Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

RAPIST SHOWING LEG: An Extension of the clinton Complex-Question Fallacy Scheme

 

by Mia T, 9-19-03

 

The missus clinton-Wesley Clark spectacle, in any permutation or combination, is as much about delusions of grandeur as about anything else. As Susan Estrich pointedly stated yet again last night: "hillary clinton is unelectable."


(requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

The clinton calculus, that the clintons' utter failure, which unleashed global terror, would be neutralized (or at least mitigated) by any general -- and no less by a general who, himself, exudes critical elements of clinton dysfunction -- is ludicrous on its face and yet another example of that unique brand of clinton rube arrogance rooted in stupidity.

Missus-clinton-flirting-to-run-by-proxy -- the rapist is the one showing leg -- is merely an extension of the original clinton Complex-Question Fallacy Scheme. (With her legs and political skills, the bait and switch is perfectly understandable.)

And the leftist media is falling for it like a homely, desperate old maid.

The clintons are betting that media desperation, coupled with her late entry-- and of course, the old clinton standbys, access journalism and plain intimidation -- will mitigate against any serious vetting of the little missus.

The clinton Complex-Question Fallacy Scheme notwithstanding, it is axiomatic and confirmed on a daily basis by clinton "infrastructure" strategy alone that hillary ("listening tour" / cozy-clintonoid-interviews-of-the-Colmes-kind) clinton is no better than Howard Dean at withstanding media scrutiny... and is likely significantly worse.

From this it follows that hillary clinton cannot survive the standard, lengthy, probing presidential-campaign process. An end run is her only option.

And contrary to conventional wisdom, time is not on her side. Not only are the clintons in general decline, not only is she vulnerable in '06, but in this post-9/11 world,

as more clinton failures and betrayals are documented, increasingly favorable demographics will prove insufficient to resuscitate disfavored, dysfunctional, dangerous democrat demagogues like the clintons.

Look, therefore, for the clintons to make their move in '04. Susan Estrich, Al From and The Times aren't on the same "Get the clintons off the stage!" page for no reason.


1 posted on 09/23/2003 7:31:33 AM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: BARBRA; All

 



New York Post

DAVIS' SOP TO TERRORISTS: GROUNDS ENOUGH FOR RECALL

Isn't it fitting that as Davis fights to avoid the recall vote, his chief advocate is the man who did nothing about terrorism, leaving a huge mess for the present administration to clean up. When will Bill Clinton finally fade away?


September 22, 2003 -- I read Rich Lowry's column ("Terror Made Easy," Opinion, Sept. 13) and realized why this country has a sign on its back that reads kick me.

Where is homeland security? Why can't California revoke the rights of illegals to get driving licenses? Instead of taking strong steps to abort this type of asinine policy, Tom Ridge states that states enact such a policy "at their peril."

Wrong. They do so at our peril. Illegals should not be given any such right, and this type of political correctness or political pandering should never even be suggested, let alone passed into law.

Paul Alexander

Staten Island

 

Absent a crime, recalling a democratically elected governor is a bad idea, but Gray Davis' pandering to illegal aliens by granting them legal drivers licenses is dangerous.

If President Bush is serious about homeland security, he will veto any bill that contains one dime of funding for states like California, as well as all "sanctuary" cities.

Joseph A. Ciccolini

West Orange, NJ

 

Now that Gov. Gray Davis of California has signed a bill that would allow illegal aliens to obtain drivers licenses (a reversal of his previous posture), the other 49 states should begin asking holders of California drivers licenses for additional ID.

It is appalling that in these times of terrorist activity, a state would contribute to a breach of national security. It is no small wonder that Davis is the subject of a recall vote.

Chuck Eckstein

Brooklyn

 

Gray Davis, in a desperate bid to pander for minority votes, supports a bill that would enable illegal aliens to obtain California drivers licenses. That's a very generous reward for breaking the law.

No doubt, terrorists have taken notice. It should expedite the acquisition of phony identities for any who desires it.

Isn't it fitting that as Davis fights to avoid the recall vote, his chief advocate is the man who did nothing about terrorism, leaving a huge mess for the present administration to clean up. When will Bill Clinton finally fade away?

Pat Sobota

Staten Island

 

How is it that nightclub managers of yesteryear had more common sense than California's legislators and its desperate Gov. Gray Davis? In the 1970s and '80s, nightclub managers and door attendants would require that partygoers present valid IDs to assure that only adults were allowed in.

For the safety of their patrons and the preservation of their business and liquor licenses, most teenagers with bogus dime store IDs would be turned away. California's government, on the other hand, shows no such concern for the safety and self-preservation of its citizens.

Hilda Malagon

Jesus E. Moreno

The Bronx

 Home


2 posted on 09/23/2003 7:32:59 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T
I don't think people who are committed to McClintock are going to change because Arnie is so liberal.
3 posted on 09/23/2003 7:35:01 AM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WorkingClassFilth; Gail Wynand; looscannon; Lonesome in Massachussets; IVote2; Slyfox; ...
A vote for McClintock is a vote for HER PING

4 posted on 09/23/2003 7:37:21 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T
No.

It is a vote against Maria Shriver and the Kennedys.

The Clintons can deal with Shriver.

They like Gray.

Bustamante they hate. McClintock they hate. Schwarzenegger, they love. Shriver they love.

Abre los ojos mi gente.

8 posted on 09/23/2003 7:44:24 AM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T
bttt
15 posted on 09/23/2003 7:47:15 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Here's to Hillary's book sinking like the Clinton 2000 economy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T
I agree completely. This recall is a direct assault upon the RAT machine and its prospects in 04. McC must withdraw or else be outed as an egoist without concern for the nation and party.
69 posted on 09/23/2003 9:54:47 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree. Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T
If you think about, what would happen if McClintock dissappeared today? The Dem smear machine would open fire against Arnold with no fear that Tom would take his place as the GOP candidate. Tom is acting as a shield for Arnold and taking heat from some in his own party. I admire him for that. I expect he will throw support to Arnold at the last moment when a "late hit" on Arnold will be seen by CA voters as just more of Davis's dirty politics. Or McClintock will just let those of his supporters who are realists switch their votes to Swartzenegger on their own.

The real problem is that if enough Republicans are afraid that Bustamonte will win then they will vote "NO" on the recall. We could end up with Davis retained as Gov and have a GOP winner of the non-election.

82 posted on 09/23/2003 10:18:02 AM PDT by Poincare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T
You tell 'em Mia T! Good work, as usual.
91 posted on 09/23/2003 10:37:56 AM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T
I've witnessed your bizarre mental mastications over the years and mostly ignored you, and after this I shall again.

IMHO, you are certifiably nuts--unsalted, rattling in a three gallon can.

101 posted on 09/23/2003 10:44:51 AM PDT by Kevin Curry ([Arnold's] lust for power is not rooted in strength, but in weakness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T
Your One Stop Resource For All The California Recall News!

Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin

176 posted on 09/23/2003 12:12:44 PM PDT by DoctorZIn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T
Thank you, Mia T.

The Clintons are all over this recall and desperate for a DNC win. I would think Freepers would be doing everything possible to prevent them from succeeding.
209 posted on 09/23/2003 1:23:31 PM PDT by Tamzee ("Big government sounds too much like sluggish socialism."......Arnold Schwarzenegger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T
It is indeed curious, with all the ballyhoo about elections and Democracy and such, that the winning candidate is chosen by a plurality rather than a majority.

Maybe what we have is not a Democracy or a Republic, but a Minorocracy?
213 posted on 09/23/2003 9:10:03 PM PDT by Graewoulf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson