Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats' prospects bleakest in 70 years, pollster says
Knight Ridder Newspapers | July 29, 2003 | Steven Thomma

Posted on 07/29/2003 8:49:24 AM PDT by HAL9000

PHILADELPHIA - The Democratic Party is approaching the 2004 elections in its weakest position since Franklin Roosevelt forged the enduring Democratic coalition 70 years ago, a prominent pollster warned Monday.

The party still has solid support from the core of Roosevelt's coalition - union members, minorities and the working poor - said pollster Mark Penn. It also enjoys solid support from gays and Hispanics, the nation's fastest-growing minority.

But less than one-third of Americans now consider themselves Democrats, down from 49 percent at their peak in 1958. And Democrats lag well behind Republicans among other growing groups of voters whose loyalties swing back and forth between parties and who hold the key to close elections - including suburbanites, professionals and middle-class families with children. That leaves the party in a poor position to build the new coalition it needs to beat President Bush and build an enduring majority in an evenly divided country.

"In terms of the percentage of voters who identify themselves as Democrats, the Democratic Party is currently in its weakest position since the dawn of the New Deal," Penn told a gathering of the Democratic Leadership Council, a group of centrist Democrats. "Exciting the Democratic base alone will not bring enough voters into the Democratic fold."

Penn, who was President Clinton's pollster, revealed his findings at a time when centrists are again battling liberals for dominance within the Democratic Party. Centrists fear that catering to the party's base with anti-war talk and "big government" proposals for health care will turn off other voters.

Already, said DLC founder Al From, the party is reviving an unwelcome image as the pre-Clinton party of "tax-and-spend" big government, weak on defense and captive to special interests. That image cost the party three straight presidential elections in the 1980s, From said.

"The Democratic Party is in danger of being taken over by the far left," said Sen. Evan Bayh, D-Ind., chairman of the DLC.

One key problem, Penn and others said, is that Democrats are perceived as catering to a political base that is losing its electoral clout in a changing country. When likely voters are asked which party they prefer, Democrats still hold an edge among many groups. Union members and gays prefer Democrats over Republicans by 43 percentage points, and African-Americans and the working poor do by 41 percentage points, Penn found.

But Republicans have an edge of 15 percentage points among suburban voters, 21 percentage points among professionals, and 29 percentage points among white-collar workers.

The Penn poll of 1,225 likely 2004 voters was conducted June 29-July 1 and had a margin of error of plus or minus 2.8 percentage points.

"The decline of manufacturing jobs and the shift from cities to suburbs and exurbs, and the dramatic increases in college education and white collar and professional jobs, do not favor the Democrats," Penn said.

The Republican advantage increases as people move up the economic ladder. Among whites, Democrats are favored only among those who make less than $20,000 a year. The Republican edge grows with income, reaching 66 percentage points among whites making more than $150,000 a year.

Democrats also maintain strength among single voters, but once families have children, they tend to turn Republican, Penn said.

And while Democrats are more often favored on issues such as poverty, the environment and health care, voters prefer Republicans on terrorism and national security.

Despite their party's weaknesses, centrist Democrats believe Bush can be defeated next year if the party coalesces around a centrist candidate who is strong on defense and offers an agenda to spark the economy. Anxieties about the war in Iraq and the economy have hurt Bush's standing; Penn's survey found that 48 percent of likely voters believe Bush deserves re-election, while 42 percent believe someone else should be elected.

Sensing opportunity, many Democrats at the DLC conference said they believe there is plenty of time for the party to settle its internal debate and find a new leader before voters make up their minds for 2004. Polls show none of the nine Democratic presidential candidates is emerging as a frontrunner, leaving the party without a single voice for now to counter Bush.

"It's still early," said Jennifer Mann, a state representative from Allentown, Pa. "Most people in my district aren't getting up every morning wondering what's happening in the presidential race. ... I know there is a degree of impatience. People are anxious for someone to emerge. But when that person does emerge, people will rally behind them."



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; democrats; dlc; polls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: moodyskeptic
See my # 20
21 posted on 07/29/2003 9:09:59 AM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Overconfidence is the biggest obstacle now.

A good rule of tumb of elections is to always run as if you were behind.

22 posted on 07/29/2003 9:10:27 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moodyskeptic
Exactly where do you find a Democrat candidate who is strong on defense and knows about economics? I've never even seen this particular species of Democrat.

Sam Nunn - retired senator from Georgia - was probably the most recent example.

23 posted on 07/29/2003 9:14:22 AM PDT by Cooter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: moodyskeptic
Harry Truman and Scoop Jackson, maybe.
24 posted on 07/29/2003 9:14:29 AM PDT by p. henry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
"The Democratic Party is in danger of being taken over by the far left," said Sen. Evan Bayh, D-Ind., chairman of the DLC.

There must be some really really really far-left whackos if baby Bayh is concerned about being outflanked from the left, sheesh.

25 posted on 07/29/2003 9:16:57 AM PDT by fnord ( Hyprocisy is the tribute vice pays to virtue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moodyskeptic
Exactly where do you find a Democrat candidate who is strong on defense and knows about economics?

They're all retiring next year when Zell Miller leaves the Senate.

26 posted on 07/29/2003 9:17:07 AM PDT by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
The party still has solid support from the core of Roosevelt's coalition - union members, minorities and the working poor - said pollster Mark Penn.

I am wondering how really solid that union support is. I base this on anecdotal information, so use it cautiously. I made friends with a fellow beachgoer at North Myrtle Beach this past week, another refugee from Ohio seeking the warmth and water of the South. Turns out he was an organizer for "the union", in the Cleveland area (and a nod to you, Dennis the Menace). He mentioned he had to "screen" all the 'Rat candidates because they would "automatically" get the union endorsement, but when it came to voting he had to vote for the Republican candidates because of the wacko positions on certain issues the 'Rats would always take. He specifically mentioned the gay marriage and abortion issues. So here is a guy who was taking part in vetting candidates he had no intention of voting for himself. Interesting...

27 posted on 07/29/2003 9:19:49 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Excellent article. I have bookmarked it.
28 posted on 07/29/2003 9:21:15 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Evil Old White Devil Californian Grampa for big Al Sharpton, Nader & Peter Camejo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moodyskeptic
Exactly where do you find a Democrat candidate who is strong on defense and knows about economics? I've never even seen this particular species of Democrat.

Adlai Stevenson? OK, he's dead.

29 posted on 07/29/2003 9:21:52 AM PDT by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
"But less than one-third of Americans now consider themselves Democrats, down from 49 percent at their peak in 1958."

Just more evidence that dead people (and illegal immigrants) do vote. No wonder they need to get the "felon" vote. I've always wondered how the Democatic Party has survived this long. They are truly a coalition of special interests that are often at odds with one and other. I mean...how can unions and blue-collar workers support a party that appeals to environmentalist, who want to destroy their jobs? How can they continue to bow to the demands of the NEA and AFT when one of thier largest constituencies (blacks) supports vouchers? There is so much pandering from Democrats that these groups are eventually going to be fighting amongst themselves for their share of the largess. I think we're looking at a gradual implosion...hopefully.
30 posted on 07/29/2003 9:22:01 AM PDT by cwb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
You tagline sums up the Rat Party since FDR.
31 posted on 07/29/2003 9:22:18 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Evil Old White Devil Californian Grampa for big Al Sharpton, Nader & Peter Camejo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dead
If it were an “evenly divided country,” the Democrats would not be in a poor position

You're not factoring in the election day Democrat voters that even the field: the homeless looking for a smoke, the dead, the invalids thrown into the back of the van, the clones, etc.
32 posted on 07/29/2003 9:24:39 AM PDT by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Love the article, but RUN LIKE WE'RE TWENTY POINTS BEHIND. Let's mop up the floor with them and then kick their *ss for missing the corners.
33 posted on 07/29/2003 9:24:40 AM PDT by Richard Kimball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Union members and gays prefer Democrats over Republicans by 43 percentage points, and African-Americans and the working poor do by 41 percentage points, Penn found.

And pandering to gays turns off far more people than it gains.

"African-American" politics is largely represented by the likes of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, guys even blacks acknowledge are sham artists. Blacks get nothing for their support of democrats except schadenfreude at harming republicans, an empty diet. The only way democrats can really motivate them is to incite hatred.

Union members and the working poor witnessed 9/11 the same as the rest of us and are just as patriotic. A bunch of them are quite dismayed at the blatant anti-Americanism of the democrats lately.

34 posted on 07/29/2003 9:33:50 AM PDT by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
People are anxious for someone to emerge. But when that person does emerge, people will rally behind them."

when that person emerges, GWB's numbers will go up 15 points

35 posted on 07/29/2003 9:41:00 AM PDT by The Wizard (Saddamocrats are enemies of America, treasonous everytime they speak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moodyskeptic
I had the exact same thought when I read that part. There is no such thing.
36 posted on 07/29/2003 9:44:36 AM PDT by Trust but Verify (Will work for W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball
You got that right. You gotta keep your foot on the neck, right up to Election Day (or maybe for six weeks after, if necessary).

The Pubbies should not rest until they have every single vote.
37 posted on 07/29/2003 9:59:34 AM PDT by gridlock (Remember: PC Kills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
--yep--"don't count your chickens before they hatch" still counts--
38 posted on 07/29/2003 10:00:49 AM PDT by rellimpank (Stop immigration now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000; Sir Gawain; Eric in the Ozarks
.."IS it SAFE?" = HILLARY on Senate Armed Services Committee..

http://TheAlamoFILM.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=629
39 posted on 07/29/2003 10:07:31 AM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE (Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.com ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fnord
There must be some really really really far-left whackos if baby Bayh is concerned about being outflanked from the left, sheesh.

Bayh was somewhat a centrist as Governor because he was held in check by Republican lawmakers. Since he has gone to Washington, however, he has been a reliable vote for the Lefties.

Too bad the people here don't see it or don't care.

40 posted on 07/29/2003 10:10:02 AM PDT by comebacknewt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson