Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: Bush down, Clark up (Clark 49% - W 46%)
Cnn/Gallup USA today ^ | Monday, September 22 | CNN

Posted on 09/22/2003 5:26:40 PM PDT by KQQL

Edited on 04/29/2004 2:03:08 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Wesley Clark emerged as the Democratic front-runner days after entering the race, according to the poll.

Fifty percent of 1,003 people questioned for the poll approved of Bush's job performance -- down from 59 percent in August and 71 percent in April -- the president's lowest rating since he came to office in January 2001.


(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; electionpresident; gwb2004; maryhelp; poll; polls; wesleyclark
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last
To: Pubbie
Clark does NOT HAVE THE NAME ID to beat Bush like that!

Maybe, maybe not.

One thing we better start doing is to realize that Bush COULD lose the election. That would be a disaster, but do not underestimate the Dims, or how easy it is to sway the general population. We cannot take anything for granted when it comes to dealing with libs. Even if polls showed W ahead by 30 points, you work even harder to keep the momentum up. You do not relax!

A few months ago Rush said "it's over for the Democratic party". I immediately thought that was a foolish and stupid thing to say.

I hope Bush has something(s) up his sleeve and is just letting the Dims get bold.

I hope!

61 posted on 09/22/2003 9:12:25 PM PDT by technomage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
48% of those polled have never heard of Clark

wasn't it actually 26%, walsh?

i see a man covering his ears and yelling "no, no, no!"

62 posted on 09/22/2003 9:14:18 PM PDT by jethropalerobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Krodg
actually, clark did even better among registered voters than with adults in general.

read the poll next time, mo-ron.
63 posted on 09/22/2003 9:18:02 PM PDT by jethropalerobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
I'm not sure what to make of this. It depends on the methodology. I suspect they just count people who can ID the candidates which would probably tend to favor Democrats since it is their primary and they're more likely to pay attention.

Clark has nowhere to go but down. He's already got all the "Wow he's a general" people behind him. When the real story starts to emerge his poll numbers will fall.
64 posted on 09/22/2003 9:39:55 PM PDT by MattAMiller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
Are you aware that up until a few weeks ago, Gallup's approval numbers for Bush were running higher than average? And that they've been running polls for longer than most of us have been alive?

Look, I'm not ascribing any more value to this poll than it deserves. The only poll that matters in November 2004. But calling this a "push poll" is absurd.
65 posted on 09/23/2003 4:08:24 AM PDT by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: jethropalerobber
"Although 39 percent of respondents overall had a favorable opinion of Clark, 48 percent said they were unfamiliar with him."

Evidently you can't read, you must have spent your youth practicing at being a smart ass rather than practicing reading and comprehension skills.

66 posted on 09/23/2003 5:16:16 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie; KQQL
"But that's ok, we know you've got your DNC Axe to grind..."

Pubbie, when you say "we" who are you speaking for?
KQQL, Thanks for the post. I find some people presuming to much on Free Republic about other people the don't know.

Now about media polls. The only poll that counts is on Nov.7 2004. The media likes to tighten up the field in a presidential poll so to have the canidates think they have a chance. They "means" the ones with the most money to spend on advertizing in their media businesses.

I read that Clark and Dean have deep pockets now so they will spend some of their war chest before Super Tuesday.

I'm presumimg abit about the media's motives but I follow the money and try to figure out the angle.

So Pubbie, the media makes their money fooling the public and us Republicians will need to work hard and stick together to defeat the Dem's in 2004.

67 posted on 09/23/2003 5:24:20 AM PDT by Major_Risktaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
"Because you don't like the results?"

It not that I don't like the results, it is that I don't believe the results! Sorry, if you do, so be it.
68 posted on 09/23/2003 7:10:56 AM PDT by lawdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: jethropalerobber
"you mean the connections bush said do not exist just this past week?"

He said there was no Iraq 911 connection.

Bush reitirated that there was a strong Iraq AlQaeda connection.

Get your facts straight.
69 posted on 09/23/2003 10:23:02 AM PDT by Pubbie ("Last time I checked, he doesn't have a vote" - Tom DeLay on Ari Fleischer's demand for Tax-Rebates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
That is right on. There is no effing way Clark would be ahead of Bush. I have been highly suspicious of these polls coming out lately that show Bush in a total free fall. Almost every single one of them is a liberal biased poll.
70 posted on 09/23/2003 3:50:40 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke
I just heard it on FOX from Fred Barnes. It is a poll of 48% Democrats, maybe not all even registered voters. This poll can be thrown in the trash.
71 posted on 09/23/2003 3:54:57 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Major_Risktaker
Pubbie, when you say "we" who are you speaking for? KQQL, Thanks for the post. I find some people presuming to much on Free Republic about other people the don't know.

Thanks for the support :)

72 posted on 09/23/2003 11:53:43 PM PDT by KQQL (^@__*^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
well, at least you got it right the second time around...

jwalsh07 in #29: "48% of those polled have never heard of Clark"

jwalsh07 in #66: "48 percent said they were unfamiliar with him"

in reality, the poll found only 26% had "never heard of" clark. comprehending yet?

73 posted on 09/25/2003 11:02:28 PM PDT by jethropalerobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: jethropalerobber
Yeah, I comprehend that you're a waste of time.
74 posted on 09/26/2003 2:07:06 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
NO WAY!!!!! The people who were polled will soon find our what an idiot this guy is.


Wednesday, Sept. 24, 2003 12:59 p.m. EDT
Ret. Joint Chiefs Chair Gen. Hugh Shelton: I Won't Back Clark for Prez

The military man who was Gen. Wesley Clark's superior officer when he served as Supreme Allied Commander of NATO shocked a California college forum earlier this month when he questioned Clark's integrity and said he wouldn't back his presidential candidacy under any circumstances.

Addressing a gathering at Foothill College in Los Altos, Calif., two weeks ago, retired general Hugh Shelton, who served as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under President Clinton, was asked by the event's moderator, Dick Henning, "What do you think of General Wesley Clark and would you support him as a presidential candidate?"

At the mention of Clark's name, Gen. Shelton's expression darkened, and he paused for a drink of water.

The gesture prompted Henning to add, "I noticed you took a drink on that one!"

According to the account carried in the Los Altos Town Crier, Clark's old boss replied, "That question makes me wish it were vodka."

Shelton then explained:

"I've known Wes for a long time. I will tell you the reason he came out of Europe early had to do with integrity and character issues, things that are very near and dear to my heart. I'm not going to say whether I'm a Republican or a Democrat. I'll just say Wes won't get my vote."

Though Shelton declined to elaborate, he offered only praise for President Bush, saying that he has "earned kudos in spite of the criticism" for keeping up the pressure in the war on terrorism.




In other words he was asked to get out of the service!

75 posted on 09/26/2003 2:18:12 PM PDT by WestCoastGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson