people who have those names in their ancestry. Proxy baptisms did not target Jewish Holocaust victims. Even though Jewish leaders won a court case against the LDS church for these baptisms, and promised to not do it again, members are still baptizing Jews. Mormons renew pledge to end proxy baptism of Jews Left that out

Also, black people were denied membership until 1978, when the president of the church at the time had a revelation that they should be included.

Absolutely untrue. Blacks were not denied membership.

Black men, while allowed to be "members" were denied being ordained in the two priesthoods claimed by the mormons, thus were "second-class members" until a "revelation" in 1978, after the civil rights movement was successful. Left that out.

Otherwise, your post was mostly accurate.

80 posted on 04/26/2007 1:47:16 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Waiting impatiently for a conservative party to rise from the ashes of the wimpy republican party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-235 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson