A vote for McClintock is a vote for HER

9.23.03 | Mia T

[Mia T]

It is critical to think out of the box, beyond California. For the clintons, the California recall election is no less than a proxy for their war with the Kennedys for the control of the Democrat Party (and the country).

EPILOGUE: THE 9^TH CIRCUIT RULING
(IMPEACHED EX- PREZ STUMPS FOR DAVIS
CLINTON PARADIGM PROVES INSTRUCTIVE FOR CALIFORNIA)

 

clinton: "This is WA-A-AY bigger than Gray Davis."

If ever there was
a counterexample
to Tip O'Neill's old saw
("all politics is local"),
it is the recall...
A vote for McClintock is a vote for HER

(requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

hillary (oops!) talks
virtual hillary is the REAL hillary clinton
missus clinton's REAL virtual office update
http://hillarytalks.blogspot.com
http://www.hillarytalks.us
http://www.hillarytalks.org

(Who in his right mind would ever want the clintons back in the Oval Office?)

missus clinton's REAL virtual office update

Lib Author Regrets Voting (TWICE!) for clinton
"Sickened" by clinton's Failure to Protect America from Terrorism


MUST-READ BOOK FOR DEMOCRATS:
How clintons' Failures Unleashed Global Terror


The Man Who Warned America
(Why a Rapist is Not a Fit President)


UDAY: "The end is near… this time I think the… Americans are serious, Bush is not like Clinton."


eyes wide shut (she knew… she raped, too)


A '68 Mustang is not exculpatory

Q ERTY8^BUMP

[Mia T]

RAPIST SHOWING LEG: An Extension of the clinton Complex-Question Fallacy Scheme

 

by Mia T, 9-19-03

 

The missus clinton-Wesley Clark spectacle, in any permutation or combination, is as much about delusions of grandeur as about anything else. As Susan Estrich pointedly stated yet again last night: "hillary clinton is unelectable."

(requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

The clinton calculus, that the clintons' utter failure, which unleashed global terror, would be neutralized (or at least mitigated) by any general -- and no less by a general who, himself, exudes critical elements of clinton dysfunction -- is ludicrous on its face and yet another example of that unique brand of clinton rube arrogance rooted in stupidity.

Missus-clinton-flirting-to-run-by-proxy -- the rapist is the one showing leg -- is merely an extension of the original clinton Complex-Question Fallacy Scheme. (With her legs and political skills, the bait and switch is perfectly understandable.)

And the leftist media is falling for it like a homely, desperate old maid.

The clintons are betting that media desperation, coupled with her late entry-- and of course, the old clinton standbys, access journalism and plain intimidation -- will mitigate against any serious vetting of the little missus.

The clinton Complex-Question Fallacy Scheme notwithstanding, it is axiomatic and confirmed on a daily basis by clinton "infrastructure" strategy alone that hillary ("listening tour" / cozy-clintonoid-interviews-of-the-Colmes-kind) clinton is no better than Howard Dean at withstanding media scrutiny... and is likely significantly worse.

From this it follows that hillary clinton cannot survive the standard, lengthy, probing presidential-campaign process. An end run is her only option.

And contrary to conventional wisdom, time is not on her side. Not only are the clintons in general decline, not only is she vulnerable in '06, but in this post-9/11 world,

as more clinton failures and betrayals are documented, increasingly favorable demographics will prove insufficient to resuscitate disfavored, dysfunctional, dangerous democrat demagogues like the clintons.

Look, therefore, for the clintons to make their move in '04. Susan Estrich, Al From and The Times aren't on the same "Get the clintons off the stage!" page for no reason.

[Mia T]

 

DAVIS' SOP TO TERRORISTS: GROUNDS ENOUGH FOR RECALL

Isn't it fitting that as Davis fights to avoid the recall vote, his chief advocate is the man who did nothing about terrorism, leaving a huge mess for the present administration to clean up. When will Bill Clinton finally fade away?

---

September 22, 2003 -- I read Rich Lowry's column ("Terror Made Easy," Opinion, Sept. 13) and realized why this country has a sign on its back that reads kick me.

Where is homeland security? Why can't California revoke the rights of illegals to get driving licenses? Instead of taking strong steps to abort this type of asinine policy, Tom Ridge states that states enact such a policy "at their peril."

Wrong. They do so at our peril. Illegals should not be given any such right, and this type of political correctness or political pandering should never even be suggested, let alone passed into law.

Paul Alexander

Staten Island

 

Absent a crime, recalling a democratically elected governor is a bad idea, but Gray Davis' pandering to illegal aliens by granting them legal drivers licenses is dangerous.

If President Bush is serious about homeland security, he will veto any bill that contains one dime of funding for states like California, as well as all "sanctuary" cities.

Joseph A. Ciccolini

West Orange, NJ

 

Now that Gov. Gray Davis of California has signed a bill that would allow illegal aliens to obtain drivers licenses (a reversal of his previous posture), the other 49 states should begin asking holders of California drivers licenses for additional ID.

It is appalling that in these times of terrorist activity, a state would contribute to a breach of national security. It is no small wonder that Davis is the subject of a recall vote.

Chuck Eckstein

Brooklyn

 

Gray Davis, in a desperate bid to pander for minority votes, supports a bill that would enable illegal aliens to obtain California drivers licenses. That's a very generous reward for breaking the law.

No doubt, terrorists have taken notice. It should expedite the acquisition of phony identities for any who desires it.

Isn't it fitting that as Davis fights to avoid the recall vote, his chief advocate is the man who did nothing about terrorism, leaving a huge mess for the present administration to clean up. When will Bill Clinton finally fade away?

Pat Sobota

Staten Island

 

How is it that nightclub managers of yesteryear had more common sense than California's legislators and its desperate Gov. Gray Davis? In the 1970s and '80s, nightclub managers and door attendants would require that partygoers present valid IDs to assure that only adults were allowed in.

For the safety of their patrons and the preservation of their business and liquor licenses, most teenagers with bogus dime store IDs would be turned away. California's government, on the other hand, shows no such concern for the safety and self-preservation of its citizens.

Hilda Malagon

Jesus E. Moreno

The Bronx

 Home

[jjm2111]

I don't think people who are committed to McClintock are going to change because Arnie is so liberal.

[Mia T]

A vote for McClintock is a vote for HER _PING

[Grand Old Partisan]

You are assuming that most McClintock supporters care about California more than than do about their own smugness.

[BibChr]

Wrong comparison, if I may say.

Don't compare Schwarzenegger to McC, who can't win.

Compare him to Bustamante, who can, and MUSTN'T.

AS is to CB's right on every point of difference.

Dan

[jjm2111]

"AS is to CB's right on every point of difference."

Which really isn't saying much. As a New Jerseyan, I have no horse in this race, but I know from experience that sometimes voting in the "moderate" RINO who is to the right of the Dem actually hurts the state in the long run.

[tallhappy]

No.

It is a vote against Maria Shriver and the Kennedys.

The Clintons can deal with Shriver.

They like Gray.

Bustamante they hate. McClintock they hate. Schwarzenegger, they love. Shriver they love.

Abre los ojos mi gente.

[Grand Old Partisan]

If you prefer a Democrat winning, then you yourself are a Democrat and not even a RINO.

[BibChr]

Not this time. I wish you'd trust me on that. I don't like voting for anyone to my left, and AS certainly is that. But we shouldn't embrace real disaster (Bustamante/McClintock=>Bustamante) because of feared inconveniences. It's a bad trade.

Dan

[tallhappy]

Got to say. Bustamante is better than Arnie.

It's a crazy world.

[Mia T]

clinton redux would render the McClintock-Arnold comparison moot.
The meaningful comparison is McClintock vs. the clintons.

[BibChr]

<< Got to say. Bustamante is better than Arnie.

It's a crazy world >>

Well, I'd have to agree that that portion of the world that contains your statement is certainly crazy.

Dan

[Grand Old Partisan]

If you prefer a Democrat winning, then you yourself are a Democrat and not even a RINO.

No, the world is not crazy; you are.

[bmwcyle]

bttt

[Afronaut]

[BibChr]

Wow! Guys!

Afronaut thinks Hillary likes candidates who will campaign actively and publicly for President Bush, support the war against terror, oppose raising taxes, support Prop 13, will bring TONS of money into CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES for Senate across the nation!

How Hillary must have changed!

Unless... afronaut is out of touch with the facts here, of course.

Dan

[Ajnin]

I'm still waiting for an Arnold supporter to exaplain how voting for somebody that is pro-gun control, pro homo, pro abortion and pro Clitnon/Kennedy is a good thing. If a conservative can't win now, when will conservatives ever win? How exactly do we "roll back" the liberal agenda by voting for liberals?

[Ajnin]

I'm still waiting for an Arnold supporter to exaplain how voting for somebody that is pro-gun control, pro homo, pro abortion and pro Clitnon/Kennedy is a good thing. If a conservative can't win now, when will conservatives ever win? How exactly do we "roll back" the liberal agenda by voting for liberals?

[skeeter]

You are assuming that most McClintock supporters care about California more than than do about their own smugness.

Amazing.

And the fact that you can discern this from 2500 miles away makes it all the more amazing.