[RaceBannon]

Mia, you are dead wrong. No one is saying that a Clinton rape equals a Arghnold grope.

However, an Arghnold grope does equal a Clinton grope, and everyone here knew and stated that Clinton's groping made him unfit for office.

People here that defend a pro-abortion, pro-homosexual,pro-domestic partnership (adultery, fornication, homosexuality) laws, pro-gun control, pro-Brady Bill candidate are against everything here that conservative believe.

This candidacy has caused a new phrase to be invented: COINO: COnservative In Name Only!

I am finally forming words to explain what I see as total hypocrisy on the Arnold/McClintock thing...

When Bill Clinton groped women, we said that was a reason to state he had no morals and should be kept from office. We were right of course, but the Dems said, "So What?"

Now, Arnold is proven to grope women, the Dems say he is unfit to hold office because of that, and the Repubs are saying, "So What?"

Who is the bigger hippocrite here? Us with Arnold? Or the Dems, with Clinton?

And don't bring up Juanita, groping is still groping, and is certainly a reason to say someone is unfit, regardless if there is a worse charge after that, groping is still a reason to say someone is unfit!

And a guy like McClintock, with no baggage, and great ideas and a wholesome attitude and outlook, is considered not worthy of voting for or supporting as a party.

Is it any wonder why the Republicans are called THE STUPID PARTY?

COnservative In Name Only!!

[Huck]

Well, at least Ahnold is only running for GOvernor of Kookafornia. There is a much lower standard for that job than for POTUS. As President, sexual adventures become security risks (blackmail, bad judgement), in Kookafornia, it's just another day at the office. Just a thought. I understand what you are saying.

[Mia T]

I can argue:

1. that there exist degrees of groping, i.e., groping a desperate woman in the Oval Office whose husband is on the verge of suicide is different in both kind and degree from culturally acceptable (altho admittedly boorish) behavior within the hollywood subset
2. that groping per se is not a disqualifier. (The clinton groping was a symptom of a far more pernicious pathology that directly translated into documentable unfitness for office transcending mere disturbing of one's sensibilities.)

But such debate is, in my view, beside the point. We do not have the luxury, post-911 to indulge our precious conceits. We must focus on our survival, literally.

If the clintons retake the White House, we will necessarily lose the war on terror.

But in order to retake the WH, the clintons must control California and its electoral votes.

We must, therefore, win California.
We must, therefore, vote for Schwarzenegger.
We have no other choice.

[PISANO]

EVERYONE HERE said Clinton's groping made him UNFIT for OFFICE

The difference is that CLINTON did it WHILE in OFFICE and LIED about a sexual assault case UNDER OATH while IN OFFICE. No one EVER said Clinton was UNFIT for office because he 'groped' someone 25 years ago in his college days!!

[pollywog]

Is it any wonder why the Republicans are called THE STUPID PARTY?

COnservative In Name Only

You have that right. Nothing conservative about a party that would compromise their platform, allow backroom endorsing of Arnold from 17 GOP members.

This reminds me of the Circus Court that tried to stay the re-call election. We are now ACTING like the liberal Democrats.

[churchillbuff]

Who is the bigger hippocrite here? Us with Arnold? Or the Dems, with Clinton?

Both

[68 grunt]

Race, McX couldn't win a hopscotch contest. Arnie stories are BS, and he will be governor. You should use a larger font.