That is not what I am saying.
What I am saying is that a vote for McClintock ensures our loss of the war on terror (or, if you will, its symbolic equivalent, another 9-11). Note that my proposition and yours are not the same.
That's probably the silliest proposition I've come across on FR in a long time. Of the arguments against McClintock some are legitimate but announcing that if you do vote for the man you're aiding Osmama Bin Laden is patently absurd. What's next? "When you vote for Pat Toomey, you're only helping Arafat?" Hyperbole anyone?