Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A vote for McClintock is a vote for HER
9.23.03 | Mia T

Posted on 09/23/2003 7:31:33 AM PDT by Mia T

It is critical to think out of the box, beyond California. For the clintons, the California recall election is no less than a proxy for their war with the Kennedys for the control of the Democrat Party (and the country).

EPILOGUE: THE 9TH CIRCUIT RULING
(IMPEACHED EX- PREZ STUMPS FOR DAVIS
CLINTON PARADIGM PROVES INSTRUCTIVE FOR CALIFORNIA)

 


clinton: "This is WA-A-AY bigger than Gray Davis."

If ever there was
a counterexample
to Tip O'Neill's old saw
("all politics is local"),
it is the recall...
A vote for McClintock is a vote for HER

(requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

hillary (oops!) talks
virtual hillary is the REAL hillary clinton
missus clinton's REAL virtual office update
http://hillarytalks.blogspot.com
http://www.hillarytalks.us
http://www.hillarytalks.org

(Who in his right mind would ever want the clintons back in the Oval Office?)

missus clinton's REAL virtual office update

Lib Author Regrets Voting (TWICE!) for clinton
"Sickened" by clinton's Failure to Protect America from Terrorism


MUST-READ BOOK FOR DEMOCRATS:
How clintons' Failures Unleashed Global Terror



The Man Who Warned America
(Why a Rapist is Not a Fit President)


UDAY: "The end is near… this time I think the… Americans are serious, Bush is not like Clinton."


eyes wide shut (she knew… she raped, too)


A '68 Mustang is not exculpatory

Q ERTY8BUMP



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: Arkansas; US: California; US: Illinois; US: New York
KEYWORDS: arnold; carecall; clinton911; clintonabuse; clintoncorruption; clintonfailure; clintonrape; clintons911; mcarse; mcclintock; mcego; mcfool; mcjeffords; mcjerk; recall; theclintonsstupid; theterrorismstupid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-226 next last
To: jjm2111
I really am getting tired of repeating myself to people who only want to get a rise. My aspiration is easy. An honorable, unified and free California. My spoils? An honorable and unified and free California.
201 posted on 09/23/2003 12:50:19 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: jjm2111
Look up genocide.
202 posted on 09/23/2003 12:51:08 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt
Look up rennaisannce.
203 posted on 09/23/2003 12:52:56 PM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: jjm2111
I have, thats why I use it.
204 posted on 09/23/2003 12:56:21 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Ravenstar; Mia T; MeeknMing; DoughtyOne; Ragtime Cowgirl; FairOpinion; goldstategop; nopardons; ...
You are tossing a "Hail Mary" pass that will be intercepted or fall to the turf.

At half timetime with 2 quarters to play you pull the fresh young strong hot quarterback that can win and put in an old tired second stringer who cannot win the big game.

This is not a playoff game but the Super Bowl.

Your quarterback will be in his living room next November 2004 watching the Cowboys play the Banditos with most of their players hurt.

The Jets just recently lost to the Redskins because their players swapped sides.

Your quarterback cannot get the performance from his team and cannot throw the long ball.

But it's only one more game to him; he's planning to win in 2006.

Taft 2006!
205 posted on 09/23/2003 12:58:13 PM PDT by autoresponder (go ahead - make my d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt
You're really tired????? That's a laugh. You post so snidely and so rudely to people who are only standing by their principles and who are not even talking to you at the time and you say you're tired???? Of course your tired. You have to think of all the snide remarks.

You call a California where the right to keep and bear arms is slowly whittled away, where thousands of unborn children are murdered, and the state wastes hard working people's money on bullsh-- honorable? Are you nuts? Arnie supports all these things. And you say you're tired. Ha!

You're just a pawn for the Sacremento power brokers who know they can "work with" someone like Arnie. They're afraid that if all conservatives vote for McC he just might win and they would have someone who wouldn't see things their way.
206 posted on 09/23/2003 1:03:34 PM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt
The real problem is that McX couldn't win if he was the only one running!

Sez you. Actually most political Californians including Democrats know of McClintock's popularity--he would have done better against Davis than Simon did by far. And he would be much harder for the Dems to slime than Arnold. The Dems urgently wish for him to drop out. He is the GOP safety net. If McClintock spoke to his supporters at the last hour urging to vote for Arnold, assuming Arnold is still ahead, would you change your mind about him?

207 posted on 09/23/2003 1:03:43 PM PDT by Poincare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3; jjm2111
You both appear unfamiliar with Arnold's conservative fiscal values and plans.

His top fiscal advisor is John Cogal, the architect of Bush's 2000 tax cut proposals. It is John Cogal who is assisting Arnold in structuring the budget proposal he will be releasing soon.
--


"Arnold Schwarzenegger's top fiscal adviser says he is drawing up several budget options that would avoid new taxes while imposing spending cuts that he insists won't cause widespread hardship."

"John Cogan, the conservative Stanford University economist who also drafted George W. Bush's tax cut proposal during the 2000 presidential campaign, said in an interview that the cutbacks needed to wipe out California's budget deficit would still leave spending significantly higher than in 1999."...

"In the Schwarzenegger campaign, his profile is lower than former Treasury Secretary George Shultz, his colleague at Stanford's Hoover Institution. But Cogan has drawn the critical job of overseeing the budget planning process and turning the candidate's anti-tax pledge into real policy."

"Backing him up are Shultz and former White House economic adviser Michael Boskin, another Hoover fellow, as well as advisers from other conservative think tanks."

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/982393/posts
208 posted on 09/23/2003 1:21:07 PM PDT by Tamzee ("Big government sounds too much like sluggish socialism."......Arnold Schwarzenegger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Thank you, Mia T.

The Clintons are all over this recall and desperate for a DNC win. I would think Freepers would be doing everything possible to prevent them from succeeding.
209 posted on 09/23/2003 1:23:31 PM PDT by Tamzee ("Big government sounds too much like sluggish socialism."......Arnold Schwarzenegger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjm2111
Oh, you sound so upset. Good!
210 posted on 09/23/2003 8:32:13 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Poincare
Harder to slime? This is true. The typical response is 'Tom who?'
211 posted on 09/23/2003 8:33:23 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: jjm2111
Tired of dealing with maroons, yes. Yourself included. I gave you an honest open answer in #201, and I get you bile in return. Please feel free to insult me at will. I like when everyone sees your character.
212 posted on 09/23/2003 8:36:25 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
It is indeed curious, with all the ballyhoo about elections and Democracy and such, that the winning candidate is chosen by a plurality rather than a majority.

Maybe what we have is not a Democracy or a Republic, but a Minorocracy?
213 posted on 09/23/2003 9:10:03 PM PDT by Graewoulf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjm2111
That is such a load of bull. Christie Whitman ran as the oh-so-conservative-RINO-Republican in NJ and helped enact some of the most liberal laws in the state. She ran the state's finances into the ground and gave us McGreedy. She also appointed the most liberal state supreme court in NJ's history. If she were a Dem the GOP legislators would have shut her down, but they easily lapped up her slimy liberalism because she was a Republican.

It is very interesting and very telling that in 213 posts here, not one Arnold-bot has responded to your post or tried to spin it.

FReegards, HB

214 posted on 09/23/2003 9:21:25 PM PDT by Hoverbug (whadda ya mean, "we don't get parachutes"!?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey
You're welcome. :)

  • The CA electoral votes are necessary for clinton redux.
  • Clinton redux is sufficient to lose the war on terror.
  • Thus, wresting control of CA from the clintons is a necessary precondition for victory in our war against the terrorists
 
 
clinton: "This is WA-A-AY bigger than Gray Davis."xx

215 posted on 09/24/2003 12:45:18 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt
68 you're the king of insults and a troll to boot. Begone Troll!
216 posted on 09/24/2003 6:39:55 AM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Hoverbug
"It is very interesting and very telling that in 213 posts here, not one Arnold-bot has responded to your post or tried to spin it."

That's probably because most Arnold-bots don't look at precedent when it comes to very liberal RINOs. RINOs always cause problems, if not in the short term, than in the long term. The same could be said for Pataki, and 9-11 notwithstanding Guiliani.

217 posted on 09/24/2003 6:43:18 AM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt
". I gave you an honest open answer in #201, and I get you bile in return. Please feel free to insult me at will. I like when everyone sees your character. "

I asked you politely to stop being so snide and insulting and just debate the issue. I could reference the post for you if you want. You only continued to be snide and insulting. In fact, 99% of ALL your posts on EVERY thread are snide and/or insulting. If you want to be treated politely don't slap people who try to treat you that way. 68, you're old enough to act like a gentleman, so do so and quit whining.

218 posted on 09/24/2003 6:48:11 AM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: jjm2111
Turn the worm, I don't care. I don't feel like debating you. I don't feel you want debate, you want argument. You want the argument in order to cause division.
219 posted on 09/24/2003 7:04:01 AM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt
Whatever.
220 posted on 09/24/2003 7:15:59 AM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-226 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson