Skip to comments.
A vote for McClintock is a vote for HER
9.23.03
| Mia T
Posted on 09/23/2003 7:31:33 AM PDT by Mia T
- If ever there was
a counterexample
to Tip O'Neill's old saw
("all politics is local"),
it is the recall...
A vote for McClintock is a vote for HER
(Who in his right mind would ever want the clintons back in the Oval Office?)
- missus clinton's REAL virtual office update
- Lib Author Regrets Voting (TWICE!) for clinton
"Sickened" by clinton's Failure to Protect America from Terrorism
MUST-READ BOOK FOR DEMOCRATS:
How clintons' Failures Unleashed Global Terror
The Man Who Warned America
(Why a Rapist is Not a Fit President)
UDAY: "The end is near
this time I think the
Americans are serious, Bush is not like Clinton."
eyes wide shut (she knew
she raped, too)
A '68 Mustang is not exculpatory
- Q ERTY8BUMP
-
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: Arkansas; US: California; US: Illinois; US: New York
KEYWORDS: arnold; carecall; clinton911; clintonabuse; clintoncorruption; clintonfailure; clintonrape; clintons911; mcarse; mcclintock; mcego; mcfool; mcjeffords; mcjerk; recall; theclintonsstupid; theterrorismstupid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220, 221-226 next last
To: jjm2111
I really am getting tired of repeating myself to people who only want to get a rise. My aspiration is easy. An honorable, unified and free California. My spoils? An honorable and unified and free California.
201
posted on
09/23/2003 12:50:19 PM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: jjm2111
Look up genocide.
202
posted on
09/23/2003 12:51:08 PM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: 68 grunt
Look up rennaisannce.
203
posted on
09/23/2003 12:52:56 PM PDT
by
jjm2111
To: jjm2111
I have, thats why I use it.
204
posted on
09/23/2003 12:56:21 PM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: Ravenstar; Mia T; MeeknMing; DoughtyOne; Ragtime Cowgirl; FairOpinion; goldstategop; nopardons; ...
You are tossing a "Hail Mary" pass that will be intercepted or fall to the turf.
At half timetime with 2 quarters to play you pull the fresh young strong hot quarterback that can win and put in an old tired second stringer who cannot win the big game.
This is not a playoff game but the Super Bowl.
Your quarterback will be in his living room next November 2004 watching the Cowboys play the Banditos with most of their players hurt.
The Jets just recently lost to the Redskins because their players swapped sides.
Your quarterback cannot get the performance from his team and cannot throw the long ball.
But it's only one more game to him; he's planning to win in 2006.
Taft 2006!
205
posted on
09/23/2003 12:58:13 PM PDT
by
autoresponder
(go ahead - make my d)
To: 68 grunt
You're really tired????? That's a laugh. You post so snidely and so rudely to people who are only standing by their principles and who are not even talking to you at the time and you say you're tired???? Of course your tired. You have to think of all the snide remarks.
You call a California where the right to keep and bear arms is slowly whittled away, where thousands of unborn children are murdered, and the state wastes hard working people's money on bullsh-- honorable? Are you nuts? Arnie supports all these things. And you say you're tired. Ha!
You're just a pawn for the Sacremento power brokers who know they can "work with" someone like Arnie. They're afraid that if all conservatives vote for McC he just might win and they would have someone who wouldn't see things their way.
206
posted on
09/23/2003 1:03:34 PM PDT
by
jjm2111
To: 68 grunt
The real problem is that McX couldn't win if he was the only one running! Sez you. Actually most political Californians including Democrats know of McClintock's popularity--he would have done better against Davis than Simon did by far. And he would be much harder for the Dems to slime than Arnold. The Dems urgently wish for him to drop out. He is the GOP safety net. If McClintock spoke to his supporters at the last hour urging to vote for Arnold, assuming Arnold is still ahead, would you change your mind about him?
To: N3WBI3; jjm2111
You both appear unfamiliar with Arnold's conservative fiscal values and plans.
His top fiscal advisor is John Cogal, the architect of Bush's 2000 tax cut proposals. It is John Cogal who is assisting Arnold in structuring the budget proposal he will be releasing soon.
--
"Arnold Schwarzenegger's top fiscal adviser says he is drawing up several budget options that would avoid new taxes while imposing spending cuts that he insists won't cause widespread hardship."
"John Cogan, the conservative Stanford University economist who also drafted George W. Bush's tax cut proposal during the 2000 presidential campaign, said in an interview that the cutbacks needed to wipe out California's budget deficit would still leave spending significantly higher than in 1999."...
"In the Schwarzenegger campaign, his profile is lower than former Treasury Secretary George Shultz, his colleague at Stanford's Hoover Institution. But Cogan has drawn the critical job of overseeing the budget planning process and turning the candidate's anti-tax pledge into real policy."
"Backing him up are Shultz and former White House economic adviser Michael Boskin, another Hoover fellow, as well as advisers from other conservative think tanks."
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/982393/posts
208
posted on
09/23/2003 1:21:07 PM PDT
by
Tamzee
("Big government sounds too much like sluggish socialism."......Arnold Schwarzenegger)
To: Mia T
Thank you, Mia T.
The Clintons are all over this recall and desperate for a DNC win. I would think Freepers would be doing everything possible to prevent them from succeeding.
209
posted on
09/23/2003 1:23:31 PM PDT
by
Tamzee
("Big government sounds too much like sluggish socialism."......Arnold Schwarzenegger)
To: jjm2111
Oh, you sound so upset. Good!
210
posted on
09/23/2003 8:32:13 PM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: Poincare
Harder to slime? This is true. The typical response is 'Tom who?'
211
posted on
09/23/2003 8:33:23 PM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: jjm2111
Tired of dealing with maroons, yes. Yourself included. I gave you an honest open answer in #201, and I get you bile in return. Please feel free to insult me at will. I like when everyone sees your character.
212
posted on
09/23/2003 8:36:25 PM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: Mia T
It is indeed curious, with all the ballyhoo about elections and Democracy and such, that the winning candidate is chosen by a plurality rather than a majority.
Maybe what we have is not a Democracy or a Republic, but a Minorocracy?
To: jjm2111
That is such a load of bull. Christie Whitman ran as the oh-so-conservative-RINO-Republican in NJ and helped enact some of the most liberal laws in the state. She ran the state's finances into the ground and gave us McGreedy. She also appointed the most liberal state supreme court in NJ's history. If she were a Dem the GOP legislators would have shut her down, but they easily lapped up her slimy liberalism because she was a Republican. It is very interesting and very telling that in 213 posts here, not one Arnold-bot has responded to your post or tried to spin it.
FReegards, HB
214
posted on
09/23/2003 9:21:25 PM PDT
by
Hoverbug
(whadda ya mean, "we don't get parachutes"!?!)
To: Tamsey
You're welcome. :)
- The CA electoral votes are necessary for clinton redux.
- Clinton redux is sufficient to lose the war on terror.
- Thus, wresting control of CA from the clintons is a necessary precondition for victory in our war against the terrorists
-
-
-
clinton: "This is WA-A-AY bigger than Gray Davis."xx
-
|
-
215
posted on
09/24/2003 12:45:18 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
To: 68 grunt
68 you're the king of insults and a troll to boot. Begone Troll!
216
posted on
09/24/2003 6:39:55 AM PDT
by
jjm2111
To: Hoverbug
"It is very interesting and very telling that in 213 posts here, not one Arnold-bot has responded to your post or tried to spin it." That's probably because most Arnold-bots don't look at precedent when it comes to very liberal RINOs. RINOs always cause problems, if not in the short term, than in the long term. The same could be said for Pataki, and 9-11 notwithstanding Guiliani.
217
posted on
09/24/2003 6:43:18 AM PDT
by
jjm2111
To: 68 grunt
". I gave you an honest open answer in #201, and I get you bile in return. Please feel free to insult me at will. I like when everyone sees your character. " I asked you politely to stop being so snide and insulting and just debate the issue. I could reference the post for you if you want. You only continued to be snide and insulting. In fact, 99% of ALL your posts on EVERY thread are snide and/or insulting. If you want to be treated politely don't slap people who try to treat you that way. 68, you're old enough to act like a gentleman, so do so and quit whining.
218
posted on
09/24/2003 6:48:11 AM PDT
by
jjm2111
To: jjm2111
Turn the worm, I don't care. I don't feel like debating you. I don't feel you want debate, you want argument. You want the argument in order to cause division.
219
posted on
09/24/2003 7:04:01 AM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: 68 grunt
Whatever.
220
posted on
09/24/2003 7:15:59 AM PDT
by
jjm2111
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220, 221-226 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson