Equating Arnold's Boorishness and clinton Rapes At Once Patently Absurd and Irrelevant

10.6.03 | Mia T

[Mia T]

To draw an equivalency
--moral or otherwise--
between Arnold's boorishness
and the clintons' rapes and other predations
is patently absurd.

Notwithstanding this, the recall is, if I may borrow from the rapist, himself, about w-a-a-aay more than McClintock, or Arnold, or anyone's precious conceit. It's about nothing less than our survival, folks. And if the clintons retain control of CA, you can kiss it goodbye.

 

TERMINATOR-FLUSHING-FEMALE-CYBORG FANTASY AGITATES FEMINISTS
WHILE REAL CLINTONS RAPING REAL WOMEN ESCAPES SCRUTINY
^{Q ERTY3}_BUMP
 

hillary BOT talks: On White House "ministering"
(clinton abuse of women)

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

missus clinton's REAL virtual office update
http://hillarytalks.blogspot.com
http://www.hillarytalks.us
http://www.hillarytalks.org

In a novel twist of logic and reality during the First Rapist's impeachment trial, the co-rapist portrayed the endless string of clinton rapes as significant clinton public policy, euphemistically dubbing chronic clinton predation "ministering to troubled young girls."

Mia T, First Rapist's Rose-Garden Escape: The Full Story

 

 

George Will continues: There is reason to believe that he is a rapist ("You better get some ice on that," Juanita Broaddrick says he told her concerning her bit lip), and that he bombed a country to distract attention from legal difficulties arising from his glandular life, and that. ... Furthermore, the bargain that he and his wife call a marriage refutes the axiom that opposites attract. Rather, she, as much as he, perhaps even more so, incarnates Clintonism

GEORGE WILL, SLEAZE, THE SEQUEL

 

eyes wide shut
(she knew… she raped, too)
the movie
(requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)


EPILOGUE: (ADDITIONAL AUDIO)
Hear Christopher Shays: "The bottom line: HE DID RAPE BROADDRICK."

thanx to Wolverine for the audio

 

GORE ON CLINTON RAPES
THE VIDEO

YOO-HOO missus clinton:
THE CLINTON RAPES ARE
"UNBECOMING" 

 

 

View the Juanita Broaddrick clintonRAPE interview NOW

thanx to WorkingClassFilth for the video
special thanx to Jim Robinson

When Alex kills a woman during a rape, Alex is sent to prison.
When clinton rapes women, girls, his country and God knows what else. . .
and kills? --- check out those fourscore-plus deaths, please!
And don't forget the wag-the-dog, desperately-seeking-a-legacy bombings,
or the cold-blooded Ricky Ray Rector execution---
not clinton but society is imprisoned,
imprisoned in clinton's
besmirched, semen-stained, feckless presidency.

A risible and repulsive result;
yet not even the punch line.

While Alex is conditioned in prison with aversion therapy,
transmuted into a moral robot who becomes nauseated
by the mere thought of sex and violence,
bill clinton and his Thought Police,
in a perverse reverse aversion,
have conditioned society's collective brain
into not mere acquiescence but twisted admiration.

In the end,
if clinton's arrogant, ruthless, reckless nature is restored to him,
it seems the joke will be on all of us,
for it will be a victory for infinite victimhood and irresponsibility,
for seduction, for violence, for nihilism, for anarchy.

We will have set apart clinton as the hero
by making his victims less human than he;
we will have allowed clinton to carefully estrange us from his victims
so that we can enjoy the rapes and the beatings
as much as clinton himself does.

Mia T, A CLOCKWORK ORANGE

 

"Free Republic is one of those groups obsessed with the Clinton era."

Word's out: Protest at Hillary's tonight
U.S. News & World Report (Washington Whispers) |
March 11, 2003 | Paul Bedard

 

 

 

I'll bet that Mr. Bedard is a member of "one of those groups" so "obsessed" with voting in -- and having access to -- the clintons that they--ooops-- failed to notice the obvious danger of the lovely couple.

 

 

Thanx for 9/11, Paul...

Mia T
"ONE OF THOSE GROUPS OBSESSED WITH THE CLINTONS"

 

^{Q ERTY8}
The Real Danger of a Fake President:
Post-9/11 Reconsideration of The Placebo President
missus clinton's REAL virtual office update^BUMP

[backhoe]

Mia, where I stand, this stuff is classic Clintonian Spin Cycle-- the truth does not matter, facts do not matter- the only thing that matters is having a counter-story ( however unbelievable, fanciful, unwitnessed ) to tell. And tell. And tell- until the witless and gullible public comes to accept it as some sort of fact. Good God, wasn't eight years of this garbage enough?

I have yet to see a single "Arnold the Groper" story that I would give a shred of creedence to.

[Support Free Republic]

---

GOD BLESS OUR MILITARY THANK A VET! MAKE A DONATION TODAY
	Keep Our Republic Free Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794 or you can use PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER and say THANKS to Jim Robinson! IT'S IN THE BREAKING NEWS SIDEBAR Thanks

[Mia T]

A vote for McClintock is a vote for HER

(requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

EPILOGUE: THE 9^TH CIRCUIT RULING
(IMPEACHED EX- PREZ STUMPS FOR DAVIS
CLINTON PARADIGM PROVES INSTRUCTIVE FOR CALIFORNIA)


The Pro-War Argument [from a leftist]
"I think that Bill Clinton will go to hell for taking two and a half years to get into Bosnia after not doing anything at all about Rwanda"

Lib Author Regrets Voting (TWICE!) for clinton
"Sickened" by clinton's Failure to Protect America from Terrorism

MUST-READ BOOK FOR DEMOCRATS:
How clintons' Failures Unleashed Global Terror
(Who in his right mind would ever want the clintons back in the Oval Office?)

 

The Man Who Warned America
(Why a Rapist is Not a Fit President)

UDAY: "The end is near… this time I think the… Americans are serious, Bush is not like Clinton."

[Mia T]

The flash movie above, hillary BOT talks on White House "Ministering" also contains audio of Dick Morris describing the clntons' secret police; one of the primary functions of the secret police was to dig up dirt on the clintons' numerous female victims, to intimidate them and, ultimately, to shut them up.

But this method of smear and intimidation was not limited to vulnerable women victims.The original, unedited audio also contained a passage in which Morris asserts that the clintons' first documented use of this method was deployed against an early political opponent in Arkansas, and would be used with increasing frequency over the decades.

It would be naive to think the clintons didn't have a hand in the Schwarzenegger smear.

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

[backhoe]

...this method of smear and intimidation was not limited to vulnerable women victims.The original, unedited audio also contained a passage in which Morris asserts that the clintons' first documented use of this method was deployed against an early political opponent in Arkansas, and would be used with increasing frequency over the decades.

If only the internet and talk radio had been as big back then as it is now, the Clintons might never have slithered their way to the highest office in the land.

America was exceedingly lucky to survive their corrupt and criminal reign-- but I fear there is still a price remaining to be paid for enabling them for eight years.

9-11 was merely the opening curtain...

[MeekOneGOP]

[RaceBannon]

Mia, you are dead wrong. No one is saying that a Clinton rape equals a Arghnold grope.

However, an Arghnold grope does equal a Clinton grope, and everyone here knew and stated that Clinton's groping made him unfit for office.

People here that defend a pro-abortion, pro-homosexual,pro-domestic partnership (adultery, fornication, homosexuality) laws, pro-gun control, pro-Brady Bill candidate are against everything here that conservative believe.

This candidacy has caused a new phrase to be invented: COINO: COnservative In Name Only!

I am finally forming words to explain what I see as total hypocrisy on the Arnold/McClintock thing...

When Bill Clinton groped women, we said that was a reason to state he had no morals and should be kept from office. We were right of course, but the Dems said, "So What?"

Now, Arnold is proven to grope women, the Dems say he is unfit to hold office because of that, and the Repubs are saying, "So What?"

Who is the bigger hippocrite here? Us with Arnold? Or the Dems, with Clinton?

And don't bring up Juanita, groping is still groping, and is certainly a reason to say someone is unfit, regardless if there is a worse charge after that, groping is still a reason to say someone is unfit!

And a guy like McClintock, with no baggage, and great ideas and a wholesome attitude and outlook, is considered not worthy of voting for or supporting as a party.

Is it any wonder why the Republicans are called THE STUPID PARTY?

COnservative In Name Only!!

[RaceBannon]

I have yet to see a single "Arnold the Groper" story that I would give a shred of creedence to.

Then you never read about Arghnold before in the last 20 years.

Arnold and his buddies used to walk up to women, and then, Arnold would say, "You! I want your body! Now!"

The woman would gasp, and his buddies would step in, act concerned, and then explain how he is european and that is how men do it over there.

Total BS. This was in a story with Dave Draper, the 1960's and 70's bodybuilder saying these things.

This story of Arnold being a letch is old as the hills, and the Dems dont have to lie about it at all. I was reading this stuff since the early 80's.

[RaceBannon]

you arent going to believe this one!

[Huck]

Well, at least Ahnold is only running for GOvernor of Kookafornia. There is a much lower standard for that job than for POTUS. As President, sexual adventures become security risks (blackmail, bad judgement), in Kookafornia, it's just another day at the office. Just a thought. I understand what you are saying.

[Mia T]

I can argue:

1. that there exist degrees of groping, i.e., groping a desperate woman in the Oval Office whose husband is on the verge of suicide is different in both kind and degree from culturally acceptable (altho admittedly boorish) behavior within the hollywood subset
2. that groping per se is not a disqualifier. (The clinton groping was a symptom of a far more pernicious pathology that directly translated into documentable unfitness for office transcending mere disturbing of one's sensibilities.)

But such debate is, in my view, beside the point. We do not have the luxury, post-911 to indulge our precious conceits. We must focus on our survival, literally.

If the clintons retake the White House, we will necessarily lose the war on terror.

But in order to retake the WH, the clintons must control California and its electoral votes.

We must, therefore, win California.
We must, therefore, vote for Schwarzenegger.
We have no other choice.

[Mia T]

And besides, I believe Arnold is the more qualified candidate. McClintock has demonstrated with his political (as opposed to ideological) rigidity that he is uniquely UNFIT to govern the hodgepodge that is the state of California.

Moreover, he fails to understand the national and global implications of this race, or chooses not to.

[KantianBurke]

"But such debate is, in my view, beside the point. We do not have the luxury, post-911 to indulge our precious conceits. We must focus on our survival, literally."

Guess mentioning that such pleas of necessity were EXACTLY what NOW and many of the other leftist groups used when Bubba's sexual assualts popped up will do you no good huh? Covering for your candidate's sexual transgressions is wrong no matter what the circumstance. At the very least its intellectually dishonest not to admit to the analogy.

[Mia T]

I am not "covering" anything. The rules in fact changed on 9/11. Survival trumps everything.

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

As a resident of NY I have avoided paying close attention, but it's my impression that the boorish behavior to which A.S. has admitted is relatively ancient--mostly or exclusively premarital--history. And I heard a talk show host quoting a woman who claimed to have been an attractive waitress in the day, and that she saw AS a lot and found his behavior to be respectful.

Now if AS gave off Clinton vibes--if he was smarmy and evasive--you would be the first one to condemn his candidacy. As it is what we seem to have is typical Clinton "personal destruction"--aptly named by x42 himself but displaced onto Republicans.

McClintock seems to perhaps be the best man to be governor. But politics is not about voting for the best man for the job; voters who considered only their own wishes for an ideal governor would probably have to write in their vote most of the time. Voting is about preventing the evil of government from getting too bad, and that more often than not entails voting for someone who is less than ideal, but might actually win.

[Mia T]

excellent points.

[bluecollarman]

" McClintock has demonstrated with his political (as opposed to ideological) rigidity that he is uniquely UNFIT to govern the hodgepodge that is the state of California."

Translation....he is a true conservative. Oh horrror of horrors!


You may vote for Arnold, but you will loose any right to ever condem a Clinton or a Kennedy. The left will rub your nose in it forever.

Rationalizing only makes you sound pathetic.

[KantianBurke]

You're right actually. "Excusing" would be a more appropriate term. FWIW, its REALLY stretching it to declaim that a vote for Arnold is a vote for sparing the country another 9-11. And its pretty easy to start forgiving all sorts of monkey business when you use the phrase "our survival depends on it." Better not to.

[Mia T]

a vote for Arnold is a vote for sparing the country another 9-11

That is not what I am saying.

What I am saying is that a vote for McClintock ensures our loss of the war on terror (or, if you will, its symbolic equivalent, another 9-11). Note that my proposition and yours are not the same.