Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BISHOP MICHAEL SHERIDAN OF COLORADO SPRINGS: NO COMMUNION FOR PRO-ABORT/HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGE VOTERS
EWTN.com ^ | 5-14-04 | Bishop Michael Sheridan

Posted on 05/14/2004 5:16:53 PM PDT by Salvation

14-May-2004 -- EWTNews Feature

A LETTER FROM BISHOP MICHAEL SHERIDAN OF COLORADO SPRINGS: NO COMMUNION FOR PRO-ABORTION / HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGE VOTERS

A PASTORAL LETTER TO THE CATHOLIC FAITHFUL OF THE DIOCESE OF COLORADO SPRINGS ON THE DUTIES OF CATHOLIC POLITICIANS AND VOTERS

Dear brothers and sisters in Christ,

This coming November we Americans will participate in one of the most important national elections in recent history. The president, senators and congressmen who are placed in office by our votes will serve at a time in which issues that are critical to the very survival of our civilization will be at the top of the political agenda. As we prepare for these elections I consider it my duty as your bishop to write to you about these matters so that you might go to the polls this fall with a well informed conscience.

The Church teaches that “man has the right to act in conscience and in freedom so as personally to make moral decisions.” (1) Often we hear people claim that they are making decisions in accord with conscience even when those decisions defy the natural law and the revealed teachings of Jesus Christ. This is because of a widespread misunderstanding of the very meaning of conscience. For many, conscience is no more than personal preference or even a vague sense or feeling that something is right or wrong, often based on information drawn from sources that have nothing to do with the law of God.

The right judgment of conscience is not a matter of personal preference nor has it anything to do with feelings. It has only to do with objective truth. “Conscience must be informed and moral judgment enlightened. A well-formed conscience is upright and truthful. It formulates its judgments according to reason, in conformity with the true good willed by the wisdom of the Creator. The education of conscience is indispensable for human beings who are subjected to negative influences and tempted by sin to prefer their own judgment and to reject authoritative teachings.” (2) All people have a grave obligation to form their consciences by adhering to the truth, precisely as that truth is found in the natural law and in the revelation of God. As Catholics we have the further obligation to give assent to the doctrinal and moral teachings of the Church because “to the Church belongs the right always and everywhere to announce moral principles, including those pertaining to the social order, and to make judgments on any human affairs to the extent that they are required by the fundamental rights of the human person or the salvation of souls.” (3) In other words, as people who profess the Catholic faith, we must “have the mind of Christ” in every judgment and act.

Among the many distortions and misrepresentations that prevail in the current debates about the relationship between religion and the social order (politics) is the assertion that faith and politics are to be kept separated. This, apparently, is based upon the American doctrine of the separation of church and state. In fact, the wall that separates church and state is the safeguard against both the establishment of a state religion and the imposition of sectarian religious beliefs and practices, such as particular denominational forms of worship or theological tenets. In no way does the American doctrine of separation of church and state even suggest that the well-formed consciences of religious people should not be brought to bear on their political choices.

The Second Vatican Council was abundantly clear on this matter. “Nor, on the contrary, are they any less wide of the mark who think that religion consists in acts of worship alone and in the discharge of certain moral obligations, and who imagine they can plunge themselves into earthly affairs in such a way as to imply that these are altogether divorced from the religious life. This split between the faith which many profess and their daily lives deserves to be counted among the more serious errors of our age. Long since, the Prophets of the Old Testament fought vehemently against this scandal and even more so did Jesus Christ Himself in the New Testament threaten it with grave punishments. Therefore, let there be no false opposition between professional and social activities on the one part, and religious life on the other.” (4)

When Catholics are elected to public office or when Catholics go to the polls to vote, they take their consciences with them. Pope John Paul II has consistently taught this as, for example, when he said that those who are directly involved in lawmaking bodies have a “grave and clear obligation to oppose” any law that attacks human life. (5) The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has declared that, “in this context, it must be noted also that a well-formed Christian conscience does not permit one to vote for a political program or an individual law which contradicts the fundamental contents of faith and morals.” (6) Anyone who professes the Catholic faith with his lips while at the same time publicly supporting legislation or candidates that defy God’s law makes a mockery of that faith and belies his identity as a Catholic.

In November we will once again have the privilege of exercising our most precious right as citizens – the right to vote. Our choices will be made from among an array of candidates who take a variety of positions with regard to many important issues. In the midst of what could be a difficult and confusing exercise it is very important to remember that not all issues are of equal gravity. As men and women of good will we strive to achieve true justice for all people and to preserve their rights as human beings. There is, however, one right that is “inalienable”, and that is the RIGHT TO LIFE. This is the FIRST right. This is the right that grounds all other human rights. This is the issue that trumps all other issues.

The November elections will be critical in the battle to restore the right to life to all citizens, especially the unborn and the elderly and infirm. As a result of the pro-life efforts of countless Americans the number of abortions performed in our country is now declining for the first time since the appalling Supreme Court decision of 1973 that made it “legal” to kill our children. We cannot allow the progress that has been made to be reversed by a pro-abortion President, Senate or House of Representatives. Neither can we permit illicit stem cell research that makes use of aborted babies. Any movement to promote and legalize euthanasia must be halted. Our votes have the power to stop these abominations.

There must be no confusion in these matters. Any Catholic politicians who advocate for abortion, for illicit stem cell research or for any form of euthanasia ipso facto place themselves outside full communion with the Church and so jeopardize their salvation. Any Catholics who vote for candidates who stand for abortion, illicit stem cell research or euthanasia suffer the same fateful consequences. It is for this reason that these Catholics, whether candidates for office or those who would vote for them, may not receive Holy Communion until they have recanted their positions and been reconciled with God and the Church in the Sacrament of Penance.

In recent months another issue has reached the level of our legislatures. It is so-called “same- sex marriage.” Those who now promote this deviancy often present it as a human right denied homosexual persons and thus illegally discriminating against them. But, in fact, no one has a right to that which flies in the face of God’s own design. Marriage is not an invention of individuals or even of societies. Rather it is an element of God’s creation. It is God who created us male and female. It is God who joined man and woman so that they could be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth. Every civilization known to mankind has understood marriage as the union of a man and a woman for the procreation and rearing of children. And yet now, in 21stcentury America, there are those who would want us to believe that all people of all times have been mistaken about the true nature and purpose of marriage. No one can simply redefine marriage to suit a political or social agenda.

Once again, we must be clear about this matter. The future of our world depends upon the strength of the family, the basic unit of society. The future of the family depends on the state of marriage. The family – father, mother and children – reflects the nature of God Himself, who is a communion of selfless and self-giving love. For this reason marriage and family life cannot be whatever we want them to be. They are only and always as God has created them. As in the matter of abortion, any Catholic politician who would promote so-called “same-sex marriage” and any Catholic who would vote for that political candidate place themselves outside the full communion of the Church and may not receive Holy Communion until they have recanted their positions and been reconciled by the Sacrament of Penance.

The Church never directs citizens to vote for any specific candidate. The Church does, however, have the right and the obligation to teach clearly and fully the objective truth about the dignity and rights of the human person. These teachings, in turn, must inform the consciences of voters. “By its intervention in this area, the Church’s Magisterium does not wish to exercise political power or eliminate the freedom of opinion of Catholics regarding contingent questions. Instead, it intends -- as is its proper function – to instruct and illuminate the consciences of the faithful, particularly those involved in political life, so that their actions may always serve the integral promotion of the human person and the common good.” (7)

Dear friends in Christ, I exhort you with all my heart to take courage and proclaim the Gospel of Life to those who will stand for elected office this fall. It is by your prayers and by your votes that politicians who are unconditionally pro-life and pro-family will serve our country. Conversely, if our voices remain silent or if, God forbid, we vote contrary to our informed consciences, we will see our country led down a short path to ruin. We want freedom for all, but there can be no freedom without truth. In the words of our Holy Father: “When freedom is detached from objective truth it becomes impossible to establish personal rights on a firm rational basis; and the ground is laid for society to be at the mercy of the unrestrained will of individuals or the oppressive totalitarianism of public authority.” (8)

Let us all pray for those politicians who claim to be Catholic yet continue to oppose the law of God and the rights of persons that, by the grace of God, they will be converted once again to the full and authentic articulation and practice of the faith.

Finally, I wish to affirm my brother bishops who have proclaimed the truth of these critical matters and who have admonished those Catholic politicians who place themselves at odds with the truth of God. May that truth which is the foundation of genuine freedom prevail in our country.

Given at the Chancery on this first day of May 2004, the Feast of St. Joseph the Worker.

Most Reverend Michael J. Sheridan
Bishop of Colorado Springs

Endnotes
(1) Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1782.
(2) ibid., 1783.
(3) ibid., 2032 and Code of Canon Law 747.2.
(4) Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World (Gaudium et spes), 43.
(5) John Paul II, The Gospel of Life (Evangelium vitae), 73.
(6) Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Doctrinal Notes on Some Questions Regarding the Participation of Catholics in Political Life”, 4.
(7) ibid., 6.
(8) The Gospel of Life, 101.



Click here to share this news story with a friend.


