Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(N. Carolina) Senate race expected to be far different from 2002
The Herald Sun ^ | 8/15/2003 | AP

Posted on 09/15/2003 4:03:57 AM PDT by mtbrandon49

RALEIGH, N.C. -- Sen. John Edwards has stepped aside to seek the presidency, and two Democrats who slugged it out in last year's Senate primary -- Erskine Bowles and Dan Blue -- may again battle for his seat.

Once again, Republicans have all but anointed a nominee, with Rep. Richard Burr of Winston-Salem already jumping out to a huge fund-raising advantage and gaining White House backing.

But despite the early similarities, campaign consultants and political analysts watching the race don't expect a repeat of the 2002 Senate race in North Carolina.

In last year's contest to replace retiring Sen. Jesse Helms, Republican Elizabeth Dole had no trouble taking her party's nomination. She then easily outdistanced Bowles, the Charlotte investment banker who is a former Clinton White House chief of staff.

Bowles had no answer for the popularity Dole had gained after years of television appearances and speeches on behalf of her husband, former senator and GOP presidential nominee Bob Dole, and her own presidential bid.

At times, Dole's campaign appearances took on the appearance of rock concerts or highly stylized presidential campaign stops. Usually, she had no problem drawing large crowds.

Although few people expect Burr to face any significant challenge in the GOP primary, political analysts point out that he has little of the star power or name recognition of Dole.

Ferrell Guillory, director of the Program on Southern Politics, Media and Public Life at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, noted that Dole's candidacy sparked a large surge in Republican voter turnout, a feat that could prove difficult for Burr to repeat.

"Burr represents a different kind of challenge than Dole for the Democrats. He doesn't have the glitz of Dole, but he fits the mold of the modern Republican Party," Guillory said.

Burr will also be running in a state in which joblessness -- particularly manufacturing job losses -- has worsened and become a more volatile issue.

Unlike Dole, Burr would be running on the same ticket with President Bush if he wins the GOP primary. But if the president's popularity continues to slip, so too will the advantages of running with an incumbent president.

Of course, Burr would have an advantage in not facing an incumbent. But with Bowles and Blue, a former state House speaker, expected to enter the race, the GOP nominee is likely to run against a seasoned candidate with whom voters are familiar.

"Burr is not going to have to face an incumbent, but he is going to have to face a Democrat with the full party rallied behind him," Guillory said.

Paul Shumaker, a Burr political consultant, said he believes Republicans are enthusiastic about Burr's candidacy and confident of victory in 2004.

His early fund raising -- donations total $1.8 million in the first six months of this year -- are evidence of his support.

"I don't think that the excitement that Richard Burr has generated has been driven by who or who will not be running from among the Democrats. It has been driven by Richard Burr," Shumaker said.

But in a state where Republicans and Democrats have traded Edward's Senate seat in every election since 1980, a close race is expected again. And Elizabeth Dole's wide victory in 2002 is likely to remain largely an anomaly in recent North Carolina political history.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: 2004; nc; northcarolina; oldnorthstate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 09/15/2003 4:03:59 AM PDT by mtbrandon49
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mtbrandon49
Ferrell Guillory seems to be hoping that Dole's wide margin of victory in 2002,is just an anomaly.
2 posted on 09/15/2003 4:13:14 AM PDT by AdvisorB (Arafat Delenda Est!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr.Smorch
I suspect this is just another of the DemocRATS political wet dreams.
3 posted on 09/15/2003 4:16:06 AM PDT by el_texicano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: el_texicano
I hope your right. The way this senate seat and our governors race have been in the past you never know whats going to happen.
4 posted on 09/15/2003 4:18:19 AM PDT by mtbrandon49
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mykdsmom; Admin Moderator
I should have put (NC) on the title.
5 posted on 09/15/2003 4:21:00 AM PDT by mtbrandon49
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
Thanks!
6 posted on 09/15/2003 4:26:28 AM PDT by mtbrandon49
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtbrandon49
;)
7 posted on 09/15/2003 4:30:12 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mtbrandon49
Burr would be running on the same ticket with President Bush if he wins the GOP primary. But if the president's popularity continues to slip, so too will the advantages of running with an incumbent president.

Did Bush win North Carolina in 2000?

8 posted on 09/15/2003 4:37:06 AM PDT by 11th Earl of Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
Bush won NC in 2002.
9 posted on 09/15/2003 4:45:22 AM PDT by mtbrandon49
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mtbrandon49
OOOps! I meant 2000.

REP George W. BUSH 1,608,390
DEM Al GORE 1,241,307
LIB Harry BROWNE 12,284
RFM Pat BUCHANAN 8,716
10 posted on 09/15/2003 4:51:20 AM PDT by mtbrandon49
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mtbrandon49
Richard Burr will make a great senator.
11 posted on 09/15/2003 4:53:41 AM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
I sure hope we can get him in there. The metro areas in NC are filling up with transplants (mostly democretins).
12 posted on 09/15/2003 5:00:03 AM PDT by mtbrandon49
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Ping-a-ling
13 posted on 09/15/2003 5:02:30 AM PDT by upchuck (The Palis are a bunch of wackos with a 14th Century mentality and 20th Century toys. Kill 'em.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Old_North_State; **North_Carolina; Constitution Day; 100%FEDUP; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; ...
NC Ping!
14 posted on 09/15/2003 5:07:17 AM PDT by mykdsmom (We often give our enemies the means of our own destruction - Aesop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: el_texicano
Just an ordinary dream......not nearly exciting enough for wet.
15 posted on 09/15/2003 5:09:45 AM PDT by bert (Don't Panic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
The President's won NC in 2000 by the second largest margin of any state, second only to his home of Texas.

As to the big turnout in 2002, it wasn't necessarily generated by Sen. Dole. Great pains were taken to put into place a turn out the vote machine during the last 72 hours. That was the lesson learned from 2000, where our margins in final polls always shrank to something less at the election. We just weren't turning people out.

This guy is full of it. The only thing the Dems have going for them is that Paul Shumaker is big in Burr's campaign.

16 posted on 09/15/2003 5:41:30 AM PDT by Windom Earle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mtbrandon49
rat media psyops droppings - period.
17 posted on 09/15/2003 7:39:15 AM PDT by jmaroneps37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtbrandon49
The NC Senate seat is no slam dunk. NC Senate races have been narrowly won. Below are the vote totals of NC Senate contests in recent history.

1990 Jesse Helms 53% Harvey Gantt 46%

1992 Lauch Faircloth 50% Terry Sanford 47%

1996 Jesse Helms 53% Harvey Gantt 47%

1998 John Edwards 51% Lauch Faircloth 47%

2002 Liddy Dole 54% Erskine Bowles 45%

I would rate Richard Burr as the slight favorite in this race. President Bush's coattails will greatly aid Burr's Senate campaign.


18 posted on 09/15/2003 10:27:21 AM PDT by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtbrandon49
This is the kind of junk the media was tossing around in 1994. Richard couldn't possibly beat a powerful Democrat tobacco lawyer. Sandy Sands had the full might of the Hunt machine behind him. But Richard has a strong work ethic. He buckled down and organized a grass-roots campaign that was a joy to behold. He was everywhere. We worked our butts off for him.

At the time, I was the president of a Parent-Teacher organization at a dinky elementary school way out in the middle of nowhere and I invited Richard to come to our school carnival. I told him it was a courtesy and if he didn't show up, I would completely understand. I was down setting up the dunking booth and I looked up and there he was. He told me he wouldn't have missed it for the world. He couldn't stay long, but by the time he left, he had all but the meanest, ugliest Democrat votes sewed up. That's the kind of person Richard is and that's the kind of loyalty he generates.

He's been a great Representative and he'll be a great Senator. I feel honored to count him among my friends.
19 posted on 09/15/2003 6:28:11 PM PDT by NCSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCSteve
Do you know where Rep. Burr stands on the prescription drug bill??
20 posted on 09/15/2003 7:33:13 PM PDT by ncweaver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson