Since Sep 1, 1998

view home page, enter name:

HAL9000 Home Page Index -

HAL9000 - Links to News Sources (v 2.11) - Updated August 5, 2007

My Bookmarks

Highlights of my political accomplishments on the Internet

FreeRepublic exclusive - Broaddrick's statement to OIC


! HAL9000 - Links to News Sources (v 2.11)

! The Clinton Library Pardons - Rick Hendrick, Archie Schaffer and Marc Rich

09/11/2001 - A lion cornered - The attack on Masood is bound to strengthen the Taleban

AP - Sen. Clinton preparing for potential presidential race

Articles of Impeachment against William Jefferson Clinton

Bill Clinton Abusing His Diplomatic Passport

Broaddrick Case Drove Impeachment, New Book Claims

Caption This ...



Free Republic exclusive - The Secret Paula Jones Documents (before Jeffrey Toobin tried to delete them)

Free Republic Supported HTML Tags and Attributes

FreeRepublic exclusive - Broaddrick's statement to OIC

FreeRepublic Exclusive - Federal Election Commission lists Hillary Rodham Clinton presidential campaign committee for 2000

Independent Counsel and Special Prosecutor Research

July 12, 2001: 'Bin Laden has raised 35,000-strong militant force'

Meredith Oakley - Oct. 4 1991 - His word is dirt: Basking in Clinton's false and empty light

OIC Ray Issues Final Report - Says Evidence of Clinton Lies Known

OIC Smaltz

OIC Starr

Reference For Excerpting Articles - Please Read And Bookmark.

Related Publications in the LAT/WP vs Free Republic Settlement Agreement


Scotsman - Saddam has weapons to wipe out world's population, Iraq nuclear bomb within 3 years

Sept. 9, 2001 Afghanistan - Opposition's military chief Ahmed Shah Massood injured in bomb explosion

Smith Bagley linked to Nathan Landow and Gambino crime family associates

Special Division Court for Independent Counsels

The Clinton Disbarment Files

The Clinton Presidential Library-Apartment Fundraising Letter

The Guild - Annotated Table of Clinton Pardons

The Next Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States - Hillary Clinton?

The Tiananmen Papers

Trie's Deadly Deals

Highlights of my political accomplishments on the Internet -

* On September 23, 1998, I researched and co-published a historic article with jqp on FreeRepublic.com disclosing Juanita Broaddrick's sworn statement to the FBI concerning her affidavit in the Paula Jones lawsuit. According to reports from Chris Matthews on Hardball and Washington Post reporter Pete Baker, this obscure information derived from the Starr Report swayed enough votes in the House of Representatives to pass the Articles of Impeachment against Bill Clinton. After the information of Broaddrick's statements to the FBI were disclosed, she eventually granted interviews with NBC News and the Wall Street Journal confirming that she was raped and assaulted by Bill Clinton in an Arkansas hotel room in 1978. The original article was deleted from the Free Republic archives, but is reproduced below.

We originally asked Matt Drudge to publish this information, but he declined. Fortunately, we were able to publish it ourselves on FreeRepublic.com (as well as the Clinton Administration Scandals mailing list and the alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater newsgroup) - and the information was picked up in the mainstream media soon afterward.

* In the Summer of 2000, I published the first evidence that Bill Clinton was selling pardons in return for contributions to the Clinton Library - in connection with the Archie Schaeffer pardon that was later granted in December, 2000. The news media began reporting the Pardons for Sale scandal after Clinton left office in 2001.

* I published a website called "The Clinton Disbarment Files", the only online source that contained the complete set of legal documents in the case.

* I posted numerous articles warning of Osama bin Laden and the Taliban before September 11, 2001 - including a series of omnious articles posted just a few hours before the World Trade Center attack.

* Working with Registered, we republished a series of sealed court documents from the Paula Jones lawsuit - briefly available from Jeffrey Toobin before he decided to retract them.

* I was charter subscriber to the alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater newsgroup and Clinton Administration Scandals (CAS) list - two forums that were predecessors to FreeRepublic.com.

* I published several lists titled "Links to News Sources". It contained links to most of the major news sources around the world, and included links to automatically translate foreign news sources such as Agence France-Presse.

* I've met several people directly involved in Clinton scandals, including the Sink Emperor himself.

The Free Republic article that help to get Bill Clinton impeached

Researched and posted by jqp and HAL9000

Topic: White Water


According to the Appendix of the Starr Report, which is available online only via 250+MB worth of .pdf,

(from p. 74)

... on Friday, January 2, 1998, Jane Doe #5 signed an affidavit in which she denied that the President made "unwelcome sexual advances toward me in the late seventies."(202) (On April 8, 1998, however, Jane Doe #5 stated to OIC investigators that this affidavit was false.)(203)

202 920-DC-00000962-63 (Jane Doe #5 1/2/98 Aff.).
203 Jane Doe #5 4/8/98 Int. at 6.


[Note: the Hotline is a subscription publication used by journalists and talk show hosts For education and discussion. Not for commercial use.

The Hotline 3/30/98


Arkansas Democrat Gazette's Friedlieb reports, in a court filing 3/28, Paula Jones' attys "shed light" on why IC Ken Starr successfully got a subpoena last week asking for information about Juanita Hickey Broaddrick. Starr's subpoena to Jones' attys "asked for all information the Dallas law firm had collected on Broaddrick, self-proclaimed Clinton paramours, Gennifer Flowers and Dolly Kyle Browning, and" ex-AR Court of Appeals Judge Beth Coulson.

CNN's Koch noted Broaddrick atty Bill Walters said if Broaddrick is subpoenaed by IC Ken Starr "his client will comply" ("World Today," 3/29).

In their filing, Jones' attys "allege that Broaddrick was sexually assaulted by Clinton about two decades ago during Clinton's term as" AR AG and that Clinton or his agents "then bribed and/or intimidated her and her family into remaining silent about this outrage." Clinton personal atty Bob Bennett: "This is a reckless and irresponsible filing under the guise of an appropriate pleading. They are desperate. It shows the weakness of their case" (3/29).

ABC's Douglass reported "legal sources tell ABC News that Jane Doe #5 [Broaddrick] told Jones' lawyers under oath that the incident did not happen, but the lawyers did not include her denial in their court papers" (3/28).

CNN's Koch reported: "Those paying [Paula] Jones' legal bills say the denial can't be trusted." Rutherford's Inst.'s John Whitehead: "This woman, her husband, people around her have been threatened. And we believe now that they were probably -- some kind of deal was made where they were bought off or they've been silenced now" ("World Today," 3/29).

The "uncorroborated charge, previously circulated by longtime adversaries of" Clinton, including AR private eye Larry Case, "have been denied under oath" by Broaddrick. A WH spokesperson called the charge "outrageous" ("Periscope," Newsweek, 4/6 issue).

CBS' Attkisson reported, "Adding to the confusion: when we asked the woman's attorney about the rape allegation, he told CBS News, 'We do not deny it. We do not admit it. People will have to judge this kind of crock on their own'" (3/29).


More Friedlieb: To support their allegation, Jones' attys included a '92 letter from Philip Yoakum to Broaddrick in which he discusses the alleged encounter at an AR State Nursing Home Conference: "What a shock now to realize that he will possibly be the president of a free democratic country while carrying the guilt of such an assault on someone as undeserving as you." Broaddrick told the Associated Press: "I'm aware of the letter. I have no comment on any of it" (Arkansas Democrat Gazette, 3/29).

Broaddrick "suggested in a telephone interview" with New York Daily News's Galvin "that she did not know Yoakum well enough to confide in him": "I knew Mr. Yoakum, But he was certainly not a family friend." Broaddrick atty Walters would not comment on the allegations, but called it "vicious rumors. We are not going to lend dignity to this process" (3/30). Walters: "It's a vicious process going on and I think these are vicious rumors and allegations" (Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, 3/29). Yoakum "said he once recorded" Broaddrick "talking about the episode but later destroyed the original tapes and gave copies to" Sheffield Nelson, a GOPer who ran against Clinton for gov. in '90 (Baker, Washington Post, 3/29).


Appearing on "FOX News Sunday," Clinton adviser Rahm Emanuel termed the charge "outrageous": "The Jones lawyers have a filed affidavit from her disputing that claim" (3/29).

CBS' Attkisson reported, "Outraged Clinton defenders say the woman is on the record denying that it ever happened" (3/29). Sen. Bob Torricelli (D-NJ): "It isn't simply that there isn't supporting evidence on this rape charge, which would make it outrageous enough for it to be in the Jones materials, it's that there is actually a sworn affidavit where the woman claimed this did not happen. ... The recklessness of this goes beyond the fact that there's no supporting evidence, there's contradictory evidence" ("FOX News Sunday," 3/29).

George Stephanopoulos: "There's ... no excuse for the Paula Jones lawyers to use this filing as a back-door way to get a real heinous allegation against the president into play" ("Sam & Cokie," ABC, 3/29).


NBC's Myers, in a 3/28 report re-broadcast throughout the weekend on MSNBC: "The explosive new allegation tonight is that President Clinton sexually assaulted a women twenty years ago" in AR. In court documents, Jones' attys claim Clinton "'forcibly raped and sexually assaulted'" Broaddrick, then "'bribed or intimidated her' to remain silent. Sources say that Broaddrick" recently "denied under oath that such an assault occurred", but Jones' attys claim "she told their investigator that she had suffered a 'horrible thing' at the hand of Clinton and did not want to relive it. And NBC News has talked to four people from [AR] who say Broaddrick told them of such an assault years ago."

The new charge is "largely based" on the letter Yoakum letter. From Yoakum's '92 letter to Broaddrick: "I was particularly distraught when you told me of your brutal rape by Bill Clinton ... how he bit your lip until you gave into his forcing sex upon you." In an interview with NBC's Myers, Yoakum claims Broaddrick told him that Clinton invited himself to her hotel room, allegedly to discuss her nursing home business in 1981. Myers, to Yoakum: "She told you in 1981 that Bill Clinton assaulted her?" Yoakum: "Yes." Myers: "Did you believe her?" Yoakum: "I believe her."

Myers noted "Yoakum admits he is no fan of the president and that he unsuccessfully tried to get Broaddrick to publicly tell her story when Clinton first ran for president."

Myers also noted "there was another woman at that hotel that day, a nurse and friend of Broaddrick, who says she iced her friend's face after the alleged assault." In a telephone interview with NBC News the woman, "who admits she dislikes Clinton, said Broaddrick was distraught, her lips were swollen at least double in size, she told me they had intercourse against her will" (3/28).

On "Meet the Press," NBC's Myers: "Potentially it's the most explosive allegation out there. Juanita Broaddrick has never tried to sell any story. She has never gone after the president. She is a nurse who built a nursing home business. She is a respected member of her community in a little town in Arkansas. ... She's neither confirming nor denying anything, and I think the key is going to be will she be subpoenaed to testify before the grand jury and what will she say? ... This would not be a consensual relationship if it occurred. It also may be viewed, some would see, as part of a pattern. You do have the Paula Jones allegations. You have Kathleen Willey saying she was groped. I mean -- so I think that, you know, how the American people receive it will be determined, in part, by whether she goes public and whether she seems credible and how she comes across, if she does it" ("Meet," 3/29).


ABC's Vargas used the term "sexually assaulted" to describe the charge against Clinton (3/28).

"FOX News Sunday": FNC's Snow to Emanuel: "It sounds like they're alleging that he raped someone." Snow, to Specter: "There is, as far as we can tell, a rape allegation that has no supporting evidence" ("FOX News Sunday," 3/29).

"Sam & Cokie": ABC's Roberts to ABC's Douglass, noted "the Jones lawyers have also raised a rather sensational matter in these papers ... about the president, before he was president, allegedly forcing himself upon a woman in a hotel room." Douglass: "Well, this is, as you say, a very sensational charge. The Jones lawyers are claiming that they have what they call 'significant evidence' that the president did sexually assault a woman 20 years ago. But what they produce as their significant evidence is a secondhand account." ABC's Roberts: "Now, we do not, at ABC news, name rape victims, or alleged rape victims, without their permission. But you talked to this woman yesterday. What did she say?" ABC's Douglass: "I did talk with her last night. I asked her if she denies the incident. And she would only say 'No comment' (3/29).

"Meet The Press": NBC's Russert: "A woman who 20 years ago encountered Bill Clinton, allegedly, and that the allegations are he assaulted her. She has signed a deposition under oath saying it didn't happen" ("Meet," 3/29).

CBS' Roberts: "A stunning allegation that the president sexually assaulted a woman in Arkansas 20 years ago." CBS' Attkisson reported there were "unsubstantiated claims that Bill Clinton raped a woman back in 1978" (3/29).

ABC's Von Fremd: "An unsubstantiated, 20 year-old allegation of sexual assault that even the woman in question denied under oath" (3/29).

NBC's Palmer noted "a senior White House adviser strongly denied a claim by Jones' lawyers that Mr. Clinton sexually assaulted a woman 20 years ago" (3/29).

CNN's Koch noted there was "an old claim that in 1978" Clinton "sexually assaulted a woman" ("World Today," 3/29).

CBS' Robelot noted the WH "called unsubstantiated claims that Mr. Clinton sexually assaulted a woman 20 years ago outrageous and false" ("This Morning," 3/30).

NBC's Russert "a woman who alleged 20 years ago to a friend that" Clinton "sexually assaulted her" ("Morning Line," MSNBC, 3/30).

Posted by: jqp () *
09/23/98 13:44:58 PDT

To: jqp
What is the url you downloaded the appendix from? This is a bombshell - she confirmed the affidavit was FALSE!
From: Steven W. () *
09/23/98 13:51:19 PDT

To: jqp & Alamo-Girl
Well, now isn't this fascinating? Excellent post, jqp!
From: Z (freeper_z@hotmail.com) *
09/23/98 13:53:06 PDT

To: Steven W.
From: jqp () *
09/23/98 13:55:50 PDT

To: Steven W. & ashisgoingtoabondonship
WHOOOP WHOOOP WHOOOP Alarms are going off all over the WH on this one.

Oh ash, is this the last straw?
From: triple () *
09/23/98 13:56:57 PDT

To: jqp
VERY interesting....
From: Prince Charles (first_fugitives@yahoo.com) *
09/23/98 13:58:04 PDT

To: triple
Cigar Boy is allowed to sexually harass women, lie under oath, and sexually assault women because he is intelligent, he cares and he is a democrat.

Ciagr boy is on the ropes and is brain dead.
From: MT Sett () *
09/23/98 14:01:05 PDT

To: jqp

Just more sex talk. Can't you all respect this man's privacy?
From: Earl B. () *
09/23/98 14:01:44 PDT

To: WHOOOP WHOOOP WHOOOP Alarms are going off all over the WH on this one.
WHOOOP WHOOOP WHOOOP Alarms are going off all over the WH on this one. !!
From: DonMorgan (morgan@dmi.net) *
09/23/98 14:05:26 PDT

To: Earl B.
Damn straight! What the hell is wrong with a man raping a couple of women every now and then. It's all about sex.
From: go star go (emailname) *
09/23/98 14:07:23 PDT

To: jqp
You should email this to Matt Drudge. It deserves a siren or cannon.
From: Prince Charles (first_fugitives@yahoo.com) *
09/23/98 14:08:32 PDT

To: jqp
If this has been in the appendex of the Starr Report for the last two weeks, why hasn't anyone picked up on it yet?
From: GregoryMark (gregorymark@mailexcite.com) *
09/23/98 14:09:17 PDT

To: go star go
Could THIS be the reason the Whitehouse is scrambling to make a deal? Or only part of the reason?
From: Peter W. Kessler (P.KESSLER@worldnet.att.net) *
09/23/98 14:09:49 PDT

To: All


Does anyone else envision more Chevy Suburbans on the steps of the Capitol?

One for Juanita...

One for Gennifer....

One for Elizabeth....

One for Sally.....

I think multiple counts of extortion (even though it is all about sex) might constitute High Crimes & Misdemeanors.
From: Earl B. () *
09/23/98 14:12:28 PDT

To: WHOOOP WHOOOP WHOOOP Alarms are going off all over the WH on this one. !!
Even sheeple know the difference between sex and sexual assualt.
From: triple () *
09/23/98 14:16:40 PDT

To: Peter W. Kessler
Peter the Lawyer?
From: DonMorgan (morgan@dmi.net) *
09/23/98 14:16:56 PDT

This is big.
From: icwhatudo (emailname) *
09/23/98 14:21:20 PDT

From: DonMorgan (morgan@dmi.net) *
09/23/98 14:23:30 PDT

To: jqp
From: Driver8 () *
09/23/98 14:23:47 PDT

To: triple
Don't assume anything about the Sheeple...they continue to amaze me.
From: Deacon (emailname) *
09/23/98 14:25:33 PDT

To: Steven W.
The Broaddrick note is also available at http://www.courttv.com on page 74 of Appendix, Vol. 2
From: jqp () *
09/23/98 14:25:52 PDT

To: jqp

Juanita Broaddrick: Raped by Clinton in 1978, according to Phillip Yoakum, Jones' lawyer

Right now, it seems like Juanita Broaddrick has been the subject of a blackmail attempt by Phillip Yoakum. There seems to be enough here to put Yoakum in jail and to end the Jones case. The letter is unsigned.

Juanita Broaddrick
Her Photo Soon to appear here.

John Whitehead
Attorney for Paula Jones, speaks to the press

NBC News Reports: Juanita Broaddrick: Raped by Clinton in the 1978, according to Jones lawyers

ABC News Reports: Text of letters claiming that Juanita Broaddrick was raped by Clinton .

October 23, 1992

Dear (name deleted):

I wanted to write this letter and give you my personal assurances on the situation that has recently occurred; and, that I am giving you these assurances as a friend and to follow up on a personal promise that I made to David on the telephoneóthat I would never do anything to hurt you. This is a promise that I can live with the rest of my life, and be at peace with my Lord that I have acted in a responsible, Christian manner without having to lie.

I would like to capsulize the events up to this date. When I first met you many years ago, I was impressed with you as a person of the quality that you brought to the nursing home profession, and I enjoyed the lively conversations you had. I was particularly distraught when you told me of your brutal rape by Bill Clinton and details of how Clinton first approached you as being interested in the nursing home business; how, while during an Arkansas State Nursing Home Association conference in Little Rock, Clinton invited himself to your hotel room ostensibly to discuss business; and how, when Clinton came to your room at the Camelot, he started trying to kiss you and ran his hands all over your body, how you resisted until he ripped your clothes off, and how he bit your lip until you gave into his forcing sex upon you. At the time neither of us realized Clinton would ever aspire as a Democratic candidate for the presidency of the United States. What a shock now to realize that he will possibly be president of a free democratic country while carrying the guilt of such an assault on someone as undeserving as you. For this I feel truly depressed and pray that God will bless this Nation in spite of the leadership that abounds in exploited individuals for their own personal gain.

When I saw Clinton win the democratic nomination for the presidency, the memory of our conversations returned. Therefore, I prepared a document detailing the facts of the rape as you had told them to me, with names omitted, and faxed it down to Sheffield Nelson. I was concerned about the situation and wanted to have someone with integrity go visit you concerning your situation with Clinton. To be perfectly honest, when Sheffield received this fax he didn't know if he was being set up by the Democratsóor just what. We talked on the telephone and he agreed to come and be with me while visiting with you. The meeting was one of mutual respect. I had taken a tape recorder just to protect myself and to see if the items I had prepared for review coincided with the conversation. The tape was never to be used against you; however, it did confirm the conversation and events almost exactly to the document I had faced him. Sheffield, when we left Brownwood, was shocked and moved at what had happened to you.

We both simply asked you if you were interested in coming forward, if for nothing else, just to release you from the guilt you said you had been carrying for fourteen years. And you mentioned that, if you did not come forward, that it would truly convince David of your innocence in the matter and also it would help to set his mind at rest. Sheffield also mentioned that he had a friend on the West coast, a trusted reporter, that you could tell your story to and thereby prevent a circus media event. He also mentioned that he would bring his wife to San Francisco and meet with you and the reporter if you so wished. Sheffield insisted that if you were to indeed come forward that it should be done in a dignified manner, and he gave you his assurances.

On Friday, I received a call from the Los Angeles Times asking if indeed the story was true, and I confirmed that it was. The reporter wanted my tape, but I would not release it to him or ever let him hear a part of it. As far as I was concerned, it was confidentialóand it still is. He asked me if you knew where you were staying in San Francisco, and I told him no. Somehow he bird-dogged it out and found you. If you recall, you never told us if your trip was for business or pleasure. Shortly thereafter, I received a call from the Associated Press, and again I confirmed the conversation but would not release the tape or let any part of the conversation be heard. If any statement was to be made, it had to come from you; not me.

Later that evening I had a telephone call from David and he asked me if Sheffield had made a recording of your conversation and I said no. As far as I was concerned, my tape did not exist because it was simply to confirm one way or the other if the event had actually happened, so this was a moot issue. David then told me that if anyone called, to lie and tell them it did not happen. I told David that I would not lie but would refer calls to him or you. And to this day, I have honored my statement. David, in no uncertain terms, threatened that I would be held personally responsible for the release of this information. He also told me that he had a call in to the Democratic party with a message for Clinton "to call David (last name deleted) as soon as possible." I asked him if Clinton would know who the call was from and he assured me that "Clinton would know!" David said he wanted to assure me that your situation with him would not go unattended and that he was "going to ask Clinton for a couple of big favors" and that he "would get them"óand that "Clinton owed it" to you all. I taped that conversation, also. My only comment here is evidently some big favors had to occur to see such a change in your attitude, and to lie on such a tragic matter. Whatever the price for silence, I hope it is worth it and that you can both be able to look in the mirror and face yourself, and the God that David talked about in our telephone conversation. My prayers are that God will bless you in your businesses; I sincerely do.

I believe that you will continue to be irreparably psychologically damaged by your decision to continue to hold this brutal rape inside; I believe your marriage will be irreparably harmed by never allowing you the opportunity to confront your attacker; I believe your son would demand you to come forward to confront Clinton if they (sic) had knowledge; and I believe that our country has a right to know what kind of fraud is being perpetrated upon it. However, I will not substitute my beliefs of what is best for you, your marriage, or our country on you as I think that is improper. I will say that I hope whatever promises or favors Clinton performs for you or David evens the score for his brutal attack, 14 years suffering you have endured, and the never ending future burden you will be carrying. Your wishes became painfully obvious to me when David started lying as he was coached to do; you, for the first time, tried to deny the rape as you were so being coached to do; and how the "pay off" was confirmed. I hope the "pay off" was your decision, (name deleted). I doubt you are the first victim that Clinton has been able to silence nor will you be the last.

As I have stated above, I am not going to release the tapes and other back-up materials, and you can live your life without the fear of me ever doing so. However, for my own protection I have made copies of the tapes and everything else and given them to both my attorney and Sheffield. These tapes and materials will be held forever, for posterity, and they will never be released unless I am forced by you to release them in court or to the press or also, in light of David's threats, in the event harm should ever come to me or my family. I gave Sheffield his copies of everything without any restrictions, so that he could use them any way he might choose.


Phillip Yoakum


Affidavit of Juanita Broaddrick denying non-consensual sex with President Clinton

Released on Monday, March 30, 1998

Following is the full text of a Jan. 2 affidavit from the woman named in documents filed by the Jones legal team on March 28. Those documents reported an unsubstantiated hearsay claim that the woman, here called "Jane Doe #5," was raped by Bill Clinton 20 years ago.

Paula Jones' lead lawyer Donovan Campbell Jr.
Jail Time for Donovan Campbell? Will he be held in contempt for revealing the identity of Juanita Broaddrick a/k/a Jane Doe #5?

1. My name is Jane Doe #5. I am 55 years old and have been married since 1981. I have one child, age 28. I currently reside in Arkansas.

2. In November of 1997, two private investigators retained by Paula Corbin Jones approached me at my residence. I declined to speak with them, but provided the name of my family attorney. I subsequently was served with a subpoena seeking the production of documents and purporting to require my testimony at a deposition in the civil action between Paula Corbin Jones and President William Jefferson Clinton (Civil Action No. LR-C-94-290). I have never met Ms. Jones, nor do I have any information regarding the allegations that she has advanced against President Clinton. In this regard, I have no knowledge or information regarding the events she has alleged occurred on May 8, 1991 at the Excelsior Hotel or, for that matter, any knowledge or information regarding any interaction between herself and Mr. Clinton.

3. I met President Clinton more than twenty years ago through family friends. Our introduction was not arranged or facilitated, in any way, by the Arkansas State Police. I have never been an Arkansas state employee or a federal employee. I have never discussed with Mr. Clinton the possibility of state or federal employment nor has he offered me any such position. I have had no further relations with him for the past (15) years.

4. During the 1992 Presidential campaign there were unfounded rumors and stories circulated that Mr. Clinton had made unwelcome sexual advances toward me in the late seventies. Newspaper and tabloid reporters hounded me and my family, seeking corroboration of these tales. I repeatedly denied the allegations and requested that my family's privacy be respected. These allegations are untrue and I had hoped that they would no longer haunt me, or cause further disruption to my family.

5. I do not possess any information that could possibly be relevant to the allegations advanced by Paula Corbin Jones or which could lead to admissible evidence in her case. Specifically, I do not have any information to offer regarding a nonconsensual or unwelcome sexual advance by Mr. Clinton, any discussion offer or provision of state or federal employment or advancement in exchange for sexual conduct, or any use of state troopers to procure women for sex. Requiring my testimony at a deposition in this matter would cause unwarranted attorney's fees and costs, disruption to my life and constitute an invasion of my right to privacy. For these reasons, I have asked my attorney to advise Ms. Jones's counsel that there is no truth to the rumors they are pursuing and to provide her counsel with this sworn affidavit.

Further affiant sayeth not.

Jane Doe #5

From: Mojo () *
09/23/98 14:26:06 PDT

To: Mojo-when you told me of your brutal rape by Bill Clinton
when you told me of your brutal rape by Bill Clinton
From: DonMorgan (morgan@dmi.net) *
09/23/98 14:27:44 PDT

To: jqp
Which file, specificially, did you find that in?
From: Steven W. () *
09/23/98 14:31:42 PDT

To: Mojo
From: Clinton's a liar (treason@thewhitehouse.is.sop) *
09/23/98 14:32:10 PDT

To: Steven W.
Mojo was RAPED BY CLINTON???? hehe
From: Clinton's a liar (treason@thewhitehouse.is.sop) *
09/23/98 14:32:36 PDT

To: Clinton's a liar
we've ALL been raped by Clinton!!!
From: DonMorgan (morgan@dmi.net) *
09/23/98 14:35:07 PDT

To: Clinton's a liar
Weren't we all?
From: Mojo () *
09/23/98 14:35:14 PDT

To: DonMorgan
Did you happen to notice the name of the hotel where this rape allegedly happened? Camelot. ("I know it sounds a bit bizarre. But in Camelot, Camelot, that's just the way things are.")
From: Mojo () *
09/23/98 14:43:31 PDT

To: Mojo-Did you happen to notice the name of the hotel where this rape allegedly happened? Camelot.
From: DonMorgan (morgan@dmi.net) *
09/23/98 14:47:43 PDT

To: Mojo
In a survey, when asked if they would have an affair with Clinton 87% of women said, "Not again..." hehe
From: Clinton's a liar (treason@thewhitehouse.is.sop) *
09/23/98 14:50:18 PDT

To: Clinton's a liar
be sure to check my post about San Diego protest - Clinton is coming - but still trying to keep secret
From: Steven W. () *
09/23/98 14:52:06 PDT

To: WHOOOP WHOOOP WHOOOP Alarms are going off all over the WH on this one. !!
WHOOOP WHOOOP WHOOOP Alarms are going off all over the WH on this one. !!
From: DonMorgan (morgan@dmi.net) *
09/23/98 14:54:22 PDT

To: Steven W.
Sweetie, we're already doing a protest in Long Beach the 26th. You guys will have to handle the lunch thingy in San Diego. We're trying to find out where the dinner thingy is here in L.A., 'cause the Long Beach protest is over at 4:00p... then we'll move it to wherever Clinton's dinner thingy is... hehe

From: Clinton's a liar (treason@thewhitehouse.is.sop) *
09/23/98 14:56:06 PDT

To: DonMorgan
Mar 30 was a long time ago. Why the alarms now? These are all reported as allegations. Based on past events, I see no alarms here. Lots of Bill's fingerprints though.
From: BEWILDERED (tbassler@micronet.net) *
09/23/98 15:01:34 PDT

To: Earl B.

And let's not forget about an alleged incident involving a former female SS agent who was sexually harassed and propositioned by the POTUS. This SS agent allegedly quit in disgust and was subsequently threatened by Treasury Dept. higher-ups to keep quiet about the incident.

Whoop, whoop, whoop. Can't keep them all quiet. Clinton's goon squad and secret police will soon have lots of bimbo eruptions to quell.

Of course, MONICA was the only one that Clinton had "inappropriate sexual relations" with, right? ;)

From: Demnomo () *
09/23/98 15:04:48 PDT

To: Whoop, whoop, whoop
Clinton accused of sexual assualt
From: triple () *
09/23/98 15:14:02 PDT

To: DonMorgan
Smart way to get the word out!
From: DallasDeb (emailname) *
09/23/98 15:14:18 PDT

This is something we've been following since the first of the year - this is one of the women who told numerous individuals she was raped by Clinton. She was treated medically after his attack. Clinton's thugs had her sign the standard bimbo affidavit in the Jones lawsuit. Her affidavit was one of those obtained by Starr from Susan Weber Wright. Once questioned she (Juanita) admitted that the affidavit Clinton made her sign was, indeed, false!
From: Steven W. () *
09/23/98 15:21:08 PDT

To: Mojo
Did anyone her Rush today, comparing JFK to WJC? "JFK will be known for Camelot and Clinton will be known for Came-alot!" There are some really clever people.
From: Misty (emailname) *
09/23/98 15:22:33 PDT

** TO THE TOP ***
From: Steven W. () *
09/23/98 15:25:47 PDT

To: DallasDeb
From: DonMorgan (morgan@dmi.net) *
09/23/98 15:27:28 PDT

To: Steven W.

I'm waiting for former Miss Arkansas/America Elizabeth Ward Gracen to finally admit that her friend's affidavit regarding Gracen's "unwanted sex" with then Governor Clinton in the backseat of his limousine was true.

Little by little, Gracen's story is coming out. First an affidavit saying she didn't have sex with Clinton; then admitting it was consensual; then the Toronto Sun article in which Gracen stated that Clinton was a "dangerous and manipulative man". She also stated that her family and friends were intimidated.

Yeesh. Clinton's goon squad must have reams of these affidavits just waiting to be signed.

From: Demnomo () *
09/23/98 15:30:26 PDT

To: Yeesh. Clinton's goon squad must have reams of these affidavits just waiting to be signed.
Cheaper by the dozen!
From: DonMorgan (morgan@dmi.net) *
09/23/98 15:36:24 PDT

To: jqp
Some one got to her, just like Elizabeth Ward Gracen and all the rest.
From: Sunshine (emailname) *
09/23/98 15:37:41 PDT

To: Misty
...or Camelittle since he has made everything so small and low.
From: Anima Mundi (inklus@harborside.com) *
09/23/98 15:51:05 PDT

From: Prince Charles (first_fugitives@yahoo.com) *
09/23/98 17:00:04 PDT

To: Prince Charles
Wonder where Patricia Ireland will stand on this? Can't wait to see her face and hear her say, "He's done so much for women." Course, that couldn't possibly include her.
From: PubsRus (emailname) *
09/23/98 17:15:22 PDT

To: PubsRus
Is that "He's done so much for women" or "to" women????

Semper Fi
From: Trident/Delta (tdelta@zdnetmail.com) *
09/23/98 18:15:06 PDT

Get the word out!
From: ICWHATUDO (emailname) *
09/23/98 19:26:17 PDT

To: Trident/Delta
Don't forget that in one of these GJ's, Starr has been bringing in people in limos with dark windows to the back of the courthouse...
From: Keith () *
09/23/98 19:26:28 PDT

To: Keith
Does anybody remember the raid on the Arkansas State Agency that oversees Nursing Homes? I think it was around April or May that I read about it and questioned whether the Feds were looking for evidence of a payoff in favors to Brodderick and her nursing home. I have not heard anything since about that raid. Anybody have info please post thanks!
From: jake () *
09/23/98 20:22:00 PDT

To: Mojo
The Clinton-speak aspects of this affidavit are far too rich to be ignored. Consider this:

3. I met President Clinton more than twenty years ago through family friends. Our introduction was not arranged or facilitated, in any way, by the Arkansas State Police.

This statement simply says the INTRODUCTION was not arranged by state police. Probably 100% correct, though it has NOTHING to do with subsequent meetings. This in NO WAY negates the various accusations, its simple obfuscation. They've got this gal by the "short hairs" and she damn well better tow the line.

5. I do not possess any information that could possibly be relevant to the allegations advanced by Paula Corbin Jones or which could lead to admissible evidence in her case.

Of COURSE, she has no information regarding Paula Jones. Her harassment case (if she chose to pursue it) would be totally and completely separate. That she chooses to avoid the international publicity that comes with being a Clinton harassment victim does not void Clinton's conduct.

Specifically, I do not have any information to offer regarding a nonconsensual or unwelcome sexual advance by Mr. Clinton....

Once again, notice the careful wording. It is NOT a denial that a sexual situation, but rather that she has NO "information to offer...." Well, that's one big surprise coming from a women that doesn't want to be chewed alive by the Clinton mafia. Not being willing to "offer" information is not the same thing as having no information to offer.

Amazing what you hear when you actually listen to what has been said...

From: Cosmo Topper (e) *
09/23/98 20:32:38 PDT

To: Cosmo Topper
What about paragraph #4? these allegations are untrue...

Even if they are true they did not happen while Clintoon was Pres, however they may be used in a pattern of covering up, intimidation and rewards..such as with Willey, Monica, Gennifer, et al.
From: jake () *
09/23/98 23:31:37 PDT

To: jake
There is a very important point to keep in mind if this story is true and that is this: this "rape" may not have taken place while Bill was in the White House but the intimidation of the victim did. Since it is safe to say she was intimidated by more than one individual that would be a conspiracy to intimidate a witness. If it can be proven that Bill was involved he could be named as an unindicted co-conspirator by the Grand Jury and in the immortal words of someone much brighter than I, "That's all she wrote!"
From: blake6900 (blake@arcology.net) *
09/23/98 23:54:54 PDT

To: all
Sign for demonstrations including those for FLOTUS: IT'S THE RAPES, STUPID!
From: Sal () *
09/24/98 10:38:15 PDT

To: Sal
Now, now boys and girls - this can't, just can't, be true about our beloved Little Willie. After all, in a closed meeting of the Dumbocrats only a week or two ago he promised them there were "no more surprises". Surely you don't think Little Willie would lie?
From: pigdog () *
09/25/98 19:00:08 PDT

To: pigdog + triple
he promised them there were "no more surprises". Surely you don't think Little Willie would lie? From: pigdog

Even sheeple know the difference between sex and sexual assualt. From: triple () *

Come on, triple! We'd have to see more than one rape, maybe a pattern of rapes to rise to the level of seriousness required for impeachment. (OOOPS, there IS a pattern...)

And, pigdog, puhleeze--do you really think any of these sleazy Democrats are going to be SURPRISED? I don't and I suspect that will be one more weasel word from the Presidue. "Technically I was telling the truth, gahuck, gahuck; Ah really didn't think this'd surprise yah'all."

AND I DON'T THINK IT WILL! Scumbags all.
From: Sal () *
09/25/98 19:55:11 PDT

Jane Doe #5 was raped by Clinton. Does he and his political party deserve your vote? Think about it.
From: Prince Charles (first_fugitives@yahoo.com) *
10/30/98 14:53:15 PST

To: PubsRus
Patsy Ireland will cry on her girlfriend's lap all night over this story.
From: Prince Charles (first_fugitives@yahoo.com) *
10/30/98 14:55:10 PST

To: all
Has anyone confirmed this? We have been burned a few times recently.
From: tomh1 () *
10/30/98 14:59:19 PST

To: jqp
"Yoakum "said he once recorded" Broaddrick "talking about the episode but later destroyed the original tapes and gave copies to" Sheffield Nelson, a GOPer who ran against Clinton for gov. in '90"

Oh yeaÖhe destroyed the original tapesÖoh yeaÖ
From: ashisalive (ashisalive@aol.com) *
10/30/98 15:20:53 PST

To: Ash is here --- sing for him
Join me in song, won't you?

JUST CLICK HERE (And then click on the headline.)
From: doug from upland (dc4afee@keyway.net) *
10/30/98 17:37:46 PST