 



TOPICS: Activism; Apologetics; Catholic; Charismatic Christian; Current Events; Eastern Religions; Ecumenism; Evangelical Christian; General Discusssion; History; Humor; Islam; Judaism; Mainline Protestant; Ministry/Outreach; Moral Issues; Orthodox Christian; Other Christian; Other non-Christian; Prayer; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics; Religion & Science; Skeptics/Seekers; Theology; Worship
KEYWORDS: bishopsheridan; catholiclist; homosexualagenda; nocommunion; proabortvoters; prohomosexualvoters
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: old and tired
We are facing a frightening voting dilemma here in Pennsylvania this Fall.

You make some very good points. This is the kind of dilemma which is very common, but which the pastoral letter does not address.

As far as your own choices, I would avoid making pragmatic decisions. That happened in Connecticut a few years back when all the conservative Republicans got together and voted for Joe Lieberman in place of Lowell Weicker, based on the same line of reasoning you mentioned. Well, clearly the pragmatic considerations did not work out quite as planned. Lieberman is still around many years later, and in the meantime, Weicker went on to become governor.

41 posted on 05/15/2004 11:57:16 AM PDT by Maximilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

It's wonderful that this can be written in our country at this time, however, that may not last long. I contribute to ADF (Alliance Defense Fund) Christian attorneys out fighting the court battles for all Christians. They sent a newsletter yesterday explaining how things could change rapidly w/the advent of the legal homosexual marriages. Currently, in Canada there is Bill C-250 which is about to pass that seeks to make it a criminal offense to publicly express "hatred" (read: moral disapproval) against people who engage in homosexual behavior.

From their newsletter: An article in the Wall Street Journal by Mary Ann Glendon from Harvard Law School gave a warning: "Religious freedom, too, is at stake. As much as one may wish to live and let live, the experience in other countries reveals that once these (same-sex 'marriage') arrangements become law, there will be no live-and-let-live policy for those who differ. Gay-marriage proponents use the language of openness, tolerance and diversity, yet one foreseeable effect of their success will be to usher in an era of intolerance and discrimination the likes of which we have rarely seen before. Every person and every religion that disagrees will be labeled as bigoted and open discriminated against. The ax will fall most heavily on religious persons and groups that don't go along. Religious institutions will be hit with lawsuites if they refuse to compromise their principles."

Allan Carlson, Distinguished Fellow of Family Studies at the Family Research Council, warns: "If same-sex 'marriage' was deemed a fundamental human right, would churches still be allowed to ban such things and claim a tax exemption? I don't know."

Raymond Flynn, one-time mayor of Boston and a former U.S. ambassador to the Vatican, adds: "The issue of legalizing same-sex marriages in MA and CA raises the question: Does this mean there will be cases brought against the Catholic Church for discrimination? I think it is the next step. I don't think people will stop until the whole sacred institution of marriage crumbles."

I believe we need prayers of numbers this day like no other. Tomorrow is bringing changes in this country like none other in our history.


42 posted on 05/16/2004 8:21:09 AM PDT by DandG13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

One more thing from the newsletter: Re Canada's bill - In response to a respectful letter by a Christian concerned about free speech and religious liberty implications of BIll C-250, liberal senator Laurier LaPierre replied, "God! You people are sick. God should strike you dead."

This is a battle that will take those of us in the Christian faith to come together and put up our best fight and God will be on our side. We need to fight and that especially means at the polls.


43 posted on 05/16/2004 8:32:27 AM PDT by DandG13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Wow. This is such a bold, explicit, and orthodox letter, that I had to do a double-take. American bishops haven't talked like this since... heck I can't even remember.

Where is the usual qualifying mish-mush what lets people pretend this doesn't apply to them? Where is the moral vaguery that lets Catholics pretend voting for a tax-cutting candidate is just as morally bad as voting for a pro-abort?

Too many terrific lines in this letter to attempt excerpting. I think I have a new favorite among American bishops.

44 posted on 05/16/2004 10:12:50 AM PDT by Snuffington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
Good post. Rarely if ever is politics little more than picking the lesser of the evils.

I regret to say that Bush is a reflection of the country we live in. The sad fact of the matter is that the voters will not elect a more Conservative president.

Bush barely beat Gore. And, at present, a good percentage of the population considers Bush to be too Conservative for them.

45 posted on 05/16/2004 9:11:47 PM PDT by Barnacle (Saint Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
The right judgment of conscience is not a matter of personal preference nor has it anything to do with feelings. It has only to do with objective truth.
Alleluia!
46 posted on 05/17/2004 6:05:07 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St.Chuck
This is indeed an outstanding letter.

There are some practical aspects that actually make his comments even more effective. Namely, there's no way the priests can know whether or not a person has voted for a pro-abort, so it's a matter individual conscience as to whether that person takes Communion, and I think it will turn some hearts.

47 posted on 05/17/2004 6:53:32 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
The bishop is not contradicting the "lesser of two evils doctrine". There are virtually no candidates who promote a platform which is 100% consistent with Catholic teaching. Even so called "pro-life" candidates get uneasy when the issue of rape is raised.

It is implicit in what the bishop is saying that he is referring to situations where Catholics vote for those very same candidates to whom he is referring in this letter.

Thus, not only Kerry, but all those who vote for him and thereby contribute to the implementation or continuation of a greater evil.

This is tanatmount to saying to Catholics "don't vote for Kerry." I don't have a problem with this. Quite the contrary. But you can bet your life that the secularists and ACLU-types in government will, particularly if this mesage is repeated on a grander scale. It will be spun as Church meddling in political matters and look for questions about tax-status etc., to be raised in order to shut up "the meddlesome priests".

48 posted on 05/17/2004 8:19:46 AM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian

I just found this on Spirit Daily -- live link there----

DAILY NEWS BRIEF FROM CATHOLIC WORLD NEWS
Copyright 2001 Domus Enterprises

Two bishops, two approaches to issue of politics

Boston, May. 14 (CWNews.com) - Several more US bishops have joined with their brother bishops in addressing the newly relevant question of what to do about Catholic politicians who publicly dissent from the Church's teachings.

Archbishop John Vlazny of Portland, Oregon, said in column in his local diocesan newspaper, that Catholics who stand in public opposition to "serious Church teaching" should refrain from receiving Communion. However, he said he will resist efforts to have refuse the sacraments to those who seek them.

"Speaking as a pastor, it is less abrasive to refuse to baptize a child or to marry a couple when the request is made beforehand than it is to refuse Holy Communion during a public liturgical service," he said. "The latter places a questionable burden on all who are ministers of the Eucharist, both ordinary and extraordinary. Public perception will inevitably weigh heavily in favor of the 'victim' of the refusal rather than the church minister trying to be faithful to church policy."

The archbishop also said, "As a pastor, I find it difficult to make a public judgment that any person is 'unfit' or 'unworthy' for the reception of the sacrament." However, he added that he believes every person can make that judgment for themselves.

When asked by The Oregonian newspaper whether artificial birth control is a mortal sin requiring the participant to refrain from Communion, he replied, "Issues about sin are always difficult. But with birth control, you're not taking the life of an innocent human being."

In his column, Archbishop Vlazny also said that Catholics may vote for pro-abortion politicians if they are not doing so because of the pro-abortion stance, but if "other candidates fail significantly in some matters of great importance, for example, war and peace, human rights and economic justice."

Meanwhile, Bishop Michael Sheridan of Colorado Springs, Colorado, also issued a statement on the issue to the faithful of his diocese in which he called on them to "take courage and proclaim the Gospel of Life to those who will stand for elected office this fall." He called on Catholics to act according to their consciences, but also to form their consciences properly "in conformity with the true good willed by the wisdom of the Creator" and according to the truth.

Bishop Sheridan said a false distinction has been made between the realms of faith and politics and that when Catholics enter public office or go to the polls to vote, "they take their consciences with them."

He added, "Anyone who professes the Catholic faith with his lips while at the same time publicly supporting legislation or candidates that defy God's law makes a mockery of that faith and belies his identity as a Catholic."

Addressing the issue of publicly dissenting Catholic politicians, Sheridan did not mince his words: "Any Catholic politicians who advocate for abortion, for illicit stem cell research or for any form of euthanasia ipso facto place themselves outside full communion with the Church and so jeopardize their salvation. Any Catholics who vote for candidates who stand for abortion, illicit stem cell research, or euthanasia suffer the same fateful consequences."

He added that these Catholics "may not receive Holy Communion" until they have recanted and been reconciled with God and the Church.


49 posted on 05/17/2004 8:02:47 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
That sounds like you'll be excommunicated for voting for him if you live in Colorado Springs.>>>

Not Necessarily,

From Living the Gospel of Life

Certainly there are times when it may be impossible to overturn or prevent passage of a law which allows or promotes a moral evil -- such as a law allowing the destruction of nascent human life. In such cases, an elected official, whose position in favor of life is known, could seek legitimately to limit the harm done by the law.

 

50 posted on 05/17/2004 8:24:40 PM PDT by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

BTTT!


51 posted on 05/18/2004 7:56:08 AM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: EsclavoDeCristo

Over here!


52 posted on 05/18/2004 10:30:42 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: All
(Colorado)Priest takes issue with Bishop Michael J. Sheridan's letter
53 posted on 05/19/2004 9:54:40 AM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